Pro: Clinton’s the only Democrat who can win in 2012

By BOGDAN KIPLING   Saturday, Oct. 23, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

EDITOR’S NOTE: The writer is addressing the question, Should Hillary Clinton challenge President Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2012?

The latest buzz flitting among the Georgetown salons is that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will switch jobs with Vice President Joe Biden and take his place on the Democratic ticket in 2012.

That’s one of the tidbits being peddled by Bob Woodward to promote his new book “Obama’s Wars” and it has Democratic loyalists desperate to salvage a rapidly failing Obama presidency atwitter with unbridled joy.

As a rumor, it’s intriguing. As common sense, it doesn’t pass Logic 101.

Why, after all, would the world’s top diplomat want to chug from John Nance Garner’s “warm bucket” when she could be sipping a Pimm’s Cup in the Oval Office on Jan. 20, 2013? With the economy unlikely to have recovered the Clinton-era glow of the 1990s, it’s far more likely that Hillary will challenge Obama at the start of 2012. If she does, that smart money in the Democratic Party will flow into her coffers like water rushing over the Hoover Dam.

Ah, but what about Woodward’s prediction that Hillary will be a good team player and wait until she is 71 to make a 2016 quest for the Oval Office? Throughout the years since he chronicled the Watergate scandal with Washington Post colleague Carl Bernstein, Woodward has been a font of delicious speculations—not all of them based in reality.

Be that as it may, there’s good reason to view Woodward’s forecast of Hillary as veep as a mere throwaway line—designed to create a momentary sensation.

Anyone who knows the Clintons well knows they have no love lost for either Barack or Michelle Obama. Both believe they were outmaneuvered by the Illinois upstart in the Democratic primaries because they received terrible advice from top campaign aides, including several they now believe were moles for Obama.

In truth, only Hillary’s belief in her “grand destiny” allowed her to accept the secretary of state offer from Obama—a stripped-down post considering the president had already named four special envoys to the Middle East, America’s key area of foreign policy concern. Her acceptance also relegated Bill Clinton to a quiet corner of the public stage—rendered all but mute in voicing any criticism of the Obama White House.

There is every reason to believe that the Clintons will deliver a comeuppance to the Obamas in 2012. By that time, both will look like eminence grises after the amateurish performance of Obama and his buffoonish advisers during his first term.

The dozens of Democratic senators and House members now fleeing any association with the administration’s disastrous health-care and stimulus bills are unlikely to return to the fold. Many, indeed, already are urging the Clintons to reclaim their party before it is destroyed by Obama’s rigid ultra-left ideology.

A longtime Clinton insider says the couple are prepared to move their governing philosophy even more to the moderate center than they did after the sweeping Republican gains in the 1994 congressional mid-term elections.

“The Clintons may have started out as ideologues,” she said, “but they quickly realized that pragmatism is the true art of successful politics, and they have been constantly fine-tuning their political philosophies.”

The woman, a close friend of the Clintons for more than four decades, also pointed out another reason Hillary can’t wait until 2016.

“The constant travel and the never-ending demands of the secretary of state’s office are taking a devastating toll on her,” she said. “She turns 63 this month, but she’s starting to look more like 70 although she’s in excellent physical health.”

Here’s betting Hillary will look years younger and be all smiles when she delivers her inaugural address from the west steps of the Capitol in early 2013.

Bogdan Kipling is a Canadian columnist based in Washington. Readers may write to him in care of the National Press Club, 13th Floor, 529 14th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20045, or e-mail him at kipling.news@verizon.net.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(9)
MrData
Nov 1, 2010 at 8:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

Pundits were already projecting ther OBAMA camp fearing an 'unemployed' Russ feingiold (should he lose to Johnson) in the 2012 presidential race. The Pundits claim that if things continue to falter for Obama, Feingold would appeal to more democrats than Hillary or Obama.

daddymack
Oct 26, 2010 at 9:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

30 years ago
....Reagan/Bush

26 years ago
....Reagan/Bush

22 years ago
....Bush/Quayle

18 years ago
....Clinton/Gore

14 years ago
....Clinton/Gore

10 years ago
....Bush/Cheney

6 years ago
....Bush/Cheney

2 years ago
....Obama/Biden (Clinton, former presidential candidate,
now Secretary of State)

2012:
....Potential Clinton presidential run in the works?

.

...I'm ready to turn the dynasty channel completely off.

MrData
Oct 26, 2010 at 11:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

It's true that Obama campaigned well in 2008 and he fooled white America & the youth of America. Obama's true extremists beliefs and his lack of ability to lead has become very clear. BUT if republicans (& their libertarian T Party pals) win next week and republicans take back at least the House, Obama will be relected in 2012. I can only agree with the premise of this article if the democrats retain control of the House & the Senate after next weeks elections. Then Obama becomes a lame duck president and the dems will be looking to Hillary to run for president, not Obama!

jewels45
Oct 23, 2010 at 2:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

Maybe we needed to have a president like Obama to teach us a leason for future elections.

gpawcat
Oct 23, 2010 at 9:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

Bogdan Kipling is a Canadian journalist.

gFreep2010
Oct 23, 2010 at 1:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

I like the clintons, but the article was written by one of the Right wing Republican's. That is a deep wish for them. Obama is doing fine. Because of the past 8 years of non-governance done by the republicans, excuse me tea party we nearly went into a depression. They have no skills at all and have shown to be irresponsible financially along with the military. I want a president that can guide us back from the edge of a cliff. Hi-tech jobs under the Republican/Tea party oppression were being sent over seas. Foreign countries economies were doing great. We on the other hand were working longer, going into more debt, with no future in front of us. It finally caught with Republican/Tea party group, which brought us to today. Going back to that crap I think not. From a depression stand point in two years this is better than I expected. Putting baffoons back in the office that got us here will take us back down within a year. They can't govern.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT