Conservation Reserve Program turns poor cropland into wildlife habitat
Photo
This land owned by Matt Bollerud in Lima township is part of the federal Conservation Reserve Program. The program pays Bollerud to keep the land out of production and encourages the return of the land to it's natural state. Bollerud's acreage contains three waterfowl scrapes and a burgeoning prairie.
Photo
Photo
LIMA TOWNSHIP It wouldn’t make much of a cornfield.
But this summer, the seven-acre patch worked to its full potential and saved corn in nearby fields from certain drowning.
Lima Township resident Matt Bollerud has a 40-acre piece of land enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program. The program, which is managed by the federal Farm Service Agency and put into effect by county conservationists, pays landowners to take poor farmland out of production and protect environmentally sensitive areas.
“It’s primarily meant to set aside land that’s less productive or has other environmental benefits,” said Rock County conservationist Roger Allan. “There’s very little prime farmland that goes into this program.”
Rock County has its share of prime farm acres.
But these acres aren’t among them, Bollerud said.
His dad cleared the brushy, marshy spot by hand 50 years ago. But year after year, one spot would collect water.
The corn would look great for a while in that spot in a dry year. But when it rained, you couldn’t pump water out of it, Bollerud said. It would just keep filling.
His dad used a sub-soiler—a large metal tooth weighted by a 300-gallon tank of water—to dig into the field and try to break up whatever was holding the water at the surface.
No go.
So Bollerud and his son used a fence post driver to sink a pipe into the ground and investigate.
What did they find?
One foot of topsoil, 7 feet of red clay and 2 feet of blue clay.
After gawking at the soil sample, Bollerud and his son peered into the hole. In 10 minutes, the 10-foot hole was full of water.
“(The field) was dry,” Bollerud said. “That filled up on a dry day.”
So Bollerud now lets the parcel do what nature intended. He signed up for the Conservation Reserve Program and turned the wettest spots into three “duck scrapes.” Those are shallow dents in the land that collect water in wet years and grow cattails in dry years.
Bollerud’s scrapes, technically called “shallow water areas for wildlife” in Conservation Reserve Program terms, are three indentations no more than 3.5 feet deep.
Most years, they are three indentations separated by 400 feet.
This year, it’s one big, 7-acre pond that formed with the early summer flooding.
Bollerud, a duck hunter, said the scrapes usually are bone dry by fall. But they won’t be this year.
That’s good news for the ducks and for the farmer who rents 100 nearby acres from Bollerud. Without the scrapes, those 7 acres of water would have pooled on his cornfield, just like water did on many fields in Rock County after this year’s flood.
“He would have had a pretty big crop loss,” Bollerud said.
LAND IS NATURAL SPOT FOR WILDLIFE
Lima Township landowner Matt Bollerud has turned a poor cornfield into an excellent shallow, marshy spot for wildlife.
Why does it work so well?
Bollerud’s property is in a natural depression in grassland blooming with wildflowers. And only a foot below the soil is at least 9 feet of clay, said Rock County conservationist Roger Allan.
Clay prevents water movement, Allan said. That’s why engineers line landfills with clay.
Farmers commonly call clay “tight” soil, Allan said, because the pieces hold so tightly together that they keep water from soaking through.
Imagine packing a jar with rocks. Lots of water still could get in. If you packed it with gravel, less water could fill the smaller spaces. Sand is even finer, and would pack tighter.
Clay has the tiniest particles of all, Allan said.
“They bind together more,” Allan said. “The tiny particles hold moisture between them. It’s hard for water to get through.”
In some cases, farmers like some clay 2 or 3 feet below the soil surface to can retain water for crops.
But if the clay is too close to the surface, it’s hard to cultivate, and it leaves water standing in a field.
Ducks like the marshy pools formed by standing water.
Corn doesn’t.
Aug 20, 2008 at 12:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
LTG: Churchill once said (and I've quoted this before) that the best argument against democracy is five minutes with the average voter.
.
The point that the tin hats (whether sannio is presently wearing his or not is up to him) always miss is that the UN is a membership organization. It has no actual sovereignty, only the powers that its members delegate to it. The UN is simply the depository body for most international agreements, and something like the World Heritage Convention is a treaty we sign (and duly approve through the Senate), because we -- and every other signatory -- recognize the importance of protecting historical or cultural areas (in that case). Whatever protection there is exists because of implementation laws in the respective member nations -- in other words, US law, enacted by our duly elected representatives. The US is voluntarily bound by signing and approving the treaty, but if we don't like that we can always pull out with due notice.
.
I can't imagine what relevance any of this has, though, to the Conservation Reserve Program. That program exists as part of the package of federal farm subsidies, and has a primary purpose of encouraging practices which will eliminate the threat of erosion by overuse of an area for agricultural production. It's just about smart farming.
Aug 19, 2008 at 10:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Whew, and our Founding Fathers gave this Sannio guy the right to cast a vote??!?
Aug 19, 2008 at 10:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm sorry, I forgot to answer Curlrock's questions.
Who shot JFK? - Probably the guy they said did it
What was really in Area 51? - Nothing but rumors
Did we land on the moon? - Yes, and when I go there, I'm going to bring back one of those electric cars, so I can save some money on gas.
Aug 19, 2008 at 9:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe I tightened my tin hat a little too tight this morning. For the life of me, I really thought the World Heritage Convention that the USA signed in 1972 gave up some sovereignty over certain sites on US soil which were declared Biosphere Reserves and/or World Heritage Sites by the United Nations. I will now lower my Cone of Silence as I hear the chopper rotors getting nearer.
Aug 19, 2008 at 3:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
I think the only park the United Nations actually owns is the one in front of their building in New York (which was given to them by John D. Rockefeller, Jr.).
http://www.aviewoncities.com/nyc/unitedn...
Aug 19, 2008 at 11:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Three questions for sannio
1)Who shot JFK?
2)What is really at Area 51?
3)Did we really land on the moon?
Aug 19, 2008 at 11:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
nowwhat - if anyone can figure-out federal farm policy, they are better than 535 members of Congress.
Aug 19, 2008 at 11:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
Sannio - quick, look-up, those black helicopters are following you.
Aug 19, 2008 at 10:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why should tax payers have to pay farmers to put land that should not be farmed in the first place in programs like this. At the same time there is another program paying farmers to dry other lands out. There is a farm outside Orfordville that has gotten tax money to drain and tile his fields. Now he got paid to put some back into this program. It will stay that way untill there is another tax program that he can milk to do something else with the land.
Aug 19, 2008 at 10:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
I wonder how long it will take before our government turns these properties over to the United Nations, like they did our federal parks? What's that you say? The citizens of the United States of America no longer owns the federal parks? Nope, we don't.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.