Buyout plan off to council

By MARCIA NELESEN ( Contact )   Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Floodplain properties


Wisconsin Emergency Management has authorized the city of Janesville to make the following offers to owners of the below floodplain properties damaged in the 2008 flood:

-- 1815 Joseph St. —$97,435

-- 809 S. Jackson —$84,426

-- 1903 Joseph St.— $82,674*

-- 1921 Joseph St. —$77,000

-- 1715 Joseph St. —$53,799

-- 1109 Elgin Ave. —$43,636

-- 1821 Joseph St. —$43,266

-- 1809 Joseph St. —$37,299

-- 1722 Charles St. —$29,054

* The owners of the property at 1903 Joseph St. intend to appeal the approval. The actual amount offered will be determined by Wisconsin Emergency Management at a price not to exceed $82,674, which city officials said is a conservative estimate based on the first appraisal and information provided by the property owners.

Source: City of Janesville

— A proposal to buy nine floodplain properties damaged in the 2008 flood advances to the Janesville City Council on Oct. 26.

The plan commission gave the proposal a positive recommendation Monday night.

The cost is $548,590, but no local tax money will be used.

Eight of the properties are in the Mole & Sadler's subdivision along Charles and Joseph streets. A ninth is at 809 S. Jackson St.

The city received money from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and from the state. Janesville will not have to chip in a local match because of additional federal emergency money received.

Once purchased, the homes will be demolished, and the properties will remain green space, said Jennifer Petruzzello, neighborhood services director.

The nine owners have agreed to sell their properties.

Some could have been rebuilt using expensive flood-construction standards. But several of the properties also required that the city develop an emergency plan because the homes can be accessed only by Joseph Street, which was under water in 2008. The city council declined to do so.

Originally, 12 properties were included in the buy-out program, but three have been temporarily removed because the Federal Emergency Management Agency found groundwater contamination. The contamination is from the former Riverside Plating, Petruzzello said.

The three properties are at 1708 Charles St., 1110 Hamilton Ave. and 1709 Joseph St. The city is waiting for a final decision from FEMA on those properties and likely would appeal if necessary, Petruzzello said. The city also could explore other funding sources.

The home offers are based on pre-flood property values and done through appraisals. Any insurance settlements or assistance the owners might have received through FEMA are deducted from the amount offered.

If approved by the council, the properties probably will be cleared sometime this winter, Petruzzello said.







reader COMMENTS (14)
chrystol
Oct 21, 2009 at 4:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

Has the city looked into dredging the river in those areas, to make it deeper to lessen flooding? Is this a viable possiblity?

hannah
Oct 21, 2009 at 2:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

It seems theyre not going to get much if they have already gotten ins money or fema money so the city will get this land for dirt cheap. If I were the homeowner I would tell them NO I will not sell and tear down the home myself. The only problem here is I dont think theyre allowed to rebuild at all cause the city decided this FOR THEM. You could still maybe keep the land and camp on it.

lilred01
Oct 21, 2009 at 2:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

For all of those whom are assuming about the residents of this subdivision, all of the residents of this area, me being a life long resident of the area, are not lucky. This has been a terrible event for all of us. This neighborhood has had the same residents for over 50 years, many of us second and third generations raised here. Pete, we are not making out great! Our life long homes are going to be destroyed, no amount of money can replace the memories that exist. And many don't know that my family is related the family mentioned by bobwood. Our lives have been turned upside down and because the city wants this area back for the park, we are all forced to live else where. Thanks to the greed of this town, I will not be able to share my childhood home with my children.

bobwood
Oct 21, 2009 at 8 a.m.
Suggest removal

What ever happened to the residents that were upset with having to move .There was an storie on the family a few weeks ago They didnt want to move , and they were very vocal about it .They must have had a change of heart .

oldvet
Oct 21, 2009 at 6:32 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'm sure the 8 Riverside park property owners are relieved that this nightmare may finally be coming to an end but I can only wonder what will happen to the 3 property owners whose property happens to be contaminated from the old Riverside Plating company. Their nightmare may have actually gotten worse.

DanMan
Oct 21, 2009 at 12:16 a.m.
Suggest removal

No local tax money? But tax money regardless. The government for the City of Janesville needs to pull its' head out!

justintimberlakerules
Oct 20, 2009 at 9:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

Pete - who doesn't know how the real world works outside of the internet? Looks like you were proven wrong again.

Gazettefan - Has hell frozen over? We both have a mutual dislike of Pete. Who knew.

gazettefan
Oct 20, 2009 at 9:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

Pete, read the quote below. It's from the story which you didn't bother to read. Or if you did read it, your poor comprehension skills are cause for concern.
-------

"The home offers are based on pre-flood property values and done through appraisals. Any insurance settlements or assistance the owners might have received through FEMA are deducted from the amount offered."

------
How wrong you are about this matter is typical of how wrong you are about everything.

justintimberlakerules
Oct 20, 2009 at 9:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

vetman - Your house is destroyed by a flood and you're considered lucky? Really? What an ignorant statement. Also, where's this magical city that has all of these jobs available?

vetman
Oct 20, 2009 at 8:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

9 lucky people get to move to an area with jobs. without having to wait for the housing market to comeback.

janesvillean
Oct 20, 2009 at 6:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

Janesville does not have high taxes by comparison with other Wisconsin cities (we rank in the lowest 1/3). I don't know what this derail has to do with the interest of public safety that is also served by governments. In this case, the safety of emergency responders as well as residents was a prime consideration.

Minan
Oct 20, 2009 at 4:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

Bad trade policies and outsourcing jobs out of the country leads to high unemployment rates.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT