Whitewater schools seeking referendum

By KAYLA BUNGE   Friday, Aug. 13, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Whitewater School District officials are planning to ask taxpayers in November to support a referendum that would help the district maintain staff and programs for the next five years.

At its next meeting Monday, Aug. 23, the school board is expected to approve a resolution for a referendum that asks voters to allow the district to exceed state revenue caps by $620,000 each year for five years, from 2011-12 to 2015-16.

The referendum will be on the ballot Tuesday, Nov. 2.

District Administrator Suzanne Zentner said the district "desperately" needs to pass the measure to ensure students in Whitewater continue to receive the quality education they and their families have come to expect.

The district is seeking to extend a referendum voters approved four years ago.

The budget picture was bleak after officials cut about $1.5 million from the budget and more than 100 students left the schools in four years.

But taxpayers in November 2006 agreed to allow the district to exceed its revenue limit by $620,000 each year for four years, from the 2007-08 school year to the coming 2010-11 school year. The referendum carried with it an increase in school taxes of $49 per $100,000 of assessed property value.

Jim Strasburg, director of business services, said the district must continue to receive that additional money or it will be forced to make significant cuts.

"It's (the referendum) for the same purposes—maintaining teachers, maintaining programs," he said. "The downside is if we don't get it, then we need to get $620,000 out of the budget, and that means losing teachers, losing the ability to purchase upgraded technology, losing the ability to purchase curricular materials."

Strasburg said the referendum—because it is a continuation of an original referendum and its related tax burden—carries no additional tax impact for district residents.

"That money is already in the levy," he said.

The school board also at its next meeting is expected to approve a resolution for a second referendum question that asks voters to allow the district to issue $2.1 million in general obligation funds to refinance its loan through the State Trust Fund Loan Program.

The loan was taken out in 2006 to pay the district's unfunded liability with the Wisconsin Retirement System. The district has been paying down the loan at a rate of about $182,000 per year, including interest, and it was scheduled to pay off the loan by 2024.

Strasburg said the district wants to refinance the loan and put it under the district's long-term debt to get a lower interest rate, accelerate payments and save taxpayers money.

"It's (the loan) currently under the revenue cap," he said, "but it won't be if it's refinanced and put under our long-term debt."

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(5)
NoLeftist
Aug 14, 2010 at 12:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

Dead on Bill! Whitewater is quite generous with retirement health benefits especially: they are about 100k per teacher, they go up 10-20pc every year, they don't get reported on by anyone, they don't get counted as part of their raises, and they come right out of instructional budgets.

billnewbie
Aug 14, 2010 at 11:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

If they time it right, they can get 4 or 5 referendum elections scheduled by this time next year. As we all know, it usually takes that many to finally get a referendum like this to pass.

I found this line from the story to be the most interesting, "District Administrator Suzanne Zentner said the district "desperately" needs to pass the measure to ensure students in Whitewater continue to receive the quality education they and their families have come to expect." When the spin is removed, what the Administrator really said is that the district employees "desperately" need the measure to pass to ensure that the employees of the Whitewater school district will continue to receive the high wages and benefits, particularly retirement benefits, that the employees have come to expect.

donnaw
Aug 14, 2010 at 7:13 a.m.
Suggest removal

They just don't get it--WE CAN'T AFFORD ANY MORE!! A deal is a deal. Get over it. Don't tell me there are no ways to cut expenses. We have been doing it at our house for quite awhile.

dtb
Aug 14, 2010 at 6:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

With the housing market down, nobody can afford to move.

nemesis
Aug 13, 2010 at 8:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

More taxes-won't be long before people leave whitewater because they can't afford to live there.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT