Raw milk case moving to Dane County

By PEDRO OLIVEIRA JR.   Friday, June 11, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— It will be up to a Dane County judge to decide what to do with an East Troy farm whose owners are part of a lawsuit against a state agency over raw milk sales.

Mark and Petra Zinniker, N7399 Bowers Road, had their farm shut down last September after state agriculture officials said more than 30 people from Walworth, Waukesha and Racine counties were diagnosed with a bacterial infection from consuming raw milk traced to the farm.

Now, the Zinnikers are suing the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection over the right to sell raw milk under a cow-share program, which the farmers were doing at the time the farm was shut down.

Under a cow-share program, one or more individuals owns the animals but have no ownership of the farm. Some supporters of raw milk consumption say the arrangement should make it legal for them to have raw milk because Wisconsin statutes allow farmers and their families to consume their own raw milk—they just can't sell it.

On Thursday, Walworth County Judge John Race ruled the case would be moved to Dane County, which already has a pending case with similar circumstances.

The Dane County case also deals with sales of raw milk, was filed against DATCP and has similar plaintiffs.

Assistant Attorney General Robert Hunter asked the judge to move legal proceedings to Dane County because “it would promote judicial efficiency for these issues to be considered and decided by a single court.”

Also listed in the Zinniker lawsuit are Gayle Loiselle and Robert Karp of Dousman. They purchased a cow from the Zinnikers under the cow-share program, according to court documents. Attorneys for the farmers say the plaintiffs should be able to own cows, contract with the Zinnikers to board the cows and consume raw milk from the cows.

“I am a cow owner with a right to an interest in obtaining products from my property,” Loiselle wrote in an affidavit. “I am not a consumer or member of the public.”

But officials on the other side of the argument say selling raw milk is illegal in Wisconsin, even under a cow-share program.

Wisconsin statutes require individuals to be bona fide owners with a "real financial stake" to get raw milk from a farm, said Donna Gilson, a DATCP spokeswoman.

Gov. Jim Doyle recently vetoed a bill that would have allowed limited sales of raw milk. At the time, the governor cited concerns over health issues and the possibility that an outbreak of disease from drinking unpasteurized milk could affect the state's dairy industry.

This is the second time Race ruled on the Zinniker case.

Last December, the judge approved a plea agreement after the Walworth County District Attorney’s office filed 24 citations, carrying a total maximum penalty of $24,000 against Zinniker Farm.

As part of the agreement, the Zinnikers admitted the violations but the case was held open and they were not be fined. If Mark and Petra Zinniker are again caught selling raw milk, they could be fined the maximum—$24,000—and would lose their license to sell milk, according to the agreement.

The case against the Zinnikers was filed after agriculture officials found that 35 people from Walworth, Waukesha and Racine counties were diagnosed with a bacterial infection that causes diarrhea, cramping and vomiting.

All said they had consumed raw milk, and 30 said they got it from Zinniker Farm. Twenty-one victims were under the age of 18, and one was hospitalized. Twenty-seven of the victims were in Walworth and Waukesha counties.

Tests by state officials showed the bacteria from 25 of the patients had a DNA fingerprint matched to bacteria found in feces from cows at the Zinniker farm.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(14)
werpknarly
Jun 25, 2010 at 10:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

9 cases of steaming hot Campylobacter and 6 cases of Salmonella... Yum Yum http://www.foodproductdesign.com/news/20...

werpknarly
Jun 25, 2010 at 9:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

btw, a farmers can drink thier own milk because they live on the farm, they're immune system is used to the 'bugs' on thier own farm. i would not drink milk from someone elses farm. AND i know of many show goat farmers that pasturise thier milk before they feed it to thier own goat kids. AND the young and the old could die from E.Coli

werpknarly
Jun 25, 2010 at 9:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

hear is 5 full servings of "IF" http://www.foodproductdesign.com/news/20...

Milkman
Jun 12, 2010 at 12:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

Talking_Monkey;

I think your "IF" said it all. The Government is most likely protecting against the times the "IF" isn't present.

"and nowadays we don't need to worry anywhere near as much if the farmer in question has modern milking facilities, up to code with practices and sanitation and such."

Talking_Monkey
Jun 12, 2010 at 11:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

When the rules were first put in place, the technology we have to day to keep the un-tainted transfer of milk to bulk container was not around. The rules were made to protect the milk from contamination during the old way of the milking process from harvest to consumer, and nowadays we don't need to worry anywhere near as much if the farmer in question has modern milking facilities, up to code with practices and sanitation and such. So, basically, pasteurizing was discovered before our current standards and we no longer need it. After all, milk straight from the cow is safe, otherwise the calves would have never lived to make milk themselves. Granted, they DO have a better tolerance for bugs and the like, but they don't take medicine. Oh, wait, they do NOW.
I think someone (the State?) needs to make a consumer ad that can relate this idea.

babaloo1
Jun 12, 2010 at 10:11 a.m.
Suggest removal

Pasteurizing milk has saved many people from being seriously ill. I don't understand why you would want to drink raw milk. I drank raw milk when I was little, lived on a farm, and never liked the taste myself. If you want to drink raw milk go for it. But...if you get sick from something that could have been prevented, then you should also shoulder the bills. I don't think insurance companies or my tax money should cover somebody because they choose to drink raw milk and knowingly take the risk of becoming ill from it.

Talking_Monkey
Jun 12, 2010 at 9:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

Seems to me that money is the deciding factor. How much money does Joe Farmer make, anyway? Not enough, I bet.

wtp
Jun 12, 2010 at 9:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

I am confused. A farmer who owns the cow and milks it can drink the milk and not break any laws. A city slicker who owns a cow and milks it and drinks the milk is breaking the law. The law is talking from both sides of there mouth. Again it is probably 1 or 2 people who is creating all the hoopla and making it hard for the rest of the world. It just amazes me how much power and voice the other side of the fence has.

evansvillehousewife
Jun 11, 2010 at 10:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is ridiculous and udderly stupid.
There ARE NO LAWS regarding COW ownership other than zoning. I can walk out of my door tomorrow and buy myself a cow. Heck, I DO buy cows, in quarters and in halves. If I get E.Coli from eating my raw burger, who do I sue? The cow? THe farmer? The processor?
I say I suck it up and cook my burgers to 160.
How are they going to prosecute people for owning and boarding cows? People in the city buy and board horses all the time, and I daresay more people get hurt on horses than get hurt drinking raw milk.
It's illegal to sell a horse for slaughter, but it's not illegal to kill and slaughter and eat your own horse. Hmmm..... perhaps I could see if there's a market for the "horsey share" program... since the market for riding and show horses is so low right now...

fromjanesville2waukesha
Jun 11, 2010 at 8:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

Someone please explain to my where the money to prosecute these people is coming from.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT