Apartment complex charged with discrimination
WALWORTH The managers of a government-funded apartment complex in Walworth are being charged with discriminating against a disabled tenant who repeatedly requested accessible parking, federal authorities said Tuesday.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is accusing Madison-based Cardinal Capital Management of refusing to provide reasonable accommodations to a tenant who has braces on both legs, making it difficult for him to walk, according to federal documents obtained by the Gazette.
The tenant lived at federally funded Village Square Apartments, 204 Madison St., Walworth, from October 2008 to November 2009. At the time, the parking lot of the 18-unit complex had 12 parking spaces, two of them designated handicap accessible, but only the one closest to the door had an accessible pedestrian path, according to the charging papers.
All parking at Village Square, which houses elderly and disabled tenants, was available on a first-come basis. The tenant, who was not named on charging papers, said he was asked by property managers to not park on the parking spot closer to the door because it was “exclusively for pick-up and drop-off of tenants, disabled or not, who did not drive,” according to federal documents.
The tenant started parking across the lot, which he told federal authorities caused him pain and took an extended period of time to get to and from his car. Once again, the tenant said, he asked for an accessible parking space. Charging documents say the manager replied, “[It] is our policy, and that’s how we do things here.”
Later in 2008, the tenant slipped and fell in the parking lot, requiring emergency medical attention, according to federal documents. The man moved out before the following winter, fearing another accident, authorities say.
The man, who lived on Social Security, had to pay for market-price housing and started getting his food from a local food pantry, according to documents.
Dan O’Connell, Cardinal Capital Management vice president, said Tuesday that company officials have reviewed the charging documents and “believe it’s full of inaccuracies.”
“We are very disappointed by what HUD did, here, and we intend on defending ourselves vigorously on this,” O’Connell said.
The company manages Village Square for apartment owner WHPC-DWR, a company also named on the federal charging documents.
O’Connell said his company specializes in affordable housing in Wisconsin. The company manages about 6,000 units throughout the state, about 20 percent of them for people with disabilities.
“We go the extra mile to try to do whatever we can to make their lives better,” he said. “We do whatever we can do to help those residents. We have never had a fair housing complaint. We have had just the opposite: People so thankful for the work we do.”
If proven, the federal charges could cost Cardinal Capital Management $16,000 in fines for a first-time offense. The accusations will be reviewed by a U.S. administrative law judge, unless a party asks the case be moved to federal district court, said Shantae Goodloe, a spokeswoman for the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Jun 18, 2010 at 4:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Also - HOW did he fall down? Ice? If it is hard for him to walk with the braces maybe he just fell over himself. I do not see enough info here.
Jun 18, 2010 at 4:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
My question is are they(tenants) ALL disabled ?
Jun 18, 2010 at 2:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why does a disabled person need assisted living if the have the capablity to live on their own?
The property owner is at fault for not making accommodations to prevent injury to the tenant. If proper protocol was followed there is no question in the failure to accommodate.
Jun 18, 2010 at 2:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe he was not ready for assisted living. Many people do not want to go to these type of places, and would rather take care in a life of self worth.
Jun 18, 2010 at 12:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
It sounds like this person needed a service that may have extended beyond a simple apartment. They really needed assisted living.
Jun 18, 2010 at 12:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Ironic....there is subjective and possible discrimination against legal-citizen tenants making a claim here........yet there are rental units everywhere not discriminating against illegal immigrants squatting in the complexes! Hmmmmmmmmm.... Where are the real interests here? $$$$$$-maybe?
Jun 18, 2010 at 7:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
O`connell says... "i just want my life back" lol
Jun 18, 2010 at 1:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Dan O'Connell, I hope you get nailed in the suit. Unless you were there and witnessed everything I highly doubt you know who the person is, what any of the facts of the case are; and most likely only care about saving your hide so you don't lose the property.
Jun 18, 2010 at 1:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
And when I managed a senior housing complex I got yelled at for making sure those with handicaps got the necessary accommodations, assistance to and from vehicles if needed, etc. Some people just need a good swift kick in the rear.
Jun 17, 2010 at 9:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
A black bear could have easily solved this "problem," and they're headed our way right now. See, Nature provides the solution if we'd only let it do its job!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.