DOT: More traffic likely means four lanes of I-90/39 in Janesville

By JIM LEUTE ( Contact )   Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

If you go


The Wisconsin Department of Transportation has scheduled two more public information meetings to discuss the expansion of Interstate 90/39 between the Illinois state line and the Beltline in Madison. The project has been divided into three segments, and each meeting will focus on one particular segment.

Central segment

Project: From County O to Dane/Rock County line

When: 5 to 7 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 19, with a brief formal presentation at 5:30 p.m.

Where: Marshall Middle School, 25 S. Pontiac Drive, Janesville.

North segment

Project: From the Dane/Rock County line to the Highway 12/18 interchange near Madison.

When: 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Monday, Sept. 24, with a brief formal presentation at 6 p.m.

Where: McFarland High School, 5101 Farwell St., McFarland.

If you would like more information about the project, visit i39-90.wi.gov. Handouts and presentations from the meetings will be available on the website after the meetings.

Photo

PhotoVideo


About 35 percent of Interstate traffic through Rock County is truck traffic. That is among the considerations for widening Interstate 90/39 to three lanes from the Wisconsin border to Madison’s Beltline and to four lanes through Janesville.

About 35 percent of Interstate traffic through Rock County is truck traffic. That is among the considerations for widening Interstate 90/39 to three lanes from the Wisconsin border to Madison’s Beltline and to four lanes through Janesville.

PhotoVideo


The Wisconsin Department of Transportation was planning to add a lane in each direction to Interstate 90/39 in 2015. Now the project will likely add two lanes in each direction where the Interstate runs through Janesville.

The Wisconsin Department of Transportation was planning to add a lane in each direction to Interstate 90/39 in 2015. Now the project will likely add two lanes in each direction where the Interstate runs through Janesville.

PhotoVideo


A steady stream of traffic on I90/39 moves past the Racine Street overpass. A proposal to increase the roadway's lanes from four to eight in the city of Janesville, is being discussed as part of a scheduled expansion.

A steady stream of traffic on I90/39 moves past the Racine Street overpass. A proposal to increase the roadway's lanes from four to eight in the city of Janesville, is being discussed as part of a scheduled expansion.

— Due to increasing traffic counts, Interstate 90/39 through Janesville will look much different in nine years.

The state's Department of Transportation is moving ahead with plans to expand the Interstate from two lanes in each direction to four from Avalon Road to Highway 26 on Janesville's northeast side.

Up until about two months ago, the department was planning for an expansion to three lanes in each direction, which is still the plan for the entire Interstate expansion project that runs from the Illinois state line to the Beltline in Madison.

The additional lanes in Janesville will eat up existing median, require noise barriers through the segment's residential stretch and require a creative design to tie together nearby interchanges at Highway 14 and Highway 26.

The additional lane also will also increase the cost of the entire 45-mile project, which in February was estimated at $715 million.

Earlier this month, the state's Transportation Projects Commission learned the cost had increased to $835 million because of design refinements and inflation.

That $835 million is in 2012 dollars. Construction isn't expected to start until 2015, and by the time the project is finished in 2021, transportation officials have said the total cost likely will be more than $1 billion.

"Things have changed, and the numbers right now put the Janesville stretch very close to needing a fourth lane," said John Vesperman, the transportation department's project chief. "We have better sets of numbers, and they are consistently getting higher."

Vesperman, other transportation officials and consultants were at the Turtle Town Hall on Tuesday for a public information session on the project's south segment, which runs from the Illinois state line to County O just south of Janesville.

The project's central segment runs from County O to the Rock/Dane County line, while the northern segment stretch to the Beltline.

According to 2010 traffic counts, an average of 50,000 vehicles a day travel the Interstate in Rock County, with 35 percent of that truck traffic.

Traffic—particularly in the Janesville area—is expected to increase to 90,000 to 100,000 vehicles a day by 2040, a time period that would encompass the 20-year design life of the project, Vesperman said.

Because federal highway dollars are expected to pay for about 25 percent of the project, federal officials have a say in the design, and they have recommended that the fourth lanes be added in Janesville.

"We want to build it and then stay out of there until 2040 or beyond," Vesperman said. "We don't want to build it and then have to come back in and make improvements for something that we know is going to be needed."

Adding the fourth lane will be a challenge in the city of Janesville, which is bordered on both sides of the Interstate by homes and businesses, Vesperman said.

"We're going to build it from the middle out," he said, noting that the northbound and southbound lanes would be separated by concrete barriers.

In addition, the segment from just north of Racine Street to just south of Highway 14 would be lined on both sides with noise barriers because of the high concentration of houses along the Interstate.

In the business district to the north, Vesperman said the Highway 14 and Highway 26 interchanges likely would be reconstructed with connecting ramps because they are so close to one another.

Vesperman said his department and its consultants are only about one-third of the way into their design of the overall project.

Specific details, including right-of-way acquisitions, interchange and overpass designs and alternate routes still need to be determined.

"There's a lot that we just don't know yet," Vesperman said.

Some details, however, did emerge Tuesday about the southern segment, which will be three lanes in each direction over the 12 miles between the state line and County O:

-- The department is considering three different interchange designs for the Interstate's intersection with Interstate 43 and Highway 81 at Beloit.

-- The interchange at County S will remain much as it is now, a diamond design with stop signs. The department, however, will review driveway access to nearby business and possibly add frontage roads.

-- The Highway 11/Avalon Road interchange would be reconstructed from a diamond/stop sign configuration to a diamond with either stoplights or a roundabout.

-- Overpasses at Creek, Hart and Woodman roads will be lengthened and built with better sightlines. Where practical, bicycle and pedestrian lanes will be added in the shoulders.

-- The segment will include an Intelligent Transportation System that features cameras to monitor traffic, electronic signboards to alert motorists of potential delays and traffic data collection devices to measure travel times.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(24)
frogger
Aug 30, 2012 at 4:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

killngrill- somebody has too!
Just think if our downtown was booming with shops that were open. "fibs" as you say would come and spend their money right here in JANESVILLE!! That would be good you know!!!

killngrill
Aug 30, 2012 at 3:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is a great idea and shold have been done years ago!

freedomfighter608
Aug 30, 2012 at 3:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

Labor, your statement blaming Walker is a blatant lie! The project was proposed under Doyle's watch, I drive it a few times a week, and it is getting congested. At times, like in the early morning and late evening/night, the traffic is lighter. Most of the funds is coming from the Federal government.

killngrill
Aug 30, 2012 at 2:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why don't we just build an "express lane" that has no exits from Rockford to Madison. And one from Madison to Portage. And one from Portage to Wisconsin Dells?
*****
It would ONLY be north bound on Friday nights and ONLY south bound on Sunday nights!!

killngrill
Aug 30, 2012 at 2:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

Great; now even more FIBS will come to the great state of Wisconsin and spend their money!

frusion
Aug 30, 2012 at 2:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

LaborParty, I disagree with you on your assessment of I90 and I94. I can speak personally to both as I have driven both for 25 years. I don't start my travel in Beloit, rather Janesville and I can tell you I90 is bumper to bumper most days with Friday and Sunday evening being even worse. As for I94 between Madison and Milwaukee, it does't start getting comparatively congested until the Hwy 100 interchange.

partarican1
Aug 30, 2012 at 10:19 a.m.
Suggest removal

let's just hope the engineers change the on-ramp/off-ramp cluster blunder at HWY 26 & HWY 14...it's a really bad design and not very safe...

pablo
Aug 30, 2012 at 9:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

Can somebody please explain to me how a rail link from Milwaukee-Madison will help traffic from Beloit-Madison? I grew up out East where far more people use mass transit than those in the Midwest. People here don't use what they have. You build rail to Madison, then what? I don't see where people are going to use it. Way more people are going to use the Interstate. As for the roundabouts, there is a reason why they are getting rid of them in NY, NJ and Philly area.

proartist
Aug 30, 2012 at 8:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

No highway expansion has ever succeeding in ending traffic congestion nor accidents. It's time Wisconsin - and the nation - stop wasting resources of land and energy by getting SERIOUS about high-speed rail.

Sigma40
Aug 30, 2012 at 8:11 a.m.
Suggest removal

usaret - Hwy 26 being an interstate was sarcasm. Interstate, freeway, whatever you want to cal it, it will no longer be the country road it once was.

ledfoot
Aug 30, 2012 at 7:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

I have no trouble with roundabouts if they are large enough, but making everyone go from 45 (in Milton) down to 15 is idiotic at best. The roundabouts that are out east, (New York) are large enough that it doesn't require you to slow down very much at all. That is the type of roundabout that you need when getting on and off an interstate.

thunderchops
Aug 30, 2012 at 7:08 a.m.
Suggest removal

I believe they could do with 3 lanes each way. I commute to Rockford and back daily and it is about time Wisconsin sees the need for expansion! Bumper to bumper 4 days out of 5 and it is horrible when 3 lanes of fools have to fit into 2 lanes!!!

dtb
Aug 29, 2012 at 10:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

$1,000,000,000.

And I thought we were broke.

usaret
Aug 29, 2012 at 8:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

Sigma: Highway 26 is not an Interstate highway. If you know how to drive and paying attention to what your doing, not texting, calling, speeding, etc., follow directions, a round about is no problem.

Sigma40
Aug 29, 2012 at 8:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

So there is more traffic now? How much of that is contributed by the hwy 26 construction? And once interstate 26 is done how much traffic from I-90 will take that route?
-
I agree...roundabouts are dangerous. The ones in between milton and whitewater, I dont know how many times I see people ahead of me almost come to a stop at them causing 5-6 cars all to come bumper to bumper. They cause congestion.

BostonBill
Aug 29, 2012 at 8:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

“Where practical, bicycle and pedestrian lanes will be added in the shoulders.”
Be sure to wear helmets and body armor, walkers and bikers. They don't really have a firm plan.

biffklg
Aug 29, 2012 at 7:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

I don't understand why they went out there and changed all the guardrails around the overpass center pillars when they are just going to get ripped out in a couple years. They were not damaged in any way that I saw. How much did this waste cost us taxpayers?

DwightKSchrute
Aug 29, 2012 at 7:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

raaswes, there's nothing confusing about roundabouts. You yield to traffic from the left, drive around it counter-clockwise, and exit wherever you need. They're really quite simple, and much safer than standard intersections.

raswens
Aug 29, 2012 at 6:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

Please, no roundabouts!
They are confusing to most people and cause many accidents.

truth1
Aug 29, 2012 at 4:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

4 lanes in each direction is an 8 lane highway, it is a 4 lane highway now.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT