City continues to clear properties damaged in 2008 flood

By MARCIA NELESEN ( Contact )   Tuesday, Dec. 28, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

PhotoVideo


This house at 1107 Hamilton Ave. will become the latest flood-damaged home to be bought and demolished by the city of Janesville. The property will be converted to parkland.

This house at 1107 Hamilton Ave. will become the latest flood-damaged home to be bought and demolished by the city of Janesville. The property will be converted to parkland.

PhotoVideo


A burgeoning prairie rests under a blanket of snow in an area bounded by Joseph Street and Hamilton Avenue in Janesville. The Mole & Sadler’s subdivision along the Rock River south of Riverside Park has been greatly diminished since the 2008 flood. The city has bought and demolished many of the houses that once stood in the floodplain.

A burgeoning prairie rests under a blanket of snow in an area bounded by Joseph Street and Hamilton Avenue in Janesville. The Mole & Sadler’s subdivision along the Rock River south of Riverside Park has been greatly diminished since the 2008 flood. The city has bought and demolished many of the houses that once stood in the floodplain.

— The Janesville City Council on Monday approved buying another flood-damaged home in the Mole & Sadler's subdivision, bringing to a dozen the number of houses acquired by the city for demolition.

The property at 1107 Hamilton Ave. will be converted to open parkland.

The house was damaged in the 2008 flood, which generated the highest Rock River floodwaters on record.

After the flood, the city submitted a grant application to the Federal Hazard Mitigation Grant Program to buy 11 properties—one at 809 S. Jackson St. and 10 in the Mole & Sadler's subdivision along the Rock River and near Riverside Park. Some of the subdivision is in a floodplain and routinely floods.

Funding to buy and demolish eight of the properties was approved by FEMA.

Three of the properties did not qualify because of Wisconsin Emergency Management concerns about groundwater contamination. Those properties have since been purchased by the city with Community Development Block Grant money through the Emergency Assistance Program. The structures were demolished.

In September, the city was awarded an additional $300,000 in community block grant money to buy residential properties in the floodplain that did not qualify for any previous grant programs because they were not substantially damaged.

The property at 1107 Hamilton Ave. is one such property.

At Monday's council meeting, Councilman Bill Truman asked if the garage could remain on the property for storage.

Assistant City Manager Jay Winzenz said he did not know if the grant would allow such an action, but said staff would look into the idea.

During the flood, the property was damaged and the occupants vacated because of a lack of sewer, water and access to the property.

City offers to purchase are based on a pre-flood appraisal minus any federal emergency assistance or insurance payments made to the owners. Using this formula, the city's offer to purchase was $114,000. The city's website lists the property's assessment at $72,700.

The structure is vacant.

Two additional property owners also are considering buy-out offers from the city.

The grant requires that acquired properties be demolished and kept as open green space.

Prairie grass is planted on the sites to reduce maintenance.

Some residents in the area earlier this year were upset when the city cut down numerous trees to grow the prairie grass. Tom Presny, parks director, said at the time that city staff apparently did not make it clear that workers must regularly burn off a prairie.

He said the city in the spring plans to plant oak trees that should tolerate both flood and fire.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(2)
topsgt132
Dec 29, 2010 at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

Didn't they just do an article/story/blog here a few months ago about the city council discussing selling off some unused/little used parks to trim the budget? Don't get me wrong, the situation sucks for the property owners and I feel for them. Just saying.

janesvillean
Dec 28, 2010 at 4:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

In general, this is good news. It's too bad the city land is not all contiguous, and I wonder if the remaining property owners will have problems because of that (there aren't many fences there now, but this has mostly been privately owned and IIUC the river access has been treated as grandfathered).
.
I feel the story did not fully address the groundwater contamination issue, though. If the state did not want to fund the purchase, but the city was able to use federal funds, what was done about the contamination, if anything?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT