Not looking for the union label

By ESTHER CEPEDA   Sunday, June 10, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— As observers outside Wisconsin attempt to divine what the failed attempt to recall Republican Gov. Scott Walker means for November's presidential election, let us instead focus on what the so-called union-buster's triumph says about Big Labor.

My favorite comment on the matter came via Twitter: "Please explain: why so many people I know who are in unions (trades or schoolteachers) so excited for Walker's win?"

Let me take a crack at that one: Because not every tradesman or teacher wants to be forced into joining a union. And they certainly don't want to pay hefty union fees that go toward supporting political agendas that have nothing to do with, say, educating children.

That's how I felt when I was a teacher and a forced member of a union, and how I still feel as the wife of a teacher union member. And a lot of others feel the same way, too.

Not that anyone would know this based on winter 2011 news coverage of masses of radical Wisconsin teachers calling in sick so they could travel to the state capitol building to wave signs comparing Gov. Walker to Hitler. The coverage of militant-fist-logo-wearing union sympathizers made it easy to imagine all collective bargainers as one big, happy family.

But if plummeting union membership doesn't adequately illustrate Wisconsin workers' desire to be relieved of their unions -- The Wall Street Journal recently reported that membership in the state's chapters of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees dropped by a heart-stopping 55 percent once the mandatory collection of dues was abolished -- then Tuesday's exit polls make it clear.

According to The Washington Post, almost a third of union members who cast a vote did so for Walker, as did 48 percent of voters who live with a union member but aren't members themselves.

Teachers in particular aren't feeling love for the unions they're basically forced to join, and recent data show that taxpayers increasingly agree with them.

The journal Education Next and Harvard's Program on Education Policy and Governance have been keeping track of attitudes toward teacher unions since 2009, and while the numbers had been stable until 2011, they fell sharply this year.

Though the majority of the general public felt neutral, the percentage of people with a positive view of teacher unions dropped to 22 percent this year from 29 percent in 2011. Last year, 58 percent of teachers had a positive view of unions but only 43 percent did this year, and the number of teachers holding negative views of unions nearly doubled to 32 percent in 2012.

Could this be because teachers are getting tired of being political pawns? Is it possible they're annoyed because they show up for work every day desiring only to teach children but are bombarded with union propaganda that seeks to paint the communities they teach in as toxic toward educators? Teachers tend to be particular about their classroom autonomy, so it's reasonable to believe that they're getting fed up by the constant pressure such as I felt to toe the union line while instructing my students.

Or maybe teachers no longer want to be represented by organizations that insist on portraying their rewarding white-collar profession as being on par with the struggles of coal miners.

Either way, the number of teachers who agree with standards anathema to unions -- that pay should be based on performance and not on seniority or accumulated college credits -- is on the rise, according to the National Center for Education Information's "Profile of Teachers in the U.S. 2011." The same goes for the number of teachers who see getting rid of unions as a way to strengthen teaching as a profession.

So never mind this nonsense about outside money being the reason for a union-buster to have prevailed in Wisconsin. All evidence points to the outcome being a simple reflection of the voters' will. The lesson the unions should take away is that just as there is power in numbers, there is also hubris -- enough to make for an irreparable fall from grace in the eyes of both voters and workers.

Esther Cepeda's email address is estherjcepeda@washpost.com.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(19)
Honorfirst
Jun 12, 2012 at 10:17 a.m.
Suggest removal

The majority of the voters in Wisconsin cast their votes in favor of reigning in the abuses of the public unions. Clearly, there may be instances where unions are needed in the private sector, but they have no place in the public domain. The unions have bargained themselves out of favor by their unsustainable benefit packages they demanded. Several of the state workers I know would not know a decent days work if it slapped them in the face. I do sympathize with many of the teachers, the ones that truly want to teach the children, not the radicals that played the system calling in sick and running to be with their radical friends in Madison to protest the end of their free ride in Wisconsin. I support education but not to the point of handing over my checkbook giving them unlimited access to my money. Most of the issues I have with the teachers center around the radical ones and the union extorting from the taxpayers. I am willing to pay for the education basics, but leave the morals, sex education, religion, patriotism, ethics and similar responsibilities up to the parents. We chose to have our children and should not delegate that task to any teacher as many of us do not agree with the liberalism that is accepted in the school system.
In order to be more competitive we need to start holding all employees accountable for their actions whether it be poor performance, tardiness or excessive sick time usage. The days of the union fighting to protect this type of employees needs to end. Many enjoy being union members because they know the union will protect their subpar performance. If they lack the work ethic, the appreciation for a good paying job, the desire to achieve all they can then let them find a different job that pays them for what they bring to the table.

jstwndrn
Jun 12, 2012 at 9:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

No problem, donnaw. Glad you mentioned it, I hadn't read it previously and thought it was very insightful.

donnaw
Jun 12, 2012 at 9:29 a.m.
Suggest removal

Thanks jst!

jstwndrn
Jun 12, 2012 at 8:39 a.m.
Suggest removal

Sorry, forgot to say that the link I just posted is for the Krauthammer article that donnaw mentioned:
.
Charles Krauthammer: Beginning of the end for unions

pubsrus
Jun 12, 2012 at 8:06 a.m.
Suggest removal

".....That's how I felt when I was a teacher and a forced member of a union, and how I still feel as the wife of a teacher union member. And a lot of others feel the same way, too."

I bet Esther, you didn't have a problem taking those raises and benefits though! You don't want to join the union, fine; negotiate your own damn contract!

miltonman
Jun 12, 2012 at 8:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

As a retired Union worker I just can't believe the Company I worked for would have given me anything for the years I worked. Without a union you would be working 80 hr weeks for $1.00 per hr.

donnaw
Jun 12, 2012 at 7:36 a.m.
Suggest removal

Charles Krauthammer has a great column out about the reasons Walker won the recall but the Gazette has chosen not to run it. Wonder why?

mopsy
Jun 11, 2012 at 3:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

I am a teacher and my parents were teachers before me, and we were all happy to see the teachers unions go. I have plenty of issues with Walker, but stripping the power from the public unions is not one of them. The unions have been abusing their power and needed to be reined in.

brwe
Jun 11, 2012 at 2:59 p.m.
Suggest removal

Let's see- she's worked as a union teacher & her husband still does. Yet, she still knows nothing about the subject because her conclusions are different from yours?

marge123
Jun 11, 2012 at 12:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

I wonder why all these anti-union teachers just didn't get a private teaching job--or why these private sector workers were not lining up to get all the over paid public jobs?

NVgrf
Jun 11, 2012 at 11:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

This woman knows nothing about teachers or their unions. More lies and half-truths out of Esther the suggester.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT