Schulte proposes small raise for teachers
JANESVILLE Teachers’ pay would rise by very little next year under a recommendation released Friday by the Janesville public schools superintendent.
Superintendent Karen Schulte recommends an increase of 2.8 percent in teachers’ salaries and benefits combined.
Schulte said she has not yet looked into how much of the 2.8 percent would be eaten up by the increased costs of health insurance and other benefits.
Schulte acknowledged that the district would have to convince teachers at the bargaining table to take a small pay increase. Negotiations on the 2009-11 contract are scheduled to begin May 19.
Schulte’s recommendation is not the final word. The school board will decide whether a 2.8 percent increase is its goal.
Schulte asked that district employees keep in mind that her recommendations come at a time when the economy is ailing and many district residents are out of work.
“I think it’s one in seven being unemployed. I want to keep that in the forefront,” Schulte said.
The district had previously budgeted for a 3.8 percent increase in teacher pay. The difference would save $595,000, she said.
Schulte based her recommendation, as well as a series of recommended budget cuts, on the goal of raising property taxes by 1.88 percent next year.
That percentage is based on a goal of no tax increase for operational expenses but a small increase to cover an increase in debt-service payments. Those debts come from voter-approved referendums.
If a 2.8 percent increase in teacher compensation can’t be achieved, then the school board might have to consider raising taxes higher, Schulte said in a memo to the board.
Schulte also is proposing a freeze in all non-union wages to be reconsidered no later than January 2010. Schulte said lifting the freeze would depend in part on the teachers’ compensation increase.
Schulte also is recommending new spending next year. One new position would be a “director of development,” who would oversee an effort to raise private funds to support district operations.
Schulte budgeted the director of development’s salary and benefits at $87,994. She said she hopes that eventually the position would pay for itself and more.
Schulte recommends eliminating these positions to save the noted amounts:
--Athletic director, $113,000.
--One special-education teacher, $57,859.
--Director of student services, $168,000. This is Schulte’s former job. She would continue to oversee this department.
--One central-office manager, $119,000. Schulte said the person in this position had not been told of the recommendation Friday, so she would not say which manager would be cut.
---One central-office clerical position, $45,400.
--Coordinator of math, science and staff development, $119,000. The person in this position is retiring at the end of this school year.
Among new positions Schulte wants:
--Six new custodians to handle the square footage added at the two high schools.
--Two new teachers for the TAGOS Leadership Academy, $115,718.
--Four elementary librarians, $138,196.
--A half-time teacher for the Janesville Virtual Academy, $28,929.
--A computer help-desk technician, $62,000.
--A computer technician, $64,500.
IF YOU GO
The Janesville School Board will consider Superintendent Karen Schulte’s recommendations for budget cuts when it meets at 6 p.m. Tuesday at the Educational Services Center, 527 S. Franklin St.

Apr 26, 2009 at 9:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
The surrounding, smaller school districts need to pay attention to what is going on in Janesville. Janesville teachers being treated like second class citizens and Janesville students taking a back seat to the taxpayer is a great selling point for surrounding districts to use for hiring experienced teachers and getting Janesville students through open enrollment. Although open enrollment for next year is now closed, there is always the next year. Once parents see the shortcomings of education in Janesville for their children over the next coming year, Evansville, Edgerton, Clinton, and Milton will look like great options for their kids.
Apr 26, 2009 at 7:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
wierd how this article was buried in the online version of saturday paper?
Apr 26, 2009 at 8:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Thank you for at least not suggesting a zero percent raise. That would be pretty tough for Dr. Schulte to do considering she just got a raise herself. Also the board just agreed to give the secrataries union a 3% raise for their next contract. They deserve that and more, but how can they justify giving the secrataries that and the super all of that and the teachers less?
I honestly believe Dr. Schulte can only help the district and is trying to shave wasteful spending downtown. A few more could be cut down there as well.
It will be intersting to see the projections in insurance cost for next year. THat 2.8 will probably come to around .5 percent raise after the inflated projections by the district. They need to keep the cash cow flowing.
Also a comment on the cuts. Why are we adding a position downtown for a director of develpment. Isn't that what the curriculum coordinators are supposed to be doing? Writing grants and obtaining money for programs? Hiring someone for $87,000 to try and get money from public supporters sounds like a way to not have to lay someone off downtown. It is called shuffling. Creating a position to protect the good old boys downtown by smokescreening actually cutting positions.
Cut the B.S and cut the positions downtown without adding any. It will send a positive message to the staff and the board that you are serious about turning this district around.
Apr 25, 2009 at 11:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Wow-clever-impressive! The title of this article makes a slap in the face sound generous..yeah, no thanks. 2.8 percent is 1 percent too little. The minimum raise is 3.8 percent by a little thing called a LAW set in 1993 (called the Qualified Economic Offer) in the Wisconsin Legislature. The QEO law also made it illegal for the teachers union to strike as part of collective bargaining which basically de-clawed the union for over 15 years now. When economic times were booming not too long ago and other sectors were raking in the money--teacher pay increases were slow and actually a lot of the 3.8 was swallowed up by the rising health care costs. So, now the tortoise is passing the hare and you're annoyed? I guess it's true that slow and steady wins the race after all. True, it's tough times now across the board, but they've been sticking it to teachers since 1993. We've already paid our dues.
Apr 25, 2009 at 8:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
the rub is A SMALL RAISE. in the economic climate, any raise is unjustified.in fact, cut their wages and benefits.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.