Know when to fold ’em

By DAVID BRODER   Thursday, July 9, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Two vastly different public officials—Robert McNamara and Sarah Palin—shared the spotlight this past week, triggering fresh thoughts about one of the classic dilemmas of governmental careers: When and how do you quit?

McNamara, the defense secretary for John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson and later the president of the World Bank, died at 93, ushered out by lengthy obituaries recalling the controversies of the 1960s, including the furor over his unexplained “resignation” at the height of the Vietnam War.

A few days earlier, Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate, had stunned Alaska and the entire political world by announcing that she was leaving the governorship 18 months before the end of her term.

More opposite characters you could not imagine. McNamara, the owlish, frighteningly smart, statistically sophisticated, emotionally fragile executive, was the coldest fish in the exotic aquarium of the New Frontier.

Palin, the most colorful and charismatic figure to pop up in the GOP since Ronald Reagan, has displayed in equally vivid terms her brimming self-confidence and her striking ignorance of public policy.

Had they ever met, they would not have known what to make of each other. But they teach a couple important lessons about the way to handle exits from high office.

McNamara, the principal architect of the American buildup in Vietnam, was slow to recognize that escalation would not yield victory. But by 1967, his sixth year at the Pentagon, he had concluded that putting in more troops and expanding the air war against North Vietnam would not halt the Viet Cong. He wrote Johnson privately that it was time to negotiate with the enemy—and thereby end the growing domestic division over the war.

Johnson would not hear of it. He summoned McNamara to the White House and while the weary defense chief later commented that he was never sure whether he had resigned or been fired, he silently accepted Johnson’s decision to send him to the World Bank.

It was not until 1995, when he was again a private citizen, that McNamara published an apologetic memoir, revealing for the first time that he had harbored the gravest doubts about the war that took 58,000 American lives. The public reaction was harsh. Opponents of the war said that if McNamara had made the reason for his “resignation” public at the time, Johnson might have been forced to end the war—and thousands who died in the next seven years might have been saved.

McNamara said he had never seen himself in the role of a whistle-blower. As an appointee of the president, he said he owed Johnson his loyalty. The voters had chosen Johnson; his judgment deserved deference. It foreshadowed the similar decision by Secretary of State Colin Powell not to go public with his reservations about the Iraq War.

These are hard calls, and those of us on the outside, who can only imagine the pressures of public office, can show some sympathy for the people who have to wrestle with the conflict between their conscience and their sense of obligation to the administration in which they serve.

But resignation on a matter of principle is never a bad thing, and it can have salutary effects. This country would be better off if it happened more often.

By comparison, Palin’s decision to abandon her gubernatorial duties is much harder to understand or to justify. Whether this is a prelude to a presidential bid in 2012 or preparation for a high-paying media career or just a return to private life in Wasilla, the puzzlement and derision Palin has encountered are well-justified.

One of the traditional values for which conservatives are supposed to stand is: Finish what you started. Meet your responsibilities.

This looks like a wholly selfish decision on her part, with no large principles at stake.

McNamara stayed too long and left too quietly. Palin is bailing out on her people far too soon. Neither can serve as an example for those in government wrestling with the decision when to quit.

David Broder is a columnist for The Washington Post. Readers may write to him via e-mail at davidbroder@washpost.com.




reader COMMENTS (6)
SuperDave
Jul 9, 2009 at 10:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

The Democratic Party of today has continued, and in fact intensified, the politics of the Clintons. And that is the politics of personal destruction, the scorch and burn technique. Attack, attack, and attack some more. Dig up all the dirt you can find, and even if you find none, just make things up.
NONE of the attacks leveled against Palin have stuck. But they have succeeded in bankrupting her and her family, which I suspect is the primary reason she resigned. I have no idea what her future plans are, but the most "transparent" aspect of the current regime is their unmitigated fear of Sarah Palin.

Unidentified
Jul 9, 2009 at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

Only the Democrats actually still think Palin has any political clout. She will NOT get a nomination from the Republican party in 012. That is every Democrats dream. On the other hand, I think her decision is the most honest one in politics. She's a lame duck governor that likely won't be able to accomplish much will all the inquiries and political brew ha that has surrounded her. Rather than drag it out 18 more months and likely accomplishing nothing, she's given her replacement time to get established before the election. To me this smart politics and better for Alaska. To her critics, she can do no right anyway so what difference does it make.

916WI
Jul 9, 2009 at 9:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

+1 Superdave--I always thought the same thing. As polarizing as Obama is, if anything ever happened to him and we ended up with Biden leading this country, we would be in for a very rough, very memorable ride......He would definitely give the late night talk shows a ton of material........

SuperDave
Jul 9, 2009 at 9:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

mabuse: You make no sense. But let's contrast Palin with the current VP, good ol' Joe. The guy who is a heartbeat away from the Presidency regularly puts his foot in his mouth and displays his ignorance.
But go ahead, keep displaying your hate-rhetoric towards Palin. Obviously you are one of those who are terrified of her popularity. Why don't you go file an ethics charge against her? Get in line.

mabusejuvenalis
Jul 9, 2009 at 6:10 a.m.
Suggest removal

Super D:

You forgot to address her long trail of vicious and false accusations, camouflaged behind the smiling make-up; her vacuous, shouting lack of experience and qualification(other than the impish eye-twinkles and writer-fed cutesy-quips). Where are the days of Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and Kennedy, of Lincoln, Wilson, TR, and the Washington-Adams-Jefferson-Madison-Monroe-Adams-Jackson runs that led this country when it was advancing, not sinking under unrelenting greed, degradation, demagoguery, and hate from the likes of Limbaughs, Cheneys, Hannitys, Coulters, Gingriches, et al, and all teh innumerable other dreary dissembling Palin-campers

SuperDave
Jul 9, 2009 at 12:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

So interesting how the Palin resignation is being analyzed by the pundits! Quite obviously, no matter how you feel about Sarah Palin, there are many who are absolutely terrified by the thought of a Palin Presidency. To that end, they will attack her mercilessly, indeed that seems to be the primary reason for her resignation. Very interesting. Can't wait to see how this plays out.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT