In search for cash, Obama keeps an A-list cast
Photo
In this Feb. 25, 2010, file photo, President Barack Obama, not pictured, acknowledges actress Sarah Jessica Parker, as first lady Michelle Obama smiles in the East Room of the White House in Washington, before he presented the 2009 National Medal of Arts and National Humanities Medal. It will be Parker's house, but Obama's show. You could call it "Checks and the City." Needing to boost his donor base and campaign cash, Obama is banking on elite entertainers for help so often they have essentially become a cast of characters in his campaign. He is using his Hollywood access and raffling it off as a prize to others, tapping into a nation that revels in celebrity even in hard economic times.
WASHINGTON Call it "Checks and the City."
Needing to boost his donor base, President Barack Obama is banking on elite entertainers for help so often they have essentially become a cast of characters in his campaign. He is using his Hollywood access and raffling it off as a prize to others, tapping into a culture that revels in celebrity even in hard economic times.
Obama's big-name tour makes its next stop on Thursday at Sarah Jessica Parker's place in the West Village of New York City. The "Sex and the City" star, who is married to actor Matthew Broderick, is hosting a cozy $40,000-per-person fundraiser along with Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour.
The president and first lady Michelle Obama will then appear at a second glitzy fundraiser in Manhattan, headlined by a performance by Mariah Carey.
While Democrats have long held political and ideological ties to the TV and movie industry, the dynamic is different this time for Obama. His own celebrity has faded a bit after more than three years in the slog of governing, and some reliable donors have gotten so used to seeing him, they want more — like a real movie star.
What's more, Obama's team is getting outraised by motivated Republicans in a new, freewheeling environment, one in which wealthy donors can give unlimited amounts of money to outside political groups, known as super PACs, that can have huge sway over the presidential race.
As one counter-response, Obama is borrowing on the power of entertainers to give big bucks themselves and to encourage others to give what they can.
The strategy holds the potential for peril. It allows opponents to paint Obama as hobnobbing for dollars with middle-class angst riding high. The Republican Party lampooned Obama as tone deaf when his campaign promoted the Parker/Wintour event the same day as news broke of climbing unemployment.
Pressed about Obama's relationship with the stars, his spokesman, Jay Carney, fired back: "Two words. Donald Trump. Next question?" Obama's Republican rival, Mitt Romney, has received fundraising help from Trump, the camera-finding real estate mogul whom Obama has dismissed as a carnival barker.
So far, the rewards of relying on celebrity help have outweighed the risks for the president in a tight re-election race.
"I think people, particularly in times of economic hardship, always look to the entertainment word for a diversion, to take their minds off what's going on in the economy," said California-based Bill Carrick, a veteran Democratic consultant. "I don't think there's much potential here for backlash."
From Tinseltown to Broadway, Obama has surrounded himself with blockbuster names lately: George Clooney, Julia Roberts, Reese Witherspoon, Spike Lee, Will Smith, Oprah Winfrey, Ellen DeGeneres, Cher and many others who make more in one year that most people do in a lifetime.
Obama played basketball with a Batman (Clooney) and a Spiderman (Tobey Maguire), all in one game. He held a private chat in Los Angeles with some of town's younger stars last week, including Jessica Alba and Jeremy Renner. He has had some of the most popular musicians in the business perform at his fundraisers, such as Alicia Keys, Cee Lo Green, Dave Matthews and the Foo Fighters. For his gig with Obama, Jon Bon Jovi even caught a ride on Air Force One.
"Let's face it: They help raise the money that you need to wage a serious campaign," said Robert Schmuhl, a professor of American Studies at the University of Notre Dame who has written about the intersection of politics and celebrity. "Most Americans today are involved in what we call the 'celebrity culture' anyway. They understand how it works."
One way Obama makes it work: Raffling access to donors, and not just to dinners with him, but ones that also offer star power at private affairs like the one at Parker's house. The contests typically ask donors to give $3 or whatever they can spare.
The Obama campaign calls it a way to lure in donors who may not otherwise be involved in politics at all. Throw in Clooney, and watch the dollars flow.
A fundraising dinner held at the star's house last month drew an eye-popping $15 million, with more of it coming from a low-dollar raffle for entry to the event than from those who paid for tickets.
That result showed how Obama's team, using Web ads and social media, is using celebrity to raise money from people who will never get in the room.
Implicit in the arrangement is that access to Obama, the president of the United States, is not enough of a draw. Obama's campaign has gone so far as to make its next "Dinner With Barack" raffle more enticing by telling would-be donors that they can help pick Obama's guest — naming Clooney and Parker as examples.
All the star wattage comes as Obama's campaign is warning supporters that they need to give or Obama could lose. Central to Obama's strategy is having a larger number of people giving small-to-medium donations. His campaign says 98 percent of donations received in May came in amounts of $250 or less.
"The other side has the money," campaign manager Jim Messina said in one appeal to donors. "They know they can buy the election if they spend it."
But Obama-friendly Hollywood has the money, too.
"There's a reason it feels like he's been here every two weeks for the last two years," Carrick, in Los Angeles, said of Obama. "Every time we turn around, there's someone on the radio telling you that you have to drive around the motorcade traffic."

Jun 15, 2012 at 12:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
PanamaRed - Cutting taxes has always lead to increased tax revenue. Always. Why is that so hard to understand? Yes, the corporations may pay less, but all the suppliers, consumers, and employees pay more. Simple really.
Jun 15, 2012 at 11:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Lower wages will result in less revenue. Providing tax breaks for Corporations will result in less revenue. Less revenue will result in less funding for education, health and local municipalities. What 916W is REALLY saying is, "I'll race you to the bottom!"
Jun 15, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
jcommon....let's not push the "Walker for President" agenda just yet. We need him to stick around the state for at least another 6 years to get things back on track here. He has quickly mitigated the public workers unions--over the next two years, apply that pro-business sentiment toward bringing companies into Wisconsin. I really hope that in his second term that he can direct his attention to the entitlement reform that this state desperately needs....
Jun 15, 2012 at 8:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
WALKER for PRESIDENT!
Jun 15, 2012 at 7:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
For all them dems that still think Clinton is right on all topics, here is a gem for you
http://www.inquisitr.com/255160/bill-cli...
In 2010 Clinton said “‘Give us two more years. If it doesn’t work, vote us out."
Jun 15, 2012 at 7:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
bottle of "wine"
Jun 15, 2012 at 6:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Its so funny to me that the Dems rip Ryan for having a $300 bottle of wind and yet say nothing to Obama's fund raising events that are $40,000 per person. What hypocrisy!
Jun 15, 2012 at 3:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
This story is so terrible, money is only bad when given to one party not the other...
Jun 14, 2012 at 10:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
acit,
Did obama win or lose Nevada in 2008? You are the one who wants to associate donors and location with candidates. Nevada IS Obama-prostitutes, gambling, etc. Maybe Harry Reid was thinking about the "clean-no negro dialect Obama" when Reid endorsed Obama in his home state of Nevada? Who is the racist? yep-Democrate leader Harry Reid....
Jun 14, 2012 at 10:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Pred,
Which celebrities endorsed Walker? As for his financing-Walker won. Money well spent.
Jun 14, 2012 at 10:40 p.m.
Jun 14, 2012 at 10:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
acit,
I don't think you can associate Romney with Vegas-yet. Obama won Nevada in 2008 so you would more likely associate Obama with Hank Reed (who like Romney is a mormon)--and ""rainbows and unicorns fill your pockets with Marijuana and LSD" not to mention gambling, heroin, and prostitution"...these are obamas people.
Jun 14, 2012 at 10:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
analertcitizen, I agree that both Obama's are well educated. Smarter, now that is another question.
Jun 14, 2012 at 10:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Why do the American taxpayers have to foot the bill for AF1 to shuttle obama to all his fundraisers?"
Come on wislady...I thought you were smarter than that.
My bad.
Jun 14, 2012 at 9:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Celebrity" take precedence over capability with the obamas."
-
That is true of Gov. Walker also TCB since over 60% of his recall campaign financing was generated by individuals who could not vote in Wisconsin like the Koch's.
Jun 14, 2012 at 9:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
@wislady- I agree! This whole thing, moneywise, both parties is out of control.
Jun 14, 2012 at 9:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why do the American taxpayers have to foot the bill for AF1 to shuttle obama to all his fundraisers?
He made a brief appearance at the WTC, caused another traffic delay for everyone at rush hour, and than dashed off to his 40 Thousand dollar/plate dinners.
Obviously, both campaigns have plenty of money in their coffers.
Jun 14, 2012 at 9:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
@Ted- You are ridiculus. Whether or not you agree with their political philosophies or not,get a grip. They are so very much smarter and well educated than you are or could ever hope to be. There- that being said, have my post removed because your feelings are hurt. WHATEVER!
Jun 14, 2012 at 8:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
@TCB- I actually like Mitt Romney chiefly because the far right has always hated him and because he is a businesman. Why the change in the Republican Philosophy lately?
Jun 14, 2012 at 8:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
They complain about Walker having too much campaign money.
They complain about Romney having too much campaign money.
They are silent on Obama having too much campaign money. Never hear them say anything about other Dem's who have too much campaign money.
Is there a double standard here?
Jun 14, 2012 at 8:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
@TCB- Just drawing from donnaw's comments about where money is coming from,. She/he made the associations, not me. I was trying, actually, to point out that associations with donors aren't as appears often.
Jun 14, 2012 at 7:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
analcitizen-you can associate donors with candidates as you wish. If that is the case-I guess you believe that Obama is a criminal since he associated with a lot of criminals, bigots, anti-semites such as Bill Ayers, Rev Wright, Bernadine Dorhn, and Tony rezko.
This is accurate, right?
Jun 14, 2012 at 7:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Celebrity" take precedence over capability with the obamas. The irony is that most celebrities do not vote-since most do not know where to vote.....Michael Moore is an example as is Ben Affleck-neither vote.
Jun 14, 2012 at 5:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Adelman ( Las Vegas Casino Owner) just gave Romney $10 million. Does that mean the we can associate Romney with the world of Las Vegas where... "rainbows and unicorns fill your pockets with Marijuana and LSD" not to mention gambling, heroin, and prostitution?
Jun 14, 2012 at 4:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
"The contests typically ask donors to give $3 or whatever they can spare." That's what Obama meant when he said in the first campaign by "hope and CHANGE".
Jun 14, 2012 at 3:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hollywood and Obama just seem to be a match made in heaven. Both make their living selling a make believe world to their audience. Narcissism and arrogance also come to mind.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.