Work slated soon to remove Yahara River dam

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Monday, Feb. 15, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


The Department of Natural Resources says that the 92-year-old dam on the Yahara River at Stebbinsville will be removed in the next four to six weeks. The dam, which is owned by Peter Burno of Stoughton, is considered in very poor condition and is a hazard to public safety.

The Department of Natural Resources says that the 92-year-old dam on the Yahara River at Stebbinsville will be removed in the next four to six weeks. The dam, which is owned by Peter Burno of Stoughton, is considered in very poor condition and is a hazard to public safety.

— A cracked and crumbling dam on the Yahara River in northern Rock County is slated to be removed in the next four to six weeks.

The DNR said in a news release last week that the 92-year-old dam is in “very poor condition and is a hazard to public safety and to navigation of the Yahara River.”

The DNR and the River Alliance of Wisconsin have secured about $110,000 in grant money to pay for the dam’s removal, according to the news release.

The dam is owned by Peter Burno under the name Wisconsin Edison Corp.

Burno of Stoughton had resisted the DNR’s efforts to remove the dam, but he applied to abandon the dam in 2007 after losing a court battle.

Large cracks in the dam show signs of movement, the news release states.

The work will involve taking out the concrete part of the 300-foot-long dam and later grading both embankments, the DNR said.

The grading is intended to “restore the area to its pre-settlement conditions. Restoration will include importing topsoil to cover fill areas, seeding and installing erosion mats,”

the DNR said.

The work “will improve the water quality and biological integrity of the Yahara River by making it easier for fish to migrate to upper portions of the river, reducing carp-spawning habitat and enhancing fish habitat,” according to the news release.

The Yahara River flows through the Madison-area lakes before joining the Rock River in Fulton Township, several miles downstream from the Stebbinsville Dam.

The Fulton Dam, downriver from Stebbinsville, was removed in 1993. The DNR also has sought to remove the Dunkirk Dam, which is upstream from Stebbinsville.

The DNR said dams are believed to have been at Stebbinsville since about 1840. The current dam was built in 1918. The site has served as a grist mill, flour mill and most was recently used to produce electricity, but no electricity has been generated there since 1996.

North American Hydro, which operates the Centerway dam on the Rock River, showed interest in the dam in 2006 but decided not to pursue it, citing concerns over the dam’s safety.

The Stebbinsville Dam has been drawn down since 1998, according to a 2009 Dane County report.

“The Stebbinsville impoundment is highly silted and supports high densities of carp, which exacerbates turbidity and sedimentation problems in the river,” according to the Dane County report. “Removal of the dam would open up an additional 4 miles of warm-water fish habitat and could benefit over 50 species of fish found in the Yahara and Rock rivers.”

The DNR says on its Web site that more than 100 dams have been removed statewide since 1967 and that many of those removals have resulted in improvements in water quality, habitat and bio-diversity.

“In the future these types of efforts will probably continue on a selective basis, driven by watershed plans that identify dams which are most detrimental to the ecosystem,” the DNR states.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(8)
TommyRay
Feb 17, 2010 at 8:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

Hey, I live on the Rock River... so, I can build a dam if I pay for it? KEWL! Green power here I come!! ;) Seriously, there had to have been SOME conditions of this dam being built back when, unless noone had any foresight and it allows it to just be 'abandoned', leaving it to the community & taxpayers.

Sandman
Feb 17, 2010 at 6:32 a.m.
Suggest removal

Mr. Peter Burno and his Wisconsin Edison Corp need to be held fiscally responsible for this, not the taxpayers (AKA "grant"), along with the the costs of cleaning up of the adjacent property that has been strewn for years with dam-related items and debris (AKA "junk").

MooShoo
Feb 16, 2010 at 6:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

Dam it, undam it.

Mikki
Feb 16, 2010 at 4:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

They should be able to get the money back from the guy, somehow. This is nuts!

SwissChick
Feb 16, 2010 at 11:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

What the . . .?? Taxpayers are paying for what a private owner is refusing to do? JHC!

misterC
Feb 16, 2010 at 9:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

Im with ya DanMan,No tax payer money should be used if Peter owns it he pays.

DanMan
Feb 16, 2010 at 9:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

If Peter Burno owns the dam, why are we paying to remove it? I know, it's a grant. Grants don't grow on trees, they come from the tax payers wallets. It says "he applied to abandon the dam in 2007 after losing a court battle." I am going to abandon my sidewalk the next time the city comes around and forces me to fix it.

partarican1
Feb 15, 2010 at 6:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is great news. That dam is a hazard to many who use the river, for whatever reason. I am excited to see this project completed before the water water warms enough to get my canoe in :)

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT