FBI reassessing past look at Fort Hood suspect

By DEVLIN BARRETT   Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Soldiers salute during the nightly Retreat ceremony on Monday Nov. 9, 2009, at III Corps Headquarters at Fort Hood, Texas, where a memorial service will be held Tuesday for the soldiers killed in last week's mass shootings at Fort Hood.

— Nearly a year before Maj. Nidal Hasan allegedly went on a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, terrorism investigators conducted an "assessment" of him before deciding he did not pose a threat.

After the shooting, the FBI is doing a new assessment — of its own conduct.

The Army psychiatrist is believed to have acted alone despite repeated communications — intercepted by authorities — with a radical imam overseas, U.S. officials said Monday. The FBI will conduct an internal review to see whether it mishandled early information about the man accused in the bloody rampage that killed 13 people and wounded 29.

President Barack Obama was joining grieving families and comrades of the victims Tuesday at a memorial service at the sprawling Texas Army base. Hasan, awake and talking to doctors, met his lawyer Monday in the San Antonio hospital where he is recovering, under guard, from gunshot wounds in the assault.

In Washington, an investigative official and a Republican lawmaker said Hasan had communicated 10 to 20 times with Anwar al-Awlaki, an imam released from a Yemeni jail last year who has used his personal Web site to encourage Muslims across the world to kill U.S. troops in Iraq. Despite that, no formal investigation was opened into Hasan, they said.

Investigative officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case. Republican Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said it was his understanding Hasan and the imam exchanged e-mails that counterterrorism officials picked up.

Officials said Hasan will be tried in a military court, not a civilian one, a choice that suggests his alleged actions are not thought to have emanated from a terrorist organization.

FBI Director Robert Mueller ordered the inquiry into the bureau's handling of the case, including its response to potentially worrisome information gathered about Hasan beginning in December 2008 and continuing into early this year.

Based on all the investigations since the attack, the investigators said they have no evidence that Hasan had help or outside orders in the shootings.

Even so, they revealed the major had once been under scrutiny from a joint terrorism task force because of the series of communications going back months. Al-Awlaki is a former imam at a Falls Church, Va., mosque where Hasan and his family occasionally worshipped.

In 2001, al-Awlaki, a native-born U.S. citizen, had contact with two of the Sept. 11 hijackers, and on Monday his Web site praised Hasan as a hero.

Military officials were made aware of communications between the Hasan and al-Awlaki, but because the messages did not advocate or threaten violence, civilian law enforcement authorities could not take the matter further, the officials said. The terrorism task force concluded Hasan was not involved in terrorist planning.

Officials said the content of those messages was "consistent with the subject matter of his research," part of which involved post-traumatic stress disorder stemming from U.S. combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A law enforcement official said the communications consisted primarily of Hasan posing questions to the imam as a spiritual leader or adviser, and the imam did respond to at least some of those messages.

No formal investigation was ever opened based on the contacts, the officials said.

They said the decision to bring military charges instead of civilian criminal charges against Hasan did not mean it wasn't a terrorism case. But it is likely authorities would have had more reason to take the case to federal court if they had found evidence Hasan acted with the support or training of a terrorist group.

Investigators tried to interview Hasan on Sunday at the military hospital where he is being held, but he refused to answer and requested a lawyer, the officials said.

On Monday afternoon, Hasan's new civilian and military attorneys met him for about half an hour at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, said retired Col. John P. Galligan, who was hired by Hasan's family.

Galligan said Hasan asked for an attorney even though he is on sedatives and his condition is guarded.

"Given his medical condition, that's the smart move," Galligan told The Associated Press on Monday night. "Nobody from law enforcement will be questioning him."

Galligan said both he and Maj. Christopher E. Martin, Fort Hood's senior defense attorney, met Hasan. Galligan questioned whether Hasan can get a fair trial at Fort Hood, given Obama's visit to the base and public comments by the post commander, Lt. Gen. Robert Cone. Galligan also said he plans to raise the issue of Hasan's mental condition.

The most serious charge in military court is premeditated murder, which carries the death penalty.

The Army has not yet appointed a lead prosecutor in the case, said Fort Hood spokesman Tyler Broadway.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(7)
janesvillean
Nov 11, 2009 at 12:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

Some balls may have been dropped, but we have to get past this idea that we can somehow look inside someone's head and predict whether they will become violent. It actually looks to me like the military was "dealing" with him by putting him on active duty. Even if there were intelligence indicators, his direct supervisors should have had more insight into his mental state than anyone in the FBI. How it was that his extreme reaction to deployment was missed is the question that I hope to be answered.

hiredgun
Nov 10, 2009 at 2:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

Congratulations to all of you on your 20-20 hindsight. Like you could have done better.

SwissChick
Nov 10, 2009 at 2 p.m.
Suggest removal

From what I've been reading about this, the government missed a whole bunch of yellow flags, let alone red flags regarding this sicko. Verbal protests to co-workers, emails, etc. for over a year. Why did the nut sign up for the military anyway? Can't blame it on the draft.
.
And a year ago he was transferred from Walter Reed about a year ago for "poor performance reviews". Should've been discharged then.

crafty
Nov 10, 2009 at 1:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

let's all just admit now that if this happened under Bush's watch, he would have been blamed directly.

carlitosway
Nov 10, 2009 at 10:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

So sad to suspect and allow him to stay withinn the very same military that protects our country. To have ties with such individuals and to be involved in a chuch of this sort would warrent probable cause to release him from the military. No let it go on until he does this and takes the life of innocent people and injured several more. Anyone that has ties to any former terroists and or groups of this kind should not be allowed to remain in The UNITED STATES MILITARY......... As far as not mentioning acts of violence in there messeges does not mean they didn't have a code of some kind. Are there any phone records that were investigated? I guess it just angers me that this happened and most likely could have been avoided if they had maybe dug a little deeper. Just my opinion.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT