Per capita, Janesville among lowest spenders

By MARCIA NELESEN ( Contact )   Friday, July 13, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo

— Janesville's operating costs continue to compare favorably to those in communities of similar size, according to a Wisconsin Taxpayer Alliance report.

The alliance, a private research organization, compared operating costs from 2010, the most recent year for which figures are available.

Janesville spent $818 per capita, one of the lowest rates when compared to peer communities. In that group, Racine spent the most at $1,204 per capita, and Oshkosh spent the least at $750 per capita.

Operating costs are defined as a broad spending measure that sometimes includes capital items, such as equipment, if it's not funded by borrowing, according to the alliance newsletter.

Overall, Wisconsin's 231 largest cities and villages spent $3.5 billion, or $964 per person, to operate in 2010, according to the alliance.

Per capita, Milwaukee spent $1,492, and Madison spent $992.

Average operating costs per capita were somewhat lower in smaller municipalities—those with populations ranging from 2,000 to 30,000, according to the newsletter. The median amount spent on operations was $802 per capita, but amounts varied widely.

Per capita spending was tops in Lake Delton and Wisconsin Dells at $3,957 and $2,209, respectively. The number of people served in the two tourist destinations swells in the summer, but tourists are not counted in per capita calculations.

Redgranite, spending $294 per capita, and Howards Grove, spending $258, ranked the lowest.

Two-thirds of municipal spending usually comes in four areas: police, fire/ambulance, street maintenance and administration, according to the newsletter.

In the cities studied, police accounted for about one-quarter of spending. Fire and ambulance services accounted for about 16 percent, street maintenance about 12 percent and administration 10 percent.

Milwaukee residents spent the most per capita for police services at $447. Madison spent $266 per capita.

Smaller municipalities spent 40 to 50 percent less per capita, according to the report.

The amount of borrowing does not vary much by municipality, but data show cities are beginning to rely more on borrowing because property tax levies are capped by the state, according to the release.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(11)
oldvet
Jul 16, 2012 at 5:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

usaret
You completely missed my point.... on purpose?

Sigma40
Jul 14, 2012 at 1:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

Street maintenance? What is that?

usaret
Jul 14, 2012 at 10:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

oldvet: Maybe you don't care what other cities spend but there are some that do.

KingRizzo
Jul 14, 2012 at 10:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

There's a platform you could run on for president, TroubleMaker.

"I promise to cut wages and reduce the police force, all while maintaining our beautiful roads!"

TroubleMaker
Jul 14, 2012 at 9:18 a.m.
Suggest removal

While keeping a lid on spending is good, it's only part of the equation. I'd like to see some numbers on what they take in per capita compared to what they spend. And all spending is not the same. For instance, paying for bloated government employee salaries would not seem as wonderful as paying for road maintenance.
--
Also, I happen to think we are dramatically over-policed. I'd like to see a comparison of per capita spending on law enforcement.

oldvet
Jul 14, 2012 at 7:08 a.m.
Suggest removal

Here we go comparing again. When will the Gazette learn that we don't care about what other cities spend. We just care about Janesville and what it spends. To H*** with other cities. All these comparisons do is to give Janesville an excuse to spend more.

non_grata
Jul 13, 2012 at 9:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

Yeah lets change counties. How about Juneau county. I like the jokes about Juneau.

BuzzMcPhearson
Jul 13, 2012 at 8:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

Geez studs, maybe because it has absolutely nothing to do with this report.

studs
Jul 13, 2012 at 8:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

Odd that the report wouldn't address the redundant spending caused by our antiquated county structure. It's time to consolidate and change counties.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT