Road to ruin: Usury, greed and the paper economy

By ROBYN BLUMNER   Monday, March 23, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

In Edna Ferber’s 1925 Pulitzer Prize-winning novel “So Big,” a cultured woman spends her life doing hard physical labor on a rural Illinois farm so that her son can go to college and land in a fulfilling profession.

But when her son abandons a career in architecture due to its low pay and joins the soulless but lucrative world of bond trading, his mother asks with disappointment and contempt: “What is this you sell in that mahogany office of yours?”

This could be the question for America. What have we been selling for the last 30 years?

We’ve built trillion-dollar enterprises on nothing more than huckstering newer and more esoteric financial products. Ephemera, as it turned out. Beyond that, we don’t make much anymore.

There are a multitude of reasons for this, including the one that everyone instantly points to: globalization. But as Chicago labor lawyer Thomas Geoghegan writes in April’s Harper’s magazine, there is one factor that has rarely been mentioned but looms larger than most of the others: the legalization of usury.

In 1978, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling effectively released banks from state interest rate caps. In Marquette National Bank vs. First of Omaha Service Corp., the court said that Minnesota could not enforce its usury law against a credit card issued by a Nebraska bank. The National Banking Act of 1864, the court said, allowed banks to lend at interest rates set by the state where the bank is chartered, not where the loan is made.

This meant those reasonable state limits of 9 percent or thereabouts went out the window as states repealed and loosened usury laws in order to give their banks competitive advantages. Interest rates on credit cards soon spiked.

As profits for these companies soared, there was a corresponding shift in the way capital flowed. Manufacturing, with its modest returns, was thrown over for the more robust returns of the financial sector.

All that capital flooding into financial institutions led to new ways to package investments; and so were born ever more exotic securities, derivatives such as credit default swaps, and even bets on the future of futures. According to Geoghegan, the “notional” value of these bets in 2007 was $516 trillion.

This great diversion of wealth meant that rather than invest in American businesses that might make something the rest of the world would want to buy, diversifying our wealth and providing good middle-class jobs, capital went into buying paper.

At the same time, without interest-rate caps, lenders had incentives to offer people more credit than they could reasonably afford. No longer was a credit-worthy borrower the best customer. The bigger profits were made when credit card companies could charge 25 or 35 percent interest on an account that was only intermittently paid off.

For payday lenders, interest rates could reach annual levels of 500 percent or higher, as long as the borrower was kept in a cycle of perpetual indebtedness.

Unhinged consumerism with its corresponding dark temperament of irresponsible borrowing was encouraged, since it added to the financial sector’s healthy bottom line.

But with our withered manufacturing base, the American buying spree wasn’t going for domestically made goods. We were buying from China and the rest of the world. Not only were we not investing in our own workforce, we were taking on personal debt as well as national debt in the form of a ballooning trade deficit.

We see where this tragic trajectory has led. Our economy has been hollowed out by a financial sector that helped to stifle manufacturing. Honest pursuits, as Geoghegan calls the production of goods, could not compete with the profits of finance once legal constraints on usury were dismantled.

Now we sit among the piles of nearly worthless paper and discover that there is nothing real undergirding our economy. We invested in electron-swaps rather than in people, good jobs and innovation.

Usury has been a known evil since Babylonian times, yet we allowed it to revive and flourish. And so paved our path to ruin.

Robyn Blumner is a civil liberties and labor law expert who writes about individual freedom, trade, globalization and workers’ rights. She is a columnist for the St. Petersburg Times in St. Petersburg, Fla., and syndicated by Tribune Media Services. E-mail her at blumner@sptimes.com.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(7)
TonyS
May 18, 2009 at 5:50 a.m.
Suggest removal

Many are against usury for some believe it as unlawful even before the 20th century. Now, Christian Power Rankings are the relative number of people, or per capita density, of Evangelical or Mormon Christians which use their Christian beliefs to decide who to vote for. (WASP or Catholics needn't apply, though they're the majority.) It's part and parcel to a lot of usury law legislation that the Christian Right and others are trying to get passed, and while that ordinarily would be commendable, the only people they're going after are lenders of payday loans. They're leaving student loan and credit companies alone – just a bit hypocritical. There may be an end to installment loans, if the Christian Power Rankings are an indicator of the numbers.

http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/...

DavidG
Mar 26, 2009 at 2:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'd echo that previous comment. I'm also considerably impressed by this article since it points to some history here that goes back much further than the last 8 years.

While we can point to the insane marketing of mortgage derivatives as one of the root causes of this mess, there are many other packages of financial products that are doing ok and are reasonably safe investments.

Derivatives seem to have taken the notion of responsibility out of the hands of local banks and mortgage houses, and spread it over the whole planet. How can you possibly worry about the risk on a new loan if your company will get rid of it next week? We need these finance guys to unwind this mess, so lets not all steer our kids away from the profession. The rules will surely change though.

janesvillean
Mar 25, 2009 at 1:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

We need to once again return to a well-regulated banking system with solid, safe investment returns. Banking should not be an industry chasing consumers with soaring interest rates. Basically, make banking boring again.
.
Turning our banking industry into a source of innovation was an absolute disaster for this country and has wiped out many people who did what they were told. Banking is too important. We cannot let this happen again.

kinsohn
Mar 24, 2009 at 11:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

I've found writing in complete sentences helps in getting your point across as well as finding a high-paying job where an illiterate Cambodian can't outbid you in wages (and he'll work real hard too).

Regardless of your ability to write, however, having the government dictate how much interest you can get on an investment doesn't help anyone in the long run.

unknowncomic
Mar 24, 2009 at 8:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

kinsohn.You sound like one of those greedy
CEO`s that can`t get enough money.Any job you
can get in the USA is good these days. Are you
cutting down people who run a lathe,or work in a factory ,or is a waitress.You get to the top you all want more more more at any price. No matter who it hurts.I know the people who do these lower paying jobs work a heck of alot harder than you. If getting a good education means being like you. I would rather be a factory worker my whole life.

darwin1
Mar 24, 2009 at 7:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

I am pretty sure anyone can run a Ponzy scheme. Finance does NOT take intelligence and know how. Some fourteen year old ran a pump and dump scheme. There is something inherently wrong with a country that thinks it can get rich on financial gimmickry. Maybe someone could explain how Nobel run Long Term Capitol Management failed? Evidently, you have to be real smart to lose a lot of money.

kinsohn
Mar 24, 2009 at 7:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

This woman clearly wears a tinfoil hat. "Honest pursuits, as Geoghegan calls the production of goods, could not compete with the profits of finance once legal constraints on usury were dismantled." She then complains about the loss of "good jobs."

If "good jobs" means high-paying jobs, you're not going to find them operating a lathe, lady. Finance jobs require intelligence and know-how, and thus pay more. Meanwhile, you can compete with your friendly Cambodian to see who can run the drill press cheaper and longer. Good luck with that!

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT