Give Satan a holiday
WASHINGTON Tragedy often brings out the best in some people. And sometimes, it brings out the worst.
Please direct your attention to Exhibits A and B, Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh.
No one should be surprised that Robertson invokes God’s wrath or Satan’s trade-offs when horror hits. Whether it’s a hurricane, a terrorist attack or an earthquake, one can be fairly certain that Robertson’s Ouija board will point to a supernatural explanation.
Invariably, he blames the victims or some third-party behavior favored by Satan and frowned upon by God. What was behind the terrorist attacks of 9/11? America’s moral decay. Hurricane Katrina? Abortion. Haiti’s earthquake? A deal with the devil.
“True story,” said Robertson on his television program, “The 700 Club.” He explained that when Haiti was a French colony, rebels “swore a pact to the devil,” saying, “We will serve you if you will get us free from the French.
“And so the devil said …”
“Excuse me just a sec while I pause to appreciate this moment. I’m pretty certain this is the first time I’ve ever quoted Satan. To proceed:
“And so the devil said, ‘OK, it’s a deal.’”
OK? Deal? But of course the devil would be prosaic.
Ever since, Robertson continued, “they (Haitians) have been cursed by one thing after the other.”
How is one to interpret such an assertion? Apparently, Robertson was referring to a Voodoo ceremony in 1791 that some historians believe was a spark for the revolution. The call to revolt was issued by Dutty Boukman, a voodoo priest and leader of the Maroon slaves. The resulting uprising, which ultimately led to Haiti’s independence, claimed the lives of thousands of colonialists and slaves.
For whose side does Robertson imagine God was pulling? The slave owners’? And does he really think that the devil is collecting on his debt by destroying thousands of lives in the earthquake and maiming countless more?
Robertson’s “700 Club” is soliciting prayers as well as donations, some of which will find their way to Haiti’s destitute and displaced. But having to hear from Robertson and entertain his devilish interpretations of events is a high price for charity. If the people of Haiti are cursed, as Robertson insists, it is partly the legacy of slavery—surely the devil’s work?—that is to blame. Earthquakes answer to no demon, and the shifting of tectonic plates should be no mystery to 21st-century man.
In Robertson’s literal world of superstition and fear, a fault’s rupture may signify a belch of the beast, but in the real world of science and knowledge, it is a natural, if disruptive, occurrence that bears no malice toward any particular man, woman or child.
That we are having this conversation is ridiculous—obviously, one would hope. That some percentage of the million daily viewers of the “700 Club” might pray and tithe to the speaker of such bile is far scarier than any voodoo curse.
Equally ill-timed and foolish, if not nearly as insane, were Limbaugh’s remarks upon news of the earthquake:
“This will play right into (President) Obama’s hands—humanitarian, compassionate. They’ll use this to burnish their, shall we say, credibility with the black community—in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It’s made to order for them.”
Limbaugh, like Robertson, has been duly condemned for his comments. The fact that he in part was lampooning Harry Reid for the Senate leader’s now-famous comments about Obama’s light skin (as a political plus) does not diminish the awfulness of Limbaugh’s cynicism. What’s worse: Reid’s antiquated observation that Obama betrays no “Negro dialect” in his diction, or Limbaugh’s implication that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, might be trying to embellish his street cred?
Is it possible that Limbaugh doesn’t know Haiti’s history also includes the post-slavery oppression of dark-skinned descendants of slaves by the lighter-skinned descendants of colonialists who bred with the enslaved?
Surely, there should be the occasional time and place when circumstances transcend the usual and free us from the race-baiting and ignorance-pandering panhandling that characterizes so much of American politics: When God and Satan are given a holiday from the news cycle. When a president can be granted the pure motives of a good nation. When science isn’t an insult to the divine and no demon earns credit for human misery.
Haiti is one of those places. Now should be one of those times.
Kathleen Parker is a columnist for the Orlando Sentinel. Her e-mail address is kathleenparker@washpost.com.

Jan 21, 2010 at 11:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
I'm STILL waiting on Hank to explain his logic in thinking that, because the U.S. is giving illegal Haitian immigrants Temporary Protected Status out of compassion, Limbaugh is "correct" in his claim that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community."
.
"These people will be made Citizens"
.
No, they have been given TPS. During the 18-month limit of TPS, only employment and travel authorization is given. No welfare programs will be available. Upon the completion of the 18 months, the status of immigrants who received TPS will revert back to whatever it was prior to the TPS (in other words, if they're illegal before TPS, they revert once more to illegal after TPS).
.
"and asked to vote for Obama in the Counties in Florida where Obama is projected to lose."
.
Absurd. Not only are they NOT eligible to vote, but they'd be "asked to vote for Obama" by whom, exactly?
.
"We are allowing criminals to stay"
.
Yes.
.
"but locking the gates to people that suffer, and could enter the Country legally."
.
Incorrect.
.
"But those legitimate people would not feel any loyalty to Obama would they?"
.
What does an immigrant's loyalty have to do with Obama? Again, only citizens may vote.
.
"This is politics."
.
Yes, your totally ignorant fear-mongering regarding Haitians receiving TPS is indeed political.
Jan 20, 2010 at 9:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Would someone please explain why Obama is not referred to as the mulatto he is, rather than African-American?"
.
Because Barack Obama self-identifies as Black?
.
"That pretty much describes him, does it not?"
.
If 'mulatto' is how you feel you need to describe him, go ahead.
.
"In addition, both sides of my ancestry are white..."
.
Obama's being a black man doesn't have the slightest thing to do with you, your ancestry, or your self-identifying preferences.
.
"I don't see the point in using "African-American" unless it's done in some elitist kind of way by Black Americans to denote that their ancestors were slaves brought here from Africa."
.
Things should only be done if you see a point to it?
It's "elitist" to note that they are Americans whose ancestors (slaves or not) originated from Africa? How... snooty... of them.
.
"Same goes for Irish-Americans, who I'd say are the only other ethnic group that wants to make the distinction"
.
And so you take offense. Typical.
Jan 19, 2010 at 10:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
When did "black man" become a scientific term?
Jan 19, 2010 at 9:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
mentor397 said: "What's funny is that when the Democrats accused Bush of using the 9/11 tragedy to further his own political agenda, there wasn't nearly this level of indignation and calling out of the 'cynics'. However, when a conservative points this out..."
As I recall, one week after 9/11, Bush had an approval rating somewhere in the 90s. It wasn't until the war in Iraq that people started to question whether he was using 9/11 as an excuse to take that action.
That's why this is different - within days, the President's enemies were speculating with nothing to back it up.
Jan 19, 2010 at 6:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hank
Please explain your logic in thinking that, because the U.S. is giving illegal Haitian immigrants Temporary Protected Status out of compassion, Limbaugh is "correct" in his claim that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community."
If you can accomplish this task, which I've requested of you several times now, then we'll move on to your new request to discuss how Barack Obama qualifies as a black man.
Jan 19, 2010 at 5:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
No disrespect, Hank, but Obama sure is. I hope that clears it up for you.
.
Still figuring out how you're going to explain your logic in thinking that, because the U.S. is giving illegal Haitian immigrants Temporary Protected Status out of compassion, Limbaugh is "correct" in his claim that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community"?
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
You think that, because the U.S. is giving illegal Haitian immigrants Temporary Protected Status out of compassion, Limbaugh is "correct" in his claim that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community"?
.
Care to explain your logic?
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Rush is merely reirating a liberal philosophy, 'We care more about people than anyone else, Don't you dare say we do not.'"
.
That's not a liberal "philosophy," but an appeal to ridicule used by some conservatives. Rush was merely reiterating the bigotry that drives his ratings.
.
"This goes right in line with Obama's government welfare push to cure society of its ills."
.
And when you say "Obama's government welfare push to cure society of its ills," exactly what are you referencing to? Healthcare reform?
.
"Obama was the first black president so why would he not be more aggressive in his efforts to help Haiti?"
.
Really? Obama is black, so it's only natural that he's supporting Haiti? Wow.
.
"Do you think the response would have been the same if it were mostly a white nation?"
.
Right. Black people don't help white people. It wouldn't even cross their minds.
.
"I am still puzled as to why Clinton did not help stop the Rwandan genocide in Uganda."
.
Oh, so invading another country is the same as directing wanted aid to another country's disaster area? I see.
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
Isn't it funny how the Washington Examiner is the ONLY source for this 3 day old quote, which isn't even complete?
.
"Did he mean that a win for Republican Brown would mean the decline of good governance in Massachusetts"
.
He never mentioned Brown or Massachusetts.
.
"or whether he meant that if the Democrat Coakley is elected, she would support more U.S. aid to build a 'modern, humane state' in Haiti?"
.
He never mentioned U.S. aid or used the words "modern, humane state" at all.
.
"In any event, Clinton claimed the two issues are entirely connected and said he did not see his time on the stump in Massachusetts as time away from the Haiti effort."
.
He didn't say any of those things.
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
vatoloco,
I hope it would have been.
.
Tell me, what evidence do you have that it wouldn't have been.
.
My point is, if all you are doing is the same partisan BS that was done wrongly to GW..Why?
.
I am not a partisan hack. I was arguing with inconvient just the other day about Obama breaking promises.
.
I tend to lean a little left on Social issues but I dont' buy into a strictly conservative or liberal agenda. I have voted for Clinton, GW and Obama...all for different reasons.
.
On this issue, Obama did the right thing. He sent help to a country devistated by a natural disaster and in desperate need. This is what the leader of the free world is suppose to do. We are suppose to set the example and hope others follow.
.
I strongly believe it is as simple as that. No strings. Has Obama screwed up? Yep! But not this time.
.
Until people in this country can recognize that the Reps. and Dems will continue to get away with the crimes they are both commiting. They know, at election time they need to show the people evidence of voting correctly on just a few issues and boom, they keep their job. We are so partisan (because of rush, hannity, ohlbermann, air america, etc...) we are blind to the corruption on both sides.
.
Jan 19, 2010 at 3:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
MToya5 on what do you base your opinion?
Jan 19, 2010 at 2:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
This will play right into (President) Obama’s hands—humanitarian, compassionate. They’ll use this to burnish their, shall we say, credibility with the black community—in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It’s made to order for them.”
I support Rush's comments more than Robertson's. Robertson is too extreme.
1. Rush is merely reirating a liberal philosophy, "We care more about people than anyone else, Don't you dare say we do not."
This goes right in line with Obama's government welfare push to cure society of its ills.
2. Everyone made a big deal that Obama was the first black president so why would he not be more aggressive in his efforts to help Haiti?
Do you think the response would have been the same if it were mostly a white nation? I mean, thousands of military personnel, aircraft carriers, 82nd airborne, etc.
I am still puzled as to why Clinton did not help stop the Rwandan genocide in Uganda.
Jan 19, 2010 at 2 p.m.
Suggest removal
All too deep. In the end all will know the truth. The fairytale as it seems will be truth. God ultimately does have the final say and final move in all things. Earth plates can move because it was their "time" or the hand of God. I am sure that will stir up some more controversy for you all.
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
What's funny is that when the Democrats accused Bush of using the 9/11 tragedy to further his own political agenda, there wasn't nearly this level of indignation and calling out of the 'cynics'. However, when a conservative points this out...
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
vatoloco
.
Try to stay on subject. The subject isn't is the media fair, does Obama lie...it is about Rush and Robertson.
.
You quoted my question and answered by ripping our President.
.
Do you defend the comments of Rush?
.
How?
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
"How can anyone with common sense and/or a brain listen to Rush anymore? Hasn't he proven himself a joke for years now?"
1. How can you listen to Obama continue to lie, expand the welfare state, and disgrace the office of the presidency?
2. Obama has proven himself a joke after a year at least.
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
The Truth Agency
The evening news the day after Reid made his comments, the day that this topic was the hottest topic on hand
ABC- at 5:30p.m.Diane Sawyer was reporting with a bullet proof vest from Afghanistan.
CBS- Katie Couric started with some kind of report about healtcare etc.
By way of comparison, when Joe Wilson of South Carolina yelled "You Lie", some of these same networks covered it very extensively.
When liberals lie, cheat, murder, they get a right of passage like Ted Kennedy who walked around drunk killing people in a car accident by a bridge. And, who can forget Mr. Clinton who did everything to disgrace the POTUS office.
When conservatives commit such offenses they have to climb to the highest mountains and yell what they did wrong.
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
“This will play right into (President) Obama’s hands—humanitarian, compassionate. They’ll use this to burnish their, shall we say, credibility with the black community—in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It’s made to order for them.”
.
How can anyone with common sense and/or a brain listen to Rush anymore? Hasn't he proven himself a joke for years now?
.
Somebody, please explain.
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
mark_twain
.
How does Kathleen Parker manage to miss the environmentalist who blamed Haiti’s woes on global warming?
.
Because, she did not choose that subject. She is an opinion columnist..she doesn't claim to be fair and balanced like some. She is simply sharing her opinion on these two clowns.
.
Or the pro-abortionist who blamed the earthquake on Haiti’s overpopulation?
.
SAME ANSWER
.
Both of these positions are as whacko as Pat Robertson’s.
.
I would guess this is the one point that most would agree with you on.
.
Why even the Gazette has a political cartoon showing the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse as never having left Haiti; isn’t that objectionable as well?
.
Haven't looked at the cartoon but I have seen many "objectionable" cartoon's printed in this paper. Again, I doubt Ms. Parker reads the Gazette.
.
Parker has taken Reverend Robertson out of context.
.
What did he actually say? How can that be taken out of context? Please describe.
.
Parker is also demonizing Limbaugh by distorting what he said on his radio show.
.
How can you defend Limbaugh and Robertson? Seriously, you attack a left wing opinion columnist for being left of center but defend Rush and Pat. WOW?!?!
.
The Obami and other media sycophants are pretending that Obama is some kind of savior for the poor people of Haiti to distract us from his incompetence and radicalism here at home.
.
Who, name somebody? Cite a video that I can watch and see this. The news I have watched gave President Obama credit for reacting quickly and doing the right thing but NOBODY was treating him as a hero.
.
The Dear Leader, prophet and Messiah Barack Hussein Obama II is a sly huckster. The man of “HOPE” is a HOAX! Do you Obami dupes and lackeys of still believe the emperor is wearing his fine clothes? Oh! Look at the crease of those trousers!
.
How can you take an opinion column about Haiti, Rush and Robertson and make it an attack on President Obama? Do you really HATE that much? Are you that much of a blind partisan hack that you can't leave him out of one post? The topic is not about President Obama yet you stretch to take a shot at him.
.
HOW PATHETIC? Keep listening to fox and Rush...it is working. You are as lost and full of hate toward our current president, President Obama, as they want you to be.
.
congrats!
Jan 19, 2010 at 12:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Cynicism on the part of Limbaugh does not and should not diminish Reid's initial comment"
.
No, but you seem to think that Reid's comment diminishes Limbaugh's cynical accusation that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community," which has nothing to do with Reid or his comment.
.
"But because Reid is one of the good ol boys he is excused."
.
Yes, how awful that Reid was "excused" for telling the absolute truth.
.
"satan does have a holiday - anyone ever heard of Halloween?"
.
Yes, and Santa has a holiday - ever heard of Christmas?
.
"And sometimes, tragedy brings out the narrowminded."
.
Talk it, don't walk it.
Jan 19, 2010 at 12:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Just what we need... another holiday.
Jan 19, 2010 at 9:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Wow Danny Glover - really? Reachign back to what a guy that didn't even star in some movies from the 80's said?
.
You guys will do anythign to avoid facing the idea that you are clinging to your superstition.
.
I am too old for this ______.
Jan 19, 2010 at 5:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Well if Peter Wastholm said it, then it must be true. Who in the hell is Peter Wastholm?
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
or one that has no thoughts of their own......
glen beck and i are old college buddies, kinda like the relationship you share with barney frank.
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
"All humans are hypocrites; the biggest hypocrite of all is the one who claims to detest hypocrisy."
Peter Wastholm
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
"zoom/truth did you miss the part where i say "let me try your arguing stance"?"
And you think that somehow absolves you of being a hypocrite? You and Glenn Beck could be siblings.
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
Dillinger- Exactly what is the difference between a fundamentalist and a Christian? Secondly, do all fundamentalists conduct themselves as Robertson does?
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Robertson is not a christian... he is a Fundamentalist.. there is a major diffrence.
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Cynicism on the part of Limbaugh does not and should not diminish Reid's initial comment - a comment that in other circles would be grounds for admonishment from the club. But because Reid is one of the good ol boys he is excused. And in regards to the title of this article - satan does have a holiday - anyone ever heard of Halloween?
Tragedy often brings out the best in some people. And sometimes, it brings out the narrowminded.
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
And give it up on Halloween being the devil's holiday... It's for the kids.. They get to be superheros, and princesses like one day a year... Its about happy children, and candy. I love it because my kid is beyond happy!! Not a giant pagan orgy.. But funsized milkyways, and the candycorn nobody likes...
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
according to the atheists god doesn't exist anyway. why are they the ones who are so outraged about robertsons quote? for purely political reasons. either that or they hate robertson because he's a christian. i don't know about you, but i follow the stories on grittv. how many people do you know that regularly watch cbn?
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
I do not know how someone could be offended that is honestly christian, for bad mouthing Robertson... He is a Fundamentalist, and the founder of the christian coalation. He nearly ran for president in the 80's.. But only if he was sent enough money by his viewers, to back his campagin. He has his hands on the polls, and telivision programming. His love of God is overshadowed by his love of money. If you go to the Christian coalition web site it is full of radical finger pointing, and hate twards anyone who is not in the market to buy his dribble.. Fundamentalist idieals have been the cause of war, and death for years... not a suprise he would try to find a way to make the death of women and children a justified moral dispute. If there where ever a second great flood..... I would look for Robertson, and his garden hose.
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
whoops wrong thread.
\
\
zoom/truth did you miss the part where i say "let me try your arguing stance"? are you blind or just ignorant as well? what am i saying? of course you are! both!
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
yeah, 1,940 websites let Chuck K. quote Carville incorrectly. ok.
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
It's like they have no self-awareness when they describe me...
Projection? Or denial?
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
"you spend two sentences answering questions I'm not sure were even asked of you, and the rest of the time you taunt Dub190 and blather useless garbage"
And your comment is different how?
I think you didn't understand the response. Rush and Robertson have national radio and TV programs, respectively, with millions of viewers. Danny Glover does not, and someone had to find his comment on GRITtv, whatever that is. Now do you understand why no one cares about what Danny Glover has to say?
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
devoted audience size? like the huge audiences at NBC and CNN, two known failures? FOX News is #1 remember? so instead of telling the truth without prejudice, the media should just tell us what the liberals want to hear? LMAO!
let me try your arguing stance, you spend two sentences answering questions I'm not sure were even asked of you, and the rest of the time you taunt Dub190 and blather useless garbage.
such a great debater you are. almost good enough for the high school team! all shock, and insult, absolutely no substance, you are a joke. you are misleading, ignorant, and useless. your lies and copied posts are one thing, annoying. out of touch is the phrase that comes to mind.
Jan 18, 2010 at 7:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Why aren't they chastising him? Because he isn't a Christian figurehead? Or because he's a LIBERAL? ANSWER ME THAT."
.
Yea, it couldn't be for a reason as simple and logical as devoted audience size...
Wonderful performance of manufactured outrage, though; I'm really feeling the all-caps sentence at the end.
.
"What is so horrible about THIS? 'This will play right into Obama’s hands — humanitarian, compassionate. They’ll use this to burnish their, shall we say, credibility with the black community — in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It’s made to order for them.' PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS TO ME!!!"
.
Ooooo...hyper-manufactured outrage mode, with THREE exclamation points at the end of yet another all-caps sentence. I can almost smell the foam on your mouth...
Explanation:
Limbaugh implied that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community." That sort of suggestion is what's known as "horrible."
.
You're not too bad at polishing yourself, dub190.
Jan 18, 2010 at 6:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
ICT is at the alter that s where
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
ICT- Where is Dan Rather when you need him?
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
When is Barry Obama's birthday? Could we just use that as Satan's holiday.
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
"In Robertson’s literal world of superstition and fear, a fault’s rupture may signify a belch of the beast, but in the real world of science and knowledge, it is a natural, if disruptive, occurrence that bears no malice toward any particular man, woman or child.
That we are having this conversation is ridiculous—obviously, one would hope. That some percentage of the million daily viewers of the “700 Club” might pray and tithe to the speaker of such bile is far scarier than any voodoo curse."
.
Nail on the head.
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Objective reporting? Hardly. Put this on the opinion or blog page." - imsmart2
.
Time to get a new user name (or is it ironic?)...
Jan 18, 2010 at 4:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
wow. Satan already has a holiday. Some say it's April 15th. I was thinking more Oct. 31st.
Yeah, this is not a race for popularity in the Democrat/Republican parties, folks. People are dead in the rubble and we can't get help or food, water or supplies there soon enough! If Obama is seeing that it happens, let's support that effort and the OTHERS involved in helping! What is WRONG with you people?!
Jan 18, 2010 at 2:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
politics does not belong anywhere during a disaster. But of course Robertson and Limbaugh are in a class by themselves (or is that a dark hole)!
Jan 18, 2010 at 2:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
WOW...and this junk is in the paper..you have to be kidding right...
Jan 18, 2010 at 2:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Kangroojack----UR most certainly right, satan does have his holiday-April 15th!!!!!!!!!
The Religious Freaks are a bunch of PINHEADS!!!!!!
Jan 18, 2010 at 1:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Parker is also demonizing Limbaugh by distorting what he said on his radio show."
Oh really? Well enlighten us, what did Rush really say on his show? Oh, that's right.... it was a direct quote. You're flattering Rush with your imitation of him. As if the earthquake happened to make Obama look better... get a life. It was a NATURAL disaster. We don't fully understand everything that causes it, but what we do know is no man can cause it.
If this had happened when Bush was President, would you be screaming the same song? Or would you be telling the other side that this is just a natural disaster and Bush had nothing to do with it?
Set your differences aside. Wake up and smell the coffee. This isn't about left versus right, this is about a devastating natural disaster. This was convenient for NO ONE.
Jan 18, 2010 at 12:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Obama only aims to try and look better than what Bush did with Katrina and 9/11"
.
Well, I guess you're damned if you do, damned if you don't then, huh?
Jan 18, 2010 at 12:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Leave it to nut-jobs to politicize a natural disaster.
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
"The Obami and other media sycophants are pretending that Obama is some kind of savior for the poor people of Haiti to distract us from his incompetence and radicalism here at home"
MarkTwain-Very true indeed. By overpouring and presenting an overkill of support (10,000 military troops) for the devastated Haitian people, Obama only aims to try and look better than what Bush did with Katrina and 9/11. It is as though Obama is still trying to convince his followers that he is the man for this job when we all know he is not.
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
OK Talkin_Monkey - now go do your homework.
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
I bet President Obama's help in Haiti wins him back-to-back Nobel Peace Prizes.
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
You just blew every ounce of credibilty you might have had, justaskme. WTG lol
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Ever notice how darwin1 and Talking_Monkey seem so alike? I bet they are both same high school girl with 2 usernames.
Jan 18, 2010 at 10:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
imsmart2- It already is on the opinion page.
As for religious and political opportunists using this tragedy to further their agendas. It's just their opinion, and we all know what opinions are like, and we all have one.
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
The concept of heaven and hell was created by a ruling class to control their people. Magical thinking is a form of escape, by the way.
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
I agree with Darwin here. I am pretty sure this happened because of some plates moving around. I do not believe God or the Devil did this. IF it was either of them I would pick God did it to try to thin out the population so less will starve to death and more can receive medical treatment. I have been told heaven is much better than earth and some may get to go sooner than others.
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
Not sure how you can compare the attacks of 911 to a earthquake. The attacks were carried out by humans, and the earthquake is a natural diaster. It has been long believed that natural disasters are a form of punishment from gods/God.
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
prounion, go bait someone else. I'm not buying.
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
What is there to think about 2012? Do you mean the elections?
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Chavez a "dumbass?" Hmmmmm, prehaps not so much.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?c...
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
The question is, what do YOU think?
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Badgerlvr - Good one!
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
What about 2012 Monkey? Worried the world will end?
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think being close-minded is a deadly sin too. It's a pandemic... And no one wants to think about 2012.
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
You can't be prejudiced against something that isn't true or real. Pat Robertson is clearly a stupid bigot who shouldn't be allowed to use the public airwaves but you people complain about Kathleen Parker? We should be prejudiced against religion, it is a scam. Try getting an education and learn something about science.
Jan 17, 2010 at 11:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Exhibit C-Danny Glover "And I hope we seize this particular moment because the threat of what happens in Haiti is the threat that can happen anywhere in the Caribbean to these island nations, you know?
They're all in peril because of global warming; they're all in peril because of climate change. When we see what we did at the climate summit in Copenhagen, this is the response, this is what happens, you know what I'm saying?"
Jan 17, 2010 at 11:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Agreed, it seems to me Kathleen Parker is as narrow mindedly against religion as the religious nuts she cites are for it. Objective reporting? Hardly. Put this on the opinion or blog page. It'll fit in well with wonders by Steve Knox like "don't look at my johnson while I use the urinal".
Jan 17, 2010 at 11:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Believing in God and not the devil is like thinking that a battery will supply power with only one wire attached.
Think about it. We complete the circuit of power that lies within us all...
Jan 17, 2010 at 10:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Once again, Kathleen Parker shows her extreme prejudice toward religions. Is it possible that she is angry with herself for not being a part of the religious community? Well, get over it Kathleen. Her attempt to 'connect' the devil with God is ridiculous - yet is so 'Kathleen Parker'-ish.
Jan 17, 2010 at 10:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
We can add Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to the list of dumbasses. He says US using earthquake as pretext to occupy Haiti.
Jan 17, 2010 at 9:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Isn't selfishness a deadly sin? Greed? Deception? It sure seems like Robertson is using this tragedy as a fund increase for himself and his organization of meek, low IQ'd masses. "The meek shall inherit the earth." In other words, be strong. We don't want the earth, a synonym for death. We want heaven. What a release it is to stand up for something that is righteous. Kinda like Jesus did back in his days of table tossing, without fear of spititual reprisal. I think it's pretty cool that an example of the "Stick it the man" (long live rock n roll) attitude was making news all over the place, becoming a part of history that has helped make us into who and what we are today.
Jan 17, 2010 at 9:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Satan doesn't need a holiday he's always happy to have extra work.
Jan 17, 2010 at 9:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Or, in the words of Bill O"Reilly..."PINHEADS."
Jan 17, 2010 at 7:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
One just has to consider the sources of these comments. Robertson and Limbaugh are two peas in a pod. Unfortunately, the pod is rotten and the peas unless.
Jan 17, 2010 at 6:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
Satan already has a holiday. April 15th. :)
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.