Budget issues complicate Edgerton City Hall planning

By STACY VOGEL   Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


Artist preliminary drawing of what the building could look like.

Artist preliminary drawing of what the building could look like.

— A few unexpected costs are driving up the estimate for a new Edgerton City Hall.

The construction estimate stands about $104,000 above the estimate used in the June referendum, partially because of soil problems at the site, Administrator Ramona Flanigan said. The city also is arguing with Alliant Energy over who should pay to remove power lines running across the site, a project that could add another $70,000.

Voters narrowly approved spending $1.2 million in June for a new City Hall on the site of a parking lot next to the existing building at 12 Albion St. A committee is working with Eppstein Uhen Architects and J.H. Findorff & Son, the construction manager, to design the building.

Soil testing done after the referendum showed worse conditions than expected, Flanigan said. The construction manager has increased the budget to reinforce the soil and pump water out of the soil.

The increase in the construction budget is part of the normal give-and-take process of designing a building, said Steve Klaven, senior project manager at Findorff. Other aspects might come in under budget or the designers will find a way to reduce expenses, he said. For example, the city could substitute stone with brick in some places.

“We always meet our client’s budget because that’s what our job is,” Klaven said. “They still get a good quality building with the same warranties.”

The cost to remove the Alliant power lines would put a further strain on the budget, Flanigan said.

The city knew early on it wanted to move power lines running across the parking lot but believed Alliant would pay for it, she said.

When the city moves utility poles for road projects, the utilities pay for it. But those poles, unlike the power lines, are in the street right-of-way.

The city attorney, Dale Pope, has said Alliant doesn’t have a legal obligation to pay for the lines’ removal, Flanigan said.

Alliant has offered cost estimates from $45,000 to $125,000 to move the power lines, Flanigan said. Its most recent estimate is $70,000. The city hopes it can work out a cost-sharing plan with the utility, she said.

But Alliant spokesman Scott Reigstad said that’s not possible. If Alliant picked up some of the costs, it would be forcing other customers to pay for the Edgerton project, he said.

The city could decide to put the building on a different part of the site to avoid the power lines all together, Flanigan said.

There’s also a chance the state could pay to move the power lines. The city has applied for a brownfield grant for soil remediation, and removal of power lines is an eligible expense. The city should find out by the end of the year if it’s receiving the grant and, if so, how much it will receive, Flanigan said.

The city hopes to begin construction by May and move into the new facility in fall 2010, she said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(12)
firefly
Nov 30, 2009 at 3:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

How come "unexpected costs" always seem to appear? Aren't the contracts tighter when it comes to money or do we not care since it is the taxpayers money involved?

moethebartender
Nov 30, 2009 at 1:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

Let's see, high tax levy, high property taxes, high water bills, no business, dwindling school enrollement, vacant multi million dollar building that took away all the downtown parking, it's getting harder and harder to find something good about Edgerton. Thank god the DNA still has taps for $1

SwissChick
Nov 30, 2009 at 12:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

That seems to be a normal comment from general contractors especially when tax dollars involved. Because why? They know they can get it.

farmdude
Nov 30, 2009 at 11:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

When you look at how Edgerton votes (and the caliber of political candidates), it's hard to feel too bad for them.

Put it in the new white elephant for now.

LydiaR
Nov 30, 2009 at 10:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

OkieFed..... the "white elephant" is going to stay mostly empty for a VERY long time. Just recently yet another business is leaving the "business friendly" town of Edgerton. When the owner of an establised business opens a store in the downtown and can't make a go of it, what does that say for Edgerton. Maybe because at their other business they sell beer.
WAKE UP city officials....EDGERTON IS A BEDROOM COMMUNITY and always will be.

infinitequotient
Nov 30, 2009 at 9:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

if they don't build this how will they eliminate more visible and slightly convenient parking therefore driving away more consumers and businesses?

rexkramer
Nov 30, 2009 at 9:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

"The increase in the construction budget is part of the normal give-and-take process of designing a building, said Steve Klaven, senior project manager at Findorff."
>
>
Yeah, that would be where city government "give" themselves a new city hall and "take" more money from the taxpayers.

garyprimer
Nov 29, 2009 at 11:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

Blue clay?

nemesis
Nov 29, 2009 at 4:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why am I not surprised that government underestimated costs in order to get something passed?

truth1
Nov 29, 2009 at 4:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

WHY would anyone vote to raise their own taxes to build a new building for city workers??(slap forehead)

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT