Holiday travelers face body scanning

By NEIL JOHNSON ( Contact )   Tuesday, Nov. 23, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


An Airline passenger is instructed by a TSA agent while being scanned by a body scanner at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago, Monday, Nov. 22, 2010.

An Airline passenger is instructed by a TSA agent while being scanned by a body scanner at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago, Monday, Nov. 22, 2010.

Depending on which regional airport local travelers use this Thanksgiving, they could be in line for security measures that might leave them feeling like a holiday turkey—plucked nude and pawed over.

Amid airport security changes by the Transportation Security Administration, airports around the country have started using full-body scanning machines that can see under clothing to detect hidden objects.

Several airports in the region have the new scanners, and new TSA rules say people lucky enough to pass through an airport checkpoint with one of the machines must either undergo a scan or submit to an intensive, full-body pat-down.

Milwaukee's Mitchell International Airport has four of the new body scanners. Two are located at the airport's Concourse C, and the other two are at the airport's Concourse D, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports.

O'Hare International Airport in Chicago has 23 of the body scanners; Chicago Midway Airport does not yet have the scanners, the Chicago Department of Aviation reports.

Dane County Regional Airport in Madison and Chicago Rockford International Airport in Rockford don't yet have body scanners; the airports continue to use traditional security methods such as metal detectors, TSA officials said.

Jim Fotenos, a spokesman for TSA's Midwest region, said the TSA has about 450 body scanners at 69 airports nationwide, but the agency plans to put 1,000 more body scanners at U.S. airports in 2011.

Fotenos said it's too early to say whether new body scanners could end up at Madison or Rockford airports next year.

For anyone planning a Thanksgiving flight out of an airport that's using the new body scanners this year, here's what to expect, Fotenos tells the Gazette:

-- The machines, like traditional metal detectors, are set up at airport concourse entrances and are used as primary screening devices to scan passengers individually.

-- Each scan takes less than 30 seconds and is designed to find metallic and non-metallic foreign objects, including weapons and explosives, that may be concealed under passengers' clothing.

-- The scans transmit beneath-the-clothes images of people's bodies to a TSA security screener working in an enclosed room. Scans that show a potential foreign object on someone's body prompt further searches, including full body pat-downs. Images gathered during the scans are immediately and permanently erased.

-- Some airports that use body scanners continue to have concourses outfitted with traditional metal detectors, but security is set up so that a passenger entering a concourse will either pass through a body scanner or a metal detector—not both, the TSA says.

As with metal detectors, only a small percentage of walk-through screenings trigger the need for further searches, Fotenos said.

People at body-screening checkpoints can opt out of the screenings, but under new rules by the TSA, those people are subject to intensive, full body pat-downs that can vary in length from two to four minutes, officials say.

Passengers have the right to have the pat-downs conducted in a private room with a person of their choice as a witness. Pat-downs are only conducted by same-gender officers, the TSA says.

National media reports this week have fueled speculation about a possible public backlash against the new body scan machines. The reports suggest that large blocs of passengers plan to opt for pat-downs in favor of body scans, which could bog down security, leading to flight delays and long waits.

While the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports unusually long waits for passengers at Mitchell International Airport, the newspaper says it's not clear whether that's attributable to TSA body screens and pat-downs or the start of the holiday crush.

Fotenos said increased baggage checks are the main culprit for airport security snarls.

Dane County Regional Airport spokeswoman Jennifer Miller said she doesn't expect security will lead to significant holiday delays at the Madison airport.

At Chicago Rockford International Airport, passenger flights are expected to double from about eight flights a week in off-peak seasons to 12 to 21 passenger flights a week, airport spokesman Thomas Bona said.

But even at holiday capacity, Bona said security at the airport doesn't get bogged down.

"Every year at the holidays, we tell people to get themselves here a little ahead of time, but we haven't seen an increase in delays. Our wait times are normally small," he said.

Meanwhile, the Chicago Tribune reports the TSA is now banning carry-on of dense food items the agency says can flag as explosives during security scans. For instance, passengers can't carry on gravy, cranberry sauce, cheese dip and maple syrup, according to tsa.gov.

The TSA, however, still allows people to carry on pies and cakes.

WINTRY MIX LIKELY FOR THANKSGIVING TRAVELERS

McClatchy-Tribune and Gazette staff

If you are slipping out of town for the long Thanksgiving weekend, you might be doing some sliding as part of your holiday travels.

It looks like a wintry mix is on tap for Wednesday, with snow in the forecast for parts of northern Wisconsin and a combination of rain and snow for southeastern Wisconsin, according to WTMJ-TV meteorologist Michael Fish and the National Weather Service office in Sullivan.

"As of right now, it looks like the better chances of accumulating snow are further to the north and west, but still, keep updated on this storm, as someone in Wisconsin will be affected by snow," Fish said of what's likely in store as thousands of people head out on Wednesday.

If you plan to stay around Rock or Walworth counties, you can expect rain Wednesday through the night, with a chance of snow Thursday, said Penny Zabel, meteorologist with the National Weather Service.

Friday through Sunday should be dry throughout most of the state, she said.

If people are traveling toward Minneapolis or northwestern Wisconsin, chances are good that they will hit snow Wednesday, said Chris Kuhlman, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service.

At this point, it's hard to nail down the amount, Kuhlman said, but the hazardous weather outlook for Minneapolis and northwestern Wisconsin says several inches of snow and areas of blowing snow seem more and more likely.

For southeastern Wisconsin, Kuhlman said there's a chance of rain or snow starting Wednesday morning, but it will change to rain across the region in the afternoon as temperatures increase. During the day Wednesday, a high of around 40 is expected.

As the temperature falls, it will be a rain-snow mix for southern Wisconsin that will end early Thursday morning, he said.

"Even if we do get mostly snow, it's not expected to be a high amount," Kuhlman said.

And it likely won't stick to the ground because soil temperatures in southern Wisconsin are still pretty warm at this point, he said.

Still, the wet and snowy weather likely won't be a welcome sight for the more than 860,000 people from the Badger state that AAA Wisconsin estimates will be traveling during the Thanksgiving holiday.

Of those, 809,000 plan to travel by auto and 33,000 by air, AAA Wisconsin says.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(9)
mespl
Nov 24, 2010 at 4:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

The same can be said for the TSA agents don't like the comments you get while your hand is on my junk don’t go to work!

brucewayne
Nov 24, 2010 at 4:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

Dont like the security measure..... Dont fly.... Damn if they do.... Damn if they dont....

mespl
Nov 24, 2010 at 3:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

GrandmaM: No they are not sensitive to anyone with any types of needs. Haven’t you heard this is the politically correct world we live in where you cannot judge anyone by their actions or how nervous they seem, simply everyone gets the same treatment of guilty until seen as or felt up as innocent. The TSA goes by the feeling that we are all threats until they feel we have proven otherwise, whose next in line cause next year it will be full body cavity searches and most people in this “free” country will just line up and bend over in the name of “safety”!

GrandmaM
Nov 24, 2010 at 11 a.m.
Suggest removal

I just wonder how they'll handle someone like my 91 year old mother who is nearly deaf, cannot walk without her support shoes on, which means she has had to have the wanding when we take her to the airport so she can visit my siblings in the South. Would she have to submit to a full body invasive pat-down? Are they sensitive to special-needs people? I suspect mom won't be flying anymore.

TomTiff465
Nov 24, 2010 at 9:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

I don't need a patdown to get in my car and drive to Grandma's house.

njohnson
Nov 23, 2010 at 5:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

Twerp13:

Some airport concourse checkpoints have body scanners, and some don't. But concourse checkpoints that DON'T have body scanners continue to use traditional airport checkpoint security systems, like metal detectors.

The rule as TSA officials have explained it: If you enter an airport concourse checkpoint that has a body scanner, you must submit to the body scan - or a TSA official will conduct a full-body pat-down.

So, to recap: Pat-downs aren't a requirement; they're used when a security checkpoint alarm is triggered -or when someone who is in line at a concourse with a body scanner declines to submit to a body scan.

Neil Johnson

twerp13
Nov 23, 2010 at 5:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ok let me get this straight... NO pat downs are required as long as the airport does not have a body scanner, but those with a scanner must do a pat down or be scanned otherwise no flight???? what is wrong with this picture? By stating the obvious here, would it not then seem that as long as no pat downs are at these scanner free airports that anyone with bad intentions would target flying out of those as there are no extra security measures (pat downs/scanners)
*
I would think the if the airports did not have a body scanner that they would automatically give the pat downs...would that not make sense?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT