Janesville utility rates to jump by nearly 30%
JANESVILLE Wastewater rates for the average Janesville consumer will rise about $70 in 2010, an increase of 30 percent, and city staff says much of the reason is because of a planned upgrade and expansion at the treatment plant and the closing of General Motors.
As a result, the city will relinquish its spot at or near the bottom of a list of 13 peer cities when its water and wastewater rates are compared.
The council approved the increase Monday. It already had been included in the 2010 budget.
The money goes to pay the utility's debt, and for operations, maintenance and equipment replacement.
The rate increase will generate $2.12 million in additional revenue in 2010, staff said.
City staff predicts a 5-percent decline in revenue in 2010, primarily because GM closed and also because of a decline in residential use.
But the largest impact comes from cash needed to fund the $32.7 million wastewater treatment plant upgrade and expansion. The debt service increase in the 2010 budget is $1.57 million.
An overall increase of 9 percent also was implemented in 2009.
The average residential customer now pays $61.60 per quarter to the wastewater utility, according to staff. The proposed rate would be $79.65. This does not include the bill for water, which is $35.85 per quarter. That rate is not proposed to increase this year.
After the rate increase, the total average bill per quarter for water and wastewater for the average residential consumer would be $120 per quarter. The bill also includes a quarterly charge for fire protection, which is $4.90. That total is 17 percent below the average of Janesville's 13 peer cities, according to a staff memo.
The highest charge is $274.35 in Fond du Lac, while the lowest is $75.10 in La Crosse. The average is $145.56.
Larger users will experience a greater rate increase. Industrial rates, for example, would increase about 33 percent.
related STORIES

Nov 11, 2009 at 6:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
If politicians could balance the municipalities/county/state/country checkbooks like their own, there would be no problems... that is, of course, they know how to add and subtract accurately... did they pass their math classes?
Nov 11, 2009 at 2:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
We need a new council yet again. They are all @#$%!
Nov 11, 2009 at 2:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe the story just isn't clear enough, but the question that goes unanswered while reading this is "Why are we expanding the treatment plant, when usage is down?"
Upgrades, improvements, etc that can be justified are worth investing in - but so far I haven't seen a large influx in population here to warrant an expansion of this (or any other) facility.
Nov 11, 2009 at 1:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
i agree with you all, its time to cut cut cut.who they going to blame it on when the gm thing gets old,do realize what the salary is for the city manager is? its unbelievable!as far as budgeting,they have no idea what their doing,lol but lets get that ice arena going.
Nov 11, 2009 at 9:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
hey i know lets cut the wages of all the city employees and reduce their benefits to help off set some of cost. Start cutting back. We as taxpayers cannot afford to keep giving these excellent benefits and high wages to there people. Cut, Cut, Cut!!!!
Nov 10, 2009 at 8:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yea everything is GM`s fault nice excuse . Try budgeting correctly...meaning stop speeding money in other places that are not needed .Common sense !
Nov 10, 2009 at 4:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
30% must be the magic number.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.