Janesville residents ask city to give them a break
Reader poll
JANESVILLE Five residents who appeared during the Janesville City Council’s first public hearing on the 2012 budget asked members to consider the many people in the community who are in dire straits.
Two visually handicapped residents thanked the council for retaining the bus system—one even suggested expanding it—and for continuing the sidewalk program.
A second public hearing is scheduled at 7 pm. today in City Hall, 18 N. Jackson St., after which the council is expected to act on the budget.
Rick Leyes, 2317 N. County E, told council members he is concerned about a proposed 21 percent water rate increase, the third in four years.
Debt that the city incurred when it built a new west side water tower to serve a new subdivision is one reason for the increase, he noted. Growth there has yet to materialize, Leyes said.
More water costs should be shifted to developers who need the water for their developments, Leyes said. The city should instead focus on maintaining the current system.
“We cannot continue to invest in expensive infrastructure with the false hope of recovering the money,” Leyes said. “Taxpayers pay the price for these bad decisions.”
He complimented the city for decreasing stormwater utility rates, but he also noted that the fee has gone up every year since 2004.
“In the big picture, the city should live within its means,” Leyes said.
Instead of raising fees and creating new ones, “it is time to make budget cuts like everyone else in the community is doing.”
One woman said she is a single, disabled mother of two. She said she has trouble paying her bills, but she wasn’t complaining.
“I’d like to let you guys know, I live within my budget. If we can do it, I know you can,” she said. “Figure out what we can do with what we have.”
Dawn Renee Penn, 1353 S. Pearl St., urged the council to “really look at what you’re doing and how you’re increasing certain things … roundabouts, bike trails, skateparks.”
“They’re nice things, but are they bringing in more money?” she asked.
Look at what could be cut, “not what more do we need,” she said. “You’re going to have more empty houses if you just keep adding taxes.”
K. Andreah Briarmoon said she had concerns about the entire budget process and asked the council to start over, calling for a citizens budget committee.
John Gorski, 402 E. Centerway, spoke at two different meetings, and the comments that follow are combined from both nights.
“Where does it all end?” Gorski asked, citing rising taxes and/or fees levied by all governments and rising food, gas, energy and water costs.
Do we really need an $800,000 (business) incubator to be built on questionable soil quality when the city is filled with empty buildings? he asked. “Is a roundabout on Wuthering Hills really, really necessary?”
Now the council wants to levy a wheel tax and build a skatepark, he said.
“GM is not here. They’re long gone and not coming back,” he said.
Employers are paying higher unemployment taxes, and they are not hiring. People are leaving Janesville to find work elsewhere.
Homes are in foreclosure, and Gorski said he owes more on his house than it is worth.
“There is just so much blood you can get from a turnip,” he said.
“We the people are not open checkbooks. If we have to do without, so can public employees.”
Gorski said he has not had a raise in six years, and he is tired of paying salary increases and generous benefits for union employees.
Jennifer Wenzel, 2502 Elizabeth St., and Dave Hyde, 1315 Mineral Point, thanked the council for maintaining the transit system and keeping fares stable.
The system is a “vital part of the community,” Wenzel said. “As Janesville grows and the economy gets worse, public transit is going to be very important.”
She commended the council for continuing its seven-year sidewalk program, a vote that generated some controversy this year.
Yuri Rashkin was the only council member to comment after the residents spoke Nov. 14.
Rashkin noted that the utility director is retiring and suggested leaving that position vacant. He suggested lowering a $100,000 subsidy to the golf courses and said he still has reservations about the wheel tax, which would bring in $550,000 in revenues.
Levitt in a memo said the utility director oversees a $26 million operation, and he would be concerned with eliminating the position.
Levitt said in a recent memo the city could cut about $15,000 from the golf course budget without a major impact on services. The council could increase fees at Blackhawk by 50 cents for another $4,000 in revenues.
If the wheel tax is voted down, Levitt suggested the council transfer $275,000 from reserves and find another $275,000 in budget cuts.
Janesville 2012 budget highlights
The proposed 2012 city budget, including the library budget, includes a 0.46 percent increase in expenditures and a 3.12 percent increase in the tax levy. The tax levy increase makes up for a loss of revenue in such areas as state aid, interest from investments and permit fees.
The council is considering a $10 fee on every car and lightweight pickup licensed in Janesville to cover the decreases. The $10 would be used for street maintenance. Last year, the council levied a $40 garbage pickup fee. Some council members have warned that the fee could increase another $40 in 2013.
Water rates are proposed to increase 21 percent.
The council would use $825,000 in reserves to help balance the budget. It would also leave several city positions open, including two police officers, deputy fire chief and community development director.
Under the current proposed budget, a Janesville homeowner with a home assessed at $120,100 would pay $950.59 for city and library services. That’s a decrease of $5.32, or 0.6 percent.
Total property taxes for that average homeowner when all taxing jurisdictions are included are projected to decrease about $2.92, or .1 percent. That is figured without knowing what credits are coming from the state, such as the lottery tax credit. That hypothetical homeowner would pay about $3,001 in 2012.
Taxing jurisdictions include the Janesville School District, Blackhawk Technical College and Rock County.
Total tax rates would decrease from $26.35 per $1,000 of assessed valuation to $24.99.
Tax rates decreased primarily because of an increase in assessed values resulting from the citywide revaluation. The city’s assessment increased from $3.523 billion to $3.848 billion—$325 million, or 9 percent.
Residential assessments increased 5.5 percent. Commercial properties increased 20 percent. Personal property assessments increased 7 percent. Manufacturing assessments increased 9 percent. Agricultural assessments increased 2 percent.
Tax increases are generally paid by the entities whose assessments increase more than the average.

Nov 29, 2011 at 4:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Don't look for any breaks from our city government clowns - they gave all of their 'extra' money to represented employees under the table - and above board with the new merit pay.
Nov 29, 2011 at 4:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
What is the real cost of subsidizing golf courses, skate parks, ice rinks, leisure services, etc.? Most citizens now-a-days don't have time for leisure. Why subsidize the wealthy and indolent? Many of us never use these facilities, why tax us? Why are agricultural assessments only going up 2% when the rest of us are paying 3 to 10 times that amount? When will the budget process take us to the point of a taxpayer revolt? Maybe a citizens budget committee would be a step in the right direction. Janesville, what's in your wallet?
Nov 29, 2011 at 2:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Trust me Marge when I say Gorski is talking all and not just union members. Go to a meeting and voice your opinion. When you have a lot of thoughts running thru your mind, and you hit center stage you say what you remember. Give the guy a break. The point he is trying to make is that it can not keep falling back on taxpayers. If you only make so much a year and do not get a raise then increases on property taxes and whatever else will break you. We do not get extra money handed to us to say, hey sorry your hours were cut and you had a loss of income. Why do the taxpayers need to keep giving things up just to fight for survival?
Nov 29, 2011 at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Fire them all and get someone in there that appreciates a job and knows how to save money.
Nov 29, 2011 at 12:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Gorski said he has not had a raise in six years, and he is tired of paying salary increases and generous benefits for union employees" I hope Mr. Gorski realizes how much non-union positions pay with their salary increases and generous benefits. Perhaps he will see how much these administrators and managers make and some even get fringes(monthly car allowance comes to mind)I wish the Gazette would break down this information so taxpayers can really see where the lions share is going.
Nov 29, 2011 at 11:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
" no raises except cost of living"
Wow isn't that a raise.
Who else even gets "cost of living".
Most are making less and glad they got to keep their job!
Nov 29, 2011 at 11:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
" no raises except cost of living"
Wow isn't that a raise.
Who else even gets "cost of living".
Most are making less and glad they got to keep their job!
Nov 29, 2011 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
why do we need an assistant operations manager mr levit?????
Nov 29, 2011 at 9:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
I have to agree very much with several of the people that were at the meeting. In this day when alot of people have a very tight budget to work with, why is the solution to always raise taxes and put more demand on the tax payer. There are alot of people out there including me. Who live off of a set income. We get no raises, no cost of living and such..You people on the council complain we do not have the money but, you come up with projects that I personally think are far from needed. The turnabout is one, what a waste of money. Wheel tax if put into affect should be on all vehicles going down our roads, not just cars and trucks. What about all these motorcycles that zoom up and down the road??? Remember there are alot of us that have only so much income to live on. There has been comments made on raising taxes to keep our education at a set level so people will want to come here but, taxes to high will keep alot of people away too.
Nov 29, 2011 at 8:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
If some had brains that may work ! )
Nov 29, 2011 at 6:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
Council members.....Read and Heed The council needs to stop pandering to the city manager who of course always will want more and money and more and more services. They need to start using their own logic and brains to find ways to cut spending and cut taxes. We are being taxed to the max now..... Is there not a conservative among them who can start a "reduce spending" program?
Nov 28, 2011 at 9:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
City govt is dumb, they only understand "build and expand" they do not understand "save and survive".
Nov 28, 2011 at 5:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
I want to know why the city dump is trying to charge city residents to bring in garbage that would not be picked up curb side. Or I suppose I could have bagged it but then they would not have been happy when they got to the house I was helping to clean out so the children could stay (cps) was involved in unfit living conditions and I was helping this lower income family who are struggling and also tax payers. Is this why 4th ward looks the way it does. Because these people know they will be charge at the dump and so they just let it pile up. They charge 40.00 but yet want to charge you again to bring it in.!!!!!!
Nov 28, 2011 at 4:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Total tax rates would decrease from $26.35 per $1,000 of assessed valuation to $24.99."
"Tax increases are generally paid by the entities whose assessments increase more than the average."
So is it up or down.
They said once if increased assessments was less than 12% then you would see a decrease.
I would love my taxes to be $3000.
They used to be about 9 years ago. Up over $1000 in the last three years. WHY??!!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.