Janesville City Council to discuss water tower

By GINA DUWE ( Contact )   Friday, Aug. 7, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— A new water tower on Janesville's northeast side could be put out for bid after Monday's city council meeting.

To remain in line for federal stimulus money, Utility Director Dan Lynch is recommending the council allow city staff to seek bids for construction of the water tower and related infrastructure.

City Manager Eric Levitt, however, is more cautious.

"I think it could be held off for awhile," he said in an interview.

Before making his recommendation, Levitt said he considered:

-- Lynch is concerned that without a new tower, interruptions in service would continue or get worse. That area of the city is fed by only one pipe, and the tower would provide redundancy and elevation for pressure, Levitt said.

-- Public safety. If the city has a severe main break and loss of pressure, fire protection could be compromised.

-- Cost to residents. The city has submitted a request to the state for a separate, 14.75 percent utility rate increase after the loss of GM's water sales and increased expenses. The state is reviewing the request, Levitt said.

"Based on all those factors, I'm not convinced that right now would be the time to move forward with this project," he said.

In a memo to the city council, he recommends the council "proceed with caution on this project or defer the project until we receive further information from (the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources) on whether we are eligible to receive funds."

Stimulus money could provide a grant of up to $2.5 million for the estimated $7 million project. If the city received a $2 million grant, the average residential customer's water rates would increase about 7 percent, or $3.21 per quarter. Without stimulus money, water rates would increase by 9 percent, or $4.13 per quarter.

Lynch wrote in the memo that starting the bidding process will help keep the project eligible for funds, if they become available.

"The WDNR will award available funds to projects which are the most ready to proceed," he wrote. "Obtaining bids does not obligate the city to award contracts, and if the WDNR funding does not materialize, the city can reject all bids."

The DNR has proposed funding for 46 other projects around the state, but some of those might drop off the list or might not need as much money as expected, leaving an opening for Janesville, which is No. 48 on the list, according to the memo.

To remain eligible for funding, construction contracts must be bid and ready to proceed on or before Oct. 1, the memo states.

Local environmentalist Julie Backenkeller still is questioning the need for the tower and why the city won't disclose the location.

"Why is it a secret?" she said.

The city is looking at multiple locations for the tower but is not releasing them because of negotiations, Levitt said.

Backenkeller also worries that a tower on the northeast side of town would encourage the city to expand into the fertile farmland, she said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(12)
greengina8
Aug 9, 2009 at 11:29 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wouldn't it be more reasonable to expect the city to fix and/or replace all existing pipes and works instead of adding a new tower to a failing system?

Unidentified
Aug 8, 2009 at 6:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

Sounds like a lose lose proposition. If we build it our rates go up if we don't our rates go up. I think getting bids by the deadline can't hurt. If the federal grant isn't substantial then don't build it. If we do build it, we should paint a big sign on it that says "Bring jobs here." Maybe we can have advertisements on it to help pay for it LOL.

rooster
Aug 8, 2009 at 4:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

next up: a new high school with three gyms and an ice hockey rink.

El_Conquistador
Aug 8, 2009 at 10:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

I say we build a children’s museum on top, a bike tunnel underneath, then a huge slide that connects the two. All of the wasteful spending in big project. Not sure how to fit a two ice rinks in it, I’m sure we could pay some consulting firm a million to design it.

w8nc
Aug 8, 2009 at 10:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

Obviously a water tower is going to be something that has to be done eventually. If it has to be done, I would suggest trying to conserve water to make up the cost difference if you don't want to pay for it.

MikeF
Aug 8, 2009 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

Observation tower would be cool! Think about the additional revenue if you turned it into a touristy thing and charged a buck a person to go there. Can you imagine the view from up there?

sannio
Aug 8, 2009 at 8:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

Boy, we're sure down on the list, aren't we? One pipe is a bad thing today, and that single pipe isn't getting any younger. I hate paying more, but...
Can we get one with an observation tower on top?

chainsawchuckie
Aug 7, 2009 at 6:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

the water bill isn't what kills you ......it is the sewer bill...................JMO

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT