Residents learn about wind turbine proposal

By GINA DUWE ( Contact )   Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


Angie and Harlin Miller, left, who own property near the proposed wind turbine sites, listen to EcoEnergy representative Curt Bjurlin explain the project area maps at an open house Monday in Evansville.

Angie and Harlin Miller, left, who own property near the proposed wind turbine sites, listen to EcoEnergy representative Curt Bjurlin explain the project area maps at an open house Monday in Evansville.

PhotoVideo


An aerial view near Evansville where EcoEnergy has mapped out homes and a 1,000 foot setback where wind turbines would not be able to be constructed.

An aerial view near Evansville where EcoEnergy has mapped out homes and a 1,000 foot setback where wind turbines would not be able to be constructed.

— A proposal to erect three wind turbines in Union Township drew people from near and far to an open house Monday night.

Many had no direct stake in the Evansville/Wisconsin Public Power project. They just wanted to learn about renewable energy.

Officials from Rock County and neighboring townships attended on a fact-finding mission.

People at EcoEnergy’s open house at J.C. McKenna Middle School saw maps of the township where wind turbines could be sited based on open land more than 1,000 feet from homes and projected wind speeds based on a test wind tower gathering data in Magnolia Township.

The most favorable wind areas of the town are west of Evansville near County C between Highway 104 and Pleasant Prairie Road, where wind speed ranges from 15 to 16.2 mph, according to the maps.

No specific sites for turbines have been chosen and no contracts have been signed, said Curt Bjurlin, EcoEnergy Wisconsin project developer.

The 4.5-megawatt project proposes putting up three turbines for the Evansville municipal water and light utility.

The power generated would be sold to Wisconsin Public Power, a regional power company serving 49 customer-owned electric utilities, including Evansville. The three turbines would produce an estimated 12 million kilowatt hours annually. It’s estimated the three turbines would supply about 18 percent of Evansville’s load.

Rock County Board Chairman Richard Ott wanted to learn about the proposals, and said they need to be approached delicately.

He said he supports the wind turbines as a form of clean, renewable energy.

“As far as visual pollution, it’s in the eyes of the beholders,” he said.

He wondered how much money the county, town and landowners would receive.

EcoEnergy has committed to pay shared revenue for all its projects, regardless of size, Bjurlin said. That means for each 1.5 MW turbine, Rock County would receive about $3,500 and the town of Union would receive about $2,500 annually, he said.

EcoEnergy officials said contracts with landowners are confidential and declined to say how much they would receive. Company officials previously have said they would pay in the ballpark of the industry standard—$4,200 to $4,500 annually for each turbine.

Town of Union Plan Commission Chairman Alvin Francis is one landowner who has been offered an EcoEnergy contract to host one turbine at either of two possible locations.

“I don’t want to put it in if it’s as dangerous as the (Town of Union Wind) Study Committee says,” he said, referring to a committee that will present its findings at a plan commission meeting Thursday night.

But he said he didn’t hear any major concerns after talking with farmers who have turbines on their property.

They said it

Here are thoughts from some people at Monday’s open house:

-- Evansville resident Bill Alt said he supports the project. He said using only three turbines is a unique approach.

“I’m definitely in favor of the way they’re trying to do it on a small scale project,” he said.

-- “I don’t have a problem with it,” said Paul Maas, who lives on Evansville-Brooklyn Road near the proposed site.

Maas and his wife, Fern, said they first were introduced to wind turbines while visiting their son in Germany.

-- Porter Township Supervisor Phil Hamilton said he watched mile after mile of turbine construction sites on a recent trip of his to Sioux Falls, S.D.

“We need it,” he said of wind energy, because coal plants are not the future.

“(Officials) just need to develop sensible setbacks,” he said.

-- Rock County Supervisor Rich Bostwick said he was impressed with what he saw.

“It’s not in my backyard, so it’s easy for me to say, ‘Yes,’ but there’s a lot of people that live next to coal plants,” he said.

Nuclear plants aren’t the answer, either, he said.

-- “I like the idea. I think it’s something to help the environment,” said Evansville resident Harlin Miller.

Miller and his wife, Angie, said they came with a lot of questions.

“We learned quite a bit,” he said.

-- Karen and Herb Hanson, who live nearby but in Green County, wanted to learn more and said they support wind energy. The couple, also investors in Evansville’s biodiesel plant, said it seems silly not to take advantage of the wind.

“It would be leaving an incredibly valuable resource untapped,” he said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(3)
2dognight
Jan 30, 2008 at 10:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

Look at betterplan.squarespace to see what Magnolia township may look like with 66 windturbines in place.
That is a huge amount of blades whirling but at times all sitting quietly without power going to those 833 homes. Would that even take care of Magnolia? Air conditioning takes a lot of power in summer when wind turbines are often not producing.

garyprimer
Jan 30, 2008 at 9:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

If my calculations are right, 12 million kwh would sell for close to $1.2 million at the retail end and should supply at least 833 homes for the entire year. I am curious to know what the investment and operating costs would be for such a facility and how much space it would use. As far as I know, they do not produce a witch's brew of unstable atomic isotopes with half lives ranging from hundreds to thousands of years. Keep in mind that it would take at least seven half life periods to deplete these waste products.

2dognight
Jan 29, 2008 at 3:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

I saw a TV show on nuclear power that said it would take 10,000 wind turbines to make the power equal to one nuclear energy plant. Where would 10,000 windturbines go in Wisconsin ?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT