County board to look at slow/no-wake standards

By NEIL JOHNSON ( Contact )   Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


The Indianford Dam on the Rock River helps control water depths in Lake Koshkonong.

The Indianford Dam on the Rock River helps control water depths in Lake Koshkonong.

Photo

Rock County - Proposed slow/no wake

— The Rock County Board will consider an ordinance that would set a countywide standard on water levels for slow/no-wake along the Rock River.

The board's public safety and justice committee on Monday forwarded an ordinance to the full county board that would set slow/no-wake at a gauge height of 7½ feet for parts of the Rock River north of the Indianford dam, and at a gauge height of 6½ feet for parts south of the dam.

Measurements would come from two United States Geological Survey gauges on the river at Newville and Afton.

It's not clear when the board could take up the committee's recommendation, but the board would have to hold a public hearing on the ordinance before approving it.

The committee's recommendation came after about 40 residents spoke at a meeting Sept. 19, during which the committee discussed new slow/no-wake standards.

Most who spoke were residents opposed to a petition by the Rock-Koshkonong Lake District asking the county to raise slow/no-wake standards on the river to a uniform gauge height of 9 feet.

The county was considering the lake district request, but residents at last month's meeting argued that raising the height to 9 feet would lead to high-water boat traffic—causing shoreline erosion and damage to piers and seawalls.

The residents, many of whom live along the river north of the Indianford dam, urged the committee to set the standard at 7 1/2 feet, at least in the north part of the county.

Committee Chairman Ivan Collins said the committee took the residents' concerns to heart.

"They're property owners on the river itself. They felt that damage would be done to their property," he said. "If we put in some kind of an ordinance and their property is damaged, what have we done to them?"

Collins said some committee members took boat rides last week to survey low-lying areas along the river, particularly in the north part of the county.

"We got a better idea of the lay of the land," he said. "There are several residents there you can see where damage would occur to their property."

Rock County townships and municipalities now request slow/no-wake orders and the Rock County Sheriff's Office enforces them.

In the north end of the county, some townships—including the town of Fulton—have their own ordinances that set slow/no-wake at 7½ feet. For them, the committee's Monday recommendation would extend the status quo.

But the status quo is a problem for the Rock-Koshkonong Lake District, which overlaps the town of Fulton geographically.

Lake district officials say studies show the townships' standard of 7 1/2 feet has put the river under slow/no-wake orders for about a third of each boating season for the last eight years.

Also, a standard of 7 1/2 feet would make it difficult for the lake district to use the Indianford dam to raise water levels at Lake Koshkonong—a plan by the district that for years has been locked in a court battle against the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Under that plan, the district during low-water periods would use the dam to raise lake levels 7.2 inches above DNR limits to a gauge height of 7 feet. But if the county set a slow/no-wake standard at 7 1/2 feet, it would give the district just a six-inch buffer whenever it used the dam to raise lake levels.

"Mother Nature rains on us six inches, and you're limiting boat navigation at that point," said lake district Chairman Brian Christianson.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(5)
partarican1
Oct 19, 2011 at 8:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

wetlands help buffer flood waters and would help immensely with flooding in this watershed...more wetlands above the dam would equal better flood mitigation downstream...and lower slow/no wake levels will help protect the shoreline above and below the dam.

papermember
Oct 19, 2011 at 3:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

Recreation is an important economic concern. However, shoreline protection must be considered a higher priority. I am not a hard core environmentalist, but water is one of the most powerful forces on this earth. We must recognize this is true. The concerns expressed about the desire to use the water for recreation, at higher levels than some of us believe is reasonable, is the challenge here. Ironically, the taxpayers along the shoreline generally believe their property is vulnerable to unreasonable damage at higher levels.

KilgoreTrout
Oct 19, 2011 at 12:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

It is not about wetlands on the lake or about farmland or erosion on the river from the lake to Indianford. Almost 100% of the river shore is protected. It does not become in danger until the level reaches 779 or 9ft on the hydro chart. The recomendations by NOAH and many other agencies are that the action level should be at that stage. These are the agencies that study, monitor and manage all waterways in the US. These are scientists and engineers not the anti boaters that show up at hearings. A fisherman that lives near the railroad bridge requires almost 1 hour to get to the lake during slow-no-wake. Down further it really takes the usage away. The county should go with the science not peoples feelings. This is really about Evan Sayre (Fulton) and his dislike for Brian Christianson of the Lake management district. The oppostion is organized by him and his cronies.

partarican1
Oct 19, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

Slow/no wake at the proposed levels will help slow erosion...is there a way to at least partially restore the wetlands surrounding the lake? That would help a lot :)

DMP
Oct 18, 2011 at 10:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

What's more important... that the people whose homes are high and dry can take their boats out for recreation in the summer months, or that those whose homes, roads, & farm fields are jeopardized by the water just learn to live with it? I think a solid, dry roof over someone's head, safe travel especially in situations of emergency services, and the livelihood of the local farmers trumps that.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT