Democrats push toward Sunday vote on health care

By ERICA WERNER   Friday, March 19, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

From left, Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif, Rep. Grace Napolitano, D-Calif., Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-NY and Rep. Pedro Pierluisi, D-PR, are seen before announcing their support, along with other members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, for the health care reform bill on Thursday, March 18, 2010 on Capitol Hill in Washington.

— Slowly but steadily, support is building behind President Barack Obama's health care legislation in the House, the result of intense lobbying and politically targeted changes aimed at reassuring waverers and winning over critics.

Obama himself was to talk up the sweeping overhaul in a midday speech Friday in Virginia, his fourth outside-the-Beltway event in two weeks as he scrambles to rally the public ahead of a climactic vote this weekend. On Capitol Hill, congressional leaders were focusing on those rank-and-file Democrats, including moderates and opponents of abortion, who remained undecided after the release Thursday of a final package of changes to the massive 10-year, $940 billion legislation.

"Every vote around here is a heavy lift," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said. "We don't have a rubber-stamp Congress or a rubber-stamp (Democratic) caucus. So, we have our full airing of issues."

The White House and Democratic leaders trumpeted two new converts to their cause, as retiring Rep. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., and first-term Rep. Betsy Markey, D-Colo., announced their support after opposing an earlier version of the legislation last year. Markey cited improved deficit cuts. Gordon said his backing was unrelated to a new provision sending higher Medicaid payments to Tennessee hospitals that treat large numbers of uninsured.

As rumors flew around the House chamber of more possible opponents-turned-supporters — and also of previous "yes" voters who might withdraw their support — Pelosi worked her members, seeking out lawmakers individually or in small groups on the House floor to try to win them over. With Republicans unanimously opposed after a year of corrosive debate, the vote set for Sunday was expected to be a cliffhanger, and Democratic leaders don't yet command the 216 commitments they need.

Obama postponed until June a planned Asia trip that was set to begin Sunday, allowing him to stay in town for the House vote and action next week in the Senate. Thursday afternoon, Obama played host to individual lawmakers seeking favors or reassurance. House Democrats were hoping to get a letter of support Friday signed by enough Senate Democrats to guarantee passage of the package of changes in that chamber, something leaders hope will reassure rank-and-file House members that they won't be left hanging out to dry.

With the addition of the 153 pages of revisions, the bill would expand health care to 32 million uninsured, bar the insurance industry from denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions and trim federal deficits by an estimated $138 billion over the next decade.

Beginning in 2014, most Americans would be required for the first time to purchase insurance or face penalties if they refused. Large businesses would face fines if they did not offer good-quality coverage to their workers. Millions of families with incomes up to $88,000 a year would receive government help to defray their costs.

To address concerns of House Democrats, those subsidies were raised by an estimated $25 billion over a decade in the package of changes offered Thursday. Seniors who experience a gap in coverage in the Medicare prescription drug program would receive a $250 rebate this year — an election-year bragging point for Democrats as they look toward the fall campaign with control of Congress at stake. A special deal giving extra Medicaid money to Nebraska was struck in exchange for more Medicaid money for all states, though other special deals decried by Obama stayed in the bill.

The changes also included another of Obama's top priorities: Federally guaranteed student loans would now be made only by the government, ending a role for banks and other for-profit lenders who charge fees. The savings, an estimated $60 billion over a decade, would increase Pell grants for needy college students as well as support for programs such as aid to historically black colleges, a priority of the Congressional Black Caucus.

The package of changes would modify the sweeping health care legislation that cleared the Senate late last year. In a strategy designed to skirt Republicans' new ability to filibuster in the Senate, House Democrats on Sunday will move to pass both the Senate measure and the package of changes to it; the bill making changes could pass the Senate under rules allowing for a simple majority, not 60 votes.

In the Senate, Republicans plan to challenge select provisions by claiming they are not eligible to be included in a measure considered under non-filibuster rules.

___

Associated Press writers David Espo, Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Charles Babington, Alan Fram, Laurie Kellman and Ann Sanner contributed to this report.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(9)
RetiredAirForce
Mar 19, 2010 at 10:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

The argument of this being like an auto insurance mandate is sad.

lovemycountry
Mar 19, 2010 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wisconsin has its' own Healthcare Freedom Amendment being proposed now.
http://racinenews.org/2010/01/25/sen-lei...

fool_on_the_hill
Mar 19, 2010 at 10:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

From another article about the Idaho lawsuit:

[ Otter, a Republican, said he believes any future lawsuit from Idaho has a legitimate shot of winning, despite what the naysayers say. "The ivory tower folks will tell you, 'No, they're not going anywhere,' " he told reporters. "But I'll tell you what, you get 36 states, that's a critical mass. That's a constitutional mass." ]

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/arti...

futurerichguy
Mar 19, 2010 at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

rexkramer, you need to re-read the article. Note that private insurers will still be providing insurance. This is not socialism. Personally, I was pushing for a single payer Medi-Care style plan, that would arguably have been more similar to socialism. This though, is not socialism. Actually, this might end up being a windfall for insurers, and reminds me a little bit of what happened with the auto insurance industry when that became mandatory.

vatoloco
Mar 19, 2010 at 9:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
vatoloco
Mar 19, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

RAF-I have heard of some states that are pushing legislation to prevent the fed from forcing people to buy insurance. How legitimate is this legislation? I think Idaho is one of the states.

rexkramer
Mar 19, 2010 at 9:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Don't worry, whatever the price of the next round of bribes, you'll be footing the bill. Just like the cost of the bill itself. They'll help themselves to the money in your pocket, but won't debate the bill in an open forum so that you, the taxpayer, can see what's in it. After all, Nancy Botox says that's why it has to be passed, so you subjects can see what's in it. Only a democrat could get away with such logic without being called out by the media. Enjoy socialism folks, after all, most of you out there voted for it.

RetiredAirForce
Mar 19, 2010 at 4:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wonder what the price will be on the remaining vote acquisitions?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT