Pro: Unlocking our energy reserves can ensure prosperity
WASHINGTON EDITOR’S NOTE: The writer is addressing the question, Should the House of Representatives vote on drilling for oil and gas in currently restricted lands and waters?
The energy policies set forth by the Congress during this crucial month will determine the fate of our nation’s economic well-being for years to come.
The choice is clear. If we maintain the status quo, and continue to prohibit the use of our own energy—especially our vast offshore reserves—America will become a second-rate nation and generations to come will not enjoy the same standard of living we do today.
If we unlock these reserves, we will stop the export of wealth—$700 billion annually—and begin to put our nation on the road to energy independence. This will create hundreds of thousands of good-paying, family-sustaining American jobs.
That said, America is so far behind the world energy curve that we are approaching the point of no return. Every day we fail to address this crisis, our dependence on foreign sources of energy grows and thousands of jobs move offshore to countries where energy is more affordable and reliable.
Congress can remedy this situation by approving the National Conservation, Environment, and Energy Independence Act—a House bill that has been in a lengthy holding pattern because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., simply refuses to allow a vote on it.
The legislation not only will put our great nation on the road to energy independence through increased domestic production of natural gas and oil, it will serve as a strong bridge to the renewable energy future.
By using a significant part of the offshore royalties that the government would receive from leasing additional lands for energy exploration and production, we can fund the development of next generation fuels such as wind, solar and geothermal.
Further, it will provide research funds for carbon sequestration and the re-processing of nuclear waste, which are key to clean-coal technologies and the expanded use of nuclear power. The bill also dedicates more than a trillion dollars to the restoration and preservation of our nation’s waterways, conservation districts and national parks.
Opening up our vast deep ocean reserves to energy exploration will send a loud and clear message to the global oil market: America means business and will secure its energy future through domestic production—not foreign dependence.
Furthermore, harvesting oil and natural gas offshore is one of the safest and most environmentally friendly places to produce energy. In fact, according to the National Academies of Science, less than 1 percent of the oil in American waters is caused by extraction—the vast majority of oil in our oceans occurs through natural seepage. Natural gas exploration has never damaged a shoreline or harmed marine life.
So just how much oil and natural gas is there underneath the ocean floor? The Minerals Management Service, the federal agency tasked with overseeing offshore oil and natural gas production, conservatively estimates the Outer Continental Shelf contains 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. That’s the equivalent of 35 years of imported OPEC oil and a 15-year supply of natural gas.
What’s more, the Minerals Management Service’s assessment is based on 30-year-old technology—the equivalent of watching a 1970s black-and-white TV compared to today’s high-definition flat-panel TV. Just like cell phones and computers, oil exploration and drilling technology has evolved safely over the years as well.
While there is no silver bullet for solving today’s frustrating energy crisis, expanded domestic production of fossil fuels, increased investment in alternative fuels and conservation can begin to unhook us from our unhealthy addiction to foreign oil.
The choice is clear and the timing is critical. Speaker Pelosi should heed the call of the American public and many of her Democratic colleagues as well. Before this month ends, she should allow a vote on the only comprehensive, bipartisan energy solution in Congress—National Conservation, Environment and Energy Independence Act.
Rep. John E. Peterson is a six-term Republican from Pennsylvania. Readers may write to him at 123 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20515.

Sep 16, 2008 at 2:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
When will people wake up to the fact that neither the Dem's or the Repub's want the cost of gas to go down. It's one of the biggest income producers for all of them and a cut would take lots of $,s out of the budget. They love it when we argue among each other about which president, party, or industry is responsible! The truth is that big oil and both sides of the isle are working together to control oil exploration. Lets wake up and figure it out, we are being used!!!
Sep 16, 2008 at 2:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
.... “thinking of you". Although they may be able to convince the un/misinformed American public with a promise short-term alleviation (lower taxes/energy prices); little attention would be paid to actually solve the problem. Short-term thinking will continue to hurt the public while creating small burst of political and financial gain to those who profit directly from Big Oil. To those easily convinced that, wealthy, oil-thirsty politicians are making decisions in “your” best interests; I suggest opening your eyes a crack, and spending more than a second of thought—maybe even induce a bit of critical thinking if the pain can be tolerated.
I agree with Mr. Peterson on one point; “America is so far behind the world energy curve that we are approaching the point of no return.” During the energy crisis in the 1970’s, Japan and most of Europe acknowledged the problem and put measures into place to adapt. As soon as prices came back down here, we dismissed the problem and went on telling ourselves it must have been solved.
Looking at the proclamation that more drilling will create so many new jobs, one should think of the job possibilities created by the research, creation, and implementation of new renewable technologies. Creativity, innovation and investment in renewable technologies will foster new jobs—many more than the investment in a century-old technology. The fear of change, new ideas, and innovation severely limits the US in many ways.
Sep 16, 2008 at 4:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
enough...again with the miss-information. You forget to mention why the Republicans were in opposition. The main reason wind fall profits tax---which would have cost you the consumer more money; those shameless Republicans thinking of you, just terrible.
Sep 15, 2008 at 9:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
The U.S. Energy Information Agency reports that even IF the outer continental shelf were opened up to more drilling, and ASSUMING that Big Oil actually starts drilling right away, peak production would not be reached until 2030 and even then production would not have a significant impact on world oil prices.
They’ve been sitting on 66,000 acres of permits and leases for years now, but Republicans recently blocked legislation requiring them to either use them or “lose” them, so that perhaps smaller companies might jump in and start producing.
Why do you think Republicans )and some Dems) did THAT?
For a clue on why, let’s consider how much Shelley Capito (R-WV) earned while she’s been in Congress, and compare it to what she’s been paid. According to OpenSecrets.org, she’s become a multimillionaire through her low-taxed “unearned assets” – simply through her stock and commodities portfolio investments.
Most folks don’t go from just-under a million bucks to multimillionaire by earning $150,000 per year, but then again her husband is a very successful “Personal Investments Manager” at CitiCorps’ Washington, DC branch. Oh and did I mention that CitiCorp just happens to be the largest funder-of-hedge-funds in the world?
Anyway, Rep Capito (who sits on the House’s powerful Banking and Securities oversight committee) voted against the Dem’s “Use It or Lose It” Bill even though it was fashioned to go a long way to break up Big Oil’s monopoly. Meanwhile she’s pushing granting them the option to drill in unopen areas of the Outer Continental Shelf, despite the fact that The U.S. Department of Energy reports that the vast majority of federal oil and gas resources offshore are already available for development.
According to the Minerals Management Service, of all the oil (85.9 billion barrels) and gas (419.9 trillion cubic feet) believed to exist on the Outer Continental Shelf, 82% of the natural gas and 79% of the oil is located in areas that are currently open for leasing (such as areas in the Gulf of Mexico and off the Alaska coast).
So like all the other Republicans that blocked the Dem’s “Use It Or Lose It Bill”, Shelley Capito (R-WV 2nd) is essentially for granting Big Oil the ability to sit on every drop until they can squeeze even more profit out of us.
Is anyone else wondering why she might be doing that?
Sep 15, 2008 at 8:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
And yet it is Speaker Pelosi who said that she would not allow a bill to drill to come to the floor for a vote. As she said, she trying to save the planet, and that's much more important than the struggles of the little people who'll just have to learn how to make do.
Sep 15, 2008 at 8:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
You see, this is what the republicans do. They state flat out lies or half-truths as fact, and bank on the fact that most Americans are either too ignorant, or too lazy to fact check them.
It's a "they don't know that we know" type of ploy.
Sep 15, 2008 at 8:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Become a second rate Nation.? Have you taken a good look at our education system and the amount of students that drop out of no child left behind.? Have you looked at our manufacturing base that has been shipped overseas for cheap labor? Have you taken a look at unemployment in this Country? Have you taken a look at our Financial debt? The only profit to be taken by Drill Baby Drill is by the Oil Companies. Do you know what our dollar is worth today? The next President will not be able to do much because of the weakness of our dollar, our outrageous debt, and the weakness of the middle class. Oil will not bring us to Prosperity. I am so angry at this nonsense I could just (can't put that in writing).
Sep 15, 2008 at 2:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Peterson if only you weren't so biased. The Dems before their vacation tried to bring an energy Bill to the floor three times within two weeks. Included off shore and lease Drilling now. Finish alaska pipe line, use oil reserves and alternative energy plans. Bush treatened to veto it. Republicans voted no. The second time the Dems brought it to the floor for a vote with Republican concessions the Republicans fillibustered. When the Sentate fillibusters no voting gets done. The do nothing Congress is a result of the Republicans fillibustering 90 times since the Dem took a slim majority in 2006. Your presentation of this issue is so Republican , it represents half truths. Thankful that it is not an out right Lie, Like the Lie Bush told us to get us to War.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.