Milton teachers take action
MILTON The Milton teachers union has started job actions to show its dissatisfaction with contract negotiations with the Milton School District.
The teachers are walking into school together at their assigned start time, wearing yellow shirts on Wednesdays and sending representatives to Milton School Board meetings, said Shelly Kress, Milton Education Association president.
They also handed out brochures to parents attending parent-teacher conferences at the high school last week.
The union started the job actions because "we just want to ensure that Milton continues to provide the best education for all of its students and that we're able to attract and retain the best teachers," Kress said.
Teacher contracts expired July 1. The district filed for mediation in June after realizing the two sides weren't going to agree on their own, Superintendent Bernie Nikolay said at the time.
The teachers weren't happy with an offer the district made at the most recent mediation session Oct. 22, Kress said.
"We wanted to work toward a settlement with the board; however, we felt that the board did not work toward middle ground," she said. "Their offer was very punitive."
The union has made a counter-offer that the district's negotiations committee will discuss today, Nikolay said.
It is up to the mediator to decide if the two sides should go to the next step, arbitration. Nikolay hopes that won't happen, he said.
"Progress has been slow, but I'm still hopeful that we will reach an agreement," he said.
Milton has a history of contentious contract negotiations. Teachers took similar job actions in the last two negotiation periods.
The two sides didn't reach an agreement on a 2007-09 contract until September 2008, 15 months after the previous contract expired. The 2005-07 contract was settled 19 months after the previous one expired and eight months after the district imposed a qualified economic offer, a state-regulated option that allowed a district to raise salary and benefit packages 3.8 percent per year after negotiations failed to reach a settlement.
The state removed the QEO as part of its 2009-11 budget package. The budget also changed state law so that arbitrators are no longer instructed to give greatest weight to local economic conditions and revenue caps in deciding contract cases.
Milton administrators turn down raise
The Milton School District already knows it will face a tight budget in 2010-11.
So the district's 13 administrators voted unanimously to forgo a pay raise next year to help balance the budget, Superintendent Bernie Nikolay said.
"We want to do our part and put our money where our mouth is," Nikolay said.
The district administrative team includes building principals and central office administrators.
The district took some criticism at its annual meeting in August for giving administrators a 4.3 percent raise in salary and benefits this year. The district responded that it always gives administrators the same raises teachers received in the previous year.
Still, the administrators understand the public's concern and agreed a wage freeze next year is appropriate, Nikolay said.
The district has not reached a contract settlement with the teachers, so it's still unknown what increase, if any, teachers will receive this year or next.
When asked if an administrative wage freeze was a way to pressure the teachers into accepting a freeze or smaller increase, Nikolay said:
"We're leading by example. We're asking others to sacrifice, and we're leading the way."

Nov 18, 2009 at 8:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
I was saying that parents have known about this problem for quite some time and know that the teachers are doing this. If they don't like it..don't go. Or just ignore it. The topic wasn't brought up in the individual conferences. So yes I did mean it. If you don't like something, be the bigger person and walk away.
Nov 18, 2009 at 8:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
DiamondQueen32 - You posted to Hockeyjockey
"If you do not want to be confronted by the harmless yellow shirts and brochures, do not go to the conferences." I surely hope you were not serious. The emphasis of Parent Teacher conferences SHOULD be about the student NOT on the grievances between the union and the Milton School District.
Nov 18, 2009 at 6:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
HockeyJockey...Mike Sheridan wouldn't have done that but GM was a union and when their contract didn't work out they striked. Their last strike was my senior year and I am now a sophomore in college, my father was a part of it. The teachers are doing everything they possibly can in a lawful and ethical way. If you do not want to be confronted by the harmless yellow shirts and brochures, do not go to the conferences. You have a choice just like the teachers do. Do the conferences over the phone or through email.
Nov 18, 2009 at 4:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Let's consider why the teachers would choose to pass out information at conferences. Could it be, perhaps, because the teachers don't have bi-weekly meetings covered by the press to spread their take on the situation? Clearly the Milton School Board has been effective in getting their message out. Why don't you want to hear the other side?
---
It is in the nature of a teacher to teach, and that is what it appears to me they were trying to do with the brochure. I, for one, would love to see one so I can have both sides of the story. (I've talked to a Milton teacher, but have not seen the brochure.)
---
As for the wearing of a certain color shirt at work or a conference - my question would be this: Did anyone attending conferences have any discussions with teachers about the contract situation - or did they actually act professionally and have normal conferences? From what I've heard, it was the latter.
Nov 18, 2009 at 3:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
thepeckingorder....inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means (as bribery)....that's the definition of corruption. The teachers are not taking or offering bribes and not doing anything unlawful. When the teachers hand out brochures it is no different than the little kiosk things in the mall that try to get you to buy their products or hand out brochures about their products.
Nov 18, 2009 at 3:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Its even more absurd that year after year after year, teachers don't settle their contracts till way after the current one has expired. Look at Janesville, they aren't even planning on negotiating till after the first of the year! It appears that the school boards have too much control of the teachers "union" as most oftentimes they settle their contracts for meager pay raises.
Nov 18, 2009 at 2:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
It was absurd when the union showed-up at the parent-teacher conferences. It shows that corruption will stop at nothing to get its' way - but we already knew that.
Nov 18, 2009 at 2:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
SwissChick....summer school, invitationals and such held by the school during the summer, tutoring, and the summer makeover the schools get every year that can't be done while the students are in session
Nov 18, 2009 at 2:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
I love the school district in Milton and I have never had a complaint about my child's teachers...except about this issue. The first time I went to a parent-teacher conference and was greeted with union T-shirts and buttons, I was ticked off. I don't care if the union goes to every school board meeting and makes its voice heard, but don't force it on the parents at a wildly inappropriate time like a teacher conference. It's just wrong. I'm so glad I didn't get handed a brochure the other night; I would have exercised MY right of free speech.
I also find it childish that the union boycotted the staff picnic early this year. Mike Sheridan wouldn't have done that to Gary Malcus at GM.
Nov 18, 2009 at 2:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
DiamondQueen32 - Just curious, . . where at?
Nov 18, 2009 at 12:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why do people always say that "teachers get the summer off". Yes they get the summers off but they don't get paid for it. They only get paid for the number of days in the school year! Many teachers get summer jobs to supplement their incomes which for a lot of them are pretty meager.
Nov 18, 2009 at 12:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
maybe the teachers should look at the rest of the community right now. Many, many people are out of jobs and taking cuts to keep jobs. My husband would have happily taken almost any cut to keep his job, just for the benefits alone. It's hard times we all have to do our part!
Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
quit hating...pretty sure none you were students there while this has been going on..i was..never bothered the students and the teachers there are wonderful. During the school day they are doing their jobs, teaching.
Marienburg1274, unless you're a teacher and know how it works, don't judge. I'm pretty sure the teachers I had during my years at MHS worked during the summer.
Nov 18, 2009 at 11:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
The only reason teachers are working without a contract is because it's illegal for them to strike.
Nov 18, 2009 at 10:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
There are no bigger whiners than public school teachers. Overworked, underpaid, blah blah blah. Get off your high horse and welcome to the real world of work where one can be fired without cause and little notice, promotions are based on merit and performance, and you don't get summer off.
Nov 18, 2009 at 10:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
gpaw cat they don't have a choice, they can not legally strike.
Nov 18, 2009 at 8:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why is it that my taxes went up the maximum amount allowed by law and yet the school board is still asking the teachers to accept lower benefits. When my taxes go up the maximum I expect the contract issues to be resolved, maybe I am expecting too much from our elected school board, is it too difficult to balance your books when you increase taxes the maximum allowed by law? This is pathetic; the school board needs to fix this. Administrators got a raise this year yet you need to take things away from the teachers.
Nov 18, 2009 at 8:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
I say give the Teachers what they want, and when Money runs out for other programs and it will, cut those programs and let the Teachers and there Union answer to that when it happens.
Nov 18, 2009 at 6:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think the teachers should be commended for working without a contract. That shows me dedication.
Nov 17, 2009 at 10:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Read the previous article regarding this. Plenty of teacher bashing going on in those blogs. Mostly ignorant people who don't have the facts or any common sense before they post.
Nov 17, 2009 at 10:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Correct, they did put that administration received a raise of 4%. So why are teachers getting bashed for wanting the same thing?
Nov 17, 2009 at 10:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Actually the story did explain that the raises are the same the that teachers got the previous year. The teachers want to "retain" the best but they never seem to want to get rid of the incompetents. Maybe the raises should have a merit component?
Nov 17, 2009 at 10:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Interesting how the story left out that administration received a 4% increase this year...
Nov 17, 2009 at 6:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Wow, no bashing of teachers. If this was about Janesville teachers, you have 50 posts bashing them.
Nov 17, 2009 at 6:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Way to lead by example administrators! Perhaps you could take a pay cut and give some to the teachers. Pretty easy to take a pay freeze when you make $90,000 plus.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.