Does a large caseload as an attorney make for a good judge?

By ANN MARIE AMES   Saturday, Feb. 18, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Reader pollAudio

Are you voting this week?

  

See the results and comments

— Attorney Jack Hoag points to the number of cases he filed in 2011 and says he has the most and best experience to be the next judge in Rock County.

His competitors say, “No so fast.”

Five attorneys and one Rock County court commissioner (who also is an attorney but does not practice) are running to replace retiring Judge James Welker. Tuesday’s primary election will narrow the field to two candidates. The candidates are Hoag, attorney Harry O’Leary, attorney and Janesville City Council member Tom McDonald, Court Commissioner Barbara McCrory, attorney Tod Daniel and attorney Mike Haakenson.

According to online Wisconsin court records, 353 cases filed in 2011 listed Hoag as the lead attorney. That is nearly four times more than the leading contenders, Daniel and Haakenson. O’Leary and McDonald filed fewer than 20 cases each.

McCrory didn’t file any cases, because she is not a practicing attorney. She works as a family court commissioner in Rock and Jefferson counties where she handles between 50 and 60 hearings in each county every month.

Hoag said the results indicate he is doing a good job as an attorney and would do a good job as judge.

“I think the numbers reflect a successful practice of law and a high demand for me to be an attorney for people,” Hoag said.

Hoag does a variety of trial work including divorce cases, criminal defense and traffic cases, he said. He works some of the criminal cases as a public defender. He also handles some cases that are not listed on online court records such as juvenile cases or cases involving termination of parental rights or court orders removing children from their parents’ homes.

The numbers are slightly elevated, he said, because some clients have multiple cases, particularly those clients whom he serves as a public defender. For example, Hoag said that as a public defender for one client he filed 10 cases in 2011, 12 in 2010 and three in 2009.

O’Leary said judges need more than a large number of trial cases in order to gain the experience to be a good judge. In fact, O’Leary said his goal is to keep his clients out of the courts.

The number of trial cases depends on an attorney’s practice, O’Leary said. His practice includes estate planning, probate, adoptions, elder law, business law and tax law, among other things, O’Leary said.

“I think I have a broad experience,” O’Leary said. “I’ve handled criminal cases. I know I can. I’ve done it, but I choose not to do it. That’s not the realm I wish to pursue as a private practitioner.”

McDonald also said the goal in his practice is to keep clients out of court. That benefits his client, other attorneys and the legal system, McDonald said.

Large numbers of cases do not necessarily indicate quality practice, he said.

“If someone does traffic citations and other simple things like that,” McDonald said. “How difficult or how complex is the matter that’s being handled in court?”

McDonald said he has enough courtroom experience to be judge.

“Ultimately the numbers show that I have been in court, and I have handled these civil matters,” McDonald said. “I’m not in court as much as the other candidates, but that is the nature of my practice. The first thing we try to do is keep people out of court.”

Haakenson works as a court-appointed guardian ad litem and handles a number of cases that do not appear in online court records. He is in court almost every day because that is where he likes to work, Haakenson said.

Haakenson said any new judge would have a considerable amount of learning to do. He thinks Rock County residents would want to vote for him because his courtroom experience will make the learning curve less steep.

“I like being in court. I feel comfortable being in court,” Haakenson said. “It’s a place I’m used to being. And, as far as experience goes, there’s an advantage to being in court every day.”

Daniel said the 91 cases filed in his name in 2011 represent a busy practice that handles cases with a degree of seriousness. Like McDonald, Daniel said large numbers of cases are not reflective of a quality legal practice.

“The problem with the way this system works is that a three-point speeding ticket and a first-degree homicide are both represented with a value of ‘one.’”

McCrory has said her experience as a court commissioner makes her the most qualified candidate for the job. She manages a court official’s calendar, makes oral and written decisions and does so in a timely fashion, she has said.

“I believe I have a lot of very good experience,” McCrory said. “I’ve been doing judicial work for the last 10 years (as court commissioner), and I think I have the experience to take it to the next level as judge.”

BY THE NUMBERS

These represent a portion of the cases tried in 2011 by five of the six candidates for Rock County judge, according to Wisconsin online court records. Some cases, such as juvenile delinquency or parental rights termination, are not public and are therefore not included in this count.

91—Tod Daniel

97—Mike Haakenson

16—Harry O’Leary

353—Jack Hoag

5—Tom McDonald

Candidate Barbara McCrory does not work as an attorney but as a family court commissioner in Rock and Jefferson counties. She is responsible for adjudicating many of the entry-level family court cases in order to clear the calendar for the judges’ assigned to cases.

Since she started working in Jefferson County in August 2009, McCrory has heard 1,599 hearings or about 52 per month, according to Wisconsin online court records compiled by the Jefferson County Court Clerk’s Office. Those hearings represented 1,103 cases, McCrory said.

In 2011 in Rock County, 1,104 hearings were set on McCrory's calendar, according to Wisconsin online court records compiled by the District Five Court Administrator's Office.

In March, McCrory is scheduled to handle 49 hearings in Rock County and 58 in Jefferson County, according to online court records.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

The Janesville League of Women Voters has compiled links to local media coverage of the candidates for Rock County Judge as well as some of the candidates’ written responses. Visit lwvjvl.org to find information about:

- JATV’s rebroadcasts of the league’s judicial forum Jan. 25.

- Links to YouTube videos of the same forum. The league’s website features a handy list of the timestamps for the questions asked during the forum. Viewers can choose to watch responses to the questions that most interest them.

- Written answers to questions.

- Links to Local Vision TV’s “Meet the Candidates” series as well as video from the Rock County Bar Association’s Jan. 24 judicial candidate forum.

- You also can visit gazettextra.com/elections to find stories The Gazette has written so far about the judicial race and others.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(26)
frogger
Feb 20, 2012 at 7:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

McCrory is not a lawyer.

poorrichard
Feb 20, 2012 at 3:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why are lawyers the only people who can become judges? The laws are too complicated and confusing. We need to get together teams of honest people with common sense and rewrite all the laws-then make those people judges. Everytime a lawyer gets involved it costs money-and usually lots of it.

frogger
Feb 20, 2012 at 12:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

My question to these canidates would be- if you were not running who would you vote for.

frogger
Feb 20, 2012 at 12:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

lujvl- I agree can we get some things we can use to decide on these people??!!

luvujvl
Feb 20, 2012 at 8:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

A large case load may look good on the surface, but it's knowledge of the law and personal integrity that make a good judge. I'd rather see some information in the Gazette about where these six stand on major issues, rather than hearing that one has tried a lot of cases, and another is younger than the rest. We already know that - it's not helpful in choosing a candidate.

schoonyg
Feb 20, 2012 at 7:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

doing more cases does not make you qualified to be a judge . Now if he als o had some DA experience i might consider it since he has reprented both sides of the law but Jack Hoag is just a public pretender and a ambulance chaser

melstew47
Feb 20, 2012 at 2:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

this man is an excellent lawyer,he would not make a good judge,ask every criminal in town thats walking loose lol,i bet jack was their attorney lol.and this is who you want for a judge?pretty scary.

JohnDoe
Feb 19, 2012 at 11:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

And then ask yourself if any of these six come close....

JohnDoe
Feb 19, 2012 at 11:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

If you really want to know what qualities make a good judge....take a look at Rich Werner and decipher his demeanor.

birdman
Feb 19, 2012 at 10:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

Hard to have much confidence in any of the candidates, in my opinion.
. . .
One will not be qualified for election as of the election date, and none of the others had the spine to address that simple issue . How, then, would any of them address complex issues in which there might be legal uncertainties and controversial situations?
. . .
Whoever we settle for, I agree with “just_tryin” that its high time we get some DUI sentences with spine! Try to imagine anyone, drunk or sober, that would be walking about free if he or she had discharged a firearm in public twice, thrice, or more times! Not bloody likely!

GuessWho
Feb 19, 2012 at 8:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

Jack Hoag should be Jack Hoax. His practice has always been to accept everyone because it equals a pay day. I have dealt with Jack for over a decade and have found too many times he shows up late for court and spends time to negotiate a plea deal. This prevents a trial, which gives him more time to accept more cases and collect more money.

ljs64
Feb 19, 2012 at 6:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

“No so fast.”

NOT so fast.

carlitosway
Feb 19, 2012 at 2:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

Caseloads are a thing to look at If you want quality in a Judge. Jack Hoag is a fair and honest person and IMO one of the best candidates for this position. I look at one candidate that is running as not so fair and honest when it came to his brother involved in an incident a few years ago and no charges were brought. I have had the experience of representation by Jack and Jack will get my vote.

chelleandlou
Feb 19, 2012 at 2:20 p.m.
Suggest removal

I personally don't think an attorney's caseload has much bearing on whether or not he/she is would be a good judge. It may, however, determine whether or not a person can handle the stress of a heavy workload.

just_tryin
Feb 19, 2012 at 10:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

This judge will replace Welker who seemed to be very soft with child abusers and rapists. Whoever wins the election needs to be tough on crime. O'leary states that he tries to keep people out of court. McDonald says the same thing. Are they going to be accepting plea bargains and handing out light sentences? Does the five time OWI violator get a light sentence to keep them out of jail so the people in the community have to worry about the accident they cause "the next time" that kills someone. To me, that takes my vote away. I get sick of seeing the people that follow the law punished by having sick, law breaking, people in the community because these lawyers are afraid to go to court.

3MTA3
Feb 19, 2012 at 8:39 a.m.
Suggest removal

Regarding the original question of the article, I'd say caseload is a pretty meaningless predictor of judicial qualification. Each candidate gave plausible reasons as to why they are or aren't litigating a high caseload, and each was able to give reason why that justified their selection for judge. I'm voting on experience, community service, and the results of the peer survey, which for me make Jack Hoag the best choice for judge.

ifiruledtheworld
Feb 19, 2012 at 7:50 a.m.
Suggest removal

I think it's at least important that the candidate be out of diapers.

Seriously--please give this apparent silly statement some thought.

votingisgood
Feb 18, 2012 at 8:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

Case volume cannot determine the best qualified candidate. It would be like saying the teacher with the most kids in his/her class is a better teacher; or the guy catching 100's of bluegills is a better fisherman than the one catching a few trophy muskies; or the urgent care doctor seeing dozens daily is better than the one doing 20 liver transplants a year. One would suggest we should consider quality rather than merely quantity.

TheTroll
Feb 18, 2012 at 6:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

Having malformed links like "lwvjvl.org" makes the Gazette look pretty incompetent. I see this all the time here, and there's no reason for it except incompetency.
This is the only website I can think of that can't consistently make hyperlinks.
It's such a simple thing that to miss it throws everything else into doubt.

JohnWicket
Feb 18, 2012 at 5:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

What does the number of cases really mean? How many were satifactorily resolved? That averages about 1 case a day. How complex were the cases? It is hard to make an assessment based on this story. It might simply mean that some of the lawyers are more or less greedy or more or less ambitious. Some might even be more or less public or private spirited? All the candidates seem well-qualified and, I suspect, they are all quick learners or else they would not be lawyers. Will we all be standing in short lines on election day flipping a coin or thinking about who put out the most legal yard signs? It's hard to be a good judge of lawyers.

partyof4
Feb 18, 2012 at 4:47 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT