Mother of baby didn't want dad to see boy

By MIKE DUPRE'   Thursday, Dec. 13, 2007
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Charles Rivers

— The mother of a Janesville baby who died of a massive brain injury Saturday told The Janesville Gazette that she objected to Rock County’s allowing the boy to spend weekends with his father.

Nicole Gordon, who is living in a residential drug treatment center in Madison, said she told officials that her son, Israel Gordon, should not be placed with his father, Charles R. Rivers, because of his addictions.

“I did not feel it was a safe place for my son,” she said.

Rivers is charged with child neglect resulting in death and obstructing. He made his initial court appearance Wednesday afternoon. A cash bond of $5,500 was set, and the hearing was adjourned until Tuesday.

Israel Gordon, 14 months old, was in foster care and stayed with his father on weekends.

The Rock County Human Services Department took the baby into protective custody and placed him in foster care two days after he was born Oct. 17, 2006, because his mother was incarcerated, Jodi Timmerman, assistant county corporation counsel, said in a brief written statement to the Gazette.

“Israel was not placed in foster care as the result of any allegations of abuse or neglect involving his father,” Timmerman said.

In February, a judge ruled that Israel Gordon needed protection, and the county human services department complied with that order, Timmerman said.

“The department facilitated visitation with the parents, as is required by law, following observed interactions with the child and observed parental conduct during visitation,” Timmerman wrote.

The human services department is working with Janesville police in the continuing investigation, she added.

Asked for a response to Nicole Gordon’s criticism of the human services department’s decision, Timmerman said she could not comment further because of the continuing investigation.

Israel Gordon’s injury apparently occurred late Saturday morning, and neither Rivers nor his girlfriend, April S. Peabody, 26, called 911 for emergency medical treatment until almost 9 p.m.

Rigor mortis was evident when an emergency medical technician tried to treat the toddler, and the technician thought the child already was dead, according to the criminal complaint.

In the late afternoon or early evening, Rivers and Peabody took Israel Gordon and a daughter of Peabody’s along with them as they went to Beloit to buy heroin or some other drug to feed Rivers’ habit, the criminal complaint charges.

The complaint also says Rivers told detectives different stories about what happened to his son.

At first, he said he had a hold of the boy as he stood in a bathtub to be washed and that his son slipped and hit the back of his head on the tub or wall. Rivers said he didn’t think the injury was serious and there was no bump on the boy’s head, according to the complaint.

But after repeated questioning by Janesville detectives, Rivers changed his story. He said the baby was standing on the side of the tub and that he let go of him to reach for something.

The baby slipped and “went face first into the corner of the tub, striking it very hard,” according to the complaint.

Rivers said the baby cried very hard for five or six minutes and started to act like someone who was trying to avoid losing consciousness, according to the complaint.

The pathologist who performed the autopsy on Israel Gordon said wounds on the baby’s mouth indicated at least one acute facial impact. The pathologist also said that “he felt it would have been readily apparent to any attentive childcare-giver that the child was badly injured and in severe distress,” according to the complaint.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(36)
Israelsmomsfriend
Feb 3, 2008 at 2:45 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
nita
Dec 19, 2007 at 4:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

This angers me,I personally knew this little boys foster mother,my heart goes out to this little boy,he was so cute and his foster mom was very good with him,how dare they let this little boy go stay with a creep like him. Guess thats are CPS,not doing there job,and allowing this boy to be with the likes of his so called dad,a junkie,way to go CPS.

bbwil
Dec 15, 2007 at 8:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

I am not surprised that the Rock County HS dept. let this happen. I've seen numerous thoughtless moves on their part. Maybe now they will see that they need to screen and test these parents THOROUGHLY before allowing visitions. There is NO WAY that this man was a fit father and you cannot tell me that there was not evidence of abuse or neglect before this awful incident. I cannot even look at his photo with becoming enraged.

cmg75
Dec 15, 2007 at 1:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's useless to blame CPS regardless if they are at fault or not. What's it going to do?
How about an IQ test at age 12 and if you can't pass it, you are sterilized. These idiots shouldn't be having children to begin with. I know, that's cruel and dramatic. This kind of thing angers me though.

billnewbie
Dec 15, 2007 at 10:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

How can we not blame CPS? They took responsibility for this child upon themselves. Obviously, this father was know to CPS to have behaviors that disqualified him for custody, therefore they knew full well that unsupervized visitation was a risk to the child. Of course, the CPS worker could not know this child would die. Never the less CPS bears some responsibility for what happened.

somebody
Dec 15, 2007 at 8:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

stop blaming cps!!! i agree that they are under trained... blame that on rock county who wants to throw our money into a new jail system that will provide a bed for this awful man instead of bettering our legal system and training for people we trust to protect!!!! anyone can pull a quick one on a case worker and the judge is the one who altimatly makes the dicision on visitation. this man did probablly exactly what a rapist doe...gains trust then makes the move.. People we need to fight for the future of our children! get our money where it belongs so we can prevent a situation like this in the future!

adriankoqueen
Dec 14, 2007 at 10:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

The court system and CPS had the ability to contol this situation and they did NOTHING!!!!

adriankoqueen
Dec 14, 2007 at 8:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

SAD SAD SAD, way to go CPS! This man should have had SUPERVISED!!!! visitations. Another case being pushed out of sight out of mind!!! What was the CPS thinking? A drug addict taking care of a child even after the mother had aprehensions!!! Maybe the case worker should have Charles and April watch your children!!! My heart goes out to the foster parents.

mamato3
Dec 14, 2007 at 4:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Rivers is charged with child neglect resulting in death and obstructing" and was given a $5,500 cash bond?! People have to know that child didn't fall in a bathtub and sustain that kind of head injury, not by himself!! Let's tell the public that it's perfectly okay to murder your child and we'll let you off with a slap on the wrist. I'm disgusted with our "justice" system and heart broken for that poor baby's suffering. My thoughts and prayers go out to his birth mother and the foster family that was raising this little boy.

PrettyBrwnEyez
Dec 14, 2007 at 3:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is sooo sad..No1 really nos the truth! No1 really nos what happened and no1 will.. Only those guys no...
How can you allow a toddler to stand on the side of a tub and let go to reach for something? Even a cracked up idiot can figure that out. Charles and April need to sit and think about this in jail. Poor baby boy, he is in a better place now.

crafty
Dec 14, 2007 at 2:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

Not that this guy isn't a slimeball.

crafty
Dec 14, 2007 at 2:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

Heroin. The name itself strikes terror into the heart these days. But originally it was named by the Bayer people from the word heroine. Or female hero. Why? Because it was so effective in relieving pain and suffering. If it were legal it would still be one of the most effective pain relievers in the doctor's arsenal. It was also considered such a safe and effective medicine that it was available over the counter until 1914.

The story these days with heroin is different. It not only is not available over the counter, its not available anywhere in America legally.

So where does this leave us today? We have black markets and addicts. Black markets of course require police and addicts require treatment.

An interesting study by Dr. Lonny Shavelson looks into the world of the addicts and their treatment. What do we know? What works? How can addicts be helped?

First we start out with an unusual point of view. Most addicts are in pain. This is quite surprising. It surprised me. I thought they were just in it for the euphoria.

Here is what Dr. Shavelson found in his study of 200 addicts: a high proportion of severely abused children (beatings, rapes, rapes of siblings). He questioned his study methodology. He thought there must have been a flaw in how his sample was selected or in how the questions he asked were framed.

Then while he was doing his research, an article came out in the Journal of the American Medical Association that said that the addiction rate goes up for male sexually abused children. And it doesn't just double or triple. It is 25 to 50 times higher than the rest of the population. Approximately 70% of the women in drug rehab experienced sexual abuse before they started on drugs. In other words, those heroine addicts not in actual physical pain are suffering from severe post traumatic stress disorder, PTSD. What is the preferred treatment in America today for these hurt and humiliated souls? We don't deal with the pain that made them liable for drug abuse. We ask that before they can be healed that they heal themselves by giving up drugs. And then we wonder why rehab for hard-core addicts does not work too well. But how could it when the treatment does not match the disease.

So the next time the TV expose shows the junkie with the spike in his or her vein think of what torment that person must be in internally in order to put them in the place they are in. And all too often our response to those suffering is to jail them. Barbaric. Or treatment that deals with symptoms and not causes. Stupid.

tboufford
Dec 14, 2007 at 1:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

oops lost track of how many fathers/kids she has.didnt want her child left with birth parent because of drugs he was on. then why leave your baby with druggie boyfriend while she goes to get him drugs?

tboufford
Dec 14, 2007 at 1:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

then why did she leave him alone with baby when she went to beloit to get him drugs?

egalindo
Dec 14, 2007 at 11:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

I wish I hadn't read this article. My heart breaks for the poor child who was just a month younger than my own child. What chances did this baby have to have a decent life with parents like that? CPS failed that child.

reebs1982
Dec 13, 2007 at 10:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm just hoping the same thing doesn't end up happening to April's daughter. Let's hope the system is corrected before another life is lost.

tibetrin
Dec 13, 2007 at 8:59 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's hard to think of this as a learning experience. But thats exactly what it is. Unfortunately, terrible things have to happen for measures to be taken to change how things are done. Does anyone at CPS or the court system foresee a tragedy like this happening? Probably not. But, tragically, this poor baby had to die to prove a point. We MUST take care of our children from the moment of conception til the day we die. It is our responsibility to care for them and teach them how to be honest, responsible, and caring parents as well. Rather than push blame, the "authorities" who chose to allow these visitations, need to do what they can to make sure this never happens again.

wiskitty
Dec 13, 2007 at 8:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

Crickett, you are so right! I work in Occupational Health and everyone and their brother has to have either a urine drug test or a hair test for employment. The truck drivers have to have random drug testing. I would think that a child is just as important a reason to drug test these so-called parents! I think that when parents aren't qualified to have custody of their kids and have addiction issues they should be drug tested frequently. Maybe they should even wear a tracking device while they are with the child so they can be monitored if they go to buy drugs. As nurses we have to rub people the wrong way all the time in order to advocate for our patients, I expect no less from caseworkers who should be advocating for the children.

evansvillehousewife
Dec 13, 2007 at 7:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

billnewbie, you are totally right. What gets me is that the parents get so LONG and SO MANY CHANCES to get their kids back. Five years of foster care? Five years of continually messing up and not meeting return conditions, and 'parents' STILL get to tie up the courts and spend taxpayer money in the battle over their kids.
CPS was TOLD by the mother that the bio-dad had a history of drug abuse. Why on earth was he not assessed more rigidly???

evansvillehousewife
Dec 13, 2007 at 7:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

Well corporate counsel, the baby wasn't PLACED in care because if abuse. That's reasonable. But then why, after the father was adujuticated as the biological father, not awarded FULL custody? And in February, why was the boy STILL judged under need of protective services? There was obviously SOMETHING that tripped CPS's trigger and made them tell the judge that the boy could not live with the father fulltime.

splowing
Dec 13, 2007 at 7:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

I think this is another case of Neglect and Abuse.They should have had a very High bond considering they Killed a Baby ! A cash bond of $5,500 isn't even enough to Pay for a Decent Burial.As far as the Tub Insident , Didn't they ever here of a Tub Ring that holds the Baby in Place so they cannot hit their Head ? Why didn't they have to attend a child care class so they knew how to bathe a baby properly ?

ewth0513
Dec 13, 2007 at 7 p.m.
Suggest removal

I can not believe this. I have a 5 yr old daughter and a 3 yr old nephew and if either of them tryed to stand on the side of the tub I would take them off myself NICELY and explain to them that it is not good to stand on it like that... NOT LET GO AND REACH FOR SOMETHING. And the drug issue you have children for crying out loud they require all attention the drugs dont get some help. I hope they both go to prison for the rest of there lives and have to think about why they are in there everyday and a very very precious life was lost and that is very sad.

mjackson
Dec 13, 2007 at 6:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree I hope both april and charles sit in jail and think about the child that died at their hands.....instead of getting medical attention for the baby they were getting heroin.....HOW PATHETIC AND SELFISH!!!!

mummag
Dec 13, 2007 at 6:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

I personally know the foster family. What adirty rotten shame. She had wanted to adopt the child and was turned down because of parental rights. Those rights did not include hurting and killing that child. My heart just breaks for them. The child was a gift from GOD and someone stopped it. they deserve any penalty they get.

somebody
Dec 13, 2007 at 4:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

I highly agree that drug screening should be done in all cases that involve drug use...This man obviously pulled a good one over on the childs case worker and judge to allow visitation!! But again.. no case worker can predict exactly what may or may not happen once that vistitaion right is allowed. I pray justice is served for that poor child!

OnWisconsin
Dec 13, 2007 at 2:46 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
momof5
Dec 13, 2007 at 2:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

billnewbie: Amen to your post! Having just dealt with CPS myself, I couldn't have said your thoughts better myself. The entire system is in need of an emergency overhaul!!

billnewbie
Dec 13, 2007 at 1:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

The primary goal of the county child protective service is to reunite children with their parents. They view drug use as just another irresponsible behavior that parents have to change, along with alcoholism, and unemployment, to name a just a few. Unsupervised overnight visits with these parents are experiments to see how well the parent performs. Reports of problems from the foster parents who have to deal with the resultant problems are often ignored by the social workers who consider the opinions of foster parents to be uninformed and or self-serving. Very often, due to tremendous turnover, the social workers are young, inexperienced, fresh college graduates who have theoretical methods of parental rehabilitation. They sometimes miss warning signs or as a result of their inexperience, do not recognise a potentially dangerous situation.

Crickett
Dec 13, 2007 at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Aren't "parents" (I use the term loosley in this case) screened for drug use BEFORE every visit with their children, especially if there have been problems in the household? You have to be drug tested to get a job cleaning toilets these days. What state or government entity allowed him this privledge at all?

amallama
Dec 13, 2007 at 11:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

Another super sad story here! How can you allow a toddler to stand on the side of a tub and let go to reach for something? Even a cracked up idiot can figure that out. Charlie and April need to sit and think about this in jail. Poor baby boy, he is in a better place now.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT