Give Satan a holiday

By KATHLEEN PARKER   Sunday, Jan. 17, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Tragedy often brings out the best in some people. And sometimes, it brings out the worst.

Please direct your attention to Exhibits A and B, Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh.

No one should be surprised that Robertson invokes God’s wrath or Satan’s trade-offs when horror hits. Whether it’s a hurricane, a terrorist attack or an earthquake, one can be fairly certain that Robertson’s Ouija board will point to a supernatural explanation.

Invariably, he blames the victims or some third-party behavior favored by Satan and frowned upon by God. What was behind the terrorist attacks of 9/11? America’s moral decay. Hurricane Katrina? Abortion. Haiti’s earthquake? A deal with the devil.

“True story,” said Robertson on his television program, “The 700 Club.” He explained that when Haiti was a French colony, rebels “swore a pact to the devil,” saying, “We will serve you if you will get us free from the French.

“And so the devil said …”

“Excuse me just a sec while I pause to appreciate this moment. I’m pretty certain this is the first time I’ve ever quoted Satan. To proceed:

“And so the devil said, ‘OK, it’s a deal.’”

OK? Deal? But of course the devil would be prosaic.

Ever since, Robertson continued, “they (Haitians) have been cursed by one thing after the other.”

How is one to interpret such an assertion? Apparently, Robertson was referring to a Voodoo ceremony in 1791 that some historians believe was a spark for the revolution. The call to revolt was issued by Dutty Boukman, a voodoo priest and leader of the Maroon slaves. The resulting uprising, which ultimately led to Haiti’s independence, claimed the lives of thousands of colonialists and slaves.

For whose side does Robertson imagine God was pulling? The slave owners’? And does he really think that the devil is collecting on his debt by destroying thousands of lives in the earthquake and maiming countless more?

Robertson’s “700 Club” is soliciting prayers as well as donations, some of which will find their way to Haiti’s destitute and displaced. But having to hear from Robertson and entertain his devilish interpretations of events is a high price for charity. If the people of Haiti are cursed, as Robertson insists, it is partly the legacy of slavery—surely the devil’s work?—that is to blame. Earthquakes answer to no demon, and the shifting of tectonic plates should be no mystery to 21st-century man.

In Robertson’s literal world of superstition and fear, a fault’s rupture may signify a belch of the beast, but in the real world of science and knowledge, it is a natural, if disruptive, occurrence that bears no malice toward any particular man, woman or child.

That we are having this conversation is ridiculous—obviously, one would hope. That some percentage of the million daily viewers of the “700 Club” might pray and tithe to the speaker of such bile is far scarier than any voodoo curse.

Equally ill-timed and foolish, if not nearly as insane, were Limbaugh’s remarks upon news of the earthquake:

“This will play right into (President) Obama’s hands—humanitarian, compassionate. They’ll use this to burnish their, shall we say, credibility with the black community—in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It’s made to order for them.”

Limbaugh, like Robertson, has been duly condemned for his comments. The fact that he in part was lampooning Harry Reid for the Senate leader’s now-famous comments about Obama’s light skin (as a political plus) does not diminish the awfulness of Limbaugh’s cynicism. What’s worse: Reid’s antiquated observation that Obama betrays no “Negro dialect” in his diction, or Limbaugh’s implication that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, might be trying to embellish his street cred?

Is it possible that Limbaugh doesn’t know Haiti’s history also includes the post-slavery oppression of dark-skinned descendants of slaves by the lighter-skinned descendants of colonialists who bred with the enslaved?

Surely, there should be the occasional time and place when circumstances transcend the usual and free us from the race-baiting and ignorance-pandering panhandling that characterizes so much of American politics: When God and Satan are given a holiday from the news cycle. When a president can be granted the pure motives of a good nation. When science isn’t an insult to the divine and no demon earns credit for human misery.

Haiti is one of those places. Now should be one of those times.

Kathleen Parker is a columnist for the Orlando Sentinel. Her e-mail address is kathleenparker@washpost.com.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(104)
inconvenienttruth
Jan 21, 2010 at 11:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'm STILL waiting on Hank to explain his logic in thinking that, because the U.S. is giving illegal Haitian immigrants Temporary Protected Status out of compassion, Limbaugh is "correct" in his claim that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community."
.
"These people will be made Citizens"
.
No, they have been given TPS. During the 18-month limit of TPS, only employment and travel authorization is given. No welfare programs will be available. Upon the completion of the 18 months, the status of immigrants who received TPS will revert back to whatever it was prior to the TPS (in other words, if they're illegal before TPS, they revert once more to illegal after TPS).
.
"and asked to vote for Obama in the Counties in Florida where Obama is projected to lose."
.
Absurd. Not only are they NOT eligible to vote, but they'd be "asked to vote for Obama" by whom, exactly?
.
"We are allowing criminals to stay"
.
Yes.
.
"but locking the gates to people that suffer, and could enter the Country legally."
.
Incorrect.
.
"But those legitimate people would not feel any loyalty to Obama would they?"
.
What does an immigrant's loyalty have to do with Obama? Again, only citizens may vote.
.
"This is politics."
.
Yes, your totally ignorant fear-mongering regarding Haitians receiving TPS is indeed political.

inconvenienttruth
Jan 20, 2010 at 9:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Would someone please explain why Obama is not referred to as the mulatto he is, rather than African-American?"
.
Because Barack Obama self-identifies as Black?
.
"That pretty much describes him, does it not?"
.
If 'mulatto' is how you feel you need to describe him, go ahead.
.
"In addition, both sides of my ancestry are white..."
.
Obama's being a black man doesn't have the slightest thing to do with you, your ancestry, or your self-identifying preferences.
.
"I don't see the point in using "African-American" unless it's done in some elitist kind of way by Black Americans to denote that their ancestors were slaves brought here from Africa."
.
Things should only be done if you see a point to it?
It's "elitist" to note that they are Americans whose ancestors (slaves or not) originated from Africa? How... snooty... of them.
.
"Same goes for Irish-Americans, who I'd say are the only other ethnic group that wants to make the distinction"
.
And so you take offense. Typical.

Zoom
Jan 19, 2010 at 10:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

When did "black man" become a scientific term?

Hockeyjockey
Jan 19, 2010 at 9:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

mentor397 said: "What's funny is that when the Democrats accused Bush of using the 9/11 tragedy to further his own political agenda, there wasn't nearly this level of indignation and calling out of the 'cynics'. However, when a conservative points this out..."

As I recall, one week after 9/11, Bush had an approval rating somewhere in the 90s. It wasn't until the war in Iraq that people started to question whether he was using 9/11 as an excuse to take that action.
That's why this is different - within days, the President's enemies were speculating with nothing to back it up.

inconvenienttruth
Jan 19, 2010 at 6:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

Hank
Please explain your logic in thinking that, because the U.S. is giving illegal Haitian immigrants Temporary Protected Status out of compassion, Limbaugh is "correct" in his claim that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community."
If you can accomplish this task, which I've requested of you several times now, then we'll move on to your new request to discuss how Barack Obama qualifies as a black man.

inconvenienttruth
Jan 19, 2010 at 5:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

No disrespect, Hank, but Obama sure is. I hope that clears it up for you.
.
Still figuring out how you're going to explain your logic in thinking that, because the U.S. is giving illegal Haitian immigrants Temporary Protected Status out of compassion, Limbaugh is "correct" in his claim that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community"?

inconvenienttruth
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

You think that, because the U.S. is giving illegal Haitian immigrants Temporary Protected Status out of compassion, Limbaugh is "correct" in his claim that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community"?
.
Care to explain your logic?

inconvenienttruth
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Rush is merely reirating a liberal philosophy, 'We care more about people than anyone else, Don't you dare say we do not.'"
.
That's not a liberal "philosophy," but an appeal to ridicule used by some conservatives. Rush was merely reiterating the bigotry that drives his ratings.
.
"This goes right in line with Obama's government welfare push to cure society of its ills."
.
And when you say "Obama's government welfare push to cure society of its ills," exactly what are you referencing to? Healthcare reform?
.
"Obama was the first black president so why would he not be more aggressive in his efforts to help Haiti?"
.
Really? Obama is black, so it's only natural that he's supporting Haiti? Wow.
.
"Do you think the response would have been the same if it were mostly a white nation?"
.
Right. Black people don't help white people. It wouldn't even cross their minds.
.
"I am still puzled as to why Clinton did not help stop the Rwandan genocide in Uganda."
.
Oh, so invading another country is the same as directing wanted aid to another country's disaster area? I see.

inconvenienttruth
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

Isn't it funny how the Washington Examiner is the ONLY source for this 3 day old quote, which isn't even complete?
.
"Did he mean that a win for Republican Brown would mean the decline of good governance in Massachusetts"
.
He never mentioned Brown or Massachusetts.
.
"or whether he meant that if the Democrat Coakley is elected, she would support more U.S. aid to build a 'modern, humane state' in Haiti?"
.
He never mentioned U.S. aid or used the words "modern, humane state" at all.
.
"In any event, Clinton claimed the two issues are entirely connected and said he did not see his time on the stump in Massachusetts as time away from the Haiti effort."
.
He didn't say any of those things.

whythink
Jan 19, 2010 at 4:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

vatoloco,
I hope it would have been.
.
Tell me, what evidence do you have that it wouldn't have been.
.
My point is, if all you are doing is the same partisan BS that was done wrongly to GW..Why?
.
I am not a partisan hack. I was arguing with inconvient just the other day about Obama breaking promises.
.
I tend to lean a little left on Social issues but I dont' buy into a strictly conservative or liberal agenda. I have voted for Clinton, GW and Obama...all for different reasons.
.
On this issue, Obama did the right thing. He sent help to a country devistated by a natural disaster and in desperate need. This is what the leader of the free world is suppose to do. We are suppose to set the example and hope others follow.
.
I strongly believe it is as simple as that. No strings. Has Obama screwed up? Yep! But not this time.
.
Until people in this country can recognize that the Reps. and Dems will continue to get away with the crimes they are both commiting. They know, at election time they need to show the people evidence of voting correctly on just a few issues and boom, they keep their job. We are so partisan (because of rush, hannity, ohlbermann, air america, etc...) we are blind to the corruption on both sides.
.

prounion
Jan 19, 2010 at 3:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

MToya5 on what do you base your opinion?

vatoloco
Jan 19, 2010 at 2:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

This will play right into (President) Obama’s hands—humanitarian, compassionate. They’ll use this to burnish their, shall we say, credibility with the black community—in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It’s made to order for them.”

I support Rush's comments more than Robertson's. Robertson is too extreme.

1. Rush is merely reirating a liberal philosophy, "We care more about people than anyone else, Don't you dare say we do not."
This goes right in line with Obama's government welfare push to cure society of its ills.

2. Everyone made a big deal that Obama was the first black president so why would he not be more aggressive in his efforts to help Haiti?

Do you think the response would have been the same if it were mostly a white nation? I mean, thousands of military personnel, aircraft carriers, 82nd airborne, etc.

I am still puzled as to why Clinton did not help stop the Rwandan genocide in Uganda.

ma_tafoya5
Jan 19, 2010 at 2 p.m.
Suggest removal

All too deep. In the end all will know the truth. The fairytale as it seems will be truth. God ultimately does have the final say and final move in all things. Earth plates can move because it was their "time" or the hand of God. I am sure that will stir up some more controversy for you all.

mentor397
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

What's funny is that when the Democrats accused Bush of using the 9/11 tragedy to further his own political agenda, there wasn't nearly this level of indignation and calling out of the 'cynics'. However, when a conservative points this out...

whythink
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

vatoloco
.
Try to stay on subject. The subject isn't is the media fair, does Obama lie...it is about Rush and Robertson.
.
You quoted my question and answered by ripping our President.
.
Do you defend the comments of Rush?
.
How?

vatoloco
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

"How can anyone with common sense and/or a brain listen to Rush anymore? Hasn't he proven himself a joke for years now?"

1. How can you listen to Obama continue to lie, expand the welfare state, and disgrace the office of the presidency?

2. Obama has proven himself a joke after a year at least.

vatoloco
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

The Truth Agency

The evening news the day after Reid made his comments, the day that this topic was the hottest topic on hand

ABC- at 5:30p.m.Diane Sawyer was reporting with a bullet proof vest from Afghanistan.

CBS- Katie Couric started with some kind of report about healtcare etc.

By way of comparison, when Joe Wilson of South Carolina yelled "You Lie", some of these same networks covered it very extensively.

When liberals lie, cheat, murder, they get a right of passage like Ted Kennedy who walked around drunk killing people in a car accident by a bridge. And, who can forget Mr. Clinton who did everything to disgrace the POTUS office.

When conservatives commit such offenses they have to climb to the highest mountains and yell what they did wrong.

whythink
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

“This will play right into (President) Obama’s hands—humanitarian, compassionate. They’ll use this to burnish their, shall we say, credibility with the black community—in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It’s made to order for them.”
.
How can anyone with common sense and/or a brain listen to Rush anymore? Hasn't he proven himself a joke for years now?
.
Somebody, please explain.

whythink
Jan 19, 2010 at 1:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

mark_twain
.
How does Kathleen Parker manage to miss the environmentalist who blamed Haiti’s woes on global warming?
.
Because, she did not choose that subject. She is an opinion columnist..she doesn't claim to be fair and balanced like some. She is simply sharing her opinion on these two clowns.
.
Or the pro-abortionist who blamed the earthquake on Haiti’s overpopulation?
.
SAME ANSWER
.
Both of these positions are as whacko as Pat Robertson’s.
.
I would guess this is the one point that most would agree with you on.
.
Why even the Gazette has a political cartoon showing the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse as never having left Haiti; isn’t that objectionable as well?
.
Haven't looked at the cartoon but I have seen many "objectionable" cartoon's printed in this paper. Again, I doubt Ms. Parker reads the Gazette.
.
Parker has taken Reverend Robertson out of context.
.
What did he actually say? How can that be taken out of context? Please describe.
.
Parker is also demonizing Limbaugh by distorting what he said on his radio show.
.
How can you defend Limbaugh and Robertson? Seriously, you attack a left wing opinion columnist for being left of center but defend Rush and Pat. WOW?!?!
.
The Obami and other media sycophants are pretending that Obama is some kind of savior for the poor people of Haiti to distract us from his incompetence and radicalism here at home.
.
Who, name somebody? Cite a video that I can watch and see this. The news I have watched gave President Obama credit for reacting quickly and doing the right thing but NOBODY was treating him as a hero.
.
The Dear Leader, prophet and Messiah Barack Hussein Obama II is a sly huckster. The man of “HOPE” is a HOAX! Do you Obami dupes and lackeys of still believe the emperor is wearing his fine clothes? Oh! Look at the crease of those trousers!
.
How can you take an opinion column about Haiti, Rush and Robertson and make it an attack on President Obama? Do you really HATE that much? Are you that much of a blind partisan hack that you can't leave him out of one post? The topic is not about President Obama yet you stretch to take a shot at him.
.
HOW PATHETIC? Keep listening to fox and Rush...it is working. You are as lost and full of hate toward our current president, President Obama, as they want you to be.
.
congrats!

inconvenienttruth
Jan 19, 2010 at 12:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Cynicism on the part of Limbaugh does not and should not diminish Reid's initial comment"
.
No, but you seem to think that Reid's comment diminishes Limbaugh's cynical accusation that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community," which has nothing to do with Reid or his comment.
.
"But because Reid is one of the good ol boys he is excused."
.
Yes, how awful that Reid was "excused" for telling the absolute truth.
.
"satan does have a holiday - anyone ever heard of Halloween?"
.
Yes, and Santa has a holiday - ever heard of Christmas?
.
"And sometimes, tragedy brings out the narrowminded."
.
Talk it, don't walk it.

garyprimer
Jan 19, 2010 at 12:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

Just what we need... another holiday.

prounion
Jan 19, 2010 at 9:10 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wow Danny Glover - really? Reachign back to what a guy that didn't even star in some movies from the 80's said?
.
You guys will do anythign to avoid facing the idea that you are clinging to your superstition.
.
I am too old for this ______.

darwin1
Jan 19, 2010 at 5:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

Well if Peter Wastholm said it, then it must be true. Who in the hell is Peter Wastholm?

crafty
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

or one that has no thoughts of their own......
glen beck and i are old college buddies, kinda like the relationship you share with barney frank.

Zoom
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

"All humans are hypocrites; the biggest hypocrite of all is the one who claims to detest hypocrisy."
Peter Wastholm

Zoom
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

"zoom/truth did you miss the part where i say "let me try your arguing stance"?"

And you think that somehow absolves you of being a hypocrite? You and Glenn Beck could be siblings.

bibledude
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

Dillinger- Exactly what is the difference between a fundamentalist and a Christian? Secondly, do all fundamentalists conduct themselves as Robertson does?

dillinger_1934
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

Robertson is not a christian... he is a Fundamentalist.. there is a major diffrence.

nemesis
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

Cynicism on the part of Limbaugh does not and should not diminish Reid's initial comment - a comment that in other circles would be grounds for admonishment from the club. But because Reid is one of the good ol boys he is excused. And in regards to the title of this article - satan does have a holiday - anyone ever heard of Halloween?
Tragedy often brings out the best in some people. And sometimes, it brings out the narrowminded.

dillinger_1934
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

And give it up on Halloween being the devil's holiday... It's for the kids.. They get to be superheros, and princesses like one day a year... Its about happy children, and candy. I love it because my kid is beyond happy!! Not a giant pagan orgy.. But funsized milkyways, and the candycorn nobody likes...

crafty
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

according to the atheists god doesn't exist anyway. why are they the ones who are so outraged about robertsons quote? for purely political reasons. either that or they hate robertson because he's a christian. i don't know about you, but i follow the stories on grittv. how many people do you know that regularly watch cbn?

dillinger_1934
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

I do not know how someone could be offended that is honestly christian, for bad mouthing Robertson... He is a Fundamentalist, and the founder of the christian coalation. He nearly ran for president in the 80's.. But only if he was sent enough money by his viewers, to back his campagin. He has his hands on the polls, and telivision programming. His love of God is overshadowed by his love of money. If you go to the Christian coalition web site it is full of radical finger pointing, and hate twards anyone who is not in the market to buy his dribble.. Fundamentalist idieals have been the cause of war, and death for years... not a suprise he would try to find a way to make the death of women and children a justified moral dispute. If there where ever a second great flood..... I would look for Robertson, and his garden hose.

crafty
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

whoops wrong thread.
\
\

zoom/truth did you miss the part where i say "let me try your arguing stance"? are you blind or just ignorant as well? what am i saying? of course you are! both!

crafty
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

yeah, 1,940 websites let Chuck K. quote Carville incorrectly. ok.

inconvenienttruth
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's like they have no self-awareness when they describe me...
Projection? Or denial?

Zoom
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

"you spend two sentences answering questions I'm not sure were even asked of you, and the rest of the time you taunt Dub190 and blather useless garbage"

And your comment is different how?

I think you didn't understand the response. Rush and Robertson have national radio and TV programs, respectively, with millions of viewers. Danny Glover does not, and someone had to find his comment on GRITtv, whatever that is. Now do you understand why no one cares about what Danny Glover has to say?

crafty
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

devoted audience size? like the huge audiences at NBC and CNN, two known failures? FOX News is #1 remember? so instead of telling the truth without prejudice, the media should just tell us what the liberals want to hear? LMAO!
let me try your arguing stance, you spend two sentences answering questions I'm not sure were even asked of you, and the rest of the time you taunt Dub190 and blather useless garbage.
such a great debater you are. almost good enough for the high school team! all shock, and insult, absolutely no substance, you are a joke. you are misleading, ignorant, and useless. your lies and copied posts are one thing, annoying. out of touch is the phrase that comes to mind.

inconvenienttruth
Jan 18, 2010 at 7:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Why aren't they chastising him? Because he isn't a Christian figurehead? Or because he's a LIBERAL? ANSWER ME THAT."
.
Yea, it couldn't be for a reason as simple and logical as devoted audience size...
Wonderful performance of manufactured outrage, though; I'm really feeling the all-caps sentence at the end.
.
"What is so horrible about THIS? 'This will play right into Obama’s hands — humanitarian, compassionate. They’ll use this to burnish their, shall we say, credibility with the black community — in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It’s made to order for them.' PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS TO ME!!!"
.
Ooooo...hyper-manufactured outrage mode, with THREE exclamation points at the end of yet another all-caps sentence. I can almost smell the foam on your mouth...
Explanation:
Limbaugh implied that an African-American president, in helping a devastated black population, is only doing so because he's interested in improving his "credibility with the black community." That sort of suggestion is what's known as "horrible."
.
You're not too bad at polishing yourself, dub190.

redder
Jan 18, 2010 at 6:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

ICT is at the alter that s where

vatoloco
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

ICT- Where is Dan Rather when you need him?

facts101
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

When is Barry Obama's birthday? Could we just use that as Satan's holiday.

inconvenienttruth
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

"In Robertson’s literal world of superstition and fear, a fault’s rupture may signify a belch of the beast, but in the real world of science and knowledge, it is a natural, if disruptive, occurrence that bears no malice toward any particular man, woman or child.
That we are having this conversation is ridiculous—obviously, one would hope. That some percentage of the million daily viewers of the “700 Club” might pray and tithe to the speaker of such bile is far scarier than any voodoo curse."
.
Nail on the head.

inconvenienttruth
Jan 18, 2010 at 5:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Objective reporting? Hardly. Put this on the opinion or blog page." - imsmart2
.
Time to get a new user name (or is it ironic?)...

ms_sassy_wi
Jan 18, 2010 at 4:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

wow. Satan already has a holiday. Some say it's April 15th. I was thinking more Oct. 31st.

Yeah, this is not a race for popularity in the Democrat/Republican parties, folks. People are dead in the rubble and we can't get help or food, water or supplies there soon enough! If Obama is seeing that it happens, let's support that effort and the OTHERS involved in helping! What is WRONG with you people?!

gmretirednow
Jan 18, 2010 at 2:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

politics does not belong anywhere during a disaster. But of course Robertson and Limbaugh are in a class by themselves (or is that a dark hole)!

redder
Jan 18, 2010 at 2:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

WOW...and this junk is in the paper..you have to be kidding right...

littlemom
Jan 18, 2010 at 2:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

Kangroojack----UR most certainly right, satan does have his holiday-April 15th!!!!!!!!!

The Religious Freaks are a bunch of PINHEADS!!!!!!

thekai
Jan 18, 2010 at 1:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Parker is also demonizing Limbaugh by distorting what he said on his radio show."

Oh really? Well enlighten us, what did Rush really say on his show? Oh, that's right.... it was a direct quote. You're flattering Rush with your imitation of him. As if the earthquake happened to make Obama look better... get a life. It was a NATURAL disaster. We don't fully understand everything that causes it, but what we do know is no man can cause it.

If this had happened when Bush was President, would you be screaming the same song? Or would you be telling the other side that this is just a natural disaster and Bush had nothing to do with it?

Set your differences aside. Wake up and smell the coffee. This isn't about left versus right, this is about a devastating natural disaster. This was convenient for NO ONE.

support_local_racing
Jan 18, 2010 at 12:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Obama only aims to try and look better than what Bush did with Katrina and 9/11"
.
Well, I guess you're damned if you do, damned if you don't then, huh?

Zoom
Jan 18, 2010 at 12:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

Leave it to nut-jobs to politicize a natural disaster.

vatoloco
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

"The Obami and other media sycophants are pretending that Obama is some kind of savior for the poor people of Haiti to distract us from his incompetence and radicalism here at home"

MarkTwain-Very true indeed. By overpouring and presenting an overkill of support (10,000 military troops) for the devastated Haitian people, Obama only aims to try and look better than what Bush did with Katrina and 9/11. It is as though Obama is still trying to convince his followers that he is the man for this job when we all know he is not.

JustAskMe
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

OK Talkin_Monkey - now go do your homework.

JustAskMe
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

I bet President Obama's help in Haiti wins him back-to-back Nobel Peace Prizes.

Talking_Monkey
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

You just blew every ounce of credibilty you might have had, justaskme. WTG lol

JustAskMe
Jan 18, 2010 at 11:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

Ever notice how darwin1 and Talking_Monkey seem so alike? I bet they are both same high school girl with 2 usernames.

milojacks
Jan 18, 2010 at 10:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

imsmart2- It already is on the opinion page.

As for religious and political opportunists using this tragedy to further their agendas. It's just their opinion, and we all know what opinions are like, and we all have one.

Talking_Monkey
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

The concept of heaven and hell was created by a ruling class to control their people. Magical thinking is a form of escape, by the way.

frogger
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with Darwin here. I am pretty sure this happened because of some plates moving around. I do not believe God or the Devil did this. IF it was either of them I would pick God did it to try to thin out the population so less will starve to death and more can receive medical treatment. I have been told heaven is much better than earth and some may get to go sooner than others.

PBRMan
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

Not sure how you can compare the attacks of 911 to a earthquake. The attacks were carried out by humans, and the earthquake is a natural diaster. It has been long believed that natural disasters are a form of punishment from gods/God.

Talking_Monkey
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

prounion, go bait someone else. I'm not buying.

prounion
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

What is there to think about 2012? Do you mean the elections?

kettleblack
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Chavez a "dumbass?" Hmmmmm, prehaps not so much.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?c...

Talking_Monkey
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal

The question is, what do YOU think?

SwissChick
Jan 18, 2010 at 9:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

Badgerlvr - Good one!

prounion
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

What about 2012 Monkey? Worried the world will end?

Talking_Monkey
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

I think being close-minded is a deadly sin too. It's a pandemic... And no one wants to think about 2012.

darwin1
Jan 18, 2010 at 8:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

You can't be prejudiced against something that isn't true or real. Pat Robertson is clearly a stupid bigot who shouldn't be allowed to use the public airwaves but you people complain about Kathleen Parker? We should be prejudiced against religion, it is a scam. Try getting an education and learn something about science.

15yearsthere
Jan 17, 2010 at 11:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

Exhibit C-Danny Glover "And I hope we seize this particular moment because the threat of what happens in Haiti is the threat that can happen anywhere in the Caribbean to these island nations, you know?
They're all in peril because of global warming; they're all in peril because of climate change. When we see what we did at the climate summit in Copenhagen, this is the response, this is what happens, you know what I'm saying?"

imsmart2
Jan 17, 2010 at 11:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

Agreed, it seems to me Kathleen Parker is as narrow mindedly against religion as the religious nuts she cites are for it. Objective reporting? Hardly. Put this on the opinion or blog page. It'll fit in well with wonders by Steve Knox like "don't look at my johnson while I use the urinal".

Talking_Monkey
Jan 17, 2010 at 11:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

Believing in God and not the devil is like thinking that a battery will supply power with only one wire attached.
Think about it. We complete the circuit of power that lies within us all...

JustAskMe
Jan 17, 2010 at 10:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

Once again, Kathleen Parker shows her extreme prejudice toward religions. Is it possible that she is angry with herself for not being a part of the religious community? Well, get over it Kathleen. Her attempt to 'connect' the devil with God is ridiculous - yet is so 'Kathleen Parker'-ish.

JasonTh
Jan 17, 2010 at 10:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

We can add Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to the list of dumbasses. He says US using earthquake as pretext to occupy Haiti.

Talking_Monkey
Jan 17, 2010 at 9:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

Isn't selfishness a deadly sin? Greed? Deception? It sure seems like Robertson is using this tragedy as a fund increase for himself and his organization of meek, low IQ'd masses. "The meek shall inherit the earth." In other words, be strong. We don't want the earth, a synonym for death. We want heaven. What a release it is to stand up for something that is righteous. Kinda like Jesus did back in his days of table tossing, without fear of spititual reprisal. I think it's pretty cool that an example of the "Stick it the man" (long live rock n roll) attitude was making news all over the place, becoming a part of history that has helped make us into who and what we are today.

JohnWicket
Jan 17, 2010 at 9:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

Satan doesn't need a holiday he's always happy to have extra work.

Hizzoner
Jan 17, 2010 at 9:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

Or, in the words of Bill O"Reilly..."PINHEADS."

Badgerlvr
Jan 17, 2010 at 7:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

One just has to consider the sources of these comments. Robertson and Limbaugh are two peas in a pod. Unfortunately, the pod is rotten and the peas unless.

kangaroojack
Jan 17, 2010 at 6:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

Satan already has a holiday. April 15th. :)

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT