Here comes another election
Know your district
With newly redrawn legislative districts, some voters will find they have been placed in different districts or even that they have different voting places. Here's how to check your voting status:
-- Contact the clerk for your municipality—town, village or city.
-- Go to the state's Voter Public Access website, vpa.wi.gov, to learn whether you are registered, find out where you vote and see the ballot for your location.
-- Click here to go to The Gazette's online voter guide to see district maps, sample ballots, voter-registration information and archived stories about races in the area.
-- For more about candidates, see the website of the Janesville chapter of the League Women Voters, lwvjvl.org/elections.html.
Photo 
Photo 
Confusing enough for ya?
Yes, another election is upon us. Wisconsin's fall partisan primary is Tuesday, which doesn't make sense because Tuesday is still summer.
More confusing might be the change in legislative district boundaries. This happens every 10 years. Districts were redrawn based on the Census 2010 and politics.
Voters will be encountering the boundary changes for the first time Tuesday. Someone who always has voted for Congress in the 1st District might now be in the 2nd District.
Or someone who was in the 43rd Assembly District might now be in the 31st District. Or the 45th District.
Both the Republican and Democratic sides have primaries in the 45th District this time, by the way, but you can vote in only one of those.
Yes, this can be confusing.
For those who need it, here's a Guide for the Perplexed, Wisconsin Primary Edition:
Q: Wait. What? I'm on vacation Tuesday!
A: No worries. Go to your municipal clerk's office now through Friday and cast an absentee ballot. After Friday, you're out of luck.
Q: Why did they change the primary date?
A: This puts Wisconsin in compliance with a federal law designed to give military and overseas voters enough time to vote by absentee ballot.
Q: I'm so SICK of elections!
A: That's not a question, but yes, this is the fifth of six elections this year. The recall elections added two to the mix. Those are over now, which is a relief to some.
Q: Why is this election important?
A: The votes will decide which candidates become the Republican or Democratic nominees in the Nov. 6 general elections. Among the contests in this area are the 2nd District congressional seat on the Democratic side and a number of Assembly races, including the Democrats' primary in the 44th District, which comprises most of Janesville.
And anyone who votes Republican can have a say in who will run for U.S. Senate this fall.
Q: I want a say in that U.S. Senate race but also in the Democratic race in my Assembly district. Can I vote for my favorite candidate in two different parties?
A: Absolutely not. Take the 44th Assembly District, for example. The Democrats are holding a four-way primary to pick their champion to unseat (they hope) Rep. Joe Knilans, R-Janesville. You can vote for one of those Democrats, but if you do, you can't vote for any Republican in any race.
Q: I don't care. I'm voting for the best person for the job.
A: That's a nice sentiment, but if you vote in more than one party's primary, all your votes will be canceled.
Q: So I'm looking at the ballot, and there's this "Party Preference" section. What's that all about?
A: This can be tricky. You're not required to connect the arrow in the Party Preference section, but if you do, it could keep your ballot from being voided. Here's how that works:
If you indicate your preference is Democratic, then only your votes for Democrats will count, even if you mistakenly vote for a Republican. And visa versa, of course.
Q: Does indicating a preference make me a registered Democrat?
A: No. Wisconsin does not require voters to register by party. If you indicate a party preference on the ballot, that will not ever be attached to your name, just as your vote is always kept secret.
Q: So, I can vote in the Republican Senate primary even though I'm a Democrat?
A: Yes. That's perfectly legal. But again, that means you can't vote in any Democratic primary on the same ballot.
Q: But then in the fall, do I have to be a Republican?
A: Of course not. On Nov. 6, you can vote for anyone you like for any office you like.
Q: Why can't I help determine the candidates for every office? It's important to me as a voter.
A: That's the way the law is written. This is why it's called a partisan primary. Each party gets to choose its own candidates.
Q: But they'll let me vote as either a Republican or as a Democrat. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of separating the parties?
A: Good point, but that doesn't change the law.
Q: What about this voter ID law I keep hearing about?
A: A photo ID is not needed for this election. The legality of that provision is still being contested in the courts. The new law does require voters to sign the poll book, and that provision is still in effect.
Q: I think I'll sit this one out. I mean, who wants to wait in line for something like this?
A: Lines will be short to nonexistent. Statewide, about 20 percent of voters are expected to turn out. If you don't vote, you are allowing that 20 percent to decide for you. It's actually less than 20 percent, because voters may vote in only one party's primary.
Q: How am I going to remember all this in the voting booth?
A: Ballots have instructions. Take your time and read them.
"Follow the instructions, and you'll be fine," said city of Janesville Clerk/Treasurer Jean Wulf.
Or ask for help from a pollworker. That's what they're there for.
Q: What a WEIRD system we have! I'm fed up! Ahhhhh!
A: Deep, cleansing breaths. After this, only one more election this year.

Aug 11, 2012 at 2:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
poobah is right about socialism - Obama is in it for pure dictatorship and communism. "I will take over all industry"
Aug 10, 2012 at 3:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Visa Versa? Frank, shame on you. As your own editor Scott Angus wrote in a recent editorial, "people don't use the right words when communicating." Visa versa is not even a word. It's VICE VERSA. Please take note.
Aug 10, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
Bowlgal, you have fallen victim to the same misunderstanding of socialism of other misinformed people that apply the word incorrectly in so many situations. The example you gave has nothing whatsoever to do with socialism.
Aug 10, 2012 at 12:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yuri Rashkin for State Assembly!!
Aug 10, 2012 at 8:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Obama's socialism: According to a response to an American Motorcyclist Association inquiry, the EPA said it plans to mandate all Americans purchase at least four gallons of gas when filling up at a gas station that provides both E15 and E10 from the same hose.
Mandates: It's a word used a lot in the Obama Administration. Mandate and Tax.
Aug 10, 2012 at 8:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
MidNight Ride - because it's just easier for liberals to blame Romney then go with the truth.
Roseanne Barr is running on the socialist ticket, however, Barak Hassain Obama is running on the New Democrats ticket which is Cloward-Piven
as I've recently learned.
First proposed in 1966 and seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
Saul Alinsky is their inspiration to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one.
Thus Obama and the new Democrats are socialists.
And it may work in tiny little nothing countries like Finland or Sweden but Capitalism is what made this country the greatest in the world. The country where millions of immigrants from across the nations flock to be free and work hard for a piece of their own pie.
Obama wants to take that all away from you.
Aug 10, 2012 at 5:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Again Gandalf, so why don't you blame HER employer for losing her coverage?
Aug 9, 2012 at 11:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
There's no need to be obnoxious, whz_bng. There were at least two socialist parties in the 1964 presidential election. Which one are you referring to?
Aug 9, 2012 at 10:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
I cannot help you if you do not have more than two brain cells to rub together. You asked about the socialists.
Aug 9, 2012 at 10:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
whz_bng said, "Pooh, go to google and look up the platform from 1964."
Which platform, whz_bng?
Aug 9, 2012 at 9:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
“To that point, if people had been in Massachusetts, under Governor Romney’s health care plan, they would have had health care.” >>>Romney spokesperson making reference to the Priorities USA Action super PAC ad.
*
No kidding. A Mitt Romney spokesperson actually said that. Priceless.
Aug 9, 2012 at 9:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Pooh, go to google and look up the platform from 1964. "worker unite" a raised fist.
Gann reread my post I said he likes the Failed European models. Failed would be Spain, Italy , Greece, Portugal and France. France want to impose a 75% tax on their big earners.
Aug 9, 2012 at 9:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
whz_bng said, "Look no further today than Finland or Sweden. Our Dems look more and more like them. In fact Obama likes the failing European model of socialism."
Failing European model of socialism. Sweden, Finland, Norway?
Gandalf makes a really valid point. Care to see what's happening to the Norwegian equivalent of our Social Security system - the Norwegian government pension fund? Check out their counter: [ http://www.nbim.no/ ]
That's right, it's been increasing steadily since 1990. 3.6 trillion Norwegian krone now and climbing. That's equal to about $619 billion US dollars in a country with a population of 5 million people. That's $123,800 per citizen. Fully funded and growing. Not bad for a "failing" socialist country, is it?
Aug 9, 2012 at 8:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
whz_bng said, "Look no further today than Finland or Sweden. Our Dems look more and more like them. In fact Obama likes the failing European model of socialism."
That's today's socialists, not yesterday's socialists. Can't you name a few of them and tell us what their distinctive economic and political policies were? What happened to yesterday's socialists? What differentiates yesterday's socialists from today's socialists?
Aug 9, 2012 at 8:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
pooh, anyone who had the views of todays Democrats would have been cosidered socialist in the past.Look up some of the socialist platforms 20,30 yrs ago and their candidates. They resemble the Dems of today. Look no further today than Finland or Sweden. Our Dems look more and more like them. In fact Obama likes the failing European model of socialism.
Aug 9, 2012 at 8:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
whz_bng said, "Pooh, Communists and Marxist were not true socialists."
That comment should have been directed to Midnite_Ride.
Aug 9, 2012 at 8:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
No, whz_bng, I'm not asking for your opinion on Obama. I'm asking you to expand on your statement that, "Todays Democrats are yesterdays socialists."
Just who were "yesterdays socialists?" Can you name some of them, their party affiliation, if any, and some of their distinctive economic and political positions? Why were they yesterday's socialists and not today's socialists? What happened to them? Where are they today?
Aug 9, 2012 at 7:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Pooh, Communists and Marxist were not true socialists.
Aug 9, 2012 at 7:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
here we go Pooh...Our president is always talking about social justice, taxing the rich, and telling industries (GM) what it can and cannot do.($8000 incentive to buy certain cars) Socio-economic system in which the wealth and prosperity of others are subject to redistribution. (tax the rich mentality)
Socialism breeds reduced incentives to work.(xtended unemployment) Reduced prosperity(100 million people now on welfare excluding SS and Disability) Socialism is in opposition to Capitalism. Now which one does POTUS not like?
Aug 9, 2012 at 6:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
But Midnite_Ride, why are you agreeing with whz_bng? He didn't say anything about communists or Marxists. whz_bng said today's Democrats are yesterday's socialists.
Aug 9, 2012 at 6:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
whz_bng, agreed - JFK would have been more at home with this GOP while today's Democrats want Cuba still poverty and markist run Government.
Aug 9, 2012 at 6:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Again Gandalf, so why don't you blame HER employer for losing her coverage?
Aug 9, 2012 at 6:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
whz_bng said, "Todays Democrats are yesterdays socialists."
Have you thought that one out, whz_bng? Do you care to expand on that thought?
Aug 9, 2012 at 6:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gandalf, also the Democratic party of Lincoln's day is a shadow of itself today.
Todays republicans are yesterdays Democrats and todays Democrats are yesterdays socialists!
Aug 9, 2012 at 6:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
Well then, according to you the wealthy still pay more in taxes now also than the rest of the workers.
I think the middle 40% can easilly pull the rest of the wagon.
Aug 9, 2012 at 5:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
oldbadger, the guy in the ad lie, was not laid off. His company closed, yes, and he was offered a buyout. His wife did not have a cancer diagnosis until 6 yrs later, and died soon afterward. How many people have lost their jobs and healthcare since Obama took office?
As to your comment about the wealth paying NO taxes, LOL. Since the top 10% of earners(waelthy) pay 70% of the taxes I think they pay more than their fair share. You probably are in the bottom 50% that pay no federal taxes.
Aug 9, 2012 at 4:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
Where are Romney's tax returns. Let us see how American he is. Let us see how many more tax breaks he needs so he can "create" jobs. Oh he creates jobs overseas where he keeps his money.
Aug 9, 2012 at 3:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gandalf
Take my response as someone else did....a reference to a movie.
"
Additionally, I do not use '"radical fringe", "extremist fringe" labels' on everyone who disagrees with me."
Maybe you should do a review of your comments....you have used those words on others also, when you don't agree.
"I admire opposing points of view that are based on solid logic"
How you can say that, and still maintain that the false ad involving Bain is factual, proves that you do not know "solid logic" when it is presented to you.
Aug 9, 2012 at 3:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gandalf said, "What I have heard and seen are the facts that Bain Capitol, led by Romney, closed the plant and failed to keep the promise of health insurance and pensions for employees, but Bain and Romney profited significantly from this closing."
You're so right, Gandalf. Here's a photo of Romney and his cohorts posing with some of those dollars stuffed in their suits and mouths -- laughing all the way to the bank -- most likely an offshore bank. [ http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/0... ]
Aug 9, 2012 at 2:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gandalf, so why don't you blame HER employer for losing her coverage?
This dud was even offered a huge buy out that would have allowed him to buy his own insurance.
Bain came in three years earlier to try to save that company and failed. It survived three years longer because of the great efforts of Bain.
What has Obama done but to give away millions of tax dollars to bad companies who went belly up.
Aug 9, 2012 at 2:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Obama's bad energy policies have put millions of steel workers, coal workers, pipe line workers, drilling platform workers, car dealerships and the millions of lower effected jobs out of work. He doesn't care. He doesn't care who was effected as long as the liberal agenda is pushed down our throats. Even if the spouses were sick. ObamaTAX is about control, not care. This ad is about putting a thought in the mindless numbskulls he actually believe it. They have already admitted it's not true, they just smear to appeal to the less engaged.
It's their base.
Aug 9, 2012 at 2 p.m.
Suggest removal
Usaret - you are correct about all the jobs that have gone over seas. This wasn't all caused by Romney but he sure didn't help. He actually is proud of it. The problem was caused by both Democrats and Republicans.
.
Still, Romney doesn't understand the pain he caused many people.
Aug 9, 2012 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
CEO's use to have a heart, unlike the Romney's of the world. I worked for companies that did what they could to prevent layoffs. Upper management use to take pay cuts. Maybe the company didn't make 30% profit but you kept your good employees. Now it is all greed and about me and not your fellow man. Sad world we live in.
Aug 9, 2012 at 1:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Strange that there those on the Left who are willing to blame Romney for closing down a plant, allegedly causing the death of a woman but for some reason fail to mention that during this same time frame, another 11 steel factories, not connected to Bain, went out of business. Reason, cheap imported steel. Now many of those people lost their jobs, health insurance, had family members pass away, are then saying that was also Romney's fault?? Might also want to note that those factories were union. Also, how about the current revelation about Delphi and the pension plans that favored union but let non-union get shafted. How many of those lost loved ones because of no insurance? Do you blame the Obama team for that? Didn't think so.
Aug 9, 2012 at 1:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
According to SEC filings, Romney was still in charge at Bain. He may not have been in the office but he is still responsible. He needs to take ownership for his actions.
.
Where is his tax returns?
Aug 9, 2012 at 1:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Midnight Ride - Obama's health care plan, or should I say the Heritage Foundation's plan, would have helped her as Romney's aid stated. She still may have died because cancer is a horrible thing and most care won't help except.
.
Also, give up on the fictitious death panels.
Aug 9, 2012 at 1:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Oh brother, Romney wasn't even at Bain, he left to save Olympics- the guy in charge at the time now works for Obama. Bain still gives millions to Obama. They tried to save the company and it just didn't work. Private companies - Unlike Obummer taking all our tax dollars and giving it to bankrupt Solyndra and where are they now?
Hope and Change is now Smear and Lie.
Aug 9, 2012 at 1:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Bowlgal - Fact, wife HAD insurance until she was laid off. She didn't go to the doctor because they couldn't afford it. She died later because cancer doesn't kill instantly.
.
I agree it is a bad ad. However, Romney just doesn't get what his actions at Bain did to many people. Actually, he doesn't care because he made millions at the expense of many.
.
Don't you people understand that they don't care about any of us. I am not a big democrat fan either because they have created some of these policies which have caused many people to lose their jobs. However, in this case Romney is worse than Obama .
Aug 9, 2012 at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
The sad sorry reality is that Obama would have killed the cancer patient anyway as his 15 member death panel would find her "too far gone". As he told one women, "take a pill".
That is why Obama isn't bragging on his healthcare to save that women. Like his economic policies, he can only smear the opponent. He's got nothing to offer us to grant him 4 more years.
Aug 9, 2012 at 12:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
"modern negative ad strategy is a Republican invention"
Another Dem move, redirection... so I guess you think that 2 wrongs make a right?
Aug 9, 2012 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Democrats are going too far and more people like me who voted for Obama are going into 2012 with eyes wide open. I've learned so much these last 4 years about Democrats and this site is a great tool to see just how much mis-leading information Democrats feed people.
That ad is a perfect example of what the left is all about. Chicago style bash knee caps lies and distortions.
The people paying attention see this but that is not who the left are counting on to get them re-elected.
It's blantantly gross and hideous. That is not the party I want running my country.
Aug 9, 2012 at 11:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
Ads like that expose who the extreme radical fringe really are. Democrats.
Aug 9, 2012 at 11:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Really Gandalf? It's simply disgusting the lies and lengths the Democrats go to protraying Republicans ie: the recent "Romney killed my wife" ad.
Fact: Wife had her own insurance
Fact: Wife passed away 6 years after he was laid off.
Caught red handed in this lie because they have so very little positive messages for us about Obama.
Zero positive.
Aug 9, 2012 at 8:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
Gandalf
At least this time you didn't use the "radical fringe", "extremist fringe" labels you typically use on anyone who disagrees with you.
By the way, you (and a few others) were perpetuating the " out-of-wedlock child that he deserted while at Marquette University" fake Walker story. Talk about hate and "radical fringe", look in the mirror.
Aug 9, 2012 at 8:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Mooshoo, while I believe the Democrats will pick our Republican Senate Candidate next Tuesday. I have no fear of any of them defeated very Madison liberal Baldwin. Our biggest problem is the voter fraud perpetrated by the organized left.
Aug 9, 2012 at 8:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
I guess that movie should be banned now (but it was a good one).
Aug 9, 2012 at 8:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Gandalf, how is that comment from Wislady any different then the Democrats protraying Paul Ryan with Granny? Hyprocrisy.
Tammy is the problem, not the solution as to why we, as a country, are on the edge of a total and complete plummet.
We have a clear choice - Vote for a Capitalist in a capitalist founded country or vote for a socialist who ignores the Constitution and has more communist like ideals.
Aug 9, 2012 at 7:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
If the good people of Jville don't wake up they are going to find themselves with poor education (privatized), polluted environment, low wages, worse roads and other services and a bunch of wealthy people paying zero taxes.
.
The repub mascot says it all... fat (cat) elephant.
Aug 9, 2012 at 6:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
Ah, yes, THAT Tommy Thompson. The one who robbed Wisconsin’s Employee Trust Fund (ETF) during his tenure. Took millions that was well earned, and built up with investments untarnished by politician creeps.
. . .
Good news: After considerable legal wrangling the stolen money was paid back into the ETF. With interest.
. . .
Bad news: We The People had to pay the interest on the stolen money when the suit was settled.
. . .
Worse news: In Wahsington ol’ Tommy would be able to help pilfer and misdirect all manner of funds. With NO chance of repayment to We The People.
. . .
Better to send one of the "back bench" choices [ good term, MooShoo ] to D.C. than T.T. Just my opinion.
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Tammy.... at the edge of the Grand Canyon....with the car still in D.
Aug 8, 2012 at 8:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Lol!
Aug 8, 2012 at 5:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
Where are they running to this time?
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.