Local schools cautious about Race to the Top
Podcast Episode
The federal "Race to the Top" program is prompting local school districts to decide whether they want to take part in the plan, or not. Kyle Geissler reports. You can read more in Monday's Janesville Gazette.
Documents
Participating LEA Memorandum of Understanding [PDF] Note: an an LEA is a Local Education Agency, usually a school district
Letter from the governor encouraging support for the memo of understanding [PDF]
JANESVILLE School districts across southern Wisconsin are saying “yes” now but may say “no” later to a federal education-reform plan called Race to the Top.
School districts across the state must decide by Wednesday whether they want to join the state in applying for a share of the $4.35 billion the federal government will distribute to a limited number of states.
Many school superintendents contacted Friday said they are signing a memorandum of understanding with the state, but they might withdraw from the program later.
The problem is that the state Department of Public Instruction is still creating its application to the federal government and can’t answer every question about how the program would work.
“This is a plane that’s being built as they’re flying it. This is a work in progress,” Edgerton School District Superintendent Norm Fjelstad said.
Race to the Top would require schools to sign on to a long list of reform measures. The measures are aimed at raising student achievement. Each district would receive funding, but whether it would be enough to pay for all the requirements is a key question superintendents are asking.
“We’re embracing the concept of it,” said Milton Superintendent Bernie Nikolay. “We like many of the initiatives in the grant. We do some of them already. Where we’re being careful is financially, whether it makes sense for us.”
Janesville Superintendent Karen Schulte agreed and said she wonders whether Race to the Top would leave districts with an unfunded program after the federal grants run out after two years.
Nevertheless, Schulte likes Race to the Top’s focus on improving schools.
“I think it supports our board’s goals and probably the goals of most school districts, and that is raising student achievement,” Schulte said. “We’re all trying to do that, anyway, and I think this will give us an added ability to do what we’ve already started to do.”
The program calls for a data-based system to evaluate teachers and principals, for example. The Janesville district already has started putting such a system in place with the help and ideas of businessman/philanthropist Quint Studer.
Most districts contacted Friday said they have already signed a memo of understanding with the state.
In districts such as Janesville and Milton, superintendents and school board presidents signed the memo, but they’re asking the full school boards to endorse the application at board meetings this week.
The memos need only one signature, but it has room for three—superintendent, board president and president of the teachers union.
Dave Parr, president of the Janesville Education Association, said he didn’t sign it, although he might do so later.
Parr, too, cited a lack of information.
“Until they give us some details, I’m not going to sign a blank check,” Parr said.
In a letter to Schulte, Parr stressed the possible changes to the teachers contract that could be required under Race to the Top. Parr wrote that any contract changes should be subject to ratification by the teachers.
One part of the program that would require a contract change is new a teacher-evaluation system that includes use of “data on student growth as a significant factor.” Many teachers question systems that judge their performance based on student test scores without taking into account things such as poverty and the support students get at home.
Like Parr, the Wisconsin Education Association Council is waiting to learn more before endorsing Race to the Top, a WEAC spokeswoman said.
While the district could change its mind later, it’s not clear the union could withdraw its endorsement, Parr said.
Parr said the goal of improving student achievement is laudable.
“I’m absolutely for the reform ideas, but the devil’s in the details.” Parr said.
Superintendents had similar concerns.
“Some of that stuff in that memorandum is pretty vague. They haven’t clarified all the details, so we haven’t made a firm commitment one way or the other,” said Brodhead Superintendent Charles Deery.
Even so, Deery has sent the application to the Department of Public Instruction, just in case.
“If we don’t sign it, we don’t even get to play later, and I think that’s a mistake,” Edgerton’s Fjelstad said.
But Fjelstad said he’s ready to just say no if he finds the conditions too burdensome.
Janesville would receive “base funding” of $1.03 million. Smaller districts would receive much less. Additional “discretionary funding” may be awarded to some districts. And if not all districts participate, the additional money would flow to the participating districts.
The Orfordville Parkview district would receive about $62,000 in base funding, which is not enough for two program requirements: to hire a mentor for teachers in reading and math and to set up a Project Lead the Way program to encourage students in science, technology, engineering and math, Parkview Superintendent Steve Lutzke said.
Even so, “I’d rather sign it and back out later rather than not sign it and then later find out it’s too late,” Lutzke said.
Superintendents said Race to the Top contains good ideas for improving schools, but they need to know more.
“These are good things. It just depends on how they want to do it,” Fjelstad said. “If we have to hire two administrative assistants to keep track of the data, then there goes part of the grant.”
In the end, the federal government might not even choose Wisconsin as one of the states to undertake Race to the Top, especially if the feds see the reaction in the Badger State as too negative.
“That’s why I think it’s important for school districts to cooperate and at least get our foot in the door,” Fjelstad said.


Jan 18, 2010 at 10:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Would you sign a blank check? What if you were told that by signing a blank check you will soon receive a check for double that amount, so there is no risk? Seriously! The banks were forced to take bailout money even though some didn't need it. Most (except freddie mac and fannie mae) paid the loan amount, interest and penalties back and are still on the hook for federal oversight in how much they can pay the people that work for them. Are we not strong enough to stand alone and reject any federal aid at this time? The plan is not complete and yet we are told to TRUST. Wake up America.
Jan 12, 2010 at 10:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
We already know this district is in a race to the bottom. Supported by a school board that would cut teachers pay and benefits to plug any and every budget boo boo, or mistake. I think we all know the entire board isnt this way just a few very vocal members. Remember saving tax dollars isnt always about cutting educators payt and benefits every chance we get. Ok Sodemann? When as a district do we start caring about our kids education and stop compromising teachers at every turn. Just to save a measely buck or two. I am proud to say I will not be sending my kids to school in this district and that is a choice, based on the way this district treats the most important people in the system. TEACHERS!
Jan 12, 2010 at 6:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
The old adage "you don't get something for nothing" comes to mind. Be careful when the federal gov't wants to "help." Every state is different, has different needs and different goals. Why not just give the states the money and let them decide where to use it in education. Or better yet, don't send as much of our money to Washington and let us keep it and use it where it is best spent. The biggest problem is at the end of the two years when the funds run out. The school board will be telling us then that "we don't have enough funds to continue this program and we will have to cut this "wonderful" program or we will have to raise taxes (again!!). "
Jan 11, 2010 at 10:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
It looks like the "No Child Left Behind" fiasco but with a different name. It seems that every ten years or so, another ingenious program is developed that is going to solve all of the educational problems of the time. One of these years, someone is probably going to suggest "new readers" for first graders, starring..."Dick and Puff and Jane...etc."
Jan 11, 2010 at 8:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Everyone likes reform! Just a year ago we elected the quintessential reformer as President, so reform is a popular theme. As everyone knows, reform of the public school system is a perennial theme promoted by all, especially by politicians looking for votes. So here comes some, even if it is just voluntary and only provides funding for 2 years. Of course the teacher's union is all for reform. Just don't ask them to submit to systems that judge their performance based on student test scores without taking into account things such as poverty and the support students get at home (their parents). We can’t have a system that holds teachers accountable for the failure of students without some kind of built in rationalizing mechanism that deflects blame from all but the worst teachers to the parents or the socio-economic class the students may occupy. And any such reform would add pressure and difficulty to our teachers’ already tremendous burdens for which they are already underpaid, according to their union. So such reforms as they pertain to new requirements for teachers must be subject to negotiated changes to the teachers’ contract (a.k.a. a raise) which will never be given back when this federal money runs out and the reforms are dropped.
Reforming the public school system is like reforming a walnut. Smash it, sort out the good parts and throw out the bad. Unfortunately, we don’t have any public officials that have the will to wield a hammer.
Jan 11, 2010 at 5:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
If you don't know where the money is coming from or the cost, be very, very careful.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.