Milton parents might have made daughter watch sex acts

By STACY VOGEL   Thursday, Dec. 20, 2007
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Jeff A. Wickline

Photo

Lisa M. Wickline

— Two Milton parents arrested Wednesday are accused of exposing their 8-year-old daughter to pornographic materials and might have made her watch sex acts and drug use in their home, a Milton Police officer said this morning.

Jeffrey A. Wickline, 48, and Lisa M. Wickline, 46, were arrested at 3:15 p.m. Wednesday in their home at 1006 W. Madison Ave., Milton, according to a news release from the police department.

They were arrested on charges of causing mental harm to a child, exposing a child to harmful material and causing a child to view or listen to sexual activity. They likely will face charges of possession of drug paraphernalia, the release said.

The arrests, made with the help of the Rock County Sheriff’s Department SWAT team, were the result of more than a week of investigation, said Sgt. John Conger with the Milton Police Department. He declined to say how the department found out about the couple’s activities.

The Wicklines’ home is kitty-corner to Milton West Elementary School and can be seen from some of the school’s windows, Conger said.

Police notified the school around 11:45 a.m. of the impending arrest, and the school was put on lockdown, Principal Carol Meland said. The front door was locked, and students weren’t allowed outside for afternoon recess, she said.

The SWAT team secured the home before the end of the school day, so children were sent home at the usual time, Meland said. They took notes home to parents informing them of the situation.

“We communicated throughout the afternoon to make sure we knew that the police action had already taken place successfully and it would be alright to have the children outside at the very end of the day,” she said.

Milton police still were combing through pornographic material recovered from the home this morning, Conger said.

Police believe the Wicklines might have had their daughter watch sexual acts between adults in the house, Conger said.

No other children lived in the house, but police had information that another adult woman lived there, Conger said. The woman, who is not a relative, was not there when police arrived Wednesday, and they’re not sure if she still lived there when the arrests were made, he said.

The couple might have brought in other adults for their activities as well, Conger said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(35)
fireflygrl94
Dec 23, 2007 at 7:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

I cant believe that I actually worked with this woman!!!!!!! swat went in d/t guns

tjncj
Dec 21, 2007 at 1:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

Evansvillehw, do I get $2.50 (1/2 of the $5) since I said meth or crack?

cocktail848
Dec 21, 2007 at 7:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

Exposure to drug use and porn at 8 years old. Wow, they are doing a great job if they want their little girl to grow up to be a stripper. Some people just should not be allowed to breed. I hope they never get the girl back.

peacegirl
Dec 20, 2007 at 11:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

How much do you want to bet that the young child will be back with the parents in no time. Sad to say it, but I bet it will happen. I hope whoever has the child can make her Holidays nice,in spite of what is going on.How tragic. I congratulate whoever tipped the authorities off. Big cyberhug to you!

mrcs4life
Dec 20, 2007 at 10:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

It would be a shame if these two "parents" were to get a slap on the hand and out on a signature bond...BUT then again, nothing surprises me anymore with our court systems.KUDOS! to whoever or however this was found out...obviously the "parents" had no regard even living across the street from a school...goes to show that these kind of people are everywhere!!! this is SICK!!! i pray that the little girl can get professional help, and be with family (who care and love this child) and be able to live a happy normal life and learn that this lifestyle is not right...that poor baby!

liberte
Dec 20, 2007 at 5:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

People are innocent in this country until proven guilty regardless of what people think are facts. This is not true in most countries. I'll continue to follow the story.

Devilsadvocate
Dec 20, 2007 at 4:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

There are a lot of "police believe" and "might haves" in the story. I take it there are more facts than that to support the arrest for "causing a child to view or listen to sexual activity" Time will tell on that one.

bosslady96
Dec 20, 2007 at 3:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with you evansvillehousewife....I am voting meth. We should all say a little prayer for the girl and any of us with kids, make sure you give them a little longer hug tonight.

tjncj
Dec 20, 2007 at 3:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

Meth or crack, or possibly both. Something has to screw you up to get this low. Have you ever seen "Intervention" on TV?
Those meth addicts are messed up but most have not completely lost their morals.

evansvillehousewife
Dec 20, 2007 at 3:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

MYYEAR08- You say they looked jacked up? I think they look like those people on "Faces of Meth"
I have 5 bucks on Meth addicts. Anyone else in?

evansvillehousewife
Dec 20, 2007 at 3:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

Wow. She had a felony battery abuse charge on her? What CPS caseworker let THAT slip through?
On the other hand, it could have been CPS monitoring that led to them getting busted here in the first place. They obviously were being watched.

snookums
Dec 20, 2007 at 3 p.m.
Suggest removal

Good point evillehousewife, I thought they always withheld the name of the accused in a sexual crime. But, they are not actually being charged with sexual assault to any degree. Pretty sad, they probably put the names in the letter sent home to parents also. Poor girl, hopefully kids her age will have compassion rather than be mean like normal kids do.

evansvillehousewife
Dec 20, 2007 at 2:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

What really surprises me is that the Gazette printed the name of the accused as well as their pictures. Usually when there is a crime involving sexual abuse of a child, the name of the perp is not released to protect the confidentiality of the child. At the very least, the relationship between this girl and the perps mnight not have been so blatantly revealed. The article could have said "an 8 year old girl" instead of "the 8 year old daughter". Now regardless of where she goes (locally), her confidentiality will be violated.

Mikki
Dec 20, 2007 at 2:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm just sad they had to name these people. The poor child has gone through enough, now everyone knows it was 'her'. Kids can be cruel, and I hope she is left alone by her peers about this.

jviers77
Dec 20, 2007 at 2:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

Is this the same Lisa Wickline charged with felony battery with intent to cause harm to a child in September of this year? Checkered past seems to always lead to a broken future for somebody.

snookums
Dec 20, 2007 at 2:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

Accused might not mean guilty, but the article says police are still combing through pornographic material and the couple will likely be charged for possesion of drug paraphernalia. So you are right accused does not mean guilty, but hard evidence does. It would be a little easier to say maybe the child made up a story and these are really great people if their house wasn't filled with porn or drug crap. Poor little girl to have to be subjected to that kind of lifestyle, whether her parents love her or not is not the point, 8 year old girls should be playing with barbies and having fun, not looking at porn while her parents hit the pot pipe or whatever they are doing. My 8 year old has never even seen an R movie for pete's sake.

jviers77
Dec 20, 2007 at 2:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

There's a great line in a Jimmy Buffett song that says "if you don't want it printed, don't do it." Police do not go into a house with SWAT unless there is some pretty credible evidence to do so. It requires a court order. There was obviously enough to get a judge's ok to move forward.
WERPKNARLY...nobody is 'lynching' anybody, but reacting to a terrible situation. Part of the reaction involves being shocked that something like this happened in such a small town. I'm sure this family seemed great when people outside their circle were around, but there is no way you can say with a straight face that they loved their little girl dearly if these 'accusations' prove to be true. Nobody does that to someone they love, child or adult.

werpknarly
Dec 20, 2007 at 2:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

Edubswomen,
I know someone who was accused by a school staff due to an off-hand comment by a child and I know another couple who went thru legal hell and had their good name destroyed in the newspapers nation-wide due to a disgruntled person who lived on their farm. No matter how this works out, Accused is NOT guilty. I know first hand how much they care for that girl. Those who are respectful will reserve judgment. Those who care will care for all involved. For the rest….. The line for the lynching party starts on the right, and I hope that party never comes for you.

WerP
judgment, not form a lynch party

bosslady96
Dec 20, 2007 at 2:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

I wonder how many neighbors thought something was going on, or just "didn't feel right" about the people who lived there. Too many people turn their heads or choose to ignore the situation becasue it "doesn't effect me". Its time for everyone to take a stance and say something if something seems wrong or doesn't feel right. The other people who may have been involved with this couple need to be arrested also.

edubswoman68
Dec 20, 2007 at 2:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ya know werpknarly there was a guy that was friends with my ex since high school and I got to know him quite well and after 16 years of knowing or thought I knew this guy he was arrested on charges of sexual assault towards a child. We thought we knew him very well. Guess not.
These people could have seemed to be nice but we never know what goes on behind closed doors.
I'm sure they had reasons for bringing in the SWAT team not knowing what might spark up. Personally if I lived near by I would want that extra protection. Wouldn't you?

Teeber
Dec 20, 2007 at 12:57 p.m.
Suggest removal

That is sick and disgusting! My prayers are with the little girl. The parents need to major, MAJOR, help! I can only hope she has a better life than she had. This is so sad!

edubswoman68
Dec 20, 2007 at 12:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

Words could never express how I feel for this little girl. I hope that she will be able to go through life without being scarred for life but at her age we all know it has already scarred her and if these scumbag parents have done this to her since she was a baby she might think it is suppose to be this way. She knows no other life style. Poor Poor girl!
I hope to God they will put her parents away forever! I always believed in an "eye for and eye" but there would be no punishment that would ever be great enough for what they have done.
I just hope there were no other children involved. You wonder what happened if the little one had friends and had sleep overs. And to be right across from the school? What a bunch of SICKOS!!!!

werpknarly
Dec 20, 2007 at 12:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

i know this family... and this leaves me confused and willing to reserve my judgement. i will wait b4 i'll through any stones. and what's up with a SWAT team? slow day downtown? my thoughs are with everyone involved. yes she is a sweet girl... but im my experiance so are the parents.

werp

tnimmo
Dec 20, 2007 at 12:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

...wow

vonesh25
Dec 20, 2007 at 11:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

What is wrong with society today? These people just put me in awe... You read about all these awful things parents do to their childern and hurting them. Something needs to be done!

MYYEAR08
Dec 20, 2007 at 11:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

These people look jacked up on something . Were there drugs involved ? I would have to sayt here was . The couple looks like they have not sleept in days . What a horrible way to raise a child . God bless the cops and or person who discoved this problem . With any hope this child will have a chance at a real happy loving life.

jviers77
Dec 20, 2007 at 10:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

What is wrong with these people? I feel so horrible for the little girl. Yet another case of a child who never had a chance in life. Hopefully now that this has come out she can get placed with a family that can give her the opportunities in life that she deserves.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT