Neighbors: Ethanol plant still stinks

By STACY VOGEL ( Contact )   Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Podcast Episode


Upgrades to the ethanol plant in Milton aren't ending complaints about odor. Kyle Geissler reports.

RSS   

PhotoVideo


The Milton Ethanol plant along County M in Rock County.

The Milton Ethanol plant along County M in Rock County.

— Two years, and nothing has changed at the United Ethanol plant on the outskirts of Milton, neighbor Ginny Goodman said.

“We don’t open our windows in the summer,” she told the Milton City Council on Tuesday. “I just feel like I’m being robbed of my right to use my backyard or to be outside.”

City council members and neighbors expressed frustration Tuesday that despite repeated talks with the plant, intervention by the Department of Natural Resources and installation of a large new piece of equipment, neighbors still say the plant smells.

United Ethanol, 1250 Chicago St., installed a new regenerative thermal oxidizer in December in response to complaints about smell, noise and emissions. A June DNR report found the plant out of compliance with more than 170 of 370 permit items, and the plant blamed inadequate equipment for many of the alleged violations.

The new equipment has decreased noise at the plant, but the odor still causes council member Dave Adams’ eyes to water, he said.

“It (the new equipment) was going to work miracles, and I’ve been out a number of times since,” he said. “Nothing’s changed.”

He asked the city attorney, Mark Schroeder, to investigate how the city could punish the plant for objectionable odors and present his findings at Tuesday’s meeting.

The conditional-use permit Milton issued to United Ethanol says the plant must follow DNR and federal regulations, including those regulating smell, Schroeder wrote in a memo to the city.

The DNR can declare odor objectionable based on its own investigation or a random sampling in which 60 percent of people exposed to the odor at home or work find it objectionable, he wrote.

The council asked Schroeder on Tuesday to draft a letter to the DNR asking it to investigate the odor.

United Ethanol is required to test emissions from its new equipment within 90 days of installation and planned to do so this week, said Eileen Pierce, DNR regional air and waste leader. It has another 60 days to report its results to the DNR.

Council members said they want the DNR to investigate the odor while it examines the emission test results.

Council member Maxine Striegl didn’t want to wait even that long.

“I think the DNR is dragging their feet doing something,” she said. “Let’s get onto them and get it done. None of this 60 days. They’ve had their 60 days as far as I’m concerned.”

The city has a few options when it comes to odor enforcement, Schroeder said. It can work with the plant to get voluntary compliance, cite the plant through municipal court or seek damages in circuit court.

Schroeder did not find any procedure for review and revocation of the conditional-use permit in case of permit violations, he wrote in the memo.

That alarmed Adams. He asked Schroeder to investigate how the city could establish such a procedure.

“I have a real problem with being a member of a body that issues a conditional-use permit and has no recourse to revoke it,” he said. “I don’t want to be part of putting anybody else in a position these folks are finding themselves in right now.”

---

Dori Lichty, spokeswoman for United Ethanol, said Tuesday the plant couldn’t intelligently comment on the situation discussed by the Milton City Council on Tuesday night until it was informed of the contents of the discussion.

The Janesville Gazette was not able to reach Lichty for a comment this morning.

Here is a statement she sent the Gazette before Tuesday’s council meeting:

“Since the installation of the new RTO, there are a few households that have entered complaints about the odor. When United Ethanol receives these complaints, we document them, visit the site, and document again. Documentation includes such things as: Is there an odor? Is the odor from United Ethanol? If so, what caused it? Which direction is the wind blowing?

“United Ethanol operations are moving along nicely; we are producing ethanol, distiller’s grain for livestock producers, and carbon-dioxide capturing for the food processing, beverage, (and other) industries.

“United Ethanol continues to be an asset to the Milton community. We bring 35 jobs to the Milton area, in addition to affiliated businesses growing their operations on account of United Ethanol and transporting corn, distiller’s grain, and carbon dioxide. In 2008, United Ethanol purchased approximately $150,000 in water from the city, and we’re in the process of paying about $349,000 for 2008 property taxes.”







reader COMMENTS (33)
SteveinBerlin
Mar 27, 2009 at 7:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

If ethanol made so much sense, we wouldn't have to subsidize it with tens of billions of dollars every year, or mandate its consumption with the government putting a gun to the American Taxpayer's head.

Listen to this whole video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9QQcP_Y1...

Here is a correction you supporters need to start using:

12.5 billion gallons of capacity of the US ethanol industry as of 01/01/2009.

25% of capacity idled due to incompetence as billions of dollars a year in American Taxpayer subsidies isn't enough to support this scam on the American people as of 01/01/2009.

Thus only 9.4 billion gallons of capacity remains.

BUT, AND THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO YOU ETHANOL SCAMMERS:

We need to deduct AT LEAST 32% because of the reduced fuel mileage of ethanol compared to real gas. (but the 32% reflects e-85 and using 100% ethanol, as the 9.4 shows, would make it closer to 40%)

Thus, only 5 to 6 billion gallons of ACTUAL ethanol is being produced this year, so stop trying to Inflate and Exaggerate the actual effect and real number that is subsidized by the American Taxpayer and its consumption Mandated with the government putting a gun to the American Taxpayer's head.

http://www.fuelgaugereport.com/index.asp...

http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/stati...

And, let’s be honest, The beginning number of 12.5 is probably whack information, as for example,

(1) bankrupt Renew Energy of Jefferson, Wisconsin claims to be the biofuels industry leader for innovation and efficiency...yet they are bankrupt. Whack

(2) bankrupt Renew Energy until this week claimed on their website and to their bank (owed $140 million with interest), The Town of Aztalan owed $38 million in taxpayer supported revenue bonds), investors, customers, venders, and even the government that they had the capacity of 130 million gallons per year.

BUT

in the court documents filed by bankrupt Renew Energy in federal court, Renew Energy UNDER OATH claims ONLY 110 million gallons of capacity per year:

http://www.thenorthwestern.com/assets/pd...

and

http://www.thenorthwestern.com/assets/pd...

What a sneaky little lie to obtain extra undeserved financing from not only its bank and taxpayer funded subsidies (revenue bonds). Sneaky too how Renew Energy took all reference to this "huge bolded lying statement of 130 million gallons" off its home page.

I am sure 20 million gallons of fake capacity a year adds fraudulently to the bottom line of the lying documents Renew Energy supplied to everyone in this clear example of yet another scam within the Ethanol Scam itself.

Here is the proof of the 130 million:

http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cf...

werpknarly
Feb 20, 2009 at 5:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
whoanellie
Feb 20, 2009 at noon
Suggest removal

And you know Al Gore invented the internet!!! He's such a learned man! If you believe evrything he and his cronies say, I have some land to sell you in the middle of the ocean!!

dqandhallie
Feb 19, 2009 at 2:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

yup head is stuck, the only problem we have here is listening to the Al Gore types you know the ones that are crying the the sky is falling. what we need to be doing is "drill baby drill" and than go eat our sweet corn in the shade not burn it!

werpknarly
Feb 19, 2009 at 1:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

ok "head stuck", NO is an easy plan. What your plan, that we can build in your back yard, that will replace 90 billion barrels of oil per day? Where's the switch? i will flip it tonight. Im sure the diosaurs were just as happy to keep on truckin cause things wernt that bad yet.... There is no one answer. We need a basket of solutions, any way we can to produce usable, afordable, portable, energy with less impact on our planet. BTW, nearly all renewable energy will be produced close to where its used... the money and jobs are created here, In OUR back yard.

dqandhallie
Feb 19, 2009 at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

still has his head stuck

werpknarly
Feb 19, 2009 at 7:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

UNITIL SWITCH GRASSS? life and economies are a process. No one has a switch to flip. Infracture needs to invented, built and adapted... i.e. ballons to gliders to props to jets...

time to go to work.. have a nice day everybody!

werpknarly
Feb 19, 2009 at 7:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

"1480's common knowledge" that heads were stuck on? World was flat.... even though a Greek (Eratosthenes of Alexandria (Egypt)), calculated the diameter of the earth in 320BC. Im sure many thought Columbus was a hoax in 1493. btw, man was never ment to fly and the moon landing was a hoax.

Price of Food in the store and Ethanol? MOST of the cost of food in the store is added after it leaves the farm. the box for the cereal cost more than the corn in the flakes.

Ethanol from corn will wane as Ethanol from cellulose takes over in the next 10-15 years. Trees that can be harvested every 3 years, Switch Grass, and other sources will replace most of the corn. ROTATION? The world record for corn production (i am in the ag industry) is over 400 bu/ac. That farm as been continues corn for over 40 years. The organic matter in his field is higher than the in the fence lines. The inputs per bu. of corn on that 400bu is far less than the average. Better soil does not need to be rotated to product corn efficiently. AND farmers PINCH every penny, if they can find a cheaper way to produce a bu. of corn, they will do it. Polution? Farms uses ounces of chemicals vs. Pounds in the past. and produce more per acre.

rep_of_1
Feb 18, 2009 at 10:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

Anything that competes directly with farmers buying corn is creating a supply/demand cost inflation on our food source. Corn production is not sustaining year after year with out crop rotation. Until switch grass is utilized, the plants need to shut down.

dqandhallie
Feb 18, 2009 at 10:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

I smell someone with his head stuck

werpknarly
Feb 18, 2009 at 9:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

interesting retort. What you might smell is someone with an economics education from the university of wisocnsin madsion. Someone who reads Scientific America, National Geographics, occasionally The Economist, among others. ive made alcohol (i read the early Foxfire books). ive made my own biodiesel. i do not work for an ethanol plant. i am not a farmer. i do work in the area. most times when i drive by the ethanol plant, if it smells it reminds me of the gardner bakery in madison.

chainsawchuckie
Feb 18, 2009 at 7:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

I still smell a rat

werpknarly
Feb 18, 2009 at 7:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

The cost of production of ethanol AND its byproducts includes the cost of ALL energy required for actual production and the production of ALL inputs, PLUS labor, facility, and the cost of debt carried. Basic economics. Current economic issues with ethanol plants are a result of the higher price of corn purchased last fall, the current market price of ethonal, high debt load of new facilities and other things. If the variable cost of ethanol and it byproducts (including the cost of ALL energy need to produce the ethanol AND its byproducts) a was higher than the price of ethanol AND all its byproducts, every plant in the country would shut down. They are not shutting down. Those in trouble are reorganizing under bankruptcy so they can keep operating. Bankruptcy is a new begining not an end. Kmart declared bankruptcy in 2002, in 2004 they bought Sears.

chad_vader
Feb 18, 2009 at 3:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

While the smell is a little strong some days, it doesn't compare to smell of a dump or a sewage treatment plant on a nice sunny day! Still should be fixed, but trying to overburden a company in this economy right now will lead to more unemployed. That's a fines and that stuff do. Use the money to fix the problem instead.

dqandhallie
Feb 18, 2009 at 1:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

werpknarly, that facts are that it takes more energy input than any energy we get out of this thing, you sound like a farmer with a very narrow view.

werpknarly
Feb 18, 2009 at 1:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

yep.. it stinks.. they should tear it down and put up a feed lot or a slaughter plant,,, maybe a farrow to finish hog setup. OR park our cars and ride horses... before internal combusion motors, horses ate 40% of the agricultural production. NOT every one thinks it stinks. Im sure GM always had the aroma of roses about it, no front page articals about driving them out of town

dqandhallie
Feb 18, 2009 at 1:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

shut that thing down, and cut our food bills, save all that waisted energy they are using on that thing they call a thermal oxidizer; they should be calling it an after burner and the DNR says that after burners are not leagle in this state so they call it something else

facts101
Feb 18, 2009 at 12:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why doesn't anybody ever complain about Air Products (formerly Tomah) on the west side? Doesn't anybody realize how explosive or volatile that place is? I know people who work there and they all say that about it. Nobody ever gripes about that place.

I live very close to Air Products and have even when it was Tomah. In fact for the 24 years I have lived close to them they bent over backwards to make sure everyone around them knew what was going on and what was being done. United Ethanol could learn alot from Air Products and the way the plant is run. Yes there are alot of very nasty things over there but they are not putting them out in the air for people to breathe.

Placebo
Feb 18, 2009 at 12:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

If anyone thinks that this is the only form of "Green Energy" that has any flaws, you need to do your own independent research and figure out for yourself how "Green" renewable energy is. They all can produce energy. The question is, how much, how reliable, and at what social cost? I used to be a puppet at one time, then I started asking questions. There is to much Pete and Repeat in a boat going on with renewable energy. Every form has pluses and minuses. They all are designed to work under specific conditions, and they are a supplement, not a major source.

Crickett
Feb 18, 2009 at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Pollution is pollution. Ever wonder why so many people have cancer? Besides heredity, the environment and our diets are a major factors. You don't have to "put up" with anything that is forced upon you. Really, get a grip woahnellie. "Sacrafice" what? Your health? Your right to breath clean air in your own yard? ARE YOU NUTS? Let YOUR kids breath it then! GOOD HEALTH is all you have keeping you alive and some day you will depend upon it to get you through. Wind, geothermal, hydro are cleaner options. Stop being one of the sheep lead to the slaughter.

SwissChick
Feb 18, 2009 at 11:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

What I'd like to know is why the people that work there everyday aren't sick. The only dust I saw on vehicles was dirt from the lack of good ground cover and red dust from corn trailers.

Why doesn't anybody ever complain about Air Products (formerly Tomah) on the west side? Doesn't anybody realize how explosive or volatile that place is? I know people who work there and they all say that about it. Nobody ever gripes about that place.

These majority of the people complaining live in the shadow of the Cargill plant. I'd hate to work there. It's such a dust bowl and that's on a quiet day. Wait till the wind picks up a bit. Did any of these complainers ever think that their "dust" on their property came from them?? Or are they just so dead-against this ethanol plant that they're willing to blame them for anything?

facts101
Feb 18, 2009 at 10:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

What everyone fails to realize here is that the smell is just part of it. Its whats in the stack emissions that can kill you. Google ethanol stack emissions and look at what you get. Its terrible that anyone is allowed to put this stuff in the air where anyone can inhale it. I have spoken with the EPA and they have quite a list of chemicals that are in the "smell" that this plant produces. As for the Frank Bros pit? Been there for years never had anyone complain about sore throats or burning of the eyes. And we are not talking about the smell of a cat food plant or papermill here. The stuff that comes with an ethanol plant is nothing more than toxic. So they paid $150.000 water bill. What did the new pump station the city have to build cost?

cappyman
Feb 18, 2009 at 10:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

what an appropriate title for this story. ethonol stinks. this is one of the great hoodwinks of all time.

PB594
Feb 18, 2009 at 10:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

java10-good one, and what about the old Friskies in Jefferson in the day!

JAVA10
Feb 18, 2009 at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal

Is the smell worse than the smell from a paper mill?

witchywoman
Feb 18, 2009 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

If City Hall and the DRN drag their feet long enough, this malodorous problem will cure itself... Corn ethanol is DOA! Due to low profit margins, ethanol producers all over the country are declaring bankruptcy! The great “corndoggle” is almost over…

Milton’s leaders got suckered ! Maybe it’s time they admitted it!

ww

PB594
Feb 18, 2009 at 9:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

What smells worse, the stack from the burning oil and fuel from Frank Bros. blacktop plant in the summer or the ethenol plant? Also it looks like the pictur was taken during the colder weather so the smoke is highlighted more, kind of like your car exhaust in the summer vs the winter.

whoanellie
Feb 18, 2009 at 9:29 a.m.
Suggest removal

But still no one wants it in there town or city,so what is the answer???

greengina8
Feb 18, 2009 at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

Nuclear energy is not clean. It leaves behind toxic wastes that remain for centuries. And we are running out of places to store the waste. Solar, wind, switch grass and hemp ethanol, and hydro power are the way to go.

whoanellie
Feb 18, 2009 at 9:17 a.m.
Suggest removal

Everyone wants to be green and leave less of our footprints, but no one wants to have it in their backyard! If you want to cut our dependence on foreign oil we need to do some things! Like put up more Nuclear plants and wind and solar. Where will we put them? Let's use our own oil, but no one wants to drill! So what are our options but to use foreign oil! All I'm saying is everyone wants this supposedly, but no one wants to sacrifice for it!

woody
Feb 18, 2009 at 8:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

Why don't we hear from Bruce, the mayor of Milton any more? Wasn't he the one that pulled the strings to get this plant to begin with?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT