Teacher exams: an overdue reform

By ESTHER J. CEPEDA   Thursday, Dec. 6, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Let’s applaud the best education reform policy proposed this year: A test—similar to a bar exam—for teachers.

This suggestion is fundamental, necessary and overdue. One other word comes to mind to describe my answer to education policy observers who are asking whether we should hold teachers to rigorous national standards: Duh.

The exam idea was proposed by Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, who, in her introduction to the AFT’s “Raising the Bar” report, laid out the thinking behind what amounts to a seismic disturbance in the world of teacher preparation: “We must do away with a common rite of passage, whereby newly minted teachers are tossed the keys to their classrooms, expected to figure things out, and left to see if they (and their students) sink or swim.”

I’ll take that a step further and say that it’s also high time to do away with the common practice of letting teachers tackle subject areas in which they possess little formal scholarship. A meticulous weed-out system and an overall culture of excellence that trickles down to the individual school level could help address this.

In 2011, the National Center for Education Statistics released a report—“Education and Certification Qualifications of Departmentalized Public High School-Level Teachers of Core Subjects”—which broke down the types of teachers in classrooms based on a 2007-08 schools and staffing survey.

In general, a majority of teachers of the 11 broad subject fields such as languages, science, and math held both a postsecondary degree and certification in their main teaching assignments. But what’s surprising is just how many don’t.

For instance, 25 percent of English teachers, 34 percent of math teachers, and 25 percent of science teachers were not considered highly qualified.

What’s worse is how many underqualified teachers are concentrated in schools that serve overwhelmingly minority student bodies.

In a 2008 report called “CORE PROBLEMS: Out-of-Field Teaching Persists in Key Academic Courses,” the Education Trust found that “in America’s secondary schools, low-income students and students of color are about twice as likely as other students to be enrolled in core academic classes taught by … teachers … who possess neither certification in the subject they have been assigned to teach nor an academic major in that subject.”

As the AFT report notes, “Teaching, like other respected professions, must have a universal assessment process for entry that includes rigorous preparation centered on clinical practice as well as theory, an in-depth test of subject and pedagogical knowledge, and a comprehensive teacher performance assessment.”

Rigor is the key word here. Another study—the National Council on Teacher Quality’s 2011 report “Student Teaching in the United States”—has shown the weakness of many teacher-preparation plans. Three-quarters of the 134 randomly sampled programs the council evaluated failed to meet five basic standards for a high-quality program.

Many states require several standardized tests in order to qualify for certification. But take it from someone who’s sat for many of these tests: They are insultingly easy. And yet there are plenty of “frequent fliers” who have to take them over and over until they can pass.

Extra education isn’t the answer either—research has shown time and again that the additional master’s level courses or degrees that so many teachers earn in order to boost their pay are unrelated to their effectiveness in the classroom.

The AFT’s proposed high standards aim at the heart of what’s required for good teachers: Top students coming out of college with documented expertise in specific subject areas, uncompromising teacher training, exacting exams that demonstrate knowledge, and stringent methods of training and evaluating classroom performance.

Lots of interested parties will hate this proposal. But it sounds a lot like the kind of academic achievement we expect of our successful public school students.

Esther Cepeda is a columnist for the Washington Post Writers Group. Her email address is estherjcepeda@washpost.com.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(12)
donnaw
Dec 9, 2012 at 7:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

fear...if you don't like the heat, get out of the kitchen. If you don't like the job and what it pays find another job. As long as taxpayers are footing the bill, they have a dog in the hunt, so to speak.

wislady
Dec 7, 2012 at 8:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

"bucnh of very uneducated people"

"Wisconsin educatio"

Those comments are certainly convincing.

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Dec 7, 2012 at 1:08 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wisconsin educatio is still great despite republican attacks!

http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/w...

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Dec 6, 2012 at 10:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

Perhaps all of the people that aren't teachers should have to take an exam every couple years to keep their job too? The praxis exam is in place and it is enough, not to mention teachers have to take 6 credits every five years to stay licensed. You want to treat these people like CPAs and pay them like janitors, and treat them like garbage too. Is the system as good as it should be? Maybe not, but the ignorance of so many folks who are NOT teachers trying to tell them how to handle their careers and what is a good way for the system to go, is laughable. A bucnh of very uneducated people trying to tell folks in a VERY educated profession how they should handle themselves (see Janesville School board)

Stubby
Dec 6, 2012 at 10:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

Perhaps one should have to take (& pass) a test before (a) being elected to a school board or (b) being allowed to post about education on the Gazette site.

WiSpedTeacher
Dec 6, 2012 at 9:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

All teachers have to pass a Praxis exam before they begin their program and pass a Praxis 2 content exam before graduating. This exam consists of Science, Math, Language Arts, Reading and History. It is very similar to an ACT exam. Certain states require a certain passing score. Having passed and been licensed in Wisconsin, when I relocated to Florida, I had no problem getting licensed there and meeting the highly qualified status.
If they have a "bar exam" then they should have pay equal to that of a lawyer!

ProfeD
Dec 6, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

There is already a test in place, it is called the Praxis. There is a general area (reading, math and writing) and then a content specific area. I don't know if all states require the test for licensure or not, the state in which I teach does have this as a requirement.

skinnypuppy
Dec 6, 2012 at 10:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

These content tests should apply to middle school teachers as well as high school ones. Sadly in the Janesville district, most middle school teachers are licensed kind. through 8th grade and do not have a specialized content area degree, unlike high school teachers. I think we have seen some real issues when teachers who are not "English" or "Math" certified are trying to teach rigorous concepts to the 6-8 population when they haven't been trained in it themselves.

wislady
Dec 6, 2012 at 7:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

"The AFT’s proposed high standards aim at the heart of what’s required for good teachers: Top students coming out of college with documented expertise in specific subject areas, uncompromising teacher training, exacting exams that demonstrate knowledge, and stringent methods of training and evaluating classroom performance."

We should expect nothing less in America.

georgethedog
Dec 6, 2012 at 6:36 a.m.
Suggest removal

This is old news in Wisconsin. Since August of 2004 ALL new teachers have had to take a content area test before receiving their teaching license.

donnaw
Dec 6, 2012 at 6:21 a.m.
Suggest removal

Boy, the teachers aren't going to like this! Too bad they can't have current teachers take the test.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT