Janesville School Board OKs teacher contract
Reader poll
Photo 
Karl Dommerhausen
JANESVILLE In an unusually close 5-4 vote, the Janesville School Board on Tuesday approved a four-year work contract with the teachers union.
The vote came after more than an hour of debate at the board table, the second lengthy, anguish-tinged discussion in two weeks.
The union ratified the contract last week. After the meeting, the union announced that 99 percent of its members had voted to ratify.
About 30 teachers attended the meeting, and some of them began counting votes after Karl Dommershausen, who previously seemed to be leaning in favor, said he would vote against it.
Like most if not all of the board, Dommershausen has concerns about how much money the contract will cost.
Dommershausen especially didn’t like provisions that make future costs uncertain.
One of those provisions will allow the teachers to reopen negotiations to increase their pay in 2011-12 and 2012-13 if the consumer price index rises above 2.5 percent.
Dommershausen also worried about the cost of insurance, which could—and probably will—rise while teachers continue to pay the same premiums.
Kevin Murray took Dommershausen to task, saying that Dommershausen had told him he would vote for the contract.
Murray asked whether he could ever rely on Dommershausen to give a straight answer again.
Board President Bill Sodemann tapped his gavel at that point and said members should not question each other’s integrity.
Sodemann again came out strongly in opposition to the contract.
He brought a basketful of figures to back up his argument, including the no-longer-used salary-plus-benefits analysis known as a QEO.
A QEO shows increases of 2.51 percent last year, 5.71 percent this year, 5.14 percent in the third year and 4.86 percent in the fourth year, Sodemann said, and that’s higher than in many years when economic conditions were better.
Send the contract back to the negotiating table, Sodemann and Dommershausen urged.
The other “no” votes were DuWayne Severson and Peter Severson.
DuWayne Severson suggested that Tuesday’s vote should spur people on either side of the issue to consider running for school board.
Peggy Sheridan said the board could have set limits for its negotiators. Instead, the board gave the negotiating team the authority to get it done, she said.
But Sodemann said he couldn’t recall any board member ever calling for the kinds of pay increases that became part of the final deal.
The contract covers four years, starting in 2009-10. Teachers get no additional pay for that year.
The average teacher salary increase will be 3.25 percent starting Aug. 28. Teachers get another 0.5 percent increase Jan. 24, 2011.
Pay increases continue in the following two school years, with the minimum increase 1.5 percent in 2011-12 and 2 percent in 2012-13.
In the end, at least some were hoping to put the debate behind them and move forward.
“After this, we tackle the next issue,” Sodemann said. “Kevin,” he said to Murray, “we shake hands and go on.”
Lori Stottler was of similar mind: “I just hope we put this thing to bed and really start looking at the big-picture vision.”
Union President Dave Parr said after the meeting that the four-year deal will come with expectations of higher student performance, something that teachers know and expect.
“This is a contract that’s going to mend fences,” Parr said.

Sep 24, 2010 at 7:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
Badger I agree with the first part of your post but you finished with..."Are you sure you're not Bill Sodeman in disguise?" And that is what I discussed in my post and I stand by my post. If you truly followed this process you'd understand how implying I'm brown nosing Commission Sodeman, you'd understand how silly you sound.
Sep 23, 2010 at 7:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
You sure missed the point fbcoach66. You might want to go and wash your face, your nose is a little brown.
Sep 23, 2010 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Badgerlvr: Commisioner Sodeman always has the courage of his convictions to sign his names to his posts. Please do not suggest he would ever do otherwise to score cheap points. All these commisioners did what they thought was right. Please respect that! I know I would not have wanted to make that decision.
Jim Reif - JEA Co-lead negotiator
Sep 23, 2010 at 1:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Peacenick: "I know a lot of professionals who would like that package."
If that's the case, why don't they go into teaching? For that fact, why don't you? After all, teachers get that great salary with so much time off and very little to do. Are you sure you're not Bill Sodeman in disguise?
Sep 23, 2010 at 11:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Sandman, what is your real name? What local board will you be running for? I want to be on your campaign committee. The countless thankless hours these school board members put in for free are to be commended, not attacked by someone without the back bone to run themselves.
Agree or disagree with them at least they have the courage to stand up and do what they think is right. Once you put your name on the ballot, then you have the right to throw stones. Until then, all nine of them deserve nothing but praise for putting in countless hours of volunteer work for the students of Janesville. Next thing we'll be attacking the bell ringers during the holiday season for daring to ask for donations.
Sep 23, 2010 at 11:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
I guess it's real easy to spend money you don't have that someone else will be responsible for paying. (No) thanks to you, school board members! "Kids are our future"/"Every child deserves a great school" WEAC slogan has gotten real old, but I guess you guys and gals continue to fall for and feed it.
I this city was a business, I certainly wouldn't invest in it. Lucky you have the power of forced taxation, or you'd be footing the bill yourselves!
About time for that other council of fools to spend $2 mil that it doesn't have on a double-sheeter ice arena that it (well-)paid a consultant to study and ultimately advise them wasn't feasible, isn't it?! That would make about as much sense as this school decision (okay, "even less sense")!
Might this be what you get when a bunch of self-aggrandizing, know-it-all, "I follow-my-heart" (whatever happened to "I use my so-called 'God-given' brains"?), low self esteem, gadfly wannabees get themselves elected or appointed to various local unpaid or low-paid boards and committees and end up controlling millions of dollars in taxpayers money without the vestigial fortitude to do the responsible, right thing? (Of course, I'm not saying that this is what is actually happening here--just positing a little conundrum for your consideration in Janesville's own little...TWIT-LIGHT ZONE!)
Sep 23, 2010 at 10:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
Vote the 3 "S's" and the "D" man back in office!
They are the taxpayers last line of defense.
Sep 23, 2010 at 9:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Good job, Karl. Stick to your guns and we (the voters) will stick with you.
Sep 23, 2010 at 8:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think that it's time to vote the 3 "S's" and the "D" man out of office!
Sep 23, 2010 at 8:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Salary range: $32,364 - $70,948 in WI-(from your site)-that does not seem like low pay to me then you add days working, benefits, and pensions, I know a lot of professionals who would like that packet.
Sep 23, 2010 at 8:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Peace I am so tired of this. The JEA took less than a state average raise. Mr. Sodeman at the end said, "If anyone can give me numbers why this is good I would change my vote." I wish I had the option to stand up and talk. The LOWEST average he could find was 1.75% per year. This contract is: 0% year 1, 2.25% year 2, 2% year 3, and 2% year 4. Add those up and you get 6.25% for FOUR years, so 6.25% divided by four is 1.56% Peace, Mr. Sodeman, that is LOWER than the LOWEST state average per cell increase!!!! Way lower than the WEAC 2.25% or state administrators 2% figures for average per cell increase!
************************
The JEA understood the taxpayers plight and traded salary for working conditions. It's called negotiating, thank them for the sacrifice and move on. As Mr. Ardery said Flint (I think, maybe Detroit) Michigan got 4% per cell, and they are worse of economically than Janesville. I say, we should thank the JEA for being willing to keep taxes low.
The numbers don't lie if you compare apples to apples! Which is the only fair comparison.
Sep 23, 2010 at 8:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
peacenick: "I know that nationally all teachers are not paid well but that is not our local truth."
-
How does average teacher pay in Janesville compare to nationwide? I don't know where this site got their numbers: http://www.teachersalaryinfo.com/compare... But it shows Wisconsin teachers right about in the the middle of the pack. It has been stated several times that this contract is below Wisconsin's average. It would suggest that Janesville is right in line with what teachers make on average throughout the country.
Sep 23, 2010 at 6:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
I am frustrated with teachers raises/benefits/pensions--I know that nationally all teachers are not paid well but that is not our local truth. Their demands just seem greedy to me and sadly unrelated to merit.
Sep 22, 2010 at 9:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
Lori Stottler's numbers were the best! We can raise our taxes $25 to pay more for garbage pick up, but when we raise them $25 for education, the public goes crazy and gets mad at the district and teachers. Maybe the Gazette could post the tax bill break down that Lori was sharing at the meeting. Or would that cause people to forget about the school increase and make them focus on all the other areas that pull form our taxes?
Sep 22, 2010 at 9:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
Bill S., why did you bring all kinds of numbers/facts to the board meeting the night of the vote? You sit there and question other members of the board about not getting the numbers right. Nineteen months of negotiating and you didn't discuss numbers over and over in closed session with the board/district team? Doesn't sound to me like you are doing your job as president very well when you bring all these numbers and research to the table at the last minute. Why not get all these numbers 10 months ago? It really made you look a bit ignorant to what was going on for the last 19 months, in my opinion.
Sep 22, 2010 at 9:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
ifiruledtheworld: "Sodeman (...) critical thinker"
-
lol
Sep 22, 2010 at 8:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
Thank goodness for Sodeman. We need a fiscally conservative critical thinker on the school board. My only regret is that he apologized for his comments a week or so ago. He should NOT have. He had a right to say what he did.
Sep 22, 2010 at 7:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
I wish the board would've rejected this, if it goes to a mediator and the teachers get MORE! Stop hoarding the fund 10 balance, created by the teachers general health. Pay them that money, they deserveit! I truely hope Sodemann stops running for school board, he doesn't understand why 95% of educators in this community can't stand him? What an arrogant man! Take your personal politics to govt please! Get out of the schools! Unfortunately we live in a conservative community that buys the crap that you are selling, I for one am not! Tapping the gavel becaue someone you criticize is being berated? I wonder if you would have done the same thing if someone would have been bashing the teachers.
I do wonder this if your QEO numbers were so correct. Then why on earth were you all so afraid of a mediator?
Stop comparing your private sector buiness and the teachers. Apples and oranges. I am sick of reading about you in the paper, why can't you just go away? If you are so concerned with tax waste why aren't you at city council meetings complaining about the 2 million dollar waste of an ice arena they just approved?
It will be a great day for Janesville when you are no longer a school board member. Your own ego wont let that happen will it?
Sep 22, 2010 at 7:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
So, it sounds like Dommershausen knew there were enough votes to pass the contract he knew should be passed, but voted against it so he could play the "I'm against taxes" card for the next election. Real nice, Karl.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.