Brodhead school voters face referendum to maintain staff, extracurriculars
Podcast Episode
Photo 
Brodhead school referendum - Tax impact
Photo 
Charles J. Deery
BRODHEAD If a school referendum in Brodhead fails next week, Superintendent Chuck Deery paints a dire picture.
Voters will be asked to exceed the revenue caps for a total of $3.59 million over four years to maintain existing staffing and programs and to pay for a new roof on the high school.
Without that boost in funding, Deery said the district will be forced to cut 11 positions and all sports and extracurricular activities at the middle and high schools.
District officials have “real serious concerns” if the referendum fails because families will have three days to file by the state’s open enrollment deadline to attend different districts, Deery said.
“I’ve been hearing from quite a few families that that’s exactly what they’re going to do,” he said. “They won’t wait around (to see the board make the cuts). They want those activities for their kids.”
A growth in expenses surpassing state-allowed revenue limits and past and projected declining enrollments are the main reasons behind the need, Deery said. A new roof also is needed on the 15-year-old high school, he said.
The district has cut an average of $200,000 each year for the last six years, he said. The board is beyond the point of making more cuts without a major impact on students, so it wants the community to decide, he said.
This year’s school tax rate is $8.45 per $1,000 of assessed home value, which is one of the area’s lowest, Deery said. If residents support the referendum, the tax rate would increase from $8.85 in the first year gradually up to $10.73 in the fourth year, he said.
Ripple effects of cuts after a no vote would show outside the school walls, Deery said. He described potential effects:
-- Students would leave the district to play sports or have more opportunities at other districts, meaning Brodhead loses aid for each student who leaves.
-- Property values can drop, he said. Deery said officials have studied other districts that cut sports, and those districts found property values dropped because people didn’t want to move to a community without sports or opportunities for kids.
-- Community involvement in the school drops, making school less interesting for kids. In a small town, the schools are a main hub of the community, he said.
-- Some teachers and staff members have said they want activities for their kids, and if Brodhead can’t provide them, they’ll go elsewhere.
-- Studies show a correlation between where people shop and where they work or attend their kids’ activities, he said. If residents are heading to and from school events in Monroe, for example, they’ll likely pick up groceries there instead of spending money in Brodhead.
The district has settled its 2009-2011 contract with teachers, and the total package increase is 3.9 percent. Of that, the salary increase is 1.56 percent the first year and 1.89 percent the second year.
Residents who oppose the referendum have written letters to the editor to local newspapers saying the district is using scare tactics, such as threatening to cut sports.
“It will happen,” said Peggy Olsen, board president. “That is on the list of budget cuts to meet the budget.”
When the board compiled its list of cuts if the referendum fails, Deery said he stressed over and over not to include items that members don’t plan to cut.
“They’ve discussed that in length,” he said.
Cutting all extracurricular activities would save the district nearly $40,000 annually at the middle school and nearly $160,000 at the high school, he said.
“(It’s) $200,000 worth of savings that they can’t find anywhere else,” he said.
Olsen said people ask her, “How did we get to this point?”
She responds by saying the board has been making cuts for six years, cutting “as much out of it as we think we’re willing to cut without asking the public.”
Board members believe they’ve done the hard work. Now it’s up to the community, she said.
“The community needs to have a say … and that’s what’s going to happen,” she said.
Brodhead school referendum
A “YES” vote:
Approves spending $3.59 million over four years by this schedule:
-- 2010-2011: $635,000
-- 2011-2012: $810,000
-- 2012-2013: $855,000
-- 2013-2014: $1,285,000
Money to replace the 15-year-old high school’s roof is included in the first two years of borrowing. The rest of the money for all four years would maintain existing staffing and programming.
Even if the referendum is approved, the district will continue to look at cuts, said Peggy Olsen, board president.
“Every time someone leaves, we always look at it,” she said. “We’ll continue to look at administrative cuts.”
A “NO” vote:
Will not approve the spending. The school board put together a list of cuts it said it will be forced to make, including:
-- Three elementary teaching positions, moving all grades to three sections
-- Three teaching positions between the high school and middle school
-- Two elective programs and their teachers at the high school and middle school
-- One guidance counselor
-- Two administrators
-- The high school adventures class
-- The long-distance learning program
-- All extracurricular positions at the high school and middle school. These cuts would be phased in over the next two years.
Source: Brodhead School District

Feb 16, 2010 at 10:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Now that it's a NO vote, will the teachers find some hidden money to save their jobs?
Feb 10, 2010 at 3:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
Shame on this administration for trying to blackmail people into a yes vote. Maybe more people should take the opp. for open enrollment.
Feb 10, 2010 at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
To janesville teacher.
You obviously misunderstood my post.
Education IS what's important to me. Sports is not.
A good education, and not a letter in a sport, is going to get the kids a better paying job.
Focus on education.
A well rounded student doen't need extracurricular sports. They need skill sets that will provide their future families stability.
Feb 9, 2010 at 8:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
I question the way the administration has "brainwashed" the kids by telling them if the vote is no they can kiss good-bye all sports. Shouldn't the concern be more less staff, and classes? There is alot of money raised by sports and extra events. If there was no sports, etc. there would be no extra money. I believe there is alot of waste that goes on (Iknow there is alot of waste), and we need to cut the extras in school. Every room has TV and phones. The administration needs to look elsewhere, and stop adding things that they don't need. It might be $100 here or there but it all adds up.
Feb 9, 2010 at 4:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Here we are just done watching one of the best Super Bowls in history and now ready to watch an international exposition of sports of all kinds with the Olympic games in VanCouver and we are actually considering cutting sports from our children's lives! Right now the district needs funds to support the status quo, if you want to redesign the educational system or how they administrate then ask your legislator to address the problem or run for the school board yourself. Don't pull the rug out from underneath a generation of students just because we are in a slow economic period. How fair is that? Money is not the most important issue here, the children are and they deserve fairness; the same that kids had ten years ago and the same as they should have ten years from now! I trust the people of Brodhead to do the right thing for the students and vote YES.
Feb 9, 2010 at 4:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
"How many atheletes even make it to college let alone pro sports. Also many pro atheletes have degrees to allow them to work after their sports careers are over, even if it just as a talking head for ESPN or the NFL network." As a teacher and a coach in the Janesville School District, sports is not just about making it to college or making it to the professional level. It is about raising a well-rounded student.
.
Extra-curriculars is only one bullet on the list of cuts (and 'extra=curriculars includes not only sports, but other clubs/organizations that greatly increase the level of education).
.
The part that concerns me most is that the list of cuts includes two ENTIRE elective areas and raising class sizes in the elementary grades. I cannot fathom how anybody would vote no for this referendum when it is just the start of the downward spiral. With a no vote, you are basically saying that education is not important to your community and the district should simply teach math and reading with 30+ student in each class (which I hope we call agree would be a bad idea!).
.
A YES vote is needed here!
Feb 9, 2010 at 4:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Freebird
You're kind of all over the place - "also we did not include retirement package"?
We? Mouse in your pocket? Voices in your head? Or are we back to "your friends from that area" who keep you so well informed?
All what hate exactly?
Ripping on people? Because I challenged your indisputable facts, or what?
Sounds like your problem is with Deery himself - well, heck everybody in Brodhead should vote "No" then and make the kids in Brodhead suffer the consequences.
Feb 9, 2010 at 3:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
What's wrong with focusing on education and not sports?
Feb 9, 2010 at 2:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
I agree 100% with tallman. How many atheletes even make it to college let alone pro sports. Also many pro atheletes have degrees to allow them to work after their sports careers are over, even if it just as a talking head for ESPN or the NFL network.
There is way too much emphasis on sports. Why do you think we as americans are falling behind India, China, Japan in engineering degrees, and education level as a whole.
The new level off expertise in America will soon be "you want fries with that?" If it isn't already.
We can still have a jewel in the crown of Brodhead if we focus on education. Period.
Feb 9, 2010 at 2:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
A friend of mine informed me that in a eastern state they had 1 school superintendent for 26 school districts!!! Only 1.... Brodhead has 1 for 1.....He said they had no problems as each school had a principal who also taught one class a day, had 1 secretary and that is it!! Lets wake up people and start from the top down!!! If that works we would only need 1 superintendent for all of Green County School districts!!!! Lets start saving money!!!
Feb 9, 2010 at 2:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
"I recommend something Amish."
Or from the Quaker Ann fashion line
http://www.quakeranne.com/plainquaker.ht...
Feb 9, 2010 at 2:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
70% of the tax dollars going into the school goes to salaries and benefits
.
Name a non-production business where this isn't true. Seriously, a business where spending money on supplies, inventory, etc... isn't important and doesn't equal 70% + being spent on salaries.
.
I dare you to name one...you can't because they don't exist. the buildings, desks, books, computers and pens aren't going to cost more than the staff...if they did something would be seriously wrong.
.
that is the most uneducated argument I have ever read and this isn't even close to the first time someone has attempted to use it.
Feb 9, 2010 at 2:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
"The REAL question is "What will the Cheerleader outfits look like????
-
I recommend something Amish....."
??? - That doesn't make sense to me... am I missing something here?
Feb 9, 2010 at 1:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
If you get a chance to read the article, read the discussion section to see some of the comments.
Feb 9, 2010 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Not sure if anyone caught the news about the bus driver in Madison making about $159,00 a year due to him/her covering sick days, FMLA, vacation etc...
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/g...
This is the reason folks, that city, state, and federal governments continue to spend over their budgets. Who is running these organizations? This is the stranglehold that many unions such as the Teamsters have on the taxpayers. Its all about the unions and not about the constituents?
Feb 9, 2010 at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
abluedevil, you must be an employee of the school district with all that hate and ripping on people who state there opinion, please look at the DPI again and noticed the fringe benefits area and also we did not include retirement package.
YES, A GOOD SECRETARY CAN DO WHAT DEERY DOES OR ANYONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER.
I WOULD TELL THE BRODHEAD VOTERS TO VOTE NO AND CLEAN UP YOUR STAFF.
Feb 9, 2010 at 1:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Not one mention of cutting retirement health benefits (usually about $100k for 10 years service) or health insurance benefits (20k/yr+) for its employees. Wonder why?
The lack of such a discussion belies WEAC's claims that "it's for the kids." No, it's for your retirement benefits!
Feb 9, 2010 at 1:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
Sad but true, all staff at the schools are important. Truth, we are in times where the only workers that have not felt the REAL impact of the recession are government workers. They still got raises in salaries, FREE retireement, Insurance, plus any other benefits. The rest have maybe faced layoffs, cut salaries, benefits and had to make some serious choices on spending or loose their home.
To constantly use the idea that "we must keep up with other salaries or loose staff" is all bull. When does the bar quit being set higher and higher for only those few. We as tax payers allow the bar to continually get set up and up and take it right in the backside. Stand up, 70% of the tax dollars going into the school goes to salaries and benefits. If the district can't afford it then so be it. Start lowering the bar all over. Spend more of the money coming in on the facility, educational equipment and supplies. Sports won't get all of your children a profession and good future as very few make pro sports.
Feb 9, 2010 at 12:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
imaxgirl
How many "good executive secretaries" do you know with a working knowledge of assessment methods, curriculum trends, grading practices, revenue limits, school finance, and state standards (to name a few of the obstacles that public school administrators have to deal with)?
You may want to look around our state and see how many districts are hiring interim district administrators because they cannot find qualified people to do these jobs.
Feb 9, 2010 at 12:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Many are already filing their open-enrollment papers instead of waiting for this vote.
Sounds like many feel other cuts should come first and will be voting NO.
If cuts need to happen and extra-curriculars are to be saved, where will the cuts come from... cutting staff and electives... that isn't a good option either.
Feb 9, 2010 at 12:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Freebird- How ignorant can a person be??? These people who are making these huge, out-of-line salaries have at least six years of college or more invested in their career. They are professionals who deserve respect! I have never seen a community that has more pride in their school system and their sports teams than Brodhead, and rightfully so. It's taken a lot of work by the administration and the community to build such a fine academic offering and now, because of money, it's on the chopping block. This is exactly why our political leaders need to separate school funding from property taxes!!!!! Brodhead, there are some things worth paying for and your educational system is a jewel in your crown. Don't deminish the value of your teachers and admininstrators to argue about money. If you want your community to be one of the places businesses are looking to locate then continue to offer a top tier education system. VOTE YES!
Feb 9, 2010 at 12:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Freebird
(with thanks to Don Diego who caught it first)
You clearly stated in your first post that your informed friends told you that "there are 7 people that are paid in excess of 100,000 year plus benifits."
I am sure you understand that the other things you listed in your second post are "benifits" (actually benefits).
You and your informed friends might want to actually investigate your "deep details" a little bit to get more familiar with how school districts really operate - for example, in most districts the administrators have the same insurance coverage as the teachers.
No one is served by misinformation during the referendum process.
Feb 9, 2010 at 12:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
It seems, regardless of if you like it or not, if people want to keep this community strong and keep a high level of education going the "yes" vote is the only option.
.
Nobody wants to ask a community for additional money during a recession but that or drastic cuts seem to be the only option.
.
Cutting staff means cutting electives at all levels and that reduces the quality of education offered..that is likely why some cuts haven't already been made.
.
I feel for everyone involved in this community...it appears to be a "no win" situation.
Feb 9, 2010 at 11:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
let the parents pay for sports.
I'm voting NO!
Feb 9, 2010 at 11:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
"I was told there are 7 people that are paid in excess of 100,000 year plus benifits..." Perhaps you meant to say "with benefits" not "plus benefits". abluedevil correctly pointed out what you wrote was incorrect. It may be a small word but it does change your arguement. There appears to only be 1 administrator getting paid more than $100,000 PLUS benefits.
Feb 9, 2010 at 10:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Don't let them scare you. They will never cut the football team. It is a sports town. They are top heavy in the administration and they have been for many years. A good executive secretary could do a lot of the work that they're paying administrators to do.
Feb 9, 2010 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
ABLUEDEVIL, you are correct on that info but that does not take into consideration the health insurance they have, add that in and also add the little perks that administrators get (cars, gas, conventions,hotels, food, etc). So, my friends are not misinformed and not brain washed by misleading facts evidently you are not aware of the deep details.
Feb 9, 2010 at 9:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Freebird
It doesn't cost anything to go to DPI's website and discover the facts - your friends are misinformed.
"7 people that are paid in excess of 100,000 year"? Actually it is only 1, but don't let facts get in the way of a good argument, right?
See the actual 2008-09 salaries below (all are comparable to other area Districts):
Deery
District Administrator
$117,601.00
Swanson
Business Manager
$74,960.00
Anderson
Director of Special Education
$67,396.00
Lueck
Principal
$93,122.00
Urness
Principal
$89,593.00
Novy
Principal
$83,918.00
Semrow
Director of Instruction
$83,892.00
Feb 9, 2010 at 7:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
I was informed by some friends from that area that this is all a joke and that there needs to be cut at the administrative level, I was told there are 7 people that are paid in excess of 100,000 year plus benifits that they know of and maybe more and that Deery threatened the school board in july that they will walk if they did not get there pay raise of 2%. Plus they are already voted a pay raise again, where is the pay freeze!How can any expect to get a raise in this economy especially Brodhead. Brodhead needs to let the super and his staff go and find someone else. They also said that they have two years of funding left before the cuts. This is a tax of $600 a year after the final year of implementation for $100,000 home. THIS IS ABSURD!
I was told that this Deery runs the schoolboard and did not like when the taxpayers where saying no at the meeting and kept interepting until one person put him in his place, I wish I was there to see that. It is sad when the super's think they are in control of our money when they work for the schoolboard, we always need to keep our super here in Janesville in check. The other thing I do not get is that they are losing students and there has been no reduction in his staff. Sounds like he likes to have a easy day while others are doing his work.
I told my friends that the economy cannot be good for Brodhead and they said it is around 50% unemployment with woodbridge closing, reduction at kuhn knight, and stoughton as well as general motors. This is sad!! I say combine classes reduce staff, UWMadison teaches well over 300 kids in one class and they have a very good educational record. Time to do your job Deery and make some cuts or you will be cut. enough said, I am glad I am not gettting that tax hike.
Feb 8, 2010 at 11:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
sorry, meant Belleville, not Brodhead. Oops.
Feb 8, 2010 at 11:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
not! Just like combining New Glarus, Monticello, and Brodhead - NOT!
Feb 8, 2010 at 7:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Both Brodhead and Parkview have serious financial problems. Parkview's may not be as serious at this very moment, but if their enrollment continues to decline, they will be faced with the same situation. The towns are 7 miles apart-- possibly it's time to merge the districts? And what a great opportunity- could be a financial win/win for both schools ,plus what a great opportunity to replace Parkview's adminstration with Brodhead's!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.