Crowded field for council
Photo 
K. Andreah Briarmoon
Photo 
Karl Dommerhausen
Photo 
Richard Ellingson
Photo 
David Henke
Photo 
George Mark
Photo 
Billy McCoy
Photo 
Thomas McDonald
Photo 
Kelly O'Brien
Photo 
Yuri Rashkin
Photo 
Kathy Voskuil
JANESVILLE Three open seats on the Janesville City Council—and no incumbents seeking reelection—have lured 11 residents to run in the April council race.
The city clerk's office confirmed the signatures on nine sets of nomination papers Wednesday. They were continuing this morning to check on the signatures of the papers filed late Wednesday by Kelly O'Brien and Kevin Bishop.
The last time Wulf can remember so many candidates was when 10 ran for four open seats in 2001.
Because of the large candidate field, the council will meet at 6 p.m. Monday to decide whether to hold a primary election, council President George Brunner said.
State statutes are "very permissive" on the issue of primaries, Brunner said. If more than two people are seeking each seat, the city may hold a primary but isn't required to do so. If one were held, the top six vote getters would advance to the general election in April.
Brunner said that as far as he knew, the city had not scheduled a council primary in 40 years.
The cost would be minimal because the primary would be Feb. 19, the day of the presidential primary.
The candidates are:
Kevin Bishop, 49, 1602 Liberty Lane, is an assembler at Fairbanks-Morse in Beloit. He has worked there for 29 years.
Bishop wants to see the city continue to grow at a reasonable pace.
Janesville is the "gateway to Wisconsin," he said. "It's a great place for businesses to locate."
Bishop said he would encourage more public input if he were on the council.
"I'd like to make sure everyone has their voices heard and that we look at everything from top to bottom," he said.
He thinks the city could use more family-friendly activities, but he hasn't made up his mind about the aquatics issue.
K. Andreah Briarmoon, 55, of 339 S. Locust St., is self-employed as Briarmoon Enterprises since 1990 for residential and commercial real estate services.
Briarmoon has attended most council meetings over the last couple years, and this is the fourth time she is running for council. She said she has board experience on a national, state, and county level.
"I believe that we have to repair our checks and balances so that democracy functions properly once again so that the citizens have a real voice and that their input and priorities are the agenda for our city administration," she said.
Briarmoon said the city needs more openness with the budget process, better input procedures for the general public, every city council meeting televised, "much more" disclosure of city information on the city's Web site, ward supervisors, a repaired and functioning citizen board of appeals and a citizen nomination committee so that the city administration is not choosing citizens that oversee him.
"Then we can maximize the wonderful potential of Janesville," she said, "and make it an even better city than it already is."
Karl Dommershausen, 65, of 2419 Plymouth Ave., owns 27 West Appraisal and Estate services. Dommershausen ran unsuccessfully for council last year.
Dommershausen, who attends most council meetings, said the budget is his priority.
"Everything I am uncomfortable with goes to the budget," he said. "Where the money comes from, where it is going, how it is allocated, how much the city council gets involved, and how much does the city administration lead."
The recent cut in funding for the historic Tallman House was the last straw, he said.
"When they couldn't find $13,000 … with the millions spent in the city, something's wrong," Dommershausen said.
For instance, he would not support a big project such as a proposed water facility when the city cannot maintain the things it has.
He also would take a close look at how federal block grant money is distributed.
And he would ask the council to increase the size of the council because he believes residents are underrepresented.
Richard "Duke" Ellingson, 62, of 17 S. Atwood Ave., is retired director of the Dane County 911 Center.
Ellingson said he is running to get involved in the community. He and his wife moved here six years ago, and they love Janesville, he said.
He isn't a single-issue candidate, but his interests include a vibrant downtown and the Tallman House.
Ellingson attended a recent vision meeting on the downtown and believes good things are planned.
"I just feel like I need to be involved in that," he said.
Ellingson is vice president of the Rock County Historical Society, which runs the Tallman House. The city recently cut funding there.
But taxes, he believes, are the most important things on people's minds.
"Whatever we can do to make that levy situation better is something I'd be most interested in, also," he said.
Ellingson is glad the city appears to be scaling back on what it can afford for a water facility. He prefers maintaining and upgrading what the city has.
David Henke, 37, of 1327 Hawthorne Ave., is a salesman for Werner Electric with a passion for politics. This is his first run for public office.
"It's important we have good, levelheaded folks on the council" who can make decisions they'll be proud of 15 years down the road, he said.
Aquatics is one issue residents seem concerned about, he said. Henke describes himself as "fiscally conservative." He believes any project involving a discretionary tax, such as a new aquatics facility, should be put to a referendum.
"I don't want to spend money we don't have or tax people for money they don't want to give," he said.
Henke also is interested in more discussion on Janesville's downtown plan, particularly on parking.
George Mark, 76, of 206 Shady Oak Court, believes his experience as a local builder, real estate agent and landlord would be an asset to the council. He belongs to several builders organizations, the South Side Business Association and the Janesville Kiwanis Club.
"I'm interested in serving the people of Janesville," said Mark, who has lived here 45 years. "I think I've got the experience and involvement in the community, so I understand what's going on."
He's most interested in issues such as taxes and fees, which he says are too high, and sidewalks. Mark disagrees with the current council's expansive sidewalk policy.
"I plan to use the professionals on staff to set the standards for sidewalks," he said.
Mark also is concerned about the drop in residential building permits because new construction adds to the tax rolls. He wants to make it easier for residents to get their building questions answered by city staff.
Billy McCoy, 55, of 1326 Putnam Ave., is on disability from General Motors.
McCoy, who has lived here for 25 years, said it's time for a change at City Hall. That started back with the 2002 assessments, he said. McCoy in 2002 organized a petition drive that by statute then required a state investigation. The state eventually gave the city high marks as a result of the investigation, but McCoy said some people still did not receive money they should have when they were over assessed.
McCoy believes assessor Charlie Knipp who was fired shortly afterward was fired because he stood up for Janesville residents.
"… It will take more than just me as a councilmember—it will have to take a vote—but I'd like to see Charlie get his job reinstated … People who should have been fired will be fired."
McCoy said the city's infrastructure is suffering, and he pointed to the railings on the Jackson Street bridge, some streets and some downtown terraces as examples. The parks should be mowed and Riverside Park wading pool reopened. He would like see more shopping opportunities on the south side.
He said people have asked how he would work with City Manager Steve Sheiffer, whom McCoy has criticized. He noted one instance in which Sheiffer walked out of council chambers when members questioned him on finances concerning an employee break room.
"I'd say, 'Mr. Sheiffer, just pack your bags and keep walking if you're not going to the can,'" McCoy said.
"The council needs to take control and be the bosses they're supposed to be."
Tom McDonald, 27, of 64 S. Fremont St., is an attorney at McDonald & Gustafson.
McDonald said he believes in community service and volunteering.
"I think the council would provide me with an excellent opportunity to give back to the community and serve the residents of Janesville," he said.
He also would bring a diverse voice to the council.
"What I'd like to do is bring a young voice and a new perspective to Janesville's leadership," he said.
"I'm going into this with an open mind on all issues," he said.
He would keep two principles in mind.
"It's very important to spend taxpayer dollars wisely," he said.
"The other thing is informed decision-making. When the council makes a decision, big or small, it's important to know the issues," he said. He would get recommendations from committees and work with the administration.
But, "The main thing (is) to get citizen input since, as council members, we are there to represent the people," he said.
Kelly M. O'Brien, 33, of 2309 Kellogg Ave., is a waitress and bartender at the Ground Round.
O'Brien said she started following the council during the aquatic facility issue.
"I just totally disagreed," she said. "I didn't think the city council was listening to all the little people. We just went through the school referendum, and I didn't think we could afford another jump like that."
During that debate, she and her friends became interested in government and how it works, she said.
"The best way to learn is first-hand," she said. "My friends are asking more questions, and they're getting involved. Before, decisions were made for them.
"I don't think they even voted, to be honest. Now they do."
O'Brien, who has lived in Janesville for about 15 years, said she would bring a different voice to the council as a young, single mother. She is not a white-collar worker.
"I try to teach my kids to stand up for what (they) believe in," she said.
Yuri D. Rashkin, 32, of 226 Forest Park Blvd., owns Service First Mortgage.
"I'm running because I believe the best way to change and to continue to strengthen our community is to become involved," said Rashkin, who has lived in Janesville for more than three years.
Rashkin said he would bring experience of running his own business for nine years. As a mortgage consultant, he is comfortable with numbers, he said.
"To me, it is more about listening to the citizens, making sure all points of view are represented," he said.
He also would ask questions.
Rashkin said he spoke to many people about the aquatic center, for instance.
"I have not heard one person who is supporting it," he said.
One quality of good leadership, he said, is proposing things that may not be universally accepted.
"But, at the same time, if you propose something and everybody says, ‘No thank you,' you have to respect that."
Rashkin was born and raised in Moscow and has been in the United States for 20 years.
"Part of the reason I'm running is because my parents left the Soviet Union to give me and my brother these types of opportunities—to own my own business and to be involved in a community politically," Rashkin said.
Kathy Voskuil, 48, of 3417 Amhurst Road, is a pain specialist representative for Pfizer.
She was chairwoman of the plan commission when the Wal-Mart Supercenter was under discussion and also ran unsuccessfully for council last spring.
"I've been involved in the community in a lot of different aspects—PTA, my church, different schools. As a resident, I feel it's important to give back to the community. That's the way I was raised."
One of the city's challenges will be how to maintain infrastructure, including police and fire services, with dwindling state funds, she said.
The council also will have to ensure the downtown and comprehensive plans are carried out in a timely manner.
And then there's the city's growing poverty problem. Voskuil hopes the city can collaborate with groups that already are working with impoverished areas.
Voskuil said she wants to be a good listener and to encourage communication between the city and residents.

Feb 11, 2008 at 4:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
There's an opportunity here for candidates to state their case.
If that's proper use of this site.
Feb 11, 2008 at 2:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Candidates should post on this blob.
Jan 10, 2008 at 7:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
This later story tells why there's a primary. Click below.
http://gazettextra.com/news/2008/jan/08/...
Jan 9, 2008 at 5:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
That photo that is almost a quarter century old will someday surpass the age of the shack.
Jan 9, 2008 at 5 p.m.
Suggest removal
tater, nothing wrong with going to that dictionary.
Jan 9, 2008 at 4:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillecomments, I'm nailed again with the bad spelling. Thanks.
And to whom it may concern: neologisms are a schizotypal trait.
Jan 9, 2008 at 5:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think I am going to run for city council, but I need to patch up my carriage barn first.
Jan 8, 2008 at 12:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
I WAS going to take time to respond to janesvillecomments Jan. 4 comments about downtown and why it would be good for Janesville to try and get something going down there, but then I considered his(her)second paragraph and realized that it's not worth the effort.
Jan 7, 2008 at 11:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Pretty funny guys! I spent 2 minutes reading the latest posts, then another 10 minutes looking up words in a dictionary!
Jan 7, 2008 at 10:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
I truly believe that sesquipedalianism is meant for poltroon's that are truly pecksniffian by nature!!
Jan 6, 2008 at 1:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Um... it's sesquipedalianism, rather than sesquapedelianism... but who's spellchecking? :)
Jan 6, 2008 at 8:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
wisconsinheat, I stand corrected, thank you, but the effort was to amuse and not impress, and to some degree make a point about credibility.
I avoid sesquapedelianism whenever possible.
Jan 5, 2008 at 4:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
gazettefan. If you want to try to impress with big words, at least spell them right.
(daguerreotype)
Jan 5, 2008 at 10:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe one way to judge the credibility of these candidates is to find out how current these photos are.
There's at least one up there that's close to being a deguerotype.
Jan 4, 2008 at 4:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
The string MikeF's post was orignally on ended.
I asked my question on this string to get the issue going again.
This string has been educational compared to some of others.
Jan 4, 2008 at 3:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, he did a great job of explaining the need for a primary. I think it would be a disservice to the citizens to deny a primary, especially after reading the city's memo that the cost to add the city council to the primary would be insignificant. Let the questioning begin!
Jan 4, 2008 at 3:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
At first I didn't understand the purpose. MikeF's explanation makes sense to me.
Jan 4, 2008 at 1:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, I responded to your pasting of Mike F's ideas earlier. It's a good point. I was just curious because you have been active in this thread but you didn't really state your support or lack of support earlier.
Jan 4, 2008 at 1:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes,
This is a post by MikeF from a related story:
A primary is a good idea in this case because there are so many candidates. There will be 9 to 11 candidates for 3 seats. A primary would remove 1/3 to almost 1/2 and bring the field down to a number that can be investigated more in depth. Think back to the last few elections, think about the forums and how long it took for each question to be answered. I believe the rules at the forum gave each candidate 60 seconds to answer a question. With 10 candidates, that is 10 minutes per question. Since a forum lasts about an hour, that is only 5 questions (with an additional 60 second opening statement). Drop the field to 6 and you can get 8-9 questions in the same hour. While this may not seem like much of a difference, it does give more insight into the candidate. I think a primary, with enough information on the candidates ahead of time, would be a great idea this year.
Jan 4, 2008 at 1:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
gazettefan--do you think there should be a primary?
Jan 4, 2008 at 12:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, the ones who live in some off-kilter parallel universe would be harmful to the city.
Jan 4, 2008 at 11:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Andrea Briarmoon has done nothing but cause problems and try to force her opinions on the City Council for years. She is an embarrassment. The other candidate who I have a problem with is Mr. Ellingson. I worked under him in Madison and can honestly say his approach there was to do nothing to rock the boat. While boat rocking for the sake of boat rocking of course isn't good, I would hope a City Councilman would have the courage to take a stand on certain issues of importance. I won't be voting for him! I look forward to learning more about the remaining candidates and making my choice.
Jan 4, 2008 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
The kind of thinking that makes someone vote for a candidate solely for the purpose of voting against the opposition will be applied against her.
Jan 4, 2008 at 1:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Karl Dommershausen seems a little too downtown-centric. I'm sorry, but someone should have told the city council (and wannabees) that downtown Janesville died a year after the Janesville Mall was built - and was allowed to rot by the trust funds managing the properties which bled off the rents and did notthing for maintenance for two decades before that. We don't need anymore council members performing CPR on the corpse. Move the circuit back downtown where there is no significant business to annoy on Friday & Saturday nights and resynchronize the traffic lights on Milton Avenue so it doesn't take 15 minutes to traverse the city's actual business district.
=======================================New_Paragraph==================================
I'm going to vote for Andreah Briarmoon because I like her collection of enemies :)
Jan 3, 2008 at 6:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
With this many candidates it is in Janesville's best interest to have a primary to ensure that the city's wishes are carried out. Even with a primary, a voter is allowed to vote a write-in to make their wishes known if needed.
Narrowing the field to 6 max would seem fair for 3 seats.
Jan 3, 2008 at 5:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
As for the cost of a primary, in a recent year (within the last 5) the cost to run the February election was estimated at $10,600 without the council candidates. The cost with the council candidates included was estimated at $11,350, or an increase of $750 to cover the ballot cost. I believe the numbers released in the next day or so will reflect similar costs. Even with inflation, I will predict an additional cost of $1,000 or less. Keep watch at http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/weblink7/... for the council meeting agenda and packet.
Jan 3, 2008 at 3:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
I meant POLITBUREAU
Jan 3, 2008 at 3:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
True re: B'moon. Her proposed polibureau would paralyze the city.
Jan 3, 2008 at 3:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Did you go to the site that the previously stated site directed you to?
http://www.karlforcitycouncil.com/index....
This site is much more complete, with a bio, viewpoints, goals, etc.
Jan 3, 2008 at 3:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
The blog site mentioned, "www.karlforcitycouncil.blogspot.com" is just for comments and it tells one to go to the web site called "www.karlforcitycouncil.com" for a complete biography and position paper. I hope that this clarifies the earlier comments.
Jan 3, 2008 at 3:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
A primary would be a good thing. It would get Ms. Briarmoon out for the spotlight quicker. We don't need her or her ideas.
Jan 3, 2008 at 3:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Not much meat on the website. Having a site is one thing. Having a meaningful site is another. Having a site just to have a site is poor planning. I hope his lack of effort with the medium doesn't translate into a lack of effort in other things.
Jan 3, 2008 at 2:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
Karl Dommershausen has a website.
http://www.karlforcitycouncil.blogspot.c...
Jan 3, 2008 at 1:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Because the council is considering a primary, I'm sure they will be provided an estimated cost at their Monday meeting. However, if you want to make sure the general public knows the answer, then perhaps this is something the gazette staff can ask and post or call the Clerk Treasurer, Jean Wulf, or ask the question of a council member or stay tuned until Monday when the Council votes on the matter.
Jan 3, 2008 at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Since my first comment was removed, I will change my tone a bit. A primary is very necessary when there are this many people running for so few seats. As a city, there should not be anyone on the council that leans too far one way or the other. Centrists are the best in the form of government we have here in Janesville. Too conservative is bad, but too liberal is not good either. People running for council need to realize what is best for the city of Janesville and not what is best for their agenda or their partys platform.
Jan 3, 2008 at 12:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
I agree with the comments made by MikeF that were pasted by gazettefan. In addition, I don't feel comfortable with a city council candidate winning a seat with a minimal percentage of the vote, which would likely happen if the city chooses not to hold a primary. As far as cost is concerned, I wonder what a "minimal amount" is? It doesn't seem that adding a city council primary to the prez primary would cost that much. Any insight into what would cause the cost to increase significantly enough to discourage a primary? I'm not familiar with exactly what the cost entails besides printing the ballots and counting them.
Jan 3, 2008 at 12:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
A primary is necessary when this many candidates are running. Without a primary, votes will be sliced/diced among too many candidates during the general election.
Jan 3, 2008 at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
This is a post by MikeF from a related story:
A primary is a good idea in this case because there are so many candidates. There will be 9 to 11 candidates for 3 seats. A primary would remove 1/3 to almost 1/2 and bring the field down to a number that can be investigated more in depth. Think back to the last few elections, think about the forums and how long it took for each question to be answered. I believe the rules at the forum gave each candidate 60 seconds to answer a question. With 10 candidates, that is 10 minutes per question. Since a forum lasts about an hour, that is only 5 questions (with an additional 60 second opening statement). Drop the field to 6 and you can get 8-9 questions in the same hour. While this may not seem like much of a difference, it does give more insight into the candidate. I think a primary, with enough information on the candidates ahead of time, would be a great idea this year.
Jan 3, 2008 at 11:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
The cost of the primary would be minimal. There is already a presidential primary scheduled, so the additional cost would only be the share of printing the ballots.
Jan 3, 2008 at 11:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
A primary costs too much money. Let them all run against each other.
And please vote for the centrists. Extremists on both sides of the political spectrum are ruining this country. Though Janesville/Rock County traditionally tends to vote 60-65% democratic, it seems to be fairly central in the politics.
Jan 3, 2008 at 11:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
How much tax money will it cost to have this proposed primary?
Just a hint to some of your candidates, a couple of you are coming across as self-serving. Whats in it for you or your business. You will be representing the city as a whole, not yourself or your special interests.
Jan 3, 2008 at 11:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
Is a primary necessary?
Jan 3, 2008 at 10:56 a.m.
Jan 3, 2008 at 10:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
Variety is a good thing!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.