GM and Segway unveil new two-wheeled urban vehicle
Photo 
Mike Gansler, Director of Core Technology with Segway Inc., drives a Personal Urban Mobility and Accessibility, or PUMA, project prototype vehicle in New York's Times Square on Sunday, April 5, 2009. Segway Inc. and General Motors Corp. announced Tuesday that they are working together to develop the two-wheeled, two-seat electric vehicle designed to be a fast, efficient, inexpensive and clean alternative to traditional cars and trucks in an urban environment.
NEW YORK A solution to the world's urban transportation problems could lie in two wheels not four, according to executives for General Motors Corp. and Segway Inc.
The companies announced Tuesday that they are working together to develop a two-wheeled, two-seat electric vehicle designed to be a fast, safe, inexpensive and clean alternative to traditional cars and trucks for cities across the world.
The Personal Urban Mobility and Accessibility, or PUMA, project also would involve a vast communications network that would allow vehicles to interact with each other, regulate the flow of traffic and prevent crashes from happening.
"We're excited about doing more with less," said Jim Norrod, chief executive of Segway, the Bedford, N.H.-based maker of electric scooters. "Less emissions, less dependability on foreign oil and less space."
The 300-pound prototype runs on a lithium-ion battery and uses Segway's characteristic two-wheel balancing technology, along with dual electric motors. It's designed to reach speeds of up to 35 miles-per-hour and can run 35 miles on a single charge.
The companies did not release a projected cost for the vehicle, but said ideally its total operating cost — including purchase price, insurance, maintenance and fuel — would total between one-fourth and one-third of that of the average traditional vehicle.
Larry Burns, GM's vice president of research and development, and strategic planning, said the project is part of Detroit-based GM's effort to remake itself as a purveyor of fuel-efficient vehicles. If Hummer took GM to the large-vehicle extreme, Burns said, the PUMA takes GM to the other.
Ideally, the vehicles would also be part of a communications network that through the use of transponder and GPS technology would allow them to drive themselves. The vehicles would automatically avoid obstacles such as pedestrians and other cars and therefore never crash, Burns said.
As a result, the PUMA vehicles would not need air bags or other traditional safety devices and include safety belts for "comfort purposes" only, he said.
Though the technology and its goals may seem like something out of science fiction, Burns said nothing new needs to be invented for it to become a reality.
"At this point, it's merely a business decision," he said.
Burns said that while putting that kind of communications infrastructure in place may still be a ways off for many American cities, the automaker is looking for a place, such as a college campus, where the vehicles could be put to use and grab a foothold in the market.
There's currently no timeline for production, Burns said.
The ambitious announcement also comes at a time when GM's future is hanging by a thread after receiving billions of dollars in federal aid and is in the midst of a vast restructuring that could still lead to a filing for bankruptcy protection.
Meanwhile, the ongoing recession has resulted in some of the lowest industrywide vehicle sales in more than a quarter century.
But Burns argued that some of the most revolutionary ideas have been born out of tough economic times.
"The next two months, and really 2009, is all about the reinvention of General Motors," he said.

Apr 8, 2009 at 10:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
who cares !
Apr 8, 2009 at 2:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
An urgent message from GM's new CEO.
http://mfile.akamai.com/5020/wma/rushlim...
All is in good hands!
Apr 8, 2009 at 12:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
I just dont think this is the answer to trasportation problems. I own a vehicle that can go 38 mph. for 100 miles on .9 gallons of fuel, It's called a scooter!
Apr 7, 2009 at 11:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Do they make it in four wheel drive? JK
Apr 7, 2009 at 6:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Rep - I was referring to SuperDaves questions as far as being like a motorcycle.
Apr 7, 2009 at 6:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
Not a motorcycle as you have to balance a motorcycle. Over grown wheel chair comes to mind.
Apr 7, 2009 at 5:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
I don't want one....I NEED to have one!
I don't care if it isn't practical for southern Wisconsin, I still want one!
Apr 7, 2009 at 4:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Superdave - I guess the answers could be
1. no different than a bike, motorcycle or moped.If your worried about getting hit, you would not get one.
2. Same as answer 1, except it would have more stability with 2 wheels.
3. Maybe some future attachments for small storage. I doubt someone would own this and NOT have a car too.
4. I don't see it pushed as an all season alternative.
5. Same as pothole but not as bad.
6. Same as when your car quits, you walk.
As the Segway has a niche market, this will too. May be more popular in other countries where smaller transportation is needed. Just as an SUV isn't for everyone (and I have one) this will not be for everyone too.
Apr 7, 2009 at 3:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
I like smaller vehicles, energy efficiency, all kinds of innovative ideas. I do not like this thing. The market for this is what, maybe a thousand per year? Who would actually buy one?
Here are just some of the issues: #1: being struck by a larger vehicle (pretty much every other vehicle!). 2. Hitting a big pothole. 3. Going to the grocery store (no space). 4. Snow! 5. Railroad tracks. 6. What happens when it loses power during operation?
Apr 7, 2009 at 3:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
We have technological things we use today because someone tried something that was not normal or considered "science fiction". To those idiots who just like to complain about GM, get in your covered wagon and head south please!And the iReal has no protection, that is more of a rolling lounge chair than this is. It would have less uses than the PUMA, ya Toyota lovers.
Apr 7, 2009 at 1:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
if the stock doubles to say $2 a share, i'm in!!!!
Apr 7, 2009 at 11:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
...or maybe I should have said....goodbye more of my tax money to a company that doesn't want to get their head out JUST like the other two.
Apr 7, 2009 at 11:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
Wow, GM, how original. Unfortunately, Toyota came out with the iReal concept early last year.
.
Behind the times as usual.
Apr 7, 2009 at 11:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
GM and their ongoing stupid ideas.
.
Goodbye, GM.
Apr 7, 2009 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
So this is how the new team put in place by the Government is going to save the automakers?
Apr 7, 2009 at 9:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Having....hard..time..writ..ting...laughing...too much.. Its so cute! a tricked out power chair with ROLL BARS! BLEEP! BLEEP! hey mister can I park under your Tahoe too? It looks like it fell off a Ferris wheel. Seriously though a Big winner in warmer climates and inner cities and could create a few jobs here but it will take a bit of getting used too having these little buggers around. So how much are we paying for these?
Apr 7, 2009 at 8:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
YAY!!! GM is coming back to J-Berg. YAY!!!!!
Apr 7, 2009 at 6:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
Its time to start having an open mind for the future generations
Apr 7, 2009 at 5:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Right. Like I would want to be stuck in traffic in one of these! I can imagine being crushed by a stupid bus driver...or Russian truck driver who can't speak English, but is piloting a 60 ton truck around the U.S.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.