New Janesville School District tool focuses on improvement
Expectations for teachers
Click here to view the criteria being used in discussions with teachers about how to improve teacher performance.
JANESVILLE "The conversations" are coming.
The conversations should be exhilarating, inspiring and fun for a lot of teachers, said Janesville public schools Superintendent Karen Schulte.
For some teachers, however, they will fall short of fun. They’ll be hearing from their principals about how they should improve.
Principals will start calling teachers into their offices this month.
The annual conversations will be “critical to the success of our organization,” said Steve Sperry, the director of administrative and human services.
The goal is for employees to reach their full potential, Sperry said.
Conversations will be based on a list of traits that great teachers should have and that not-so-great teachers should improve on.
The traits describe teachers in three levels: high-performing, middle-performing and low-performing. In shorthand, this is called the HML (high, middle, low) process.
To explain what officials have in mind, it helps to consider what HML is not:
-- It’s not a rating system, officials insist. There’s no list of high-, medium- and low-performing teachers.
-- It’s not an evaluation system. The district already has a formal evaluation system, and this won’t take its place.
-- There has been no talk of turning the process into a teacher merit-pay system, Schulte said.
“I do not believe this will lead to merit pay,” said teachers union President Dave Parr.
What HML is, is a procedure for bosses to tell employees how they’re doing and how they can improve. It’s something bosses everywhere do; this is a standardization of the process, officials said.
“I don’t think we can afford to not address employee attributes or employee traits,” Sperry said. “By not doing so, I think we risk the integrity of our profession, and we also risk the important goal of educating children.”
Nobody will lose a job over this, but knowing where you stand in the eyes of the boss may help you consider other employment, officials said.
District officials developed the HML process last summer without teacher input, according to a letter sent to teachers last week.
Principals have already had the conversation with their bosses. Now, it’s being rolled out to teachers.
Officials said they’ve spent considerable time training principals so that everyone conducts the process the same way.
“When a teacher transfers from one school to another, the expectations will be the same,” Parr said.
The HML process is part what the district calls its Journey to Excellence. It’s based on the quality-improvement theories of Quint Studer and his Studer Group, a consulting company that specializes in the health-care field and donating its resources to make the process work in Janesville public schools.
“Many health-care organization leaders are spending 80 percent of their time on the 5 percent of employees who are not meeting expectations,” according to Studer Group’s website. “Although we wish the low performers would leave our organizations, they are tenacious. …”
Sperry said the district has done such a good job of hiring teachers that the percentage of low performers will be lower than what Studer might predict.
The district’s hiring process has been revamped in recent years. A key part of it is the “peer interview,” in which groups of employees have a say in who gets hired. That gives those employees a stake in making sure the new teacher is successful, Sperry said.
One of the negative traits on the lists is questioning of the peer interview process.
That’s not to say people shouldn’t ask questions, but “if people believe it’s not effective for the district … then I would guess at some point that the district would not be a match for them,” Schulte said.
The same goes for another negative trait: questioning whether all students can learn.
Schulte said many high-performing teachers had been invited to the Studer Group’s conferences called TYYO, or Taking You and Your Organization to the Next Level, where the approach was explained.
Teachers at those meetings were enthusiastic about it, saying they wanted to hear what they were doing right and how they could improve, Schulte said.
And feedback has been a constant complaint in surveys of teachers, Schulte said.
Even so, the announcement that these conversations were about to start surprised some teachers who contacted the Gazette. Union leaders brought it up at a meeting about 12 days ago, and word spread.
Parr said the district had planned to announce it at the end of January, but about one-third of teachers already had been to TYYO meetings, Parr said, so it should not have been a surprise to many.
A letter from Schulte and Parr, along with the lists of traits, was sent to teachers Jan. 12.
“Our school district is continuing to create a culture where employees feel valued, where all of us have a say in how we will continue to improve the performance and perception of our school district,” the letter reads. “… Everyone has the right to know what is expected of them. Everyone has the right to know how well they are accomplishing their tasks.”
Parr said he doesn’t think teachers will actually be told they are low performers.
“I don’t know that someone has to have a word associated with their performance. That’s not the intent here,” Sperry said. “The intent is to have some kind of change take place.”
Schulte said high performers are not perfect. They might have negative traits. From day to day, the traits they exhibit might fall into the high, middle or low categories.
The process seeks to help teachers see where they need to improve and then to show them that their principals will help them achieve the improvements, Sperry said.
The high performers will receive the feedback that they want and but that some have never gotten, Schulte said.
“They’re going to be feeling pretty darn good about themselves,” Sperry said.
And for those who hear negatives, that can be a positive, too, Schulte said.
“I think everyone wants to improve,” she said.
“I really think in the end that they’re going to be pretty satisfied with this process,” she added.

Jan 29, 2011 at 10:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why is that people only want to bash teachers? I understand that they are public employees and are paid by tax payers, but there are at least 2 if not more articles/blogs on here where people can and do bash them. What about other public employees? Police officers, fire fighters....why are teachers singled out? Is it because their job is not considered "important" while police and fire are considered important? Just asking...
Jan 24, 2011 at 6:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Many health-care organization leaders are spending 80 percent of their time on the 5 percent of employees who are not meeting expectations" ...sounds familiar, just substitute health care leaders with teachers and employees with students. This is true for time and money.
Jan 24, 2011 at 3:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Too bad they decided to use "HML Process" as the name of this initiative, considering that it is common texting lingo for Hate My Life. Oops...a bit laughable. Consequently, I love my life and my job and take great pride in it, no matter what label administration would like to slap on me.
Jan 24, 2011 at 1:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
I would hate to be a teacher in Janesville. Every time there is a story in the Gazette about the school district or anything related to schools around here, the commenters show no restraints in screaming about saving money in the schools. Don't increase salaries, don't pay for seminars/training for teachers, don't increase budgets for supplies....really?? When I moved here, people told me "oh, we have such a good school system here". But now no one seems willing to put a dime into making sure it stays that way. Just whining and complaining. If these whiners are parents, then I feel sorry for the teachers that have to deal with their kids. It starts at home.
Jan 24, 2011 at 12:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
As my economics prof. once said, "There's no such thing as a free lunch." That translates to: Nothing is free! There's ALWAYS an underlying motive that's going to cost something. As for HML, who would want to be a teacher these days anyway?
Jan 24, 2011 at 11:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
I agree with someday, and I do know someone on the inside. I may not know everything, but some things I do know. It is costing us taxpayers for this scheme with higher taxes and less teachers, along with the lower enrollment thanks to Government Motors and its subsideries.
Jan 24, 2011 at 8:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
If Studer is paying for everything, then who pays for the subs, airline tickets, hotels, food, transportation etc. when staff attends the "Studer" seminars? Isn't that called "building budgets?"
Jan 24, 2011 at 7:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Other Districts in this area have tried similar schemes to this and have seen no requisite rise in student performance. Some groups have even seen a decrease in performance as face-to-face instruction time has been diminished so that more time is given to planning and preparing and giving the standardized tests. These tests teach nothing and certainly don't reflect the standards or "norms" of any given community. Unique student abilities and creativity are all but ignored. Let's spend more time teaching and less time testing. Think about your last test. What did you learn from it? Tests make one significant contribution and that is to textbook publishers and their political lackies. Take back the local control of your district. Put your money where it counts most, in your children!
Jan 24, 2011 at 7:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Not sure what the first comment even means!! As usual, misinformed readers of the Gazette think they know, but they don't!! Studer is GIVING his time, money, and services to the School District of Janesville!! NOT costing Janesville taxpayers ONE CENT!!
Jan 23, 2011 at 9:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why are we still spending money on the Studer Group? That is part of the reason we are in a deficit. The school district needs to cut it's losses and get back to the basics of running a district with their own instincts not the Studer groups way of running it.
Jan 23, 2011 at 8:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
This is a flawed process because it does not take into consideration that it may not be the teacher's fault. If the student does not want want to make the effort, then the teacher is going to be blamed for the failure, not the student. Teachers try their hardest to give the students knowledge as dictated by the DPI and the district.
Jan 23, 2011 at 6:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
"To explain what officials have in mind, it helps to consider what HML is not: a rating system, officials insist. There’s no list of high-, medium- and low-performing teachers."
Really? If there is no 'list' then how do principals decide who they need to talk to about improving? No list or rating system my backside!
Jan 23, 2011 at 5:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm sure there are quite a few teachers that are certain that they are H performers, but if you're comfortably overweight and you're not striving to "maintain and improve wellness (aka exercising vigorously) to benefit self and the SDJ" then you are NOT an H performer, just sayin'. I'll be checking out your progress at conferences.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.