Residents get their say on police
MILTON Milton Township voters will get their say on Election Day about an issue that has divided the town board for two years.
In two referendum questions, voters can say whether they support eliminating the town's police department and court system.
The referendum is non-binding, meaning the town board is not obligated to take action on the outcome of the vote.
Referendum supporters say the police department is a duplication of services the town can't afford. Opponents say the department provides a valuable service to the town.
The Town of Milton Police Department consists of three part-time officers who serve about 20 hours a month and a part-time chief, Tom Kunkel. Kunkel told a committee appointed to study the police department that he works about 1,300 hours a year or 25 hours a week.
That would put an officer on duty about 23 percent of the time.
But Sue Gavigan, a town board member and referendum proponent, said officers patrolled only 14.8 percent of the time in 2007 between 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. and 1.3 percent of the time between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. She calculated the numbers from time and payroll sheets, she said.
"Our officers work on a when-they-can basis," she wrote in an e-mail to The Janesville Gazette. "Rock County Sheriff's Department serves us 24/7."
Gavigan said the police department cost residents $6,700 in 2007 and more than $80,000 over four years.
But Town Chairman Bryan Meyer said the police department is worth the expense because it enforces town ordinances, something the sheriff's office does not do. He said he often asks Kunkel to visit residents who are violating ordinances to try to resolve the issue without citations or court actions.
"It's just one more tool just to maintain peace and laws," he said.
Gavigan said the town could use a part-time enforcement officer instead of a police department to enforce ordinances. In fact, the town pays Kunkel $1,000 a year to be ordinance enforcement officer.
Meyer said he doesn't believe relying on an enforcement officer will bring much savings after paying the officer and processing costs.
Gavigan disagrees. She said other town boards usually handle ordinance violations by sending letters to residents first and then bringing in enforcement officers on a per-diem or part-time basis. Most enforcement officers are paid between $1,000 and $2,000 a year, she said.
"It would save a significant amount, I really believe," she said.

Oct 21, 2008 at 9:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
By voting you are telling the board what we the people want. If the board doesn't vote the way the people chose, then maybe it's time for a new board. I also want to add that I'm glad someone is counting our "beans". And, Rock Cty would be breaking up bar fights because Town of Milton barely patrols.
Oct 21, 2008 at 7:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
villalamesville.
I think you are talking about the City of Milton, this referendum is for the Township of MIlton. This is a common misunderstanding.
Oct 21, 2008 at 7:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
with the little amount of wages paid the officer wont go broke if they lose the job seeing as how they have other jobs but the township could better use the money other things like paying for real police service from RCSD
Oct 20, 2008 at 5:44 p.m.
Oct 20, 2008 at 2:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
I was convinced about getting rid of the department when I found out that they duplicate services and they are not even available in high crime time like evenings (nor do they work holidays or sometimes even the day before holidays). Let's save money and have the Rock County sheriff's do the work. I'm for them being hired by Rock County as positions open up.
Oct 20, 2008 at 12:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
No matter how you look at it, having a town police dept & court is a duplication of both agencies, which we aready pay for in our county taxes.
Oct 20, 2008 at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
POLERT SEZ: "I believe this is a case where it is cheaper to keep the township Police than remove the force to later rebuild. But I would demand they give a few more tickets for non resident of the area to offset their costs."
That's called profiling....illegal profiling.
Oct 20, 2008 at 11:28 a.m.
Suggest removal
I would demand that law enforcement officers enforce laws fairly, not with an eye towards ticketing non-residents.
Oct 20, 2008 at 11:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
I believe this is a case where it is cheaper to keep the township Police than remove the force to later rebuild. But I would demand they give a few more tickets for non resident of the area to offset their costs.
Oct 20, 2008 at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
"Why not let the bean counters breakup a bar fight or answer a domestic disturbance call..." - In most cases, Milton Township Police would not handle either of these issues because there is no direct way to contact them at night (their phone goes to an answering machine after about 5:00pm). Rock County would be called.
For more details take a look at www.miltontownshippoliceref.com
Oct 20, 2008 at 9:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
why not let the bean counter breakup a bar fight or answer a domestic disturbance call maybe then theyll reconsider
B
Oct 20, 2008 at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
With current econmic and uncertain times it makes sense to downsize whenever possible. However, with current economic and uncertain times times slashing law enforcement is not the answer.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.