Auto industry to press Congress for $50B in loans

By KEN THOMAS  Monday, Sept. 8, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

In this Oct. 19, 2006 file photo, Terry Brunner, left, and Dave Johnson install a windshield on a Cadillac at the General Motors Corp. Lansing Grand River assembly plant in Lansing, Mich. Auto industry allies hope to secure up to $50 billion in government loans this month that would pay to modernize plants and help struggling car makers build more fuel-efficient vehicles.

— Auto industry allies hope to secure up to $50 billion in government loans this month that would pay to modernize plants and help struggling car makers build more fuel-efficient vehicles.

With Congress returning this coming week from its summer break, the industry plans an aggressive lobbying campaign for the low-interest loans. The situation is growing dire after months of tumbling sales, high gasoline prices and consumers' abandoning profitable trucks and sport utility vehicles.

Lawmakers authorized $25 billion in loans in last year's energy bill to help the companies build fuel-efficient vehicles such as hybrids and electric vehicles. With credit tight, automakers and suppliers now want lawmakers to come up with the money for the program — and expand the pool of money available to $50 billion over three years.

Industry leaders have argued that the loan guarantees are not a government bailout because it would hasten production of fuel-efficient vehicles and reduce dependence on imported oil.

"This is not about benefiting Wall Street," said Ford Motor Co.'s President of the Americas Mark Fields, referencing recent federal support for the investment firm Bear Stearns and troubled mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. "This is benefiting Main Street, the working men and women. The auto industry is part of the backbone of the U.S. economy."

The low-interest loans, at rates of about 4 percent to 5 percent, would pay for up to 30 percent of the cost of retooling plants to build hybrids, plug-in hybrids, electric cars and other alternatives.

Ford and General Motors Corp.'s credit ratings have fallen below investment grade, making it difficult for the companies to borrow money at affordable rates. Chrysler, which has been heavily dependent upon truck sales, has been privately held since last year and faces similar problems accessing capital.

"This industry could fall down, literally, or be absorbed if they don't get something in place very soon. I think it's that severe," said Rep. Joe Knollenberg, R-Mich. "Something has to happen pretty quickly because they can't compete paying 15 to 20 percent (interest)."

Industry lobbyists pressed the issue at the recent presidential conventions in Denver and St. Paul, Minn., and members of Michigan's congressional delegation have talked to legislative leaders and the Bush administration about the program. Discussions surround a three-year plan that would make $25 billion in loans available in the first year, followed by $15 billion the second year and $10 billion in the third.

To provide $50 billion in loans, Congress would need to set aside about $7.5 billion to guard against a loan default.

Automakers want to secure the money for the loans before November's election because a new president and Congress could delay the companies' ability to access the loans.

The White House said last week it was talking to members of Congress and the industry about the financing. The issue, meanwhile, has gained a foothold in the presidential campaign in states with many auto workers such as Michigan and Ohio.

Democrat Barack Obama has criticized Republican rival John McCain for not supporting the full $50 billion loan program. McCain said last week he supported fully covering the $25 billion loan program in the energy law.

Congressional leaders have said they are open to an expanded program. But the industry will face a compressed schedule in an election year when many lawmakers will push to leave Washington so they can campaign for re-election this fall.

"We're hopeful that we're making an effective case to get this done between now and the end of this session," said John Bozzella, Chrysler's vice president of external affairs and public policy.

The loans would be available to foreign automakers, but the companies are not expected to seek the money because they are in a better financial situation and priority would be given to companies with plants 20 years or older.







reader COMMENTS (12)
miyata312
Sep 9, 2008 at 1:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

Well if they built and sold cars here that people WANTED instead of what the big 2.5's marketing people THINK people wanted, they may not be in such trouble here.

Why is Ford Europe & Aus and GM Europe & Aus not having the problems they have in North America?

wahoo_35
Sep 8, 2008 at 3:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

JANESVILLE IS SAVED!!!

Zoom
Sep 8, 2008 at 1:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

"We either pay them with our hard earned money or we lose even more jobs."

Unfortunately, it may not be an either/or situation. Most likely, it will be both.

Here is another option. Put the companies in receivership to oust the overpaid management of these companies, reduce prodution by 30%, then reduce everyones pay by 50%, so they at least can keep their jobs.

MOC0428
Sep 8, 2008 at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

So if I read this right, GM, Ford, Chrysler etc.... want this money available because they made poor decisions in the past????? Can someone please tell me why the foreign automakers had if figured out but the U.S. automakers didn't? The problem lies in that if we don't get them this money then we may very well lose jobs in our country. Seems like a catch 22. We either pay them with our hard earned money or we lose even more jobs. I drive a U.S. made foreign vehicle, giving money to a poorly run company doesn't sit well with me but if it helps keep jobs maybe it is worth it.

Zoom
Sep 8, 2008 at 11:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

The proposed loans are $50 BILLION.

cozat5
Sep 8, 2008 at 11:17 a.m.
Suggest removal

Now this is where i will disagree with most republican thinking. Why are our law makers even considering this when these numbers are a representation of the salary of just 2 of the administrators at the 2 top auto companies in the U. S. GM CEO Rick Wagoner earned $9.3 million in salary and bonus in 2006. Ford's new CEO, Alan Mulally, got $27.8 million in salary and bonus in his first few months on the job, including an $18.5 million signing bonus

Zoom
Sep 8, 2008 at 10:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

China is the next frontier for the U.S. auto industry. Buick is actually a very popular brand there.

proartist
Sep 8, 2008 at 10:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

GM opened a new plant in western India last week...http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18153128/

Zoom
Sep 8, 2008 at 10:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

Interesting discussion at the link below. A lot of people much smarter than me make some good points, both for and against the $50B loans.http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/question-of-the-day-50b-loans-for-american-jobs/

Zoom
Sep 8, 2008 at 9:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Why should we pay to bail out poorly managed businesses? Chrysler was failing long before the most recent economic downturn. GM and Ford suckled at the SUV teet for far too long. These companies have Economists on their staff, yet they did nothing when fuel prices were predicted to rise. After the mismanagement of these companies, should we really think that they will spend the loan money wisely?

marymac4
Sep 8, 2008 at 8:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Another loan so the auto companies can close the plant and stick the tax payers again thru some type of government cut or new tax. The people of this country need to vote on this type and amount of loans. Can the auto makers guarantee they can cover OUR money and show it in writing? Will they be allowsd to write it off and find another way to get money?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT