Computers allow farmers to plant precisely
Photo
Photo
Photo
WHITEWATER TOWNSHIP If only Whitewater Lake weren’t in the way.
And Lake Michigan.
And the Appalachian Mountains.
And about a million other places where corn won’t grow.
But if he could get away with it, Chuck Pope said he would plant corn all the way to New York, 36 perfectly straight rows at a time.
Pope uses global positioning software in the cab of his tractor as a guide as he plants thousands of acres of corn in Walworth, Rock and Jefferson counties.
The equipment isn’t new, but it’s becoming more common as farmers look for ways to cut costs.
Look, Ma! No hands
As Pope rounds the corner in a field, a little image of a tractor lines up with a pre-programmed line on a computer monitor in the cab of his John Deere.
Pope hits a switch and lowers the 90-foot-wide planter. He flips a switch on the back of the steering column, and the tractor takes over, steering itself and following the GPS line up the field.
The steering wheel twists gently. Pope turns from side to side in his chair, keeping his eyes on the planter.
His hands aren’t on the wheel.
On the monitor, the image of the little tractor and planter look like they’re painting the screen. The color change shows where Pope has planted. Equipment beeps and flashes as Pope steers around an island where trees grow in the middle of a cornfield.
The little image of the tractor paints a dark spot on the field where Pope has crossed twice.
No worries.
Another monitor indicates the planter shut off a few rows to prevent double planting in the overlap.
Pope can flip switches to shut off rows when he wants, like when he crosses his fingers and drives over muddy spots in the field with the heavy equipment.
The future
It’s not a brand new concept to use data tracking software and Global Positioning Systems to maximize crop yields.
Pope’s been doing it for 10 years.
Not far away, Darien Township grower Wes Hopkins is just getting started collecting field data this spring. As he does spring fieldwork, Hopkins is inputting field names, seed hybrids and nutrient management practices.
“All this can be layered in there,” Hopkins said. “You map it, taking in and out whatever you like. Eventually you map in fertilizer needs.”
When you take into account the high cost of inputs—the things that go into growing a crop—investing in technology makes more and more sense, Hopkins said.
“A lot of this technology has been available,” Hopkins said. “But when corn was $2, and inputs cost half of what they are, it didn’t cost out.”
Seed costs about $80 per acre, and that’s “being kind,” Hopkins said.
Precision planting shaves 2 to 3 percent off Pope’s seed costs, he said. That adds up to savings of $8,000 to $15,000 per year, he said.
It’s not like things are going to get cheaper, Hopkins said.
“We realize, here, as an ag community, that things aren’t going to go backwards,” Hopkins said. “Any way we can save money is a benefit. This is another tool.”
It’s a tool that’s changing fast.
Pope remembers having to make his own straight lines with his 12-row planter.
“I thought I was good,” he said.
At the time, Pope marked rows with markers that fold out like long robot arms from the end of the planter.
The 36-row planter he’s used for the last five seasons has 45-foot markers that fold out from each end. But computerized planting means Pope doesn’t need the markers; he’s used them four or five times in five years, he said.
Not many farmers in Rock or Walworth counties have a 36-row planter, but a 48-row planter already is on the market, Pope said. It doesn’t even have fold-down row markers, Pope said. Designers just assumed farmers would have GPS equipment in the cabs.
A two-wheel-drive tractor model is available that turns the tractor around at the end of the field and raises and lowers the planter, Pope said.
“That’s scary,” he said.
Still, he chuckles as he points out the perfectly straight cornrows slicing across the field.
“Isn’t that cool?” Pope says, grinning like a kid with a new video game. “I could keep going, 36 rows at a time, all the way to New York.”
THE BOTTOM LINE
When you put food on your kids’ plates, you try to make sure you give them enough to grow but not so much that food ends up all over the floor.
Farmers have to make a similar decision when they “feed” a field, Walworth County conservationist Brian Smetana said.
“You want to make sure you’re not over-applying while making sure you have enough nutrients to get a decent crop,” Smetana said. “In essence, every farmer does a nutrient management plan. It’s just part of farming.”
A nutrient management plan helps crop producers manage the amount, source, placement, form and timing of the nutrients they put into the soil.
Some farmers want a structured plan. Others are required to have a plan in place to qualify for grant money or to participate in some programs, Smetana said.
When they turn to the local conservation office or their fertilizer salesman for help, what they get is documentation, he said.
“Let’s make sure that when we’re putting nutrients out there, it is being done properly,” Smetana said.
Farmers—Especially those who raise animals and need to dispose of manure—commonly use three tools for accurate fertilizing, Smetana said.
Soil testing—A lab at UW-Madison test soils for a variety of micronutrients and sends back recommendations for nutrient application on a field-by-field basis.
Farmers might also use yield data during the harvest season to manage springtime fertilizer application.
Maps—What fields are too hilly for winter application? Where’s a good field to spread manure in the winter? Where are the wells and streams?
“A plan would take a map of his farm, identify where not to spread in winter or what fields need incorporating (tilling fertilizer into the soil),” Smetana said. “Or, if you’re going to spread, here’s how much will work.”
Snap-Plus software—The UW Extension, the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Office host a Web site where producers can learn about and download nutrient management software.

May 22, 2009 at 10 p.m.
Suggest removal
RobsEm - $336k for a 2009 John Deere 9870 STS combine...
http://configurator.deere.com/servlet/co...
May 22, 2009 at 9:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
RobsEm...Combines do not cost $300K times 4...I have dealt with these types of items for 40+ years and the top of the line combine with a corn and grain harvesting header (they are different items, for you non-farm types) have a list price of about $450K.
Farmers today use 6 figure costing machinery and 6 figure costing inputs (seed, fuel fertilizer, rent, taxes, labor ect. added together)to try and eeek out a net profit per acre of pennies on their dollar invested. A profit is not guaranteed by any means, til the crop is in the bin and or sold.
VOLUME and efficiency are the keys to survival. You need to have one or both to survive.
The high tech tools in this story are just the "tip" of the iceberg of whats coming..
Imagine driverless tractors and harvesters controlled by satellite and computer that are commanded by the farmer. He/she won't have time to run them in the future. Marketing thier product and managing expenses with be their main challenge.
As the number of farmers continues to shrink, the cost of new technology must be embraced and adapted if you plan to survive in agriculture.
May 22, 2009 at 8:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Taxed2much and puffer, I wish Combines were 300K. Multiply that by 4, figure what food products are worth to Americans, and now you understand what government subsidies are designed for. Oh, I forgot about seed, irrigation, property taxes, man hours, fertilizers, and this piss-poor economy adds to this equation.
May 22, 2009 at 6:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
not sure what you mean by 10 % back??? who received 10 % back. $300 sure isnt 10 %.
May 22, 2009 at 5:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
http://farm.ewg.org/farm/region.php?fips...
Why do you assume I just picked a number out of the air? No need to be an a-hole about it, you could have just asked where I got the information. It is public information.
And yes I was over the threshold, but even if I wasn't I would argue it's not the same thing. The government isn't giving me hundred's of thousands of dollars, and this isn't something that I applied for. I pay taxes, but the government doesn't prop up my income in years when I don't do well.
May 22, 2009 at 4:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
hannah you missed my point.
My point was, dont complain about an entitlement program if you have taken part in one yourself. The stimulus last year was an entitlement program.
I would have liked 10% back. I may have bought a new Tahoe made here in Janesville.
May 22, 2009 at 3:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
This year I got me some GPS and Spinners for my John Deere!
May 22, 2009 at 3:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
if you make $250 a year will you really MISS $300? if you make $1000 a month YES this will help.
May 22, 2009 at 2:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
hey puffer?
were you a recipient of last years "stimulus" checks? Also are you a recipient of the current "payroll" stimulus program? If so plese spend MY money with care.
Like many people, I make too much money according to the government. I did not get last years "stimulus" nor do I get this years. Actually I am not really sure what it is because I know I dont qualify. It also looks as if since I make more than $250K per year I will have to pass on some more money to those that dont, so again please spend it with care since in the end, your tax break or stimulus is a subsidy.
However I doubt that you spend your subsidy money on $300K corn planters or combines made in the USA by UAW workers, nor help keep the US consumer paying the lowest % of income on food.
If you were over the threshold like me income wise I will retract my statement.
May 22, 2009 at 2:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
It's also greener, this technology can track fertilizers applied to very small sections of field over a long period of time. This helps a farmer calculate the exact amount of the appropriate fertilizer to specific areas they are farming.
May 22, 2009 at 1:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
puffer, why dont you back your mouth with some facts? where did you get those numbers? or did you just ramble off 540k?
May 22, 2009 at 11:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
partarican1 - corn and soybeans are the most profitable cash crop that can be grown well in the soils of this region.
May 22, 2009 at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
can they plant anything other than corn and soybeans? What's up with this monoculture?
May 22, 2009 at 10:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
It's our money they are saving? What about the subsidies they receive? It's our money they are using to continue farming. The man listed in the article has received over $540,000 in subsidies from 1995-2006. That is $540K of OUR money. Do these new techniques save that much??
May 22, 2009 at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
runts- if the farmers save money in the end when growing the crop by being more careful on using less seed then in return our food cost wont be as high. everything a farmer pays for in the end affects us, so stop your bitching, its your money these farmers are saving.....
May 22, 2009 at 9:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Whats the point of farming if you have a computer do it for you??
May 21, 2009 at 4:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
very cool article- amazing what technology can do. and cool how they did it in the old days.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.