Return to the Rock

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Thursday, April 3, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Podcast Episode


Kyle Geissler talks with Janesville Gazette reporter Frank Schultz about the city taking a new look at the future of the Rock River in Janesville.

RSS   

PhotoVideo


Wisconsin DNR representatives joined City of Janesville staff for a tour of the Rock River in the central part of the city on Wednesday. Here, the group pauses on the bike trail bridge just east of South Jackson Street and discusses the area between the rear of Dawson Fields where Spring Brook enters the river and Monterey Park.

Wisconsin DNR representatives joined City of Janesville staff for a tour of the Rock River in the central part of the city on Wednesday. Here, the group pauses on the bike trail bridge just east of South Jackson Street and discusses the area between the rear of Dawson Fields where Spring Brook enters the river and Monterey Park.

— The Rock River churned and roiled through downtown Janesville on Wednesday.

It was a refreshing sight under the bright sun.

But in the summer, the river can be an open storm sewer where bicycles, bricks and other junk poke through the murky water and the rough fish swarm like flies in the shallows.

Buildings turn their backs to the river, and so does much of the community.

“People call it the moat that divides Janesville,” City Manager Steve Sheiffer said.

Sheiffer wants to make the river a focus of downtown redevelopment, and he announced he will propose to spend $25,000 to $50,000 next year to create a detailed plan.

Not that any changes will happen soon. Sheiffer said he wants people to imagine what the river could look like in 15 to 20 years.

Sheiffer took city staff and three DNR officials on a tour Wednesday to start the imagining.

DNR participants included Susan Josheff, the DNR’s lower Rock River leader, Robert Davis, a water management engineer, and Al Byla, water management and zoning specialist.

“This is about the naturalness of this area and what it’ll be in 20 years, and I’m proposing that this be a priority,” Sheiffer told the group.

The tour started near the Monterey Dam, where a lagoon that was once part of a millrace has become a placid backwater.

“Right now it’s a carp hatchery,” Byla said.

The backwater, located along the bike trail behind the Van Galder Bus Co., is separated from the river by a narrow strip of land. The setup poses a danger. An uprooted tree could open a breach.

“It’ll do major damage if water starts passing through there,” Davis said.

The river’s main channel near the dam is one of the best places to fish in Janesville, “and we’ve been trying to protect it,” Sheiffer said.

Byla said he wouldn’t mind seeing fish ladders around the dam.

Sheiffer said he wants to make the river more natural from Monterey Park upstream into downtown.

Defining just what “natural” means will be important, Byla commented.

Tour participants seemed to agree the sloping concrete slabs that hold up the riverbanks in Monterey Park will have to go.

Josheff said the slabs keep frogs and turtles away from what would be their natural homes, and she suggested natural vegetation instead of concrete or mowed grass along the riverbanks.

“It doesn’t mean you’d have to take out the ball diamond,” Josheff commented. “… It might even save you from mowing grass.”

Farther up the river, city officials pointed to the old Accudyne plant, now a city property and scheduled for demolition.

The plant sits on land where the river turns sharply to the left before flowing into Monterey Park.

Parks Director Tom Presny noted the land has clear views up and down the river, “a tremendous vantage point.”

“But what is that? What do we do (with the land)?” Sheiffer asked.

Sheiffer said people think of the downtown as being north of Court Street, but he sees the downtown extending downstream past the library and the Old Fourth Ward: “This is where the opportunity is.”

He talked of making the river more a part of the city’s oldest neighborhood.

Sheiffer was in a buoyant mood. He talked of opening possibilities rather than making specific plans.

“I have a wide open mind on everything,” he said.

WHAT’S NEXT

A plan for the Rock River in Janesville is likely to be a topic for a new city “green committee.” The committee’s goals and membership still are in development and will be discussed at the city council meeting on Monday, April 28, according to a city memo. City Manager Steve Sheiffer said creating a vision for the downtown riverfront could be a good first project for the committee.

WHAT CAME BEFORE

The city has bought up properties along the river for years, and it has built walkways along the river downtown. The city council adopted a plan last fall, the “City of Janesville Downtown Vision and Strategy,” which calls for enhancing the Rock River, encouraging arts and culture, building downtown housing, redeveloping historical buildings and connecting parks with walking trails, among other goals.







reader COMMENTS (20)
greengina8
Apr 5, 2008 at 5:57 p.m.
Suggest removal

Rock River Coalition is working very hard upstream to have more strict legislation on lawn fertilizers and ag runoff issues. Everything we do for/to the river counts, here and down-stream.

Seabee
Apr 4, 2008 at 11:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

WHile the city may be able to spruce up the river-front, the river itself will still be a sewer. The river's problems go all the way upstream, and downstream too. Sorry, but whatever they do here, won't mean diddly-squat to the river. Now, if they could get all the counties and communities upstream to do something too, that may have a noticeable affect.

MajorMojo
Apr 4, 2008 at 2:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

one of the biggest problems is that there are many rental's in the down town area and the renters care as much about the property as the slumlords.

greengina8
Apr 4, 2008 at 10:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

Take pride in the Mighty Rock. It is one of our largest natural resources within the county.
I am concerned that when the shore is returned to a more natural state that it will be planted with rye-grass or some other non-native grass and then get fertilized by some toxic chemicals (ie.. from ChemLawn, TruGreen, etc) that will potentially harm the health of the river. A note here: just because a chemical is from a natural source does not make it safe!
Remember, anything we put in the water here eventually ends up in the Gulf of Mexico.

diamondback
Apr 3, 2008 at 6:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

North... West ....South.... or East... This town was build on the FOURTH WARD.Take down the lines in this town and be happy for what we have,stop with my address is better than yours.The river project sounds like a WIN-WIN for the whole community.

DanHartung
Apr 3, 2008 at 4:57 p.m.
Suggest removal

The river was the jewel of the city in the plan drawn up by John Nolen in the 1920s. Most of the land acquisitions have been in line with this plan even though many other things have changed (e.g. loss of the mills, outer development, new highways and major streets). Though this isn't a new idea it is good to see that the current planners still recognize its value.
.
About 1975 the city had the river drawn down between the dams and a huge corps of volunteers waded around and cleaned up debris that had accumulated over decades. I'm sure that some new stuff has appeared but it probably isn't as bad now as it was then. Still, it may be worth considering doing the same thing again if there is visible debris.
.
I suspect some of the trees along the river wall may have been removed to protect the integrity of the wall. The city isn't afraid to plant trees so I don't think they have anything against them.

karl_d
Apr 3, 2008 at 4:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

Before everyone continues slinging mud at each other, I would like to offer a solution.

Contact Community Action, Echo, the City of Janesville, and a vast array of great service groups and agencies. Then step up and physically or financially help all the troubled people in Janesville. You that yell and do nothing to assist cannot complain. There are plenty of opportunities to make all neighborhoods better.

If you do not believe me, move to that other perfect city that you are judging us by.

By the way, the landlord paints the outside of buildings, but not all buildings are rentals. Owner occupied properties take time to rehab, give them time.

Some of the bloggers really add positive comments and suggestions, but I am betting that the majority of complainers have not lifted one finger to help, only to dial the phone number of Sound Off and type bad words and use foul language.

Be positive and lend a hand because there is no shortage of ways to help instead of complaining.

StaceyU2
Apr 3, 2008 at 2:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

What about the bowling balls left behind Riversedge (old Playmore Bowl) ..I used to bowl on friday afternoon and monday nights down there, and after someone has a bad game (or night) of bowling.. the first olace they go is out the south door and plant their bowling ball in the river.. I'm sure that that travel down stream and cause havoc on everything... So cleaning up the river would be great... Bring back Good fishing to the river... good luck to city officials on this endevor..

frusion
Apr 3, 2008 at 1:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

I like the idea of doing something to return the natural beauty and usefulness of the river. I grew up with the river being a central focus of my past time. The Monterey area of the river has so much more potential than we are currently getting out of it. GM distracts much of the natural feeling of the river when standing in the park. Perhaps major planting on the south side of the river would help that? As for the inlet back-wash next to the rock, the water is so shallow maybe dredging the whole span of river would help create better flow. Unless you have a small boat with a shallow motor, you can hardly even boat between downtown and the dam. There’s so much junk in the water you don’t dare boat at anything more than an idle or you’ll hit a cement block, an old crate, or who knows what. I’m not promoting boating in this area, I’m just saying part of the whole stigma might be the industrial feel and the inability to utilize the river to its full potential.

gonzo
Apr 3, 2008 at 1:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

how many renters paint there homes anyway?

MOC0428
Apr 3, 2008 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal

opinionsforfree: I live on the East side so your post doesn't personally offend me but it does bother me that you made that comment. I'm sure that some don't care about their houses, and that is not just in the fourth ward. I can find houses on the East, West or North side that look like crap. Did it also occur to you that some people may be having financial hardships. They may have to choose between food and paint. I know what I would choose in that situation. Be careful how you judge people as life has a funny way of turning on you!

Opinionsforfree
Apr 3, 2008 at 11:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

Ok not everyone in the forthward is a dirtbag. Just the ones who refuse to keep their yards clean,keep their houses panted, so on so forth So if your one of thoise I can see why you would be pissed at what I said.

sannio
Apr 3, 2008 at 10:50 a.m.
Suggest removal

Calling people in the Fourth Ward "dirt bags" isn't a positive move in improving our city. Making them feel that this is their city, too, would. It might even make them vote for people who would better represent them, making them feel even more a part of Janesville.

MikeF
Apr 3, 2008 at 10:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

I think it is great to focus on the river because that is what drew the settlers to this area to begin with. The river needs to be showcased, not hidden behind buildings.
As for the cutting down of the trees along the river in Riverside Park, I think the Friends of Riverside Park group would have a thing or two to say about that. :)

Opinionsforfree
Apr 3, 2008 at 10:37 a.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
jviers77
Apr 3, 2008 at 10:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

It would be wonderful to see Janesville do something to the Rock River area similar to what Beloit has done. Yes, it will take time and money, but it will be nice have a river that doesn't look forgotten.

rockpile
Apr 3, 2008 at 9:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

Just take a look at what Beloit has done and consider all the possibilities Janesville has!! Kudos to the manager.

sannio
Apr 3, 2008 at 9:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'm not sure what what is meant by making the river "more natural". I've seen all the trees cut down between the Marshall apartments, and the library. Also, all the trees along the river in Monterey park were cut down. I'm just waiting (and not wanting) to see all the trees cut down along the river at Riverside park. Were the banks of the river free of trees before? The undeveloped portions of the river have plenty of trees along the banks, so my guess is no.

Long_Time_Gone
Apr 3, 2008 at 9:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

This sort of major "redevelopement" doesn't happen overnight, but by focusing on Monterrey and that industrial corrider that no longer is industrial (save for GM), will transform my ole hometown into a showcase city.
*
The city manager should be commended for leaving this, a REAL legacy, to be proud of.
*
Can we also re-open Lions Beach and Riverside Park??

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT