McCain tossing Hail Marys while Obama uses Reagan playbook
WASHINGTON Krauthammer’s Hail Mary Rule: You get only two per game. John McCain, unfortunately, has already thrown three. The first was his bet on the surge, a deep pass to David Petraeus who miraculously ran it all the way into the end zone.
Then, seeking a game-changer after the Democratic convention, McCain threw blind into the end zone to a waiting Sarah Palin. She caught the ball. Her subsequent fumbles have taken the sheen off of that play, but she nonetheless invaluably solidifies his Republican base.
When the financial crisis hit, McCain went razzle-dazzle again, suspending his campaign and declaring he’d stay away from the first presidential debate until the financial crisis was solved.
He tempted fate one time too many. After climbing up on his high horse, McCain had to climb down. The crisis unresolved, he showed up at the debate regardless, rather abjectly conceding Obama’s mocking retort that presidential candidates should be able to do “more than one thing at once.” (Although McCain might have pointed out that while he was trying to do two things, Obama was sitting on the sidelines doing one thing only: campaigning.)
You can’t blame McCain. In an election in which all the fundamentals are working for the opposition, he feels he has to keep throwing long in order to keep hope alive. Nonetheless, his frenetic improvisation has perversely (for him) framed the rookie challenger favorably as calm, steady and cool.
In the primary campaign, Obama was cool as in hip. Now Obama is cool as in collected. He has the discipline to let slow and steady carry him to victory. He has not at all distinguished himself in this economic crisis—nor, one might add, in any other during his national career—but detachment has served him well.
He understands that this election, like the election of 1980, demands only one thing of the challenger: Make yourself acceptable.
Once Ronald Reagan convinced America that he was not menacing, he won in a landslide. If Obama convinces the electorate he is not too exotic or green or unprepared, he wins as well.
When after the Republican convention Obama’s poll numbers momentarily slipped behind McCain’s, panicked Democrats urged him to get mad. He did precisely the opposite. He got calm. He repositioned himself as ordinary, becoming the earnest factory-floor, coffee-shop, union-hall candidate.
In doing so, he continues his clever convention-speech pivot from primary to general election. In a crowded primary field in which he was the newcomer and the stranger, he rose above the crowd on pure special effects: dazzling rhetoric, natural charisma and a magic carpet ride of transcendence and hope.
It worked for two reasons: Democrats believe that nonsense, and he was new. But now he needs more than Democrats. And novelty fades.
Obama understood that the magic was wearing off and the audacity of hope wearing thin. Hence the self-denial perfectly personified in his acceptance speech in Denver. He could have had 80,000 people in rapture. Instead, he made himself prosaic, even pedestrian, going right to the general election audience to project himself as one of them.
Ordinariness was the theme. His self-told life story? Common man, hence that brazen introductory biopic that shamelessly skipped from Hawaii grade-schooler to Chicago community organizer with not a word about Columbia and Harvard. His riff on American concerns? All middle-class anxieties. His list of programs? All pitched as his middle-class remedies.
He’s been moderate in policy and temper ever since. His one goal: Pass the Reagan ’80 threshold. Be acceptable, be cool, be reassuring.
Part of reassurance is intellectual. Like Palin, he’s a rookie, but in his 19 months on the national stage he has achieved fluency in areas in which he has no experience. In the foreign policy debate with McCain, as in his July news conference with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Obama held his own—fluid, familiar, and therefore plausibly presidential.
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously said of Franklin Roosevelt that he had a “second-class intellect but a first-class temperament.”
Obama has shown that he is a man of limited experience, questionable convictions, deeply troubling associations (Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Tony Rezko) and an alarming lack of self-definition—do you really know who he is and what he believes? Nonetheless, he’s got both a first-class intellect and a first-class temperament.
That will likely be enough to make him president.
Charles Krauthammer is a columnist for the Washington Post. His e-mail address is letters@charleskrauthammer.com.

Oct 5, 2008 at 1:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
Very well written story here. We have to ask themselves whether we can even take a chance on having John McCain elected to the presidency, knowing full well his history of support to the very powers that be that got us where we are today. Its not all his fault. He's still getting snowed by his advisors and those in the white house. He's even changed his attitude a bit on deregulation. But the bottom line is, like Bush, he was one of those C-students. He lets other influence him but pretends to still be a maverick.
Senator Obama is a bit new to many of you. I don't think there is a more sincere politician anywhere. Columbia and Harvard are not schools you get into easily. He has a good head, picks wise advisors, and knows where to get the experience he lacks. He spoke out about this mortgage mess and the costs of deregulation before McCain realized the economy was a serious issue. We have to look at one guy who just stopped paying for student loans, lives in the standard two places most of our senators live in, and has the organizational skills to get this far. We should compare this to the history Senator McCain has of being influenced by the very people he helped deregulate. The very same senator (Phil Gramm) that co-sponsored the 2000 bill that led to this mess is on McCain's team today. The C-student candidate is getting snowed.
If some of you don't believe this, then why would Senator McCain choose Sarah Palin? Why not somebody he knew and trusted? The answer has to be that the puppetmasters were pulling the strings.
Oct 3, 2008 at 2:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
This is an excellent example of a point I was making on one of Horowitz’s idiotic rants. The liberal writers tend to be very negative, and rather than make a logical point, go straight to sarcasm and ad hominem attacks. You will never see a liberal writer say a good thing about McCain, or give a solid criticism about Obama. Krauthammer is definitely conservative, but spares no criticism of McCain’s strategy, while praising Obama’s. How refreshing it would be if one of the lefties tried something similar for a change. I won’t be holding my breath, though.
Oct 3, 2008 at 1:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Never under estimate the power of money and corruption, both of which McCain has on his side. Do you think Halliburton or KBR, all the War profiteers want to loose their profits? Do you think the powerful lobbyist want to loose their ability to write Our laws to their benefit? We just gave Wall Street 700 billion to screw the people and they are still functioning without regulation. In 2000 it took the Supreme Court to give Bush his Presidency to destroy America. I don't under estimate the power of money or corruption Mc Cain and religious right Palin may still win.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.