Janesville's historic commission makes bid for final say
Photo 
Christine E. Moore
Photo 
Richard J. Fletcher
JANESVILLE An ordinance to give more power to Janesville’s historic commission is advancing to the city council.
Residents in historic overlay districts must come before the commission for approval of exterior work that requires permits.
The commission can delay the permit for six months, during which time it is hoped the homeowner and commission agree on what work should be done. If no agreement is reached after six months, the resident can do whatever he or she wants.
If the ordinance is changed, the commission would have final say, although homeowners could appeal to the city council.
Work that requires permits in overlay districts includes replacing windows, fencing, siding or demolition. It does not include paint color.
The commission Monday decided removing architectural details should require a permit, too.
Overlay districts cover the Courthouse Hill Historic District and several individual properties around Janesville.
At Monday’s meeting, Christine Moore of the Janesville Design & Development Center asked the commission to continue its work to make the downtown historic district an overlay district.
The commission has hosted two information meetings for residents of the overlay districts. The majority who attended appeared to favor the change.
The ordinance change might be introduced to the council in March and then advance to the plan commission for a public hearing. A second public hearing will be held before the council.
Rich Fletcher, chairman of the historic commission, said the change is important because it would guarantee people wouldn’t make poor decisions that impact historical properties.
“Look at the Lovejoy house, what he did with that,” Fletcher said.
Owner Brad Goodrich removed architectural details and applied a concrete-like surface to the historic house at 220 St. Lawrence Ave. He did that without going before the commission. He has been cited for removing a porch, also without going before the commission. The property now is in foreclosure.
“We’re trying to prevent that,” Fletcher said. “That’s not what most people want.”
Most people in the past have worked well with the commission, Fletcher said. It has issued 126 certificates of appropriateness since 1990, and four have been denied.
One of the four appealed the decision to the plan commission, which attached conditions to the project. Another owner demolished the garage after the six-month period. Two did not move ahead with plans to install vinyl and aluminum siding.
The proposed ordinance is similar to ordinances in many other cities, Fletcher said.

Jan 29, 2010 at 8:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
There are FEW historic homes in Janesville. They are not out for "total domination" as you would imply. As it currently stands, before one buys these homes, we are required to sign paperwork relating to this issue. These homes are an important part of history. The Lovejoy mansion has been a complete disgrace, and, yes, I would support them not allowing one to put glass block walls in the kitchen or neon lighting. It is YOUR home, but, there are 1000s of houses in Janesville that one can buy and rip apart and re-construct as he will. However, these historic homes SHOULD NOT be on the butcher block.
Jan 28, 2010 at 5:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
This is crazy. It is private property. If the city wants to control it; buy it.Tax credits are incentive to influence but government control of private property doesn't sound like democracy.
Jan 28, 2010 at 3:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
the city can not take of the tallman house, but they want to tell taxpayers, on how they can remodel their homes. dah...
Jan 28, 2010 at 2:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
ladulce, the commission has no authority over home interiors.
.
In any case, historic rehabilitation guidelines are not opposed to adding modern features such as a contemporary kitchen or bathroom. Times have changed a lot and it's not really possible for people to live the same way. It's certainly reasonable to modernize a home to make it livable. Doing so capriciously, however, may mean being ineligible for historic preservation tax credits, which make some renovations economically viable and allow the building to survive instead of being neglected or demolished.
http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/tax/r...
http://www.oldhouseweb.com/how-to-advice...
http://www.oldhouseweb.com/how-to-advice...
Jan 28, 2010 at 1:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
I agree. As a historic home owner in the Courthouse hill area, I am appalled at what one neighbor did to the interior of their home. Making it "modern". If they wanted a modern home, they should not have bought this historic home, only to rip it apart.
Jan 28, 2010 at 10:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Long over due and it will be welcomed by most - if not all - historic homeowners in Janesville. Thank you, Historic Commission!
Jan 27, 2010 at 6:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hank, this has nothing at all to do with insurance.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.