Milton approves landlord law

By NEIL JOHNSON ( Contact )   Wednesday, July 20, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Nancy Lader

Photo

Jerry Schuetz

— The Milton City Council on Tuesday approved an ordinance allowing the city to fine landlords at least $300 for failing to maintain safe, livable conditions in residential rental properties.

The council did so by waiving a third reading on the ordinance, which was introduced in June.

Alderwoman Nancy Lader, who owns eight rental properties in Milton, issued the lone “no” vote because she wanted a third reading on the ordinance.

Under the new ordinance, city code enforcers can issue landlords citations for failure to make timely, adequate repairs on residential rental properties. It also would force tenants to handle repairs when they damage rental properties.

The ordinance mirrors state statutes for rental property maintenance, but it will allow repair complaints to be handled locally, in city court, instead of circuit court.

It’s intended to force landlords to maintain amenities agreed upon in leases and would give renters a faster way to handle maintenance problems than filing a complaint in circuit court.

Noncompliance fines range from $300 for a first offense to $1,000 for a third offense, plus fees.

Joe Thompson, who owns rental properties in Milton, addressed the council Tuesday.

Thompson said he supports the ordinance, but he wanted to know how the complaint process would work.

City Administrator Jerry Schuetz said a city police officer would be in charge of enforcing the ordinance and a city building inspector would inspect maintenance complaints.

Complaints would be filed through municipal court by the city, not a tenant or a landlord.

Thompson also asked how much notice landlords would get on repair complaints before getting a ticket.

Schuetz said the first step in enforcement would be to try to get landlords or tenants to voluntarily comply with repair issues.

As it is written, the ordinance would apply only to active rental leases. But Mayor Tom Chesmore, who has been a vocal supporter of the ordinance, said the city council could strengthen enforcement if landlords try to skirt the rules.

The intention is to ensure landlords aren’t ignoring dangerous problems in apartments. Chesmore has cited black mold, buckled floors and broken furnaces as problems the ordinance could address.

“If this (ordinance) doesn’t address some of the issues, then we’ll revisit this,” Chesmore said. “We’ll get to them.”

Thompson suggested the city should put out a handbook that shows renters how to handle repair requests.

Schuetz said the city was in the midst of forming an area landlord-tenant coalition. The group would allow city officials to work with landlords and renters on expectations for property maintenance and other issues.

It would be a good idea to have landlords and renters file maintenance checklists when tenants move in and out, former Alderwoman Lynda Clark said. That would ensure maintenance problems don’t sneak up on people.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(5)
gmaof3
Jul 21, 2011 at 5:57 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is a great ordinance! Renters have rights too. If a landlord can't get something repaired within 48 hours, they are treating their tenants with great disregard. I don't think its too much to ask that the "home" these families are living in, be up to code.
Personally, I had a bad experience with a faulty fan on a central air conditioner. I didn't discover it until I got my utility bill. My bill jumped from about $85 to $530! This was in the 80's and I lived in a very nice apartment building in Rockford. Bottom line is, the landlord actually was found "not at fault" because I didn't tell him there was a problem. Well, I didn't KNOW there was a problem, until I got my bill!
That said, there is no reason this should even be an issue, if landlords treated their rental properties as they do their own homes.
No excuses.... step up and do the right thing! Landlords are not "gods", they can be fined.

melstew47
Jul 21, 2011 at 3:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

why isnt there a like button?it would make things easier,then i could just click like or dislike lol

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Jul 21, 2011 at 1:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

300$ thats it? Should be closer to 3000! Thes people that own properties should be keeping them livable. If they dont want to follow a set of standards then DONT RENT THEM OUT! N o one is forcing them to!

LydiaR
Jul 21, 2011 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

If Ms. Lader owns "eight" rental properties in Milton, should she even be allowed to vote on this issue???? Seems like a conflict of interest to me.

SuzQue
Jul 21, 2011 at 12:55 a.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT