Janesville School District to take second look at gifted program

By MARCIA NELESEN ( Contact )   Saturday, April 7, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Janesville School Board members Tuesday are expected to decide whether to expand the district’s gifted and talented program, but the board’s president said budget constraints could doom the proposal.

President Bill Sodemann said the Challenge Program is a good one and could bring revenue into the district.

“The Challenge Program has a lot of good things, but to do it this year, no way,” Sodemann said. “We are so far in debt.”

Sodemann said the vote could be close but probably would fall short.

Staff recommends expanding the program to include third grades at both Roosevelt and Madison elementary schools. Third grade seems a logical time to start the program because that’s when curriculum shifts to learning how to apply fundamentals, officials said.

About 5 percent of the student population is in gifted programming. The program begins with fourth grade at Roosevelt.

Under the proposal, the program would continue to expand at Madison each year with the addition of fourth and fifth grade. Under the current and proposed program, students continue in the program in middle school.

Sodemann said he is willing to commit to the program the following year and market it to bring families into the district.

Estimated costs to expand the program this year would be about $168,000, staff estimated. At a previous meeting, a board member predicted the revenue would not cover the cost.

But officials in a more recent memo estimated 2011-12 revenue from students coming into the district from open enrollment and transfers is about $243,000.

Of the fourth- through eighth-grade students who open-enrolled in Janesville this year, 26 percent are in the Challenge Program, according to a memo by Amy Sheridan, talented and gifted coordinator. Seven transferred from private schools specifically for the program.

The district has a waiting list for its Challenge Program, with 20 students on a waiting list for fourth grade in 2012-13. Another 30 have been accepted into the program.

“Adding a second fourth-grade Challenge classroom would serve our students best, and administration is considering the costs,” Sheridan wrote in the memo.

On the agenda

The Janesville School Board will meet at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday at the Educational Services Center, 527 S. Franklin St. A reception for outgoing board members Lori Stottler and DuWayne Severson will be at 6:10 p.m.

Items on the agenda include:

-- Swearing in of new board members, although they won’t be seated Tuesday.

-- Approval of the 2012-13 staffing plan.

Karen Schulte, district administrator, recommends reducing teachers by five, mostly from special education classes, and increasing classroom aide hours slightly for an overall savings of $292,141. Her recommendation is based on board-approved pupil-teacher ratios.

Officials predict a budget deficit of $8 million to $10 million, a gap that will need to be filled with taxes, other revenue, budget cuts or a transfer from the fund balance.

Teachers represent about 60 percent of the budget, while the cost of all personnel being about 85 percent, Bill Sodemann, board president, said.

Sodemann said the board has little choice but to approve the suggested staffing plan because of past decisions. Besides approving pupil-teacher ratios, the board opted not to close a school.

The board must notify teachers by May 1 if they are to be layed off.

“There’s not a whole lot left outside of cutting course offerings,” Sodemann said. “We’re pretty much kind of stuck. In 2013, will have more flexibility.”

That flexibility will come because the board will not need to negotiate working conditions and health insurance with the union to find savings, the result of legislation passed this year by the state.

In addition, teachers will be required to pay about half of the money the district contributes to their pensions. The current contract does not require teachers to do so, and the board has been unable to use that money to make up for cuts in state education funding.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(14)
capricorn
Apr 12, 2012 at 5:59 p.m.
Suggest removal

I do not understand why expanding the gifted program would require hiring more teachers. Teachers would need to be reassigned and probably attend workshops. But we already have a program in place with excellent staff. We can have an expanded program with little added expense. Lets challenge more qualified students.

frusion
Apr 11, 2012 at 5:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

The criteria for students to qualify for TAG is too soft. If you want to truly have excellerated learning in an advanced classroom better screening needs to take place and then there would be no need to expand the number of students. There has been many students that are advanced in a couple of disciplines but much less in overall academics. It boils down to what you want out of an excellerated learning program. Do you want your little Johnny in there because he has read all Harry Potter books or do you want the true gifted kids that are cross functionally advanced?

studs
Apr 9, 2012 at 1:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

Forget special programs and reduce the class size so that the ratio of teachers/students is 10/1. This would benefit everyone. Oh, we can't do that? Yes, yes, tax cuts for the rich and our wars are so much more important.

lvbald537
Apr 9, 2012 at 10:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

There are kids who are qualified for the current program who are not served because of space. Those kids should be served by adding classrooms at the current level before additional grades are added.

frusion
Apr 9, 2012 at 8:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

Orange, what specifically is lacking in the special education curriculum? I'm asking because I don't know.

dtb
Apr 8, 2012 at 8:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

So if 5 teachers cost the district $292k ($58,400 each, total salary + bennies) where are all the haters who like to proclaim techers make $75-100,000?

nonprofiter
Apr 8, 2012 at 5:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

Fellow commenters, I don't think it's helpful to pit special ed and g/t programs against one another. Wisconsin statute requires K-12 identification and appropriate programming for gifted and talented (g/t) students.

We have a statutory responsibility to meet the learning needs of children who qualify for this program. I've seen excellent teachers struggle to meet the needs of g/t students in an average elementary school class. There's definitely a need to offer more seats in this program, and to younger students.

If you read the article, you'll see that the program expansion would bring in more revenue than it would cost. Why in the world would you not do it?

orange
Apr 8, 2012 at 10:45 a.m.
Suggest removal

What's more important, expanding the challenge program or special education needs ? Guess that ones already been answered.

AndrewJackson
Apr 8, 2012 at 10:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

A basic education for ALL our kids should hold priority over any expanded program. Figure out how to do this first. That is your job School Board.

realist
Apr 8, 2012 at 7:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

“The Challenge Program has a lot of good things, but to do it this year, no way,” Sodemann said. “We are so far in debt.”

Are you the only decision maker on the board bill? Do others have any input into the decisions? Maybe a comment from you should start out as "I don't think we should do this.... Or " I will not vote for this because....
Not you Master Bill. "No Way" is your comment. Next year it will work because we can pay for it off the backs of the teachers. Keep the threats coming Bill. Look how well it is working out for your master walker. Any time you try to vilify a group of people it may work initially but it will come around eventually and you will look like the moron.

frusion
Apr 7, 2012 at 6:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

Just my opinion, the challenge program as it is now is a joke. There is nothing truly challenging about it for many students that are placed in it. There's many students that coast in the challenge program and to me if it were really a challenge program all the TAG students should be pushed to excell further than the class as a whole. The challenge classes set their cruise control at the room average so I submit how is that much different than any other class?

luvujvl
Apr 7, 2012 at 6 p.m.
Suggest removal

Way to go, Bill - scare tactics already. Threaten more cuts now - may as well start up the drama bus early. Hopefully your new Board members will be proactive and forward thinking individuals who support the Challenge Program and all of our students' needs.

howardzinnfan
Apr 7, 2012 at 4:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

I see surrounding districts benefitting if the board does not expand the program. Open enrollment period is still open.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT