Does Romney’s Mormonism matter?

By MICHAEL GERSON   Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— As a Mormon who did his missionary work in France, Mitt Romney knows something of uphill battles. Imagine spreading a faith that renounces smoking, coffee and alcohol in the cafes of Paris.

Romney’s current task may seem easy in comparison. But his religious beliefs remain an obstacle. About 20 percent of Republicans and 23 percent of Protestants tell Gallup they would not support a Mormon for president. A portion of conservative Christianity is unhinged in its condemnation, regarding Mormonism as a dangerous, secretive cult. Even without recourse to calumny, it is clear that evangelicals will not be reconciled to Mormon doctrines without ceasing to be evangelicals.

Yet, Romney’s faith should not matter. Presidents are elected for their policy views, leadership skills and character, not their soteriology. Such theological convictions about salvation may be infinitely important, but they are politically irrelevant. The whole “no religious test for office” idea remains a good one.

But presidential primaries are not always the best place to maintain such distinctions. In interfaith relations, it is the lack of familiarity that breeds contempt—and portions of America still view Mormonism as a threatening novelty. The last time Romney ran in South Carolina, he was greeted by anonymous fliers attacking his faith. Anti-Mormon attitudes could make a difference in some states, particularly in close races.

Among conservatives, however, this opposition is more likely to fade than build. No primary opponent of Romney’s can exploit these sentiments, at least in an overt way. When Mike Huckabee tried during the last election, he was forced to make a very public apology. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is America’s fourth-largest denomination; Mormons are one of the nation’s strongest conservative voting blocks. A serious Republican candidate simply can’t run an anti-Mormon campaign.

As political choices in the primaries become less theoretical, Romney is likely to benefit. The question posed to religious conservatives will no longer be: “Would you support a Mormon for president?” If Romney’s campaign is effective, the question will be: “Would you support a conservative Mormon who can beat a liberal next November?”

Since their political re-emergence in the 1970s, conservative evangelicals have lived with a tension. They hold tightly to their theological convictions. But there isn’t a conservative evangelical majority in America. This mathematical reality is what led Jerry Falwell to associate politically with Pentecostals and Catholics, as well as Jews and Mormons. Such ecumenism has been an unexpected contribution of the religious right. In a democracy, the desire for influence tends to overwhelm theological differences. If Romney looks like the likely nominee, mainstream religious conservatives are more likely to build bridges than torch them.

But even though conservative objections to Romney’s Mormonism are likely to diminish, criticism by secular liberals is likely to blossom.

On politics, Mormon church authorities have generally kept their heads down over the last few decades. Past interactions with the federal government were unpleasant—President James Buchanan, for example, once sent about a third of the U.S. Army to suppress a rumored Mormon revolt in Utah. Mormonism has understandably developed a tradition of non-interference in political matters.

But in 2008, Mormon leaders raised their heads in support of Proposition 8—the California initiative against gay marriage. Their commitment to the traditional family runs deep, and no issue is currently more likely to provoke liberal ire. Secular progressives will add this transgression to a history of Mormon offenses against women and minorities and raise, as usual, the specter of theocracy.

Recent Mormon involvement in presidential politics does little to justify these fears. Morris Udall and George Romney were hardly religious radicals. Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman are, by most measures, the moderates in the current field.

Yet secular tolerance for the emphatic faiths has been thinning for some time. To many liberal thinkers, conservative religion is inherently illiberal. Mormonism only magnifies those concerns. Damon Linker has warned that Mormon leaders, claiming prophetic authority, might dictate to an American president.

Jacob Weisberg has insisted, “I wouldn’t vote for someone who truly believed in the founding whoppers of Mormonism.”

Twenty-seven percent of Democrats currently say they would not vote for a Mormon—a higher percentage than among Republicans or Protestants.

Will Romney’s Mormonism matter? It depends. On much of the right, politics will eventually trump theology. On at least some of the left, secularism will trump tolerance.

Michael Gerson is a columnist for the Washington Post Writers Group; email michaelgerson@washpost.com.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(136)
dustyd
Oct 14, 2011 at 8:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Back to the issue at hand: Romney's beliefs matter because he believes bizarre things that are not true. This demonstrates that he is gullible and easily decieved, qualities that we shouldn't want in our President.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 11, 2011 at 5:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

And I don't care what you say, Poobah. Zawi Hawass is still a tuchas.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 11, 2011 at 5:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

"You say communisim as if it were a bad thing"
-
Death by Communism:
China = 73,237,000
Soviet Union = 58,627,000 (doesn't count 1918-1922)
North Korea = 3,163,000
-
That's your top three. Need I say more? There is more. Socialism fails wherever it is tried, and people get killed over it. The NSDAP did a pretty good job too.... I don't know why they were so scared of communists. Cut from the same cloth, you know? And don't give me that "communism and socialism are two different things" crap. The difference in lives is negligible.

packolies
Oct 9, 2011 at 4:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

yeah one the all time best south park episode.. dumb di dumb dumb.. dumb dumb dumb.

ozzman99
Oct 9, 2011 at 4:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

Joseph Smith was called a prophet dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb

poobah
Oct 8, 2011 at 7:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

Lord of robots said, "My family has been here since before the Revolutionary War, that's all."
-
By the way, robolord, the degree of freedom of speech also has nothing to do with how long your family has been in America.

poobah
Oct 8, 2011 at 7:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

Lord of robots said, "My blood has chewed a little more dirt than his, I think, but I don't see you defending that, do I?"
-
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
-
I don't see anything in the First Amendment that gives a person greater freedom of speech than others based on military service.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 8, 2011 at 7:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

Poobah, one thing I've noticed about socialists is that they are good at twisting words and painting sentences their way. You excel at it.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 8, 2011 at 7:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

Oh. Lemme guess... Here comes the part where someone says that they are a Vietnam veteran that was in Special Forces for three tours and was a Sniper, a Ranger, Engineer.........always happens. Probably on Westmoreland's staff, too. Knew him personally, in fact.....

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 8, 2011 at 7:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Myself my father and my
son have and are protecting the rights of fools like you to voice your opinoin. go ahead. your welcome."
-
I thank them for their service. He rubbed my nose in his and his family's first. In case you hadn't noticed......My family has been here since before the Revolutionary War, that's all. My blood has chewed a little more dirt than his, I think, but I don't see you defending that, do I? Did you say something about character???

poobah
Oct 8, 2011 at 7:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

Lord of the robots said, "I have so many relatives dating back to before the revolutionary war that have protected our country, including my immediate family and myself, you can't even bring that up."
-
When you told non_grata that, "you can't even bring that up" you just told another veteran that he is unable to speak about his military experience. But, of course, you boast freely about yours. It's always just a matter of time for a person's true character to shine through.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 8, 2011 at 6:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Many democracies across the world also believe that socialism is the best replacement for corporatism (capitalism gone wild)."
-
America wasn't founded as a democracy. It was founded as a Republic. What's that tell you?? Hint: Benjamin Franklin was a lot more intelligent than you are......
-
Jerks have been trying to turn us into a democracy since the Civil War, starting with Lincoln when he killed the 10th Ammendment. Here we go....

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 8, 2011 at 5:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

I have so many relatives dating back to before the revolutionary war that have protected our country, including my immediate family and myself, you can't even bring that up. I've got TWO combat patches from two different wars, and I don't care to make it three. Fix the system, but don't do it with socialism. That's all I'm saying. Socialism sucks, it doesn't work, and it's not what our country was founded upon. If people don't like the way things work here, they are welcome to leave. If they want to change it, I have a problem with that. We are not a European country. There's a reason why there's a statue of liberty. It's not so that we can re-invent ourselves.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 8, 2011 at 5:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

"WOW, did I miss some crazy stuff here. RLOT- no offense but you need to stop with the communist this and communist that, it really doesn't work, no matter how many conservative wierdos say that the current Pres and the dummycrats are socialists/communists, its just NOT reality."
-
I didn't say that. They don't worry me. People like you do. And you are right. Communism doesn't work. It never has. Well, I take that back. It works if you kill eveyone opposed to it. Socialism is the same. Just ask Adolf Hitler, Perone...Stalin...etc.. Oh, that's right.......

non_grata
Oct 8, 2011 at 5:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

Myself my father and my
son have and are protecting the rights of fools like you to voice your opinoin. go ahead. your welcome.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 8, 2011 at 5:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

There is only one option, non grata. I swore an oath to protect it against all enemies, foreign, and domestic. We are not "in between." That's the problem. People are trying to make it "in between." I say they go somewhere where they will be happy if they don't appreciate what my greatx5 grandfathers gave them and trying to make it convenient for themselves. Our country used to work correctly. We have to fix some things. For one, stand by the constitution and quit trying to rewrite it. Socialists have been trying to destroy that for only ONE century. If our system didn't work, you probably wouldn't even be alive now. Think about it.

pubsrus
Oct 8, 2011 at 5:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

Hey Retired Air Force not all of what you say about the auto makers going through a normal bancruptcy is true. Had this been allowed to happen the pensions would have been taken over by PBGC at a cost to the taxpayers of over $6 billion dollars (yes billion with a b) forever plus the cost of the unemployment and social costs. I think the taxpayer actually got a deal at $61 billion.

non_grata
Oct 8, 2011 at 4:59 p.m.
Suggest removal

You people are out of your minds. I stated one simple line saying "You say communisim as if it were a bad thing" to gode some simpleton into saying something rediculous and voila, everyone goes berzerk. Communism isn't the boogieman,neither is capitalism. we will always be somewhere in between. Get over yourselves yours is not the only opinion and, hopefully, there will always be many opinions and those willing to voice them.

lovemycountry
Oct 8, 2011 at 4:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

Does Romney matter ? He managed 4% at today's presidential straw poll at the 2011 Values Voter Summit. Ron Paul, the only candidate who can save the U.S., won it with 37%.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 8, 2011 at 3:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

If you want to be a socialist, go to a socialist country and live there. If their intent is to ignore our constitution and make our country into a socialist state, there will be another civil war. It will be very short. There are not as many socialists in this country as the socialists think there are, which is typical of narcissists.

poobah
Oct 8, 2011 at 12:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

Many democracies across the world also believe that socialism is the best replacement for corporatism (capitalism gone wild).

RetiredAirForce
Oct 8, 2011 at 11:39 a.m.
Suggest removal

"We Communists believe that socialism is the very best replacement for a capitalist system that has served its purpose, but no longer meets the needs and requirements of the great majority of our people."

http://www.cpusa.org/socialism-usa-gus-h...

poobah
Oct 8, 2011 at 11:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

"To condemn free-market capitalism because of anything going on today makes no sense. There is no evidence that capitalism exists today. We are deeply involved in an interventionist-planned economy that allows major benefits to accrue to the politically connected of both political parties. One may condemn the fraud and the current system, but it must be called by its proper names —Keynesian inflationism, interventionism, and corporatism." - Ron Paul
-
I love how you take such pride for living in a capitalist society and bash socialism at every chance, when in fact the days of capitalism have been long gone.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 8, 2011 at 9:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

"A life free of exploitation, insecurity, poverty; an end to unemployment, hunger and homelessness."

"An end to racism, national oppression, anti-Semitism, all forms of discrimination, prejudice and bigotry. An end to the unequal status of women."

"Renewal and extension of democracy; an end to the rule of corporate America and private ownership of the wealth of our nation. Creation of a truly humane and rationally planned society that will stimulate the fullest flowering of the human personality, creativity and talent."

http://www.cpusa.org/socialism-usa-gus-h...

RetiredAirForce
Oct 8, 2011 at 8:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

Hilarious. A protest organizer all but admits he is paying people to protest.

http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/06/organi...

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

RAF- To your earlier post. I actually do make concious choices with my dollars.
Example: I needed a new pair of running shoes, got online and found out that the ONLY company that still manufactures some of their shoes here (30%) was New balance. So I went to every store in Janesville till I could sift through all the new balance shoeboxes to find a pair manufactured in America, took me almost 2 hours!:)
I own 2 HONDAS , 1 truck, 1 car. Both Assembled in Ohio. 70% of the parts mad in America, more than any Chevy, Ford , or Chrysler on the market. I own a LOWE boat , made in the Good Ol USA.
I alos make conscious desicions of what products I buy based on their political contributions, right down to the toiletpaper. I believe as a conscious American consumer these things are important. Some see it as nit picking, I see it as voting woith my wallet and supporting workers in THIS country.
Maybe some would call me a Communist, but I could care less about political parties, beliefs, labels, or anything attached with an "ism".
I would also agree that those who buy cheap crap made in The communist republic of China ARE greedy in a sense, and very uneducated manytimes. Also many times have no choice, because their situation only allows the cheap stuff in.

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

WOW, did I miss some crazy stuff here. RLOT- no offense but you need to stop with the communist this and communist that, it really doesn't work, no matter how many conservative wierdos say that the current Pres and the dummycrats are socialists/communists, its just NOT reality.
Here IS the reality, the USA is no longer a great nation for a great many reasons. To start with our consuming class that creates demand in a supply and demand economy has disappeared. All in the interest of corporate profits. I would submit to you that we are nothing more than a corporate plutocracy, or possibly an oligarchy. Either way, the farthest thing from a communist state as you suggest OVER and OVER with little proof.
My question is why the stupid generalizations? At what point will we as a nation realize we have been sold out by the upper 2% to an ACTUAL communist state that our current Junior Senator is on record as saying is the best place in the world to do business,China. So while RLOT is complaining about a communist state coming home to roost, it appears that our wealthiest have purchased the governemnt that used to be a democracy and sold it to China. Does that make you proud to wrap yourself in the constitution?

I just dont get the whole cheerleading for America, without seeing the many difficulties and realities that we now face because of the ignorance of the population, or what I like to call the Wal-Mart mentality that so many have.
We live in a nation where the NUMBER 1 cause of bankruptcy is health care, yet any attempt at reform is considered communism? No matter how bad the insurance companies hurt so many lillions of Americans, we still use ridiculous labels.

No matter how many millions of jobs are shipped away so the rich can have more, we still use the very same labels. How low will we allow this country to sink, all because we want to label everything, instead of doing whats right for our country? Whats right includes tax cuts for the most fortunate? Whats right includes more free-trade deals, so now we can make things in Columbia, Panama, and Korea, and buy them at Wal Mart? Does that make me a pinko commie RLOT? Maybe make a substantive argument instead of hyperbolic labeling , OVER and OVER.

KingRizzo
Oct 7, 2011 at 10:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

Does his Mormonism matter? To the tea partiers, his Mormonism is nothing compared to Obama's blackness, and that's why it doesn't matter much at all!

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 9:20 p.m.
Suggest removal

There are traps for you.

Mouse
Oct 7, 2011 at 9:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

RAF,,,, time to come off the rides at the mall now! We have run out of quarters for you, and you need to listen to the qustion.
Does Romney’s Mormonism matter?

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 4:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

There is no Mormon god. End of story.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 4 p.m.
Suggest removal

We should not even be having this conversation. We are Americans, so deal with it.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 3:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

Gimme. Gimme. Gimme.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 3:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

We all have greed. Marx was no differentt. He wrote a manifesto, and it was nothing more than a book bitching about the things he wished he'd had that he himself could not attain because of sloth.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 3:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

And what is class envy, and why does it exist? Ask yourself that question, and then apply it to yourself and your own life. Then answer that question. Why do I envy" Why do I exist? What can other people do for me that I cannot do for myself with effort? Answer those questions, and then talk to me about communism or socialism.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 3:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

Don't worry, RAF. We all understand perfectly what you just said.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 3:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

poo I was just informing you there is greed at many levels. It is the class envy part of society that has a single vision of what they think it means and are so short sighted they never lets it go.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 3:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

Poobah.........meh.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 3 p.m.
Suggest removal

Compassion and love are relative to the caliber of the weapon communists use to shoot those who disagree with them.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:59 p.m.
Suggest removal

So now you're calling poor people who are forced into buying cheaper products greedy. It never ends with you, does it?

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

greed is also shown by those that buy the cheapest products...oops.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

RAF, I'd much rather be a follower on the path of compassion and love for all of mankind than a leader on the path of greed and divisiveness.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

You have no idea what you have given away through your own sloth, and yet you want it back and more, at the expense of the rest of us. Maybe you don't deserve it. 10th Ammendment.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

10th Ammendment.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

And on top of that, the only way that governments change is through war and death. And that is what you want?? I do not. We have a good thing going here, but you don't appreciate it for what it is.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm only dealing with reality, Poobah. The only way to enforce a communist sans socialist country is to shoot those who disagree. Tell me that's not so.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

"What's funny is Mitt's family were illegal immigrants in Mexico, and he's someone who is an expert in laying off Americans while getting rich."
-
And your problem with that is what, animal?? You have the same potential. The problem is that you don't really care for yourself, or your family, and want to blame your sloth on ohters, and make them pay for your lack of responsibility. How fair is that, commie?

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

poo guess you don't know the difference between ultra wealthy people and publicly owned companies that millions of people own via their own 401k's. Then again the followers of this world are having problems thinking for themselves.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

The sanity remark coming from someone who just minutes earlier said, "You can only change the world by shooting at people..."

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

Funny how you dodge sanity, poobah.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

Poobah, go live in Mexico and then bitch about how bad you have it. No. Wait. Then go bitch about how bad Americans have it. Even our poor citizens have it better than any other country in the world. Why is that your mantra? How much money have you given to our American poor? You know, most of them don't even want it. They feel like I do. They don't want the federal government to give them anything. They want to be responsible for their own lives. Why don't you?

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 2:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

RAF, when families live on minimum wage as millions do, they have no choice but to buy cheaper goods. Those families did not import the goods they are buying and they didn't send the jobs overseas either. Ultra-wealthy people did that. It leaves poor families with no choice but to buy foreign (cheaper) goods. Don't blame the poor for this.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 1:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

There is no choice in a communist system. The people are never taken care of. It doesn't work. People are always in charge, and people are inherently selfish. We can control ourselves, but only if we recognize a rule of law, and stand by it. We did that already, so whey are people trying to change it?? It may not be perfect, but it works.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 1:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

"The latter gives you hope that no matter what you do, you'll be forgiven for it, and at some point in time, to be determined by other or no one, you'll get to some point where you are happy."
-
I forgot to add, that when you don't think like THEY do (religious fanatics), they also will kill you. Seems like communism and religion are bedfellows.
-
Doubt that? Just ask anyone like me who has been to the middle east or afghanistan. I've been to both. I don't capitalize either, because I don't acknowledge either as true geographical features. They are both populated by animals.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 1:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

poobah how much rice and beans bought in this country are from a factory moved to china? The conversation you stepped into was over consumer demand for cheaper goods that has driven companies to lower production costs by some choosing to move factories overseas. If you, as a consumer don't like that, than shop someplace else. By playing the victim claiming there is no choice in our consumer society you indeed need to head to new york to be around other followers to chant in the street and think protesting wall street will do anything about those that go to bed hungry.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 1:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

When you stop thinking about how guilty you feel about all those who don't feel like you do, Poobah, you'll be better off. You can only change the world by shooting at people, and neither one of us wants to do that even if we have to, do we? I don't. You can feel bad about yourself as much as you want, and feel guilty about your success, but don't base your life on the people who get a couple of cats, then allow them to breed to 80 cats, so we can watch them on T.V. when they animal control agents walk into the filth. There are people out there that are not your fault, and not your problem. They are what they are, and it's THEIR fault. They are responsible. Not you. You don't have to prop up their stupidity or feel guilty about it. They shop at goodwill because it is the life they made. No one is holding them down but themselves.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

The two greatest threats to the human race are communism and religion. The former gives you hope that all your wants and needs will be taken care of no matter what you do. You live like an animal. The problem with that is that if you don't think like they do, they kill you. The latter gives you hope that no matter what you do, you'll be forgiven for it, and at some point in time, to be determined by other or no one, you'll get to some point where you are happy. The problem with that is that you are stipped of free thought and you are a slave. The problem with both, is that you have to dodge bullets and bombs to ultimately find out that you are on your own, and you are responsible for what and who you are.
_
When humanity finally determines that it's wants and needs are driven by selfishness and greed, and learns how to deal with that, the world will be at peace.
-
That will never happen. Deal with it.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

RAF said, "You have a choice to buy goods from any store in your area."
-
As I told you in my original post, RAF. You and I are more fortunate than tens of millions of Americans. This isn't about me or you. It's about those less fortunate than us. It's about the people who eat rice and beans because they can't afford ribeye steaks or even hamburger. It's about people who go to Goodwill and buy a pair of shoes for $1 because they can't afford a pair of $25 shoes. It's about the people who don't buy the medications they need because they don't want to go to bed hungry. Quite the choice, isn't it RAF?

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

Go live in Yemen for a year, then come back and tell me how much fun you had.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

Smile, chase kittens. Did you not know that the Royal hunting ground is ALWAYS forbidden???

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

Lord of the robots. You don't get it. I'm not arguing about the merits or problems of communism with you. So can you save the communist rants for later? If you dread communism so much, why would you support policies that subject tens of millions of Americans to what you yourself describe as one of the characteristics of a communist system? That being no to little consumer choice.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

thurty30 your 2 cents is worth just that.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

poobah, I did address your failed point, perhaps you missed it.

"poobah yes you are follower. Step away from msnbc and think for yourself. You have a choice to buy goods from any store in your area."

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ehem....I've read Marx AND Engles......it does not work. It's another form of envy, that starts with a P. An excuse for people living like animals because of their own sloth, no disrespect to sloths. They are what they were. They died, too. Communism is no different.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

Even religion hasn't killed that many people......but there is still hope....

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

non_grata, not I. Nor have I suggested America should move to communism. 90% of these people who scream the "C" word couldn't even tell you what communism is. They'd only be able to say, "It's what China and Cuba are." They couldn't tell you what type of a system it is, its history and evolution. Many of these same people are so proud of their failed trickle-down policies that have resulted in horrible income disparity and wealth disparity gaps in America. They need to be reminded, quite frequently, that their beloved policies are, in fact, enslaving people to the wealthy and taking away their choices - consumer and otherwise. They don't realize the very policies they support are resulting in themselves, and others less fortunate than them, living in situations very similar to the systems they so dread. Such irony.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

http://www.scottmanning.com/content/comm...
-
You say communism like it's a good thing.....

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

non-grata, tell me about the country where communism worked on your planet......

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

Poobah, that's their fault for the most part. There is a reason luggage is produced. If it doesn't work where you live.....move. I've lived in nine states due to work. Grandma will still send you greeting cards and money on your birthday. There is NO lack of work in America. And yet, Madison has a heroin problem. Think about it.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

By the way, communism is as communism does. Think about it. Be careful what you wish for, and read the U.S. constitution again. If you want a communist country, go there. Don't make my country one of them. I am sworn to defend MY country against all enemies, foreign AND domestic.

thurty30
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

RAF....please attempt to not make blank accusations about anyone. It has been known for sometime that Poohah does not watch TV. Please stay on point here, the name calling must end. Just try agreeing to disagree.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

Fine, robot lord, so it's a fact and you thereby have perfectly illustrated the point: tens of millions of Americans have as much consumer choice as those living under communism.

non_grata
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

You guys say communist like it was a bad thing?

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

And now, RAF, how about actually addressing the point I brought up in my earlier post today which I will copy here so you don't have to hunt through the communist fear-mongering.
-
Consumer choice, RAF? Choice is a privilege only wealthy people fully enjoy. You and I don't have the choice that someone making a million dollars per year has. And even more poignant is the truth that people making minimum wage have drastically fewer choices than you and I have. Don't take for granted that everyone has the freedom of choice you enjoy when buying products and services. And by the way, it's those people chanting in the streets on Wall Street and elsewhere who understand this and are doing something about it. You can too by going to http://www.occupywallstreet.org

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's not a premise, it's a fact. Steve Jobs is the epitome of the American dream. The problem people have with it, is they wish it was them. All you have to do is what he did. Get to it, or be a communist. And by the way, you can't be more liberal or capitalist than Steve Jobs. May he rest in peace.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

RetiredAirForce said, "poobah yes you are follower. Step away from msnbc and think for yourself."
-
Geez, that's funny. A guy who made a career of following orders in the Air Force calling someone else a follower. I don't watch TV, RAF.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

Oh, here comes the "C" word and it's only noon time! Oh lord of the robots, hear me. For the sake of this conversation, let me agree with your premise that communism offers little to no consumer choice. Given the fact that low income Americans have little consumer choice, you have just pointed out that tens of millions of Americans live under a system that provides as much consumer choice as communism. Thank you for helping me to illustrate the need for significant changes in our income disparity and wealth disparity problems in this country.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Mormonism is crazy in its own way."
-
So says GFAN. I say that religion is crazy in it's own way....... It makes people crazy. There is no monster under the bed. The monster is you.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

poobah yes you are follower. Step away from msnbc and think for yourself. You have a choice to buy goods from any store in your area.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal

Let me remind you, Poobah, that in a communist state, you have no choice whatsoever. You do what THEY say. And that's what you want? Or are you just saying that we should all be sad because we are not all millionairs?? I don't have to be one, so what makes you so sad that you are not one? If you set your mind to it, you could do it. Not in China, however.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

So, Poobah, you are a communist? So nice of you to admit that.

Robot_Lord_of_Tokyo
Oct 7, 2011 at 11:39 a.m.
Suggest removal

"His Mormonism matters about as much as Chris Christie's weight."
-
What about Kirstie Alley?? At least Chris Christie won't eat you.

dustyd
Oct 7, 2011 at 10:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

The author writes in this article: "The whole 'no religious test for office' idea remains a good one." It just kills me how, now that they are about to have a Mormon candidate, all the right-wingers are saying "religion doesn't matter" and "his religious beliefs shouldn't enter into your decision." What a different tune from all the outrage, fear mongering and consternation that went on about whether Obama might be a Muslim, or what Rev. Wright said. According to the new switch-a-roo Republican doctrine, it shouldn't matter if Obama actually is a Muslim.

poobah
Oct 7, 2011 at 10 a.m.
Suggest removal

Consumer choice, RAF? Choice is a privilege only wealthy people fully enjoy. You and I don't have the choice that someone making a million dollars per year has. And even more poignant is the truth that people making minimum wage have drastically fewer choices than you and I have. Don't take for granted that everyone has the freedom of choice you enjoy when buying products and services. And by the way, it's those people chanting in the streets on Wall Street and elsewhere who understand this and are doing something about it. You can too by going to http://www.occupywallstreet.org

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 7:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

fear you skipped right over the part that is driving the market, the consumer. If you feel things are wrong, as a consumer, consume based on your positions. If people did that, vs chanting in the streets, it would make a difference.

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

unfortunately in America's drastic race to the bottom in wages , our overall purchasing power has been depleted. Its not the few buut the many that count when it comes to consuming products.
You say that the market is fair? That is VERY questionable at best. Read this story and tell me how driving wages down in China is working out?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/may...
To me a fair market means a level playing field, not de-regulating wages and safety standards in order to displace American workers. Unfortunately greed has become the definition of the "fair market", and you would rather have unfettered capitalism than a vibrant middle class.
Let me ask you this if the market were so fair , then why do wages fall when productivity rises? http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/05/i...
Why engage in a race to the bottom to give the fortunate a larger piece oof the pie? In the name of Free, unfettered capitalism? The very system that is now failing? This country's economy will not come back to life until we manufacure here, and pay people decent wages for a blue collar career. We can listen to Obummer talk about "out innovating, and out educating" its all rhetorical garbage. Wage and class desparity are on the rise, until we have a large manufacturing middle(consuming) class again, this nation will be stuck in reverse. It makes no matter what corrupt party is in charge. Why I could really care less whom wins congress or the white house. They all serve the same corporate maters.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

"the government LOAN to the auto industry"
-
Assuming it was a loan also assumes it will be paid back...

RetiredAirForce
Oct 7, 2011 at 12:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

If the auto makers would have gone through a normal bankruptcy they could have been bought out or restructured and the only cost would have been to the investors; as it should be. The market still had demand for product so somewhere in the country workers would have made up the delta in supply.

The market is pretty fair, if you don't like where the product is made or sold, shop some place else. In the end the consumer is the one driving the business model, if they were not looking for the cheapest product of the same quality the demand to lower production costs wouldn't be so great. In the end those with purchasing power can and do shape what has and will happen.

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 6, 2011 at 11:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

I would agree in principle RAF, but the government LOAN to the auto industry essentially saved in the neighborhood of 2 million American jobs. That includes suppliers and everything else that goes along with making and shipping and selling automobiles. Anyone that lives in Janesville can attest to the amount of work an industry like that CREATES. Many of those jobs were and are middle class.
Next we proceed to the bank bailouts that disappeared into the pockets of the so-called "job-creators" , to the tune of 40 times more than the government "loaned" (loosely used term) the auto industry.

Raf my problem isnt necessarily with the government picking winners and losers, its with them being bought out by the winners to make laws to ship our manufacturing sector away to third world countries. Now that in itself isntthe problem, its the fact that tied to these trade pacts are the biggest problem, lifting tariffs. So if a company wants to move their T-shirt factory to China, FINE, but then they PAY to bring their crap back here to sell to the consumers here. If it was a fair/level playing field that benefitted the middle class in AMerica I would be fine with globalization, but the fact that the governemnt is essentially bought off by the winners, to make the MAJORITY of the American working class losers, is where the problem exists for me.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 6, 2011 at 11:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

fear I don't favor the govt picking winners and losers, bailing out some and not others. In order for capitalism to work people that invest in a business assume risk, bailing them out is a waste of tax payer dollars.

realitybytes
Oct 6, 2011 at 10:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

I find that ANY candidate that is overly religious causes me great concern. Why you might ask? Certainly somebody who is Christian and follows the words in the Bible can't be bad; right?

Religion and government should not mix or we could end up with nutjobs as found in the attached: http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthrea...

poobah
Oct 6, 2011 at 10:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

I doubt Romney's biggest hurdle is his Mormon faith in the general election, but his moderate history in getting the nomination. Gallup did an interesting poll earlier this year that found there is about a 15% point disadvantage for a Mormon candidate as opposed to Catholic/Jewish/Baptist candidate. Interesting that atheists are the least electable group now.
-
http://www.gallup.com/poll/148100/hesita...
-
Willingness to vote for candidates with following characteristics
-
Black 94%

Woman 93%

Catholic 92%

Baptist 92%

Jewish 89%

Hispanic 89%

Mormon 76%

Gay/lesbian 67%

Atheist 49%

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 6, 2011 at 9:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

I would agree with mentor religion should have nothing to do with it, AT ALL.
I would also like to say that the multiple first lady stuff was really funny.:)

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 6, 2011 at 9:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

RAF, I honestly don't point all the blame to Bush, but you certainly have no problems giving it all to Obummer. ie your youtube posts. Many conservatives refuse to concede that the HUGE majority of job losses in the Obummer presidency came in the first 9 months following Bush, how could that be a direct result of Obummer?
I point to about 3 decades of irresponsible policies going all the way back to Reagan. Clinton is as responsible as anyone. While creating the illusion of balanced budgets, he is signing NAFTA and other trade deals that have been directly responsible for almost 10 million jobs leaving this nation ,, never to return.
I am just not one to point the finger of blame at one person , just because I disagree with them. As most conservatives have done with this president. This current economic situation is a result of decades of bad policy adding up to a derailment of our economy. There is plenty of blame to go around. My contention is that Bush had chances to fix things and refused to do so, continuing to give high level jobs to bank execs and finally as a going away present, scaring congress and the American people into the TARP bailout orchistrated by Hank Paulson(bank exec) his treasury secretary. BTW I am fully aware that you didnt support the Bank bailout. Did you support the "Bush Stimulus" that goes forgotten, when he just mailed out checks to everybody so they would buy flat screen TVs (made in Taiwan)?
I just think people need to do a little more homework when doling out blame to Obama, this is not one party or person failing, its the entire system, IMO.

packolies
Oct 6, 2011 at 7:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

can we have more than one first lady at a time?

RichE95
Oct 6, 2011 at 4:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

dustyd - take a minute and look at my first post on this. I said a person's faith or lack of faith should not matter. Stalin, MAO, the North Koreans etc are typical of those who rise to power on a creed of atheism. They try to purge all religion and imply they are the only clear headed critical thinkers. It is very relavant to the attitudes expressed by you bloggers who mock religion at every turn and would cast votes based on your bigotry.

mentor397
Oct 6, 2011 at 3:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

His Mormonism matters about as much as Chris Christie's weight.

dustyd
Oct 6, 2011 at 2:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

RichE: if you're so fair minded and inclusive, what do you have against atheism which, by the way, is merely a lack of belief in the supernatural and entirely unrelated to Stalinism or any other political philosophy?

RichE95
Oct 6, 2011 at 1:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

prounion (naturally), dustyd etc would probably be very comfortable with a Stalinist candidate who practiced atheism. Like so many from the left they just don't understand what made America strong. American pluralism has been able to absorb the best from around the world. We are the most fair minded inclusive society that has ever existed - despite Jimmy Carter's malaise and Obama's guns and religion and softness pronouncements. Your attitudes would have ruled out some great Presidents and invited totalitarianism.

Gandalf
Oct 6, 2011 at 11:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

There are situations where a person's faith is directly related to their fitness to be the President. For instance, it would not be good to have an evangelically-minded President who believes that we are at the 'end of days', and that person would purposely act to make that end happen. To discriminate against such a person would be justifiable and appropriate.

ifiruledtheworld
Oct 6, 2011 at 11:10 a.m.
Suggest removal

No.

prounion
Oct 6, 2011 at 10:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

Really Rich - if he said he believed in Santa Clause would that influence your vote? Magical Jesus, angry Allah, and crazy - gold plated wisdom are all faith based irrational delusions.

dustyd
Oct 6, 2011 at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

Not voting for someone because you think they are deluded is not bigotry, it's common sense.

RichE95
Oct 6, 2011 at 10:13 a.m.
Suggest removal

It is not surprising that Democrats have the highest percentage of bigots who would not vote for Romney because of his religion. Increasingly, the Democratic Party represents those with a bigoted attitude towards Christians, Mormons, Jews etc. Their only exception is Muslims. Somehow Democrats feel it PC to support Muslim's, even those who would discriminate against other groups that are PC to the Democratic Party. In America, a person's faith or lack of faith should never be an issue as long as they pledge to uphold the constitution. I just wish the Democratic Party would understand that simple concept.

SuperDave
Oct 6, 2011 at 9:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

@fear: You are correct. A quick search revealed that "more" (not "most") Americans think Obama is Muslim. I am not "painting him as islamic", again, I don't care one way or another. But many people do, and that's the point of this article about Romney.
My take is that politicians, especially those that aspire to national office, are quite capable of compartmentalizing their religious beliefs from their political ambitions.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 6, 2011 at 5:45 a.m.
Suggest removal

So fear, no president is responsible for how many more years?

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 6, 2011 at 12:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

the "relavance of Bush? Ummm maybe the fact that his administration left the economy in ruins, left us fiughting 2 unfunded, unending wars in the middle east?
Anyone that has the nerve to blame the majority of this nations problems on President Obummer, is short-sighted and completely ignorant. This nations economy was shedding jobs at the rate of 750,000 a month the first six months of his presidency, how again was he supposed to stop that? I think he made some hasty comments about the unemployment rate and his stimulus package that have gotten him into trouble, because his administration didn't know how bad things were.
Ialso don't see conservatives harping on the failed Bush stimulus. Mailing out checks to people? Brilliant!!
Aside of 9/11 happening during his presidency, the Katrina debocle, the economic meltdow, and 2 unending , unfunded wars, starting from balanced budgets progressing to record defecits, doubling the nations debt, he wasnt that bad, right?
I could care less if he is still in office, Jesus Christ himself could not have dug our nation out of the holes his administration put us into. I am NO fan of Obummer, but he was doomed to fail no matter what, just like the next 3 presidents will, because NONE of them are willing to solve the fuindamental problems facing the MAJORITY of the people of this once great nation.

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 6, 2011 at 12:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

What poll Dave, name ONE that shows a majority of Americans that dont believe he is, ONE. Your attempt at painting him as islamic is ridiculous and meant to inject hyperbole, nothing more. If you dont know that he is Christian, then why would you use the Islam label other than to demagogue?
Please Dave show me a poll that states that the majority of Americans believe him to be anything other than christian.'
Yes I am fully aware that JFK wwas our ONLY Catholic President.

RetiredAirForce
Oct 5, 2011 at 10:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

fear, is bush still in office? What was that about being relevant...

RetiredAirForce
Oct 5, 2011 at 10:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

fear it has as much relevance as a persons skin color or religion does when it comes to being the head of the executive branch of our nation. It is very clear the current holder has failed, even by his own standards...but instead of discussing the relevant issues people are easily distracted with things like what are his favorite color because that matters as much as his religion does.

SuperDave
Oct 5, 2011 at 10:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

@fear: Your comment "Yo Dave , that was really dumb political partisan hyperbole on your part. You may HATE Obama, but you know darn well he is a christian, not that it should matter".
I have no idea what Obama's religious beliefs are, nor do I care. Why in the world would you think I "HATE" him??? And no, I don't know darn well or otherwise that he is a "christian", and polls have shown that most Americans do not believe he is.
Do you realize that JFK was a Catholic? My goodness!

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 5, 2011 at 10:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

little more serious discussion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHB1YCavW...

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 5, 2011 at 10:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

RAf what does that little clip have to do with the article? Do you have a clip of the Bush administration laying the foundation for generations of recession? Kinda curious if any of the current candidates can dig us out of the hole that they created. Will you hold them as accountable? Doubtful.
Here is another clip about as relavant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aEURwsrU...

NVgrf
Oct 5, 2011 at 9:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

It doesn't to liberals, but does for conservatives....so figure out the rest.

baegucb
Oct 5, 2011 at 6:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

I just thought of a good joke for the idiots, maybe Mitt was born in Kenya?

baegucb
Oct 5, 2011 at 6:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

What's funny is Mitt's family were illegal immigrants in Mexico, and he's someone who is an expert in laying off Americans while getting rich.

gazettefan
Oct 5, 2011 at 5:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

Mormonism is crazy in its own way.

partarican1
Oct 5, 2011 at 4:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

testify, dustyd...

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Oct 5, 2011 at 4:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

Is the story about how mormonism began any crazier than the story of the ten commandments and Moses on the mountain? Faith is all in which story you choose to buy.
Yo Dave , that was really dumb political partisan hyperbole on your part. You may HATE Obama, but you know darn well he is a christian, not that it should matter.

Mouse
Oct 5, 2011 at 4:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

Republicans controling abortion rights..... run by a Mormon President that beleive in Polygamy? Wow!!!!!

prounion
Oct 5, 2011 at 3:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

Justsome - did you get Max's permission before speaking to GF again? Maybe you can swing back over and pick up where you ran off on the sisters article?

gazettefan
Oct 5, 2011 at 3:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

OK, let's start over. Expatiate your belief.

gazettefan
Oct 5, 2011 at 3:22 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
justsomeguy
Oct 5, 2011 at 3:11 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
prounion
Oct 5, 2011 at 2:59 p.m.
Suggest removal

Dusty - totally agree - an athiest president is the only solution to avoiding a person that is rational enough to avoid superstitious nonsense like the 2012 end of the world Mormanism, and of course the christian superstitions/myths that are just as silly.

gazettefan
Oct 5, 2011 at 2:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

Yeah, like you just freshened-up things on this site. If you don't like the debate, just avoid it. Take the easy way out.

And, when it comes to saying the same things repeatedly, it's believers who do that. And it's a lot fewer than ten things. Non-believers are able to articulate prolifically in complex ways. Your sense of sameness comes from the stultifying effect of your belief.

justsomeguy
Oct 5, 2011 at 2:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

Takes a lot of "clear thinking" to repeat the same comments and the same thoughts on the same local message board to the same 10 people for 3+ years.

dustyd
Oct 5, 2011 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

Romney's Mormonism matters a lot! Isn't it reasonable to ask about someone who wants to be President of the United States "if he believes these bizarre superstitions, what else might he believe?" If Romney proclaimed that he believes the world will end on October 12, 2014, would that matter? Of course it would, even though there are many in America with similar religious beliefs. Calling it "religion" and "personal" doesn't let the gullible off the hook for believing crazy nonsense, like angels delivering gold tablets to a guy in New York during the mid-1800's. A Presidential candidate's beliefs matter because they provide a strong indicator of his/her propensity to believe in things that aren't true. I don't want the President to believe things that aren't true.

prounion
Oct 5, 2011 at 12:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

Does the particular brand of delusion matter? Does which particular imaginary sky god matter?

www.godisimaginary.com

SuperDave
Oct 4, 2011 at 8:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

Does Obama's Islam matter? (or whatever he is)

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT