PSC grants power to pipeline plan
MADISON The Wisconsin Public Service Commission granted eminent domain authority Thursday to a company that wants to extend a petroleum pipeline from near Whitewater to the state line.
In granting Enbridge Energy Partners the power to seize private property, the commissioners determined Enbridge affiliates, Enbridge Pipelines Lakehead LLC and Enbridge Pipelines Wisconsin LLC, should be treated as corporations.
For the most part, only legally recognized corporations can wield eminent domain, so the commissioners had to find that the Legislature intended to also recognize limited liability companies as corporations.
Commissioner Lauren Azar noted the pipeline will increase access for Wisconsin consumers to gasoline refined in the Chicago area by moving 400,000 barrels of oil a day.
Enbridge has largely completed construction of two parallel pipelines:
-- One from pipeline facilities in Superior to a pumping station near Whitewater. It moves crude oil extracted from oil sands in Alberta, Canada.
-- A second to return finished petroleum products along the same route.
Both pipelines follow an existing Enbridge pipeline.
An additional project extends the pipeline 22 miles along the Rock-Jefferson county line south to Pontiac, Ill. In documents filed with the PSC, Enbridge has stated it would need to acquire 158 acres of right of way in Rock County, of which 150 are farmland.
Thursday’s decision didn’t please an attorney for farmers near Clinton.
“It’s not in the public interest because there’s been no demonstrated public use for it in Wisconsin. This oil will be moved through the state and could be continued south to Oklahoma and the Gulf Coast for export to Asia,” said Jon Kingstad, a Minneapolis attorney who has represented numerous property owners along the entire pipeline route.
Among Kingstad’s clients are Gordon Widener and Kenneth Book, of Harvard, Ill., who have “substantial farming operations” near Clinton and “aren’t happy” with the prospects of an oil pipeline crossing their fields.
“It raises havoc with agricultural operations, it affects drainage, prevents tillage and they come with hazard like leaks and spills and explosions,” Kingstad said.
His clients are willing to negotiate a fair price for a pipeline easement, Kingstad said, but eminent domain gives Enbridge “an unlawful leverage.”
Enbridge spokesperson Denise Hamsher said eminent domain would be used as a last resort.
“Our experience in northern Wisconsin has been to come to a mutual agreement with property owners,” Hamsher said.
The PSC hasn’t chosen from three route alternatives identified by Enbridge, but Hamsher said easement negotiations have been underway with property owners near the Rock-Jefferson county line.

Mar 14, 2008 at 6:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Eminent domain is a big problem; this decision is highly unfortunate given this company's existing track record. This decision should be fought --strenuously-- since the state had to go out of its way to determine that LLCs should be treated as corporations. What a joke.
Mar 14, 2008 at 4:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Thanks for the site (bookmarked). I take it the EPA doesn't have the authority to over rule the DNR? They can only "object"? I know some of this land is private land, but there are alot of concerns for wetlands and forests.
Mar 14, 2008 at 3:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
RCGladiatorQB12- go to www.midwestadvocates.org for the info on the spills and the lawsuit(2 incidents in separate counties[Rusk & Polk]).
The other info is from the UW college courses I've taken recently.
Mar 14, 2008 at 3:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
This pipeline has been being built for several months now. They must have been confident they were going to get permission to build it.
Mar 14, 2008 at 3:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
I haven't found anything to back your statements up, but I'm still looking. I must say they are very interesting though. I've done a few papers on Eminent Domain, and that was the first question that came to my mind; "How is this for a public use"? Unless eminent domain has been ratified in recent MONTHS I think this case should go to the Court of appeals. $$$$$$
Mar 14, 2008 at 9:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
All of the readers should know this:
1-Over the last 8 years, 45% of what has been leaked/spilled by Enbridge has been in Wisconsin, and has entered the groundwater.
2-Also, there are still pending lawsuits filed by several high-profile environmental organizations, charging the WDNR with fast-tracking the permit process; eliminating the (required by law) environmental impact statement.
3-Almost 300 acres of wetland have been delineated in Wisconsin because of this pipeline.
4-Tar sand extraction of petroleum causes more greenhouse gasses than other petroleum extraction methods. It will also not decrease the US dependency on foreign oil.
5-Eminent Domain is a cruel joke. It is not in the best interest of anyone to seize property for this pipeline(other than Enbridge). If they didn't have the land before they started this project, they should have put it somewhere else.
6-To Enbridge Inc. I'm keeping my eyes on you...
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.