Janesville School Board to discuss potential for teacher contract changes

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Monday, Aug. 15, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Reader pollAudio

Do you expect Janesville teachers to reopen parts of their contract to save the district money?

  

See the results and comments

Photo

Karen Schulte

— The Janesville School Board will huddle with its labor lawyer tonight to consider its options in a possible negotiation with the teachers union.

A glimmer of hope appears to exist that the union might agree to consider economic concessions.

That glimmer is enough for the board to get a briefing from labor attorney Mike Julka and possibly vote on a strategy for approaching the union, the meeting notice indicates.

School board President Bill Sodemann recently met with teachers union president Dave Parr about the possibility.

“If there wasn’t hope I wouldn’t be doing this,” Sodemann said Sunday.

Sodemann indicated that hope is driven in part by the potential benefit to the district’s budget. The school board is facing the prospect of raising taxes to close a $2.1 million budget hole in the current fiscal year and a long-range estimate that the board will need to fill a $9 million budget hole in 2012-13.

Julka will discuss what is allowed to occur in contract negotiations under legislation authored by Rep. Joe Knilans, R-Janesville, said Superintendent Karen Schulte.

Knilans’ legislation allows a reopening of the teachers contract while protecting the contract from Wisconsin Act 10.

Act 10 is the so-called budget-repair bill, which strips all public employee unions of most of their ability to bargain new contracts.

The Janesville teachers’ contract protects them from Act 10 until it expires on June 30, 2013.

Parr previously said the teachers wouldn’t consider opening their contract to make economic concessions—as other public-employee unions across the state have done—because that could trigger Act. 10. Knilans’ legislation would protect the union if it reopens its contract, but only until Sept. 29.

“It doesn’t hurt for them to talk to us,” Schulte said. I think we should have the discussion, have it go to their entire membership and let them vote.”

Schulte said some have believed that the only thing that could be renegotiated was employee contributions to their pensions. But Julka will tell the board that anything that saves the district money could be considered, including a pay freeze, furloughs or increased contributions for health insurance.

Parr would not say whether there’s hope or not that teachers would agree to consider an offer. He said he and Sodemann agreed to keep the content of their talk private and that both would go to their respective boards for guidance.

“I just don’t want to get everybody worked up, because I definitely want to see what the (union’s) executive board has to say,” Parr said Sunday.

Running any contract-related matter through the union’s executive board is standard practice. Parr can’t take unilateral action.

If a deal is eventually made, it wouldn’t be sealed until the union membership votes on it.

Parr said he meets with his board on Aug. 29, and if something comes of this, there would be time for the union membership to vote on it before Sept. 29.

The only other item on tonight’s closed-door agenda is presentation of an appraisal of the district’s Educational Services Center at 527 S. Franklin St.

The city of Janesville has expressed interest in buying the site for a new fire station. If the board decides to move forward, the next step could be for the school administration to approach the city, Schulte said.

Schulte on Sunday would not reveal what value the appraiser put on the land and building. She said revealing it could harm negotiations on a sale.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(5)
i_luv_jvl
Aug 16, 2011 at 10:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

Give them their collective bargaining rights back, and they'll eagerly pay. Simple as that. Otherwise I'd say no. At least hang on to what you have as long as you can.

i_luv_jvl
Aug 16, 2011 at 10:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

Does this mean that the Governor wants to reconsider the teachers' offer to make concessions and open HIS contract (ACT 10) for negotiation? I didn't think so.
I think we know the answer then, don't we? Walker already made that decision for the teachers.

marge123
Aug 16, 2011 at 3:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

Wow, they have enough money for a "labor lawyer" must not be "broke" or need "the tools"

factsplease
Aug 16, 2011 at 3:20 p.m.
Suggest removal

http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2011-0...
Interesting and relevant radio show about education and teacher's unions. Main idea: the unions have overreached and need to be reined in, but they serve an important role and should not be "killed"(like Walker is doing), just re-focused.

Thinkfuture
Aug 16, 2011 at 7:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

I just find it ironic that the very people who did nothing to support unions during the Walker fiasco in February relentlessly seek and expect union support now.
---
The union resentment is the direct result of the discriminatory activities of selected board leaders, Knilans, and other Walker supporters toward unions.
---
The hypocrisy is too much. A town built on union-fought-for wages has local leaders subvert union rights and then demand union support. It doesn't make sense. Lie in your bed....
---
P-Poor management from the governor's office on down.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT